Next Article in Journal
Supportive Care and Unmet Needs in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: Screening and Related Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on the Health of the General and More Vulnerable Population and Its Determinants: Health Care and Social Survey–ESSOC, Study Protocol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Early Detection Methods for Silicosis in Australia and Internationally: A Review of the Literature

1
Centre for Resources Health and Safety, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
2
School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 8123; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158123
Submission received: 25 May 2021 / Revised: 6 July 2021 / Accepted: 7 July 2021 / Published: 31 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Occupational Safety and Health)

Abstract

:
Pneumoconiosis, or occupational lung disease, is one of the world’s most prevalent work-related diseases. Silicosis, a type of pneumoconiosis, is caused by inhaling respirable crystalline silica (RCS) dust. Although silicosis can be fatal, it is completely preventable. Hundreds of thousands of workers globally are at risk of being exposed to RCS at the workplace from various activities in many industries. Currently, in Australia and internationally, there are a range of methods used for the respiratory surveillance of workers exposed to RCS. These methods include health and exposure questionnaires, spirometry, chest X-rays, and HRCT. However, these methods predominantly do not detect the disease until it has significantly progressed. For this reason, there is a growing body of research investigating early detection methods for silicosis, particularly biomarkers. This literature review summarises the research to date on early detection methods for silicosis and makes recommendations for future work in this area. Findings from this review conclude that there is a critical need for an early detection method for silicosis, however, further laboratory- and field-based research is required.

1. Introduction

Silicosis is an incurable, sometimes fatal, but completely preventable lung disease caused by exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS). Worldwide, thousands of workers in a range of industries are at risk of developing silicosis. Early detection of silicosis is vital to identify the disease at a pre-clinical stage to allow interventions that improve outcomes for workers, while investigating inadequacies in workplace control practices. Currently, international respiratory surveillance includes health and exposure questionnaires, spirometry, X-rays, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). However, some of these techniques are unable to detect silicosis at an early stage. This review investigates current respiratory surveillance for silicosis and explores potential opportunities for alternative early detection methods, particularly biomarkers and exhaled breath condensate (EBC).
Pneumoconioses are a group of non-malignant parenchymal (interstitial) lung diseases caused by inhaling dust particles [1,2]. Worldwide, one of the most common work-related injuries is pneumoconiosis, specifically caused by exposure to RCS [3]. Indeed, in China, pneumoconiosis is the most prevalent occupational disease [4]. Recent years have seen a resurgence of certain types of pneumoconiosis, particularly in the United States [5] and Australia [6].
The three primary types of pneumoconiosis are asbestosis, coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP), and silicosis [6]. Silicosis is a fibrotic lung disease caused by inhaling RCS [7]. For both developed and developing countries, silicosis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity [8]. Silicosis is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, although the true extent is likely underreported due to poor respiratory surveillance [7].
Australia has recently experienced a surge in silicosis cases as a result of growth in the manufactured stone industry. In 2019, there were an estimated 350 cases of silicosis in Australia, with 100 cases identified between September and December [9]. Given that over 500,000 Australians are exposed to RCS in the workplace annually [10], silicosis has the potential for huge socioeconomic impact. In addition to silicosis, in 2015, the Queensland government received its first report of CWP in over 30 years [6], prompting the Queensland Government Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) to conduct a review of the health assessment performed under the Queensland Coal Mine Workers’ Health Scheme [11].
Industries where occupational exposure to RCS is prominent include manufactured stone, stone masons, coal mining, denim blasting, dental technicians, and other various trades [12]. Table 1 demonstrates the broad range of workplaces where RCS exposure can occur. In addition, exposure is also possible via background environmental conditions [13] and volcanic eruptions [14].
Worldwide, silica (silicon dioxide) is a naturally occurring and abundant mineral, forming the major element of most rocks and soils [7,17,18]. There are non-crystalline and crystalline forms of silicon dioxide, with only crystalline forms causing pneumoconiosis. Silica dust is generated in the workplace in a range of industries. Mechanical processes in the workplace, such as sawing, crushing, drilling, polishing, cutting, or grinding of natural stone or manufactured products, produce the harmful dust. Respirable particles are dust particles that are so small they are not visible [17]. In addition to silicosis, RCS is associated with a number of diseases, including lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tuberculosis, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune diseases (AIDs), and chronic kidney disease [19,20]. Some patients with silicosis are susceptible to also developing tuberculosis (silicotuberculosis) [21].
The symptoms of silicosis differ according to the stage and severity of the disease. Simple silicosis may be asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed during routine respiratory surveillance. The most commonly recognised form of the disease is chronic silicosis, which usually develops after exposure to low concentrations of silica dust for 10 or more years [8]. Symptoms of chronic silicosis may include cough and shortness of breath. Accelerated silicosis shares some clinical features with chronic silicosis, although it often progresses more rapidly and develops 5–10 years after initial exposure [15]. Acute silicosis is rare and develops after exposure to high concentrations of silica dust for a period of a few weeks to five years [7]. Symptoms of acute silicosis include dyspnoea, dry cough, fever, fatigue, and weight loss, with respiratory failure and death often occurring within a few months [7]. For all three forms of silicosis, the rate of development is dependent on the surface characteristics of the RCS particles and the intensity and duration of exposure [22].
Respiratory surveillance (also referred to as occupational lung disease screening) in Australia and overseas has common elements, although differences do occur due to available technology and the cost of surveillance. Exposure history and respiratory symptom questionnaires constitute the first step in respiratory health surveillance. Spirometry is a second commonly used method. Together with questionnaires and spirometry, medical imaging—commonly radiography (X-ray)—is used for the diagnosis, surveillance, and screening of occupational lung disease. In addition, various HRCT protocols are a final step in the surveillance process.
Pneumoconiosis appears as small dot-like opacities on chest X-rays and HRCT, with the shape, size, and quantity of these opacities graded to represent the severity of the disease [6]. For X-rays, this grading is typically conducted using the International Labour Office (ILO) Classification System [23] and, depending on the organisational/regulatory requirements, may be interpreted by one or multiple qualified B readers [15].
Specifically, the US follows these standard methods of respiratory surveillance, and there appears to have been little change in this for some time, although some new monitoring techniques continue to be developed [24]. NIOSH [24] outline occupational respiratory surveillance in the US to include questionnaires, radiography, spirometry, and biomarkers. Surveillance has two phases: (i) an initial medical examination that includes history, physical examination, respiratory and cardiovascular examinations, chest X-ray, and pulmonary function testing (FVC and FEV (1 s)); and (ii) periodic medical examinations on an annual basis [24]. These methods, together with sputum cytology and tuberculin skin tests, are identified as the specific medical tests and examinations for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulated substances [25]. As identified by this review, NIOSH also recognises that an optimal method for the early detection of pneumoconiosis is yet to be developed.
Following the unexpected reporting in 2015 of the first case of CWP in over 30 years in Australia, there has been a renewal of the Coal Mine Workers’ Health Scheme [6]. Subsequently, the highest number of cases of CMDLD ever diagnosed in Queensland, Australia has been recorded [6]. This resurgence highlights the need for regular respiratory surveillance with a high level of sensitivity.
Most silicosis cases are not diagnosed at an early stage, as the initial phase of the disease is typically asymptomatic [21] and is often undetectable with spirometry and X-ray. Specifically, silicosis can present a diagnostic challenge due to its radiological resemblance and clinical overlap with sarcoidosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and neoplastic lesions [26]. In addition, barriers to early diagnosis include a lack of a suitable biomarker, poor health-seeking behavior, insufficient occupational healthcare services at workplaces, particularly in developing countries, and unorganised sectors [21]. Impediments to early diagnosis also include a lack of education and understanding of the level of risk associated with RCS and the limitations of the current methods of initial medical screening (i.e., spirometry and X-ray). In Australia specifically, cultural barriers of a predominantly young, migrant workforce, the growth of the manufactured stone industry, and a historical lack of regulation are suggested to have contributed to a resurgence of silicosis in some populations. Surveillance is needed long-term, even after retirement and cessation of exposure, due to the long latency of silicosis.
Compounding the issue of exposure to RCS is that X-ray and HRCT present the concern of giving a regular radiation dose to workers. For example, in NSW, workers need to be scanned every year for their whole career. Regulators have a duty of care not to expose workers to an ongoing, annual dose of radiation, although it may be argued that the level of radiation is incidental, and must be weighed against the opportunity for a more sensitive test that reliably detects disease [19].
Despite efforts to establish and maintain best practices, respiratory surveillance continues to be a disparate process [27]. Standardisation of the process is required in order to protect workers exposed to RCS.
Despite the acknowledgment that improved detection methods other than spirometry, X-ray, and HRCT are needed, knowledge gaps remain around alternatives. Although research has been conducted into EBC and biomarkers as methods for detecting silicosis, these techniques have not been validated, and remain at an investigative stage. In addition, there is inconclusive evidence as to which biomarker(s) most effectively capture silicosis.
The literature review was directed by the following research questions:
  • What methods are currently used in respiratory surveillance for occupational lung disease? Have they been validated?
  • What alternative methods exist or are under investigation, and what evidence is there for the effectiveness of these methods?
  • Is there evidence to support conducting a prospective cohort study to test the validity of alternative methods of early detection of silicosis?
The overarching objective of this review is to inform changes to respiratory surveillance with the global goal to reduce the prevalence of silicosis and improve the prognosis of workers who develop silicosis. Although the search did return a large number of studies that investigated treatments, including murine experiments and investigations of DNA, treatments for silicosis are not a focus of this review.

2. Materials and Methods

The review involved three separate search strategies: a scoping literature review of peer-reviewed articles, a search of the grey literature, and a search of websites and online material. In addition, the research team consulted with leading academics and regulatory professionals in Australia and overseas to gain insights into the current prevalence of silicosis and screening methods.

2.1. Scoping Review

The scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR framework. PRISMA-ScR is a systematic approach to assist with mapping evidence on a topic and identifying the main concepts, theories, and knowledge gaps relevant to that topic [28,29].
An initial browsing search of the online database MEDLINE was completed to familiarise the researchers with the key search terms. The scoping review search was conducted in the online library databases Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL. Using the keyword search function, search terms were: “silicosis” or “pneumoconiosis” or “black lung” or “respiratory fibrosis” or “dust disease”, together with “monitor” or “early detect” or “mass screening” or “screen” (truncation and proximity searching were applied to some terms). The search was limited to articles written in English and published since 2010. Articles were catalogued and screened using the referencing software Endnote and the web-based software platform Covidence, which streamlines the production of reviews. The reference lists of included articles were also searched. The search was conducted in March 2020.

2.2. Grey Literature

When searching grey literature, it was necessary to keep the search terms more broad than when searching peer-reviewed journal databases. Google Scholar was searched with the terms “silicosis” and “early detection” and “screening”. The records were presented according to relevancy; the first 200 records were screened, and those that were appropriate were included in the review [30]. The Mednar database was searched with the search term “silicosis”. The first 200 records were screened, and relevant documents were included in the review. Mednar conducts a comprehensive search across medical societies, the National Institute of Health resources, US government websites, and patents. The OpenTrials database was searched to find clinical trials specifically relating to silicosis and early detection methods.

2.3. Websites, Industry, Government, and Regulators

When searching websites, it is optimal to maintain generic and overarching search terms, as the search relies on the website’s own search engine. Websites searched included regulatory bodies, industry organisations, and government websites in Australia and internationally.

3. Results

The findings from the three search methods are synthesised below. The database search for the review returned 1751 articles. After 46 duplicates were removed, the titles and abstracts of 1705 articles were screened for relevance, of which 122 progressed to full-text screening. This final screening process determined that 52 articles were eligible for the final scoping review. Figure 1 shows the screening process for the scoping review. The final 52 articles included in the scoping review are summarised in Table 2.
In addition, following the search methods outlined above, there were 19 grey literature sources screened and included in the final review; these are summarised in Table 3.
The countries represented by the peer-reviewed literature included in the scoping review are shown in Figure 2.
The worldwide occurrence of silicosis was demonstrated in the spatial distribution of the studies included. This was not necessarily an exhaustive list of all countries that had incidences of silicosis.
Many studies included in this review reported a high incidence of smoking among participants. This confounder makes it difficult to isolate the impacts of silica dust exposure from the damage caused by smoking. It is common practice for cessation of smoking programs to be promoted at screening appointments and to participants in silicosis research studies.

Clinical Trials

OpenTrials returned 44 entries when we searched for “silicosis” and “pneumoconiosis”, however, these trials either had no results available or were testing drugs for treatment. It appears from the search conducted for this review that clinical trials investigating early detection methods for silicosis are rare.

4. Discussion

This review was guided by the overarching aim to inform changes in respiratory surveillance with the global goal to reduce the prevalence of silicosis and improve the prognosis of workers who develop silicosis. Some articles included in the scoping review focus more broadly on pneumoconiosis in general or other types of pneumoconiosis, such as CWP. The methods investigated in these articles are pertinent to respiratory surveillance for silicosis. Different surveillance methods were identified, including spirometry, imaging, and HRCT, and these are discussed in more detail below.

4.1. Spirometry

Spirometry is a type of pulmonary function test. Spirometry is currently used for diagnosing the risk of damage, identifying lung disease, monitoring workers exposed to particulate matter, and to evaluate therapeutic interventions [35]. Although spirometry has been used as the first-choice method to evaluate pulmonary alterations in workers exposed to particulate matter, spirometry has limited sensitivity when detecting abnormalities before extensive damage occurs [35]. In addition, there are different standards for the procedure itself, for example, in Australia, the test must be performed for coal mine workers by practitioners with a particular qualification [77], but this is not required in other occupations.
Spirometry, or some form of pulmonary function test, was used in many of the studies in the scoping review. In these investigations, spirometry was always accompanied by health and exposure questionnaires and, in most cases, by additional surveillance methods, such as chest X-ray or HRCT [20,45,61,62,66]. Spirometry can contribute to the diagnosis and monitoring of pneumoconiosis, and specifically, Trakultaweesuk et al. [66] found that spirometry, using a mean decline in FEV1 of 272.0 ± 155.5, was a good parameter for the respiratory surveillance of silica-exposed workers. It is important to note that spirometry and questionnaires alone are not able to diagnose the difference between silicosis and COPD. Despite the widespread use of spirometry, the practical implications and inconsistencies in performing the test must be considered [77].

4.2. Imaging

Respiratory surveillance routinely incorporates imaging, including chest radiography (X-ray) and/or HRCT. Globally, it is typical for chest X-rays to be assessed according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Classification System [78]. In addition, many jurisdictions have the requirement for an NIOSH B Reader to assess the chest X-ray, a certification granted to physicians who demonstrate proficiency in the classification of chest X-rays for pneumoconioses using the ILO Classification System [15].
It has been identified that chest X-rays are failing to reliably detect occupational lung disease [19,79]. For example, in a cohort of workers from Queensland, 43% had chest X-rays classified as normal using the ILO Classification System, however, the disease was visible on HRCT [19]. Non-occupational lung disease is now diagnosed using CT, and it is recommended that HRCT also replace chest X-ray for the diagnosis of occupational lung disease due to CT’s higher sensitivity to detect early disease and greater accuracy in characterising patterns of disease [19,80,81]. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists [19] strongly recommend CT as the primary imaging modality to be used for respiratory surveillance in exposed workers. This recommendation is supported by Kahraman et al. [46], and the references therein.
Specifically, HRCT has an enhanced capacity to detect pneumoconiosis compared to chest X-ray due to the increased sensitivity provided by the finer spatial resolution and 3D nature of HRCT [6]. While Larici et al. [48] concluded that HRCT is the optimal modality of imaging, Şener et al. [63] resolved that, although HRCT had a higher rate of detection in the early stages, the cost, radiation exposure, accessibility, and lack of ability to evaluate pulmonary functions did not support the introduction of routine use in this setting.
In some jurisdictions, in this case Korea, analog radiography persists as the standard for respiratory surveillance. Lee and Choi [50] concluded that soft images from a flat-panel detector of digital radiography provide more accurate and reliable results in pneumoconiosis classification and diagnosis than analog radiographs, and concluded that, in the circumstance where HRCT is not available, digital radiograph is preferred. Conflictingly, [69] found digital and analog radiography to be equivalent.
There is a body of work that investigates the automatic classification of chest X-rays [57,64,72,73,75,76]. In some locations, there is a lack of expertise in the diagnosis of occupational lung disease, and it appears that these technologies have the capacity to assist by automatically detecting abnormalities in chest X-rays.
As stated previously, detection in the early stages of silicosis has challenges. McBean et al. [6] described radiologists as being at the frontline in occupational lung screening and that they must be aware of the imaging spectrum.

4.3. Biomarkers

There is a growing body of epidemiological research that focuses on validating biomarkers by assessing their ability to indicate exposure, effect, disease, or susceptibility [82]. When used in health surveillance, biomarkers can be indicators of hazard, exposure, disease, and population risk [83]. The overarching goal of using biomarkers is to provide insight into the pathogenesis of silicosis and the biological mechanisms that underpin its progression. This review identified a number of studies that aimed to validate particular biomarkers as indicators of silicosis [4,36,37,42,49,61,67]. The grey literature search returned several Chinese articles about biomarkers that could not be accessed.
Thakkar et al. [84] identified that existing studies that consider biomarkers have been conducted with cross-sectional methods within a group population over a short time period. These findings give statistical and probabilistic results in terms of an individual subject. However, what is needed is an observation of biomarkers over time, i.e., a longitudinal cohort study is essential. A study of this design would have prognostic value and contribute to workers adopting preventive strategies, while also reducing individual cases of silicosis [84].
Many studies test for biomarkers of oxidative stress, an imbalance in the body between the production of free radicals and the antioxidant defense [65]. Oxidative stress can lead to damage in biological tissue as a result of an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants [82]. Metals found in mine dust have the potential to induce oxidative stress, which can cause harmful effects to the human body [43]. The ability of a chemical to exert biological effects dictates the capacity to generate oxidative stress [43]. Oxidative stress has been identified as strongly related to the severity of silicosis [12]. However, the parameters of oxidative stress that represent silicosis remain invalidated.
There are many avenues of biomarkers that require further investigation. It has been identified that, in the search for biomarkers for pneumoconiosis, there is a need to investigate biomarkers that play important roles in screening, diagnosis [74], and disease progression [85]. In addition, Schulte [83] notes the need to justify the cost and difficulty in obtaining samples. Pandey and Agarwal [85] emphasise the need for a cohort and longitudinal study of the potential biomarkers in vulnerable groups.
A large number of biomarkers with the potential to detect lung disease were investigated in the literature summarised in this review, including (but not limited to): Club/Clara cell protein 16 (CC16) [21]; serum HO-1 [61]; IL6 [53]; TNFα, IL6, and IL8 [47]; and Npnt [49]. It was not possible to determine a single biomarker with the most potential. Indeed, the need for research to identify biomarkers that provide insight into the pathogenesis of silicosis and the biological mechanisms that underpin its progression was abundantly clear.

4.4. Exhaled Biomarkers

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) can be used to assess the respiratory health of pneumotoxic-exposed workers, as it quantifies lung tissue dose and the consequent pulmonary effects [39]. EBC is obtained by collecting exhaled cooled breath, which is analysed for volatile and non-volatile macromolecules [86]. The range of biomarkers that have been explored when investigating pneumoconiosis, including oxidative stress and inflammatory-derived biomarkers, suggests that EBC analysis may contribute to understanding the pathogenesis of the airways of exposed workers [39]. EBC analysis, as a method of studying pulmonary biomarkers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility in the workplace, proves to be one of the most promising methods currently available [39]. In particular, due to its non-invasive collection method, it is highly suitable to be applied in field studies and longitudinal assessments [39].
Although not commonly used, findings support the suggestion that EBC can contribute to an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of silicosis [59,60]. Indeed, when compared to plasma and urine, markers in EBC appeared to be the most useful method for detecting pneumoconiosis [60]. Leese et al. [87] demonstrated that crystalline silica particles can be detected in the EBC of exposed workers, however, there were limitations due to the volume of the sample produced.
The measurement of exhaled NO and volatile organic compounds is considered to be an inexpensive, safe, and easy-to-perform test that can be used to assess peripheral lung inflammation, and could potentially play a role in the diagnosis and follow-up of fibrosing lung disorders [62,71]. However, further research is needed that includes follow-up testing and investigating different levels of exposure [62].
EBC is non-invasive and highly accurate, making it an attractive option for the early detection of silicosis. Again, there is a growing body of research investigating a number of EBC options, and the need for further study is acknowledged [62,71,87]. Indeed, Corradi et al. [39] recognised the substantial limitations that currently exist, preventing its use as a routine method of screening in the workplace. Specifically, they identified the need for further development in the area of standardising EBC collection, data reporting, and validation of biomarkers.

4.5. Summary of Methods

This review identified the need to standandarise the process of respiratory surveillance. In addition, X-ray was determined as not sufficient in detecting silicosis, while spirometry is subject to the skill and experience of the practitioner. HRCT is recognised as the optimal method, however, it is not always available. EBC and biomarkers hold promise, although, at this stage, they are not validated and remain at an investigational stage.
The strengths of this review include the search being conducted beyond peer-reviewed literature to include grey literature and supporting regulatory documentation, as well as the scoping review following the systematic PRISMA-ScR framework. However, it should be noted there are some limitations, such as including only papers published in English, and the fact that only those published since 2010 were included.
Based on the findings presented here, a number of recommendations were formulated. Firstly, there is a need for further lab- and field-based studies that monitor a range of biomarkers to successfully identify one or more biomarkers that conclusively provide insight into the pathogenesis of silicosis and the biological mechanisms that underpin its progression. Second, any future empirical studies that attempt to validate the use of biomarkers or EBC as an early detection method for silicosis must also include standard surveillance methods as a point of comparison, i.e., spirometry, X-ray, and HRCT. Lastly, future empirical studies should include a diversity of participants to allow examination of a range of scenarios, for example, diagnosed silicosis patients at different stages of the disease, exposed workers (with no previous diagnosis of silicosis, COPD, TB, fibrosis, etc.) with a varying number of years of occupational exposure, and healthy unexposed controls with no previous diagnosis of silicosis, COPD, TB, fibrosis, etc.

5. Conclusions

Silicosis is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease, yet it is totally preventable. Caused by exposure to RCS, hundreds of thousands of workers worldwide are at risk of developing silicosis. The global prevalence of silicosis (and other pneumoconioses) warrants further investigation into methods for detection in the early stage of the disease. While spirometry, X-ray, and HRCT can play important roles in respiratory surveillance, there is opportunity for new methods, such as biomarkers and EBC, to become routine methods of surveillance. Any future effort to research into early detection methods for respiratory surveillance should focus on providing insight into the pathogenesis of silicosis and the biological mechanisms that underpin its progression. These efforts should include longitudinal analysis of at-risk populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J., J.T. and E.K.A.; methodology, C.J., J.T. and E.K.A.; formal analysis, E.K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.A.; writing—review and editing, E.K.A., C.J. and J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Humanomics Pty Ltd., grant number G1901613, and the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (Commonwealth of Australia), grant number G2000210.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alif, S.M.; Glass, D.C.; Abramson, M.; Hoy, R.; Sim, M.R. Occupational Lung Diseases in Australia 2006–2019. Safe Work Australia 2020. Available online: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/occupational-lung-diseases-australia-2006-2019 (accessed on 7 August 2020).
  2. De Vuyst, P.; Camus, P. The past and present of pneumoconioses. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2000, 6, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Doganay, S.; Gocmen, H.; Yikilmaz, A.; Coskun, A. Silicosis due to denim sandblasting in young people: MDCT findings. Eurasian J. Med. 2010, 41, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chu, M.; Ji, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, R.; Sun, C.; Wang, T.; Luo, C.; Gong, J.; Zhu, M.; Fan, J.; et al. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci of silica-related pneumoconiosis in Han Chinese. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 6385–6394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cohen, R.A. Resurgent coal mine dust lung disease: Wave of the future or a relic of the past? Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 73, 715–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McBean, R.; Tatkovic, A.; Edwards, R.; Newbigin, K. What does coal mine dust lung disease look like? A radiological review following re-identification in Queensland. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 64, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Leung, C.C.; Yu, I.T.S.; Chen, W. Silicosis. Lancet 2012, 379, 2008–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Greenberg, M.I.; Waksman, J.; Curtis, J. Silicosis: A review. Dis. Mon. 2007, 53, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lavoipierre, A. Silicosis Cases in Australia Rising, with Thousands Exposed to Unsafe Quantities of Silica in Past Decade 2019. Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-26/silicosis-cases-rapidly-climbing-more-toxic-asbestos-expert-says/11826332 (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  10. McMahon, A. Silicosis: Here’s What You Need to Know about The Dust Lung Disease Killing Stonemasons 2018. Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-12/what-is-the-dust-lung-disease-silicosis/10365604 (accessed on 5 July 2020).
  11. DNRME. Review of Respiratory Component of the Coal Mine Workers’ Health Scheme for the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines. Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Monash University 2016. Available online: https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/383940/monash-qcwp-final-report-2016.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2020).
  12. Palabiyik, S.S.; Girgin, G.; Tutkun, E.; Yilmaz, O.H.; Baydar, T. Immunomodulation and oxidative stress in denim sandblasting workers: Changes caused by silica exposure. Arh. Za Hig. Rada I Toksikologiju. 2013, 64, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Norboo, T.; Angchuk, P.T.; Yahya, M.; Kamat, S.R.; Pooley, F.D.; Corrin, B.; Kerr, I.H.; Bruce, N.; Ball, K.P. Silicosis in a Himalayan village population: Role of environmental dust. Thorax 1991, 46, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gudmundsson, G. Respiratory health effects of volcanic ash with special reference to Iceland. A review. Clin. Respir. J. 2011, 5, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. NIOSH. Health Effects of Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Akgun, M.; Araz, O.; Akkurt, I.; Eroglu, A.; Alper, F.; Saglam, L.; Mirici, A.; Gorguner, M.; Nemery, B. An epidemic of silicosis among former denim sandblasters. Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 32, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Safe Work Australia. Crystalline Silica and Silicosis 2020. Available online: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/silica (accessed on 3 August 2020).
  18. Raymond, L.W.; Wintermeyer, S. Medical Surveillance of Workers Exposed to Crystalline Silica. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 48, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. RANZCR. Imaging of Occupational Lung Disease, Clinical Radiology, Position Statement. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) 2019. Available online: https://www.ranzcr.com/search/silicosis-position-statement (accessed on 3 August 2020).
  20. Brilland, B.; Beauvillain, C.; Mazurkiewicz, G.; Rucay, P.; Roquelaure, Y.; Tabiasco, J.; Vinatier, E.; Riou, J.; Jeannin, P.; Renier, G.; et al. T Cell Dysregulation in Non-silicotic Silica Exposed Workers: A Step toward Immune Tolerance Breakdown. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Naha, N.; Muhamed, J.; Pagdhune, A.; Sarkar, B.; Sarkar, K. Club cell protein 16 as a biomarker for early detection of silicosis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2020, 151, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. RACP. Accelerated Silicosis. Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) 2020. Available online: https://www.racp.edu.au/advocacy/division-faculty-and-chapter-priorities/faculty-of-occupational-environmental-medicine/accelerated-silicosis/faqs (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  23. ILO. ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses: International Labour Organization (ILO). 2011. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/areasofwork/occupational-health/WCMS_108548/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 6 April 2020).
  24. NIOSH. Specific Medical Tests or Examinations Published in the Literature for OSHA-Regulated Substances 2014. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-110/nmed0205.html (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  25. NIOSH. Occupational Respiratory Disease Surveillance 2012. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/surveillance/ords/workermedicalmonitoring.html (accessed on 24 August 2020).
  26. Bandyopadhyay, A.; Majumdar, K.; Chakraborty, A.; Mitra, P.; Nag, S. CT-guided aspiration cytology of advanced silicosis and confirmation of the deposited zeolite nano particles through X ray diffraction: A novel approach. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016, 44, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lewis, L.; Fishwick, D. Health surveillance for occupational respiratory disease. Occup. Med. 2013, 63, 322–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. McGowan, J.; Straus, S.; Moher, D.; Langlois, E.V.; O’Brien, K.K.; Horsley, T.; Aldcroft, A.; Zarin, W.; Garitty, C.M.; Hempel, S.; et al. Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020, 123, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Godin, K.; Stapleton, J.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Hanning, R.M.; Leatherdale, S.T. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: A case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Aggarwal, B.D. Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for silica exposure-induced toxicity in agate workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 71, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Alexopoulos, E.C.; Bouros, D.; Dimadi, M.; Serbescu, A.; Bakoyannis, G.; Kokkinis, F.P. Comparative analysis of induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) profile in asbestos exposed workers. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2011, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aslam, T.; Miele, A.; Chankeshwara, S.V.; Megia-Fernandez, A.; Michels, C.; Akram, A.R.; McDonald, N.; Hirani, N.; Haslett, C.; Bradley, M.; et al. Optical molecular imaging of lysyl oxidase activity—Detection of active fibrogenesis in human lung tissue. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 4946–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Chao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, J.; Han, B.; Cheng, Y.; Tu, X.; et al. Role of MCPIP1 in the Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by Silica. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 40, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chao, T.P.; Sperandio, E.F.; Ostolin, T.L.V.P.; Almeida, V.R.D.; Romiti, M.; Gagliardi, A.R.D.T.; Arantes, R.L.; Dourado, V.Z. Use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess early ventilatory changes related to occupational particulate matter. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2018, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chu, M.; Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Mao, L.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, L.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, M.; Sang, L.; Huang, Q.; et al. miRNA sequencing reveals miRNA-4508 from peripheral blood lymphocytes as potential diagnostic biomarker for silica-related pulmonary fibrosis: A multistage study. Respirology 2020, 25, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chu, M.; Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Sang, L.; Tian, T.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, W.; Huang, Q.; et al. Functional variant of the carboxypeptidase M (CPM) gene may affect silica-related pneumoconiosis susceptibility by its expression: A multistage case-control study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2019, 76, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Codorean, E.; Raducanu, A.; Albulescu, L.; Tanase, C.; Meghea, A.; Albulescu, R. Multiplex cytokine profiling in whole blood from individuals occupationally exposed to particulate coal species. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 16, 6748–6759. [Google Scholar]
  39. Corradi, M.; Gergelova, P.; Mutti, A. Use of exhaled breath condensate to investigate occupational lung diseases. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 10, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cox, C.W.; Lynch, D.A. Medical imaging in occupational and environmental lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2015, 21, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dinescu, V.C.; Puiu, I.; Dinescu, S.N.; Tudorascu, D.; Bica, E.C.; Vasile, R.C.; Bunescu, M.G.; Romanescu, F.M.; Cioatera, N.; Rotaru, L.T.; et al. Early predictive biochemical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic markers for cardiac damage in patients with pulmonic silicosis. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ehrlich, R.I.; Myers, J.E.; Naude, J.M.T.W.; Thompson, M.L.; Churchyard, G.J. Lung function loss in relation to silica dust exposure in South African gold miners. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 68, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Greabu, M.; Didilescu, A.; Puiu, L.; Miricescu, D.; Totan, A. Salivary antioxidant biomarkers in non-ferrous metals mine workers—A pilot study. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2012, 41, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, L.; Ji, X.; Yang, S.; Hou, Z.; Luo, C.; Fan, J.; Ni, C.; Chen, F. Genome-wide analysis of aberrantly expressed circulating miRNAs in patients with coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 3739–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johnsen, H.L.; Bugge, M.D.; Føreland, S.; Kjuus, H.; Kongerud, J.; Søyseth, V. Dust exposure is associated with increased lung function loss among workers in the Norwegian silicon carbide industry. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 70, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kahraman, H.; Koksal, N.; Cinkara, M.; Ozkan, F.; Sucakli, M.H.; Ekerbicer, H. Pneumoconiosis in dental technicians: HRCT and pulmonary function findings. Occup. Med. 2014, 64, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kamaludin, N.H.; Jalaludin, J.; Tamrin, S.B.M.; Akim, A.M. Biomarker of occupational airways inflammation for exposure to inorganic dust. Future Food 2018, 6, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  48. Larici, A.R.; Mereu, M.; Franchi, P. Imaging in occupational and environmental lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2014, 20, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, S.; Honda, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Kumagai-Takei, N.; Yoshitome, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Sada, N.; Kon, S.; Otsuki, T. Role of nephronectin in pathophysiology of silicosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lee, W.J.; Choi, B.S. Reliability and Validity of Soft Copy Images Based on Flat-panel Detector in Pneumoconiosis Classification. Comparison with the Analog Radiographs. Acad. Radiol. 2013, 20, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lee, W.J.; Choi, B.S. Utility of digital radiography for the screening of pneumoconiosis as compared to analog radiography: Radiation dose, image quality, and pneumoconiosis classification. Health Phys. 2012, 103, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, W.J.; Choi, B.S.; Kim, S.J.; Park, C.K.; Park, J.S.; Tae, S.; Hering, K.G. Development of standard digital images for pneumoconiosis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2011, 26, 1403–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, S.J.; Wang, P.; Jiao, J.; Han, L.; Lu, Y.M. Differential gene expression associated with inflammation in peripheral blood cells of patients with pneumoconiosis. J. Occup. Health. 2016, 58, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Mao, L.; Laney, A.S.; Wang, M.K.; Sun, X.; Zhou, S.; Shi, J.; Shi, H. Comparison of digital direct readout radiography with conventional film-screen radiography for the recognition of pneumoconiosis in dust-exposed Chinese workers. J. Occup. Health 2011, 53, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Miao, R.; Ding, B.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhu, B. Proteomic profiling change during the early development of silicosis disease. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Nardi, J.; Nascimento, S.; Göethel, G.; Gauer, B.; Sauer, E.; Fao, N.; Cestonaro, L.; Peruzzi, C.; Souza, J.; Garcia, S.C. Inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters as potential early biomarkers for silicosis. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 484, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Okumura, E.; Kawashita, I.; Ishida, T. Development of CAD based on ANN analysis of power spectra for pneumoconiosis in chest radiographs: Effect of three new enhancement methods. Radiol. Phys. Technol. 2014, 7, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ophir, N.; Shai, A.B.; Alkalay, Y.; Israeli, S.; Korenstein, R.; Kramer, M.R.; Fireman, E. Artificial stone dust-induced functional and inflammatory abnormalities in exposed workers monitored quantitatively by biometrics. ERS Monogr. 2016, 2, 00086-2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pelclová, D.; Fenclova, Z.; Vlckova, S.; Lebedova, J.; Syslová, K.; Pecha, O.; Belacek, J.; Navratil, T.; Kuzma, M.; Kacer, P. Leukotrienes B4, C4, D4 and E4 in the exhaled breath condensate (EBC), blood and urine in patients with pneumoconiosis. Ind. Health 2012, 50, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pelclova, D.; Fenclova, Z.; Syslova, K.; Vlčková, Š.; Lebedová, J.; Pecha, O.; Běláček, J.; Navrátil, T.; Kuzma, M.; Kačer, P. Oxidative stress markers in exhaled breath condensate in lung fibroses are not significantly affected by systemic diseases. Ind. Health 2011, 49, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sato, T.; Saito, Y.; Inoue, S.; Shimosato, T.; Takagi, S.; Kaneko, T.; Ishigatsubo, Y. Serum heme oxygenase-1 as a marker of lung function decline in patients with chronic silicosis. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 54, 1461–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sauni, R.; Oksa, P.; Lehtimäki, L.; Toivio, P.; Palmroos, P.; Nieminen, R.; Moilanen, E.; Uitti, J. Increased alveolar nitric oxide and systemic inflammation markers in silica-exposed workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 69, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Şener, M.U.; Şimşek, C.; Özkara, Ş.; Evran, H.; Bursali, İ.; Gökçek, A. Comparison of the international classification of high-resolution computed tomography for occupational and environmental respiratory diseases with the international labor organization international classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis. Ind. Health 2019, 57, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sundararajan, R.; Xu, H.; Annangi, P.; Tao, X.; Sun, X.; Mao, L. A multiresolution support vector machine based algorithm for pneumoconiosis detection from chest radiographs 2010. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 14–17 April 2010. [Google Scholar]
  65. Syslova, K.; Kačer, P.; Kuzma, M.; Pankracova, A.; Fenclova, Z.; Vlčková, Š.; Lebedova, J.; Pelclova, D. LC-ESI-MS/MS method for oxidative stress multimarker screening in the exhaled breath condensate of asbestosis/silicosis patients. J. Breath Res. 2010, 4, 017104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Trakultaweesuk, P.; Chaiear, N.; Boonsawat, W.; Khiewyoo, J.; Krisorn, P.; Silanun, K. Spirometry changes in normal or early ILO pneumoconiosis radiographs of sandstone-dust exposed workers: A preliminary result. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2017, 100, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar]
  67. Uygur, F.; Ornek, T.; Tanriverdi, H.; Altuntas, M.; Altinsoy, B.; Erboy, F.; Tor, M.; Atalay, F. Platelet Indices in Patients with Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis. Lung 2016, 194, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Weissman, D.N. Role of chest computed tomography in prevention of occupational respiratory disease: Review of recent literature. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 36, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Xing, J.; Huang, X.; Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Comparison of high-resolution computerized tomography with film-screen radiography for the evaluation of opacity and the recognition of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. J. Occup. Health 2014, 56, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Xue, C.; Wu, N.; Li, X.; Qiu, M.; Du, X.; Ye, Q. Serum concentrations of Krebs von den Lungen-6, surfactant protein, D.; and matrix metalloproteinase-2 as diagnostic biomarkers in patients with asbestosis and silicosis: A case-control study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017, 17, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Yang, H.-Y.; Shie, R.-H.; Chang, C.-J.; Chen, P.-C. Development of breath test for pneumoconiosis: A case-control study. Respir. Res. 2017, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Young, C.; Barker, S.; Ehrlich, R.; Kistnasamy, B.; Yassi, A. Computer-aided detection for tuberculosis and silicosis in chest radiographs of gold miners of South Africa. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2020, 24, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yu, P.; Xu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, C.; Sun, X.; Zhao, J. An Automatic Computer-Aided Detection Scheme for Pneumoconiosis on Digital Chest Radiographs. J. Digit. Imaging 2011, 24, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhang, G.H.; Li, L.; Hao, C.; Ren, J.C.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, J.; Gao, L.; Ding, S.; Yao, S.; Yao, W.; et al. Screening and Preliminary Verification of a Phage Display Single-Chain Antibody Library Against Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 58, 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhao, W.; Xu, R.; Hirano, Y.; Tachibana, R.; Kido, S.; Suganuma, N. Classification of pneumoconiosis on HRCT images for computer-aided diagnosis. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2013, 96, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhu, L.; Zheng, R.; Jin, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W. Automatic detection and recognition of silicosis in chest radiograph. Bio.-Med. Mater. Eng. 2014, 24, 3389–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. TSANZ. Standards for Spirometry Training Courses Companion Document to Standards for the Delivery of Spirometry for Coal Mine Workers. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) 2017. Available online: https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1274422/tsanz-spirometry-training-standards.pdf (accessed on 22 June 2020).
  78. Tamura, T.; Suganuma, N.; Hering, K.G.; Vehmas, T.; Itoh, H.; Akira, M.; Takashima, Y.; Hirano, H.; Kusaka, Y. Relationships (I) of International Classification of High-resolution Computed Tomography for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Diseases with the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses for parenchymal abnormalities. Ind. Health 2015, 53, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Newbigin, K.; Parsons, R.; Deller, D.; Edwards, R.; McBean, R. Stonemasons with silicosis: Preliminary findings and a warning message from Australia. Respirology 2019, 24, 1220–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Cox, C.W.; Rose, C.S.; Lynch, D.A. State of the art: Imaging of occupational lung disease. Radiology 2014, 270, 681–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bacchus, L.; Shah, R.D.; Chung, J.H.; Crabtree, T.P.; Heitkamp, D.E.; Iannettoni, M.D.; Johnson, G.B.; Jokerst, C.; McComb, B.L.; Saleh, A.G.; et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Review ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Occupational Lung Diseases. J. Thorac. Imaging 2016, 31, W1–W3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sies, H. Oxidative stress: Oxidants and antioxidants. Exp. Physiol. 1997, 82, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Schulte, P.A. The use of biomarkers in surveillance, medical screening, and intervention. Mutat. Res./Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2005, 592, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thakkar, L.R.; Pingle, S.K.; Tumane, R.G.; Soni, P.N. Expression of Low Molecular Mass Proteins in Stone Quarry Workers. Natl. J. Lab. Med. 2013, 2, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  85. Pandey, J.K.; Agarwal, D. Biomarkers: A potential prognostic tool for silicosis. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 16, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Horváth, I.; Barnes, P.J.; Loukides, S.; Sterk, P.J.; Högman, M.; Olin, A.C.; Amann, A.; Antus, B.; Baraldi, E.; Bikov, A.; et al. A European Respiratory Society technical standard: Exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 49, 1600965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Leese, E.; Staff, J.F.; Carolan, V.A.; Morton, J. Exhaled Breath Condensate: A Novel Matrix for Biological Monitoring to Assess Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica. Ann. Work. Expo. Health 2017, 61, 902–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart showing the screening process for the scoping review.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart showing the screening process for the scoping review.
Ijerph 18 08123 g001
Figure 2. Global incidence of silicosis in the journal articles included in the scoping review.
Figure 2. Global incidence of silicosis in the journal articles included in the scoping review.
Ijerph 18 08123 g002
Table 1. Common operations or tasks that involve exposure to free crystalline silica [7,15,16].
Table 1. Common operations or tasks that involve exposure to free crystalline silica [7,15,16].
ActivityIndustries or Occupational Activities
DrillingConstruction, quarrying and related milling, mining and related milling, tunneling
Breaking and crushingConstruction, quarrying and related milling, mining and related milling, tunneling
CuttingArts, crafts, and sculpture, jewelry, construction, quarrying and related milling, grindstone production
Abrasive blasting and sand blastingBoiler scaling, production of dental material, metal products, automobile repair (removal of paint and rust), arts, crafts, and sculpture, shipbuilding and repair, foundries, construction, quarrying and related milling, production of denim jeans, tombstone production
GrindingArts, crafts, and sculpture, jewelry, construction, quarrying and related milling
SandingAutomobile repair (removal of paint and rust), construction
Excavation and diggingAgriculture, construction, quarrying and related milling, mining and related milling, tunneling
HammeringBoiler scaling, construction
Casting and mouldingJewelry, foundries, ceramics
Furnace installation and repair (refractory materials)Iron and steel mills, foundries, glass
Cleaning (dry sweeping and brushing, pressurised air blowing)Construction, arts, crafts, and sculpture, jewelry
Polishing and buffingProduction of dental material, arts, crafts, and sculpture, jewelry
Table 2. Extraction table of the 52 articles included in the scoping review.
Table 2. Extraction table of the 52 articles included in the scoping review.
Author (Year)Objective/sType of Study (Cross-Sectional, Clinical Trial, Longitudinal, Review)Population/Exposure (Years)Population SizeGenderAge (Years)Respiratory Surveillance Method/S UsedOutcomesLocation
Aggarwal [31]Investigate total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in blood samples as a non-invasive method to measure silica-induced toxicity. First study to estimate LDH activity in blood cells of silica-exposed agate workers and controls. Proposes LDH activity as a diagnostic tool for early silica exposure-induced cytotoxicity.Cross-sectionalSilica-exposed agate workersExposed workers: 35 Control subjects: 27Exposed workers: 21 maleExposed workers: 42 ± 11Blood sampleBlood cells: LDH activity significantly higher (~10×) in control subjects, suggesting the blood cells of exposed workers may have been damaged directly or indirectly by silica exposureIndia
Exposure: 16 ± 8Control subjects:27 maleControl subjects: 31 ± 9Blood plasma: LDH activity is higher (~25×) in exposed workers, suggesting that silica exposure may have induced cellular and tissue injuries, with more extracellular LDH enzyme released into blood plasma
Alexopoulos et al. [32]Compare cellular profiles of asbestosis-exposed workers using induced sputum (IS) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) to test the usefulness of IS in monitoring workers over an extended period. Validate screening tool for biological Cross-sectionalWorkers at a car brakes and clutches factory that uses chrysotile asbestosWorkers: 39Workers: 24 male37–53Questionnaire, Bronchoscopy, Induced sputumFindings detected significant correlations between IS and BALF cellular profiles. This indicates that IS sampling, a less invasive and expensive method, may provide useful insights both for inhalation of dusts and inflammatory processes in the lung.Romania
Exposure: >15
Absence of diagnosis of pneumoconiosis
Aslam et al. [33] Develop fluorescence-based analysis tool to monitor in real-time the LOX enzyme activities in vitro and in vivo of patients with fibrogenesis. These powerful tools are a simple and effective method of monitoring.Cross-sectionalHuman and asinine ex vivo tissue modelsHuman lung samples: 17N/AHuman lung samples: 55–81Lung samples from carcinoma resections, Biopsy, ex vivo asinine lung samplesSuccessful design of an activity-based fluorescent probe that quantifies in real-time the LOXF activity in fibrogenic conditions. This probe has the potential to image real-time LOXF activity within the lungs of patients.United Kingdom
Number not statedAsinine lungs: aged
Brilland et al. [20]Analyse the impact of crystalline silica on T cell phenotype and regulatory T cells (Tregs) frequency.Prospective cohortWorkers with moderate to high levels of exposureExposed workers: 55MalesExposed workers: 41.30 ± 6.52Clinical examination, chest X-ray, pulmonary function test, blood samplingAlterations of the T cell compartment can be detected early during the course of crystalline silica exposure, hence preceding the development of silicosis or autoimmune diseases. France
Two cohorts of HC; group 1 = 42 and group 2 = 45Control group 1: 41.67 ± 12.59
Control group 2: 42.06 ± 8.89
Chao et al. [34]Investigate the mechanisms underlying endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT)Lab basedN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A—lab basedFindings suggest MCPIP1-induced EndMT in endothelial cells plays an important role in the development of silicosis. China
Chao et al. [35]Investigate if cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be better than spirometry when used to detect early signs of damage caused by occupational exposure to particulate matter. First study to focus on early detection in asymptomatic participants.Cross-sectionalMale workers from the Epidemiology and Human Movement Study (EPIMOV). Completed a validated occupational respiratory questionnaire to determine occupational exposure to particulate matter.Exposed = 52Male only>18 Male workers exhibited ventilatory alterations during exercise, even with normal pulmonary function at rest. Findings suggest ∆VT/∆InVE may be the most appropriate variable from the CPET to differentiate workers with incipient ventilatory changes. CPET may be useful in the prevention of occupational respiratory diseases.Brazil
Control = 83
Chu et al. [4]To systematically evaluate genetic variants that were associated with pneumoconiosis susceptibility.Three-stage case-controlExposed coal and metalliferous underground minersCases: 202N/AN/APhysical examination, radiograph, genome samplesIdentified a genome-wide significant association and two additional replicated associations for pneumoconiosis susceptibility in Han Chinese.China
Control: 198
Chu et al. [36]Identify miRNA as potential diagnostic biomarkers for silica-related pulmonary fibrosis.Three-stage case-controlSee Table 1 in articleCases: 67See Table 1 in articleSee Table 1 in articleBlood samplesmiRNA-4508 may be a potential diagnostic marker for silica-related pulmonary fibrosis, and a functional variant of miRNA-4508 may affect susceptibility. China
Controls: 67
Chu et al. [37]Investigate the causal variants of chromosome 12q15 in silicosis susceptibility.Case-controlCase: 24.58 ± 7.00Cases:177Case: Male 89.27%Case: 67.70 ± 8.49Blood samplesA variant of the carboxypeptidase M (CPM) gene may increase silicosis susceptibility. Provide insight into the aetiology and biological mechanisms of silicosis. Assist in identification of high-risk individuals with occupational silica-exposure.China
Control: 24.05 ± 5.69Healthy controls: 204Control: 84.80%Control: 60.26 ± 6.35
Codorean et al. [38]Perform exploratory study on peripheral whole-blood to analyse early effects of exposure in coal fired power plants. Cross-sectionalThree groups: 10 years; 20 years; controlN/AN/AN/ABlood samplesThis method is non-invasive and rapid and could be a useful tool in identifying early hazard before it is diagnosed clinically. Romania
Corradi et al. [39]Review EBC studies that investigate exposure and effect biomarkers in lung disease, particularly toxic metalsReviewN/AN/AN/AN/AExhaled breath condensate (EBC)Exhaled breath biomarkers have been shown to be capable of detecting and monitoring diseases of the respiratory system. N/A
Cox and Lynch [40]Provide review of recent developments in medical imaging of environmental lunch disease.ReviewN/AN/AN/AN/AMedical imagingMedical imaging is useful in the diagnosis, epidemiological study and management of occupational lung disease. Studies that compare HRCT with film-screen radiography found CT was more sensitive. N/A
Dinescu et al. [41]Identify correlations between electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes in patients with silicosis prior to chronic pulmonary heart disease occurring.Prospective, descriptive, analyticalN/ACases: 67N/ACases: 477–8 yearsElectrocardiograph, echocardiographValues of the right heart echocardiographic parameters at the upper limit of normality are early markers for cardiovascular damage in patients with silicosis. Romania
Control: 25
Doganay et al. [3]Assess MDCT findings of silicosis in denim sandblasters and define the role of MDCT in the early detection of silicosis.Cross-sectionalDenim sandblasters12 male patients admitted to a pulmonary outpatient clinic between April-December 2009. Male only19–25 yearsCTSilicosis may cause immediate mortality, especially in young people. MDCT can play an important role in the early detection of silicosis.Turkey
1.0–5.2 years21.2 ± 1.2
3.7 ± 1.4
Ehrlich et al. [42]Estimate the effect of respirable dust and quartz exposure on spirometric lung function.Cross-sectionalBlack South African gold miners520 mine workersNot reported37–60 yearsQuestionnaires, X-ray, spirometryStudy demonstrated significant lung function loss attributable to dust exposure, mediated by silicosis, pulmonary TB and/or an independent dust effect. South Africa
6.3–34.5 yearsMean = 46.7 years
Mean = 21.8 years
Greabu et al. [43]Evaluate the relationships between occupational exposure to mine dust and salivary antioxidants, blood uric acid and the possible implications for the causes of diseases caused by exposure.Cross-sectionalLong-term occupational exposure in non-ferrous metal minesExposed workers: 30Not reportedExposed: 44.3 (SD) 4.5Saliva samplesFirst study to describe saliva and serum parameters involved in antioxidant protection and metabolic regulations in non-ferrous metal miners. Romania
Control: 30Control: 51.3 (SD) 5.6
Guo et al. [44]Survey and identify differentially expressed circulating miRNAs by miRNA deep sequencing blood samples from patients at varying stages of CWP. Case-controlN/ACases: 30N/AN/ABlood samplesDemonstrated that expressed circulating miRNAs showed dynamic expression patterns across diseased samples. This suggests these miRNAs may have critical roles in the occurrence and development of CWP. China
Controls:10
n = 456
Johnsen et al. [45]Investigate the relationship between dust exposure and annual change in lung function among Norwegian silicon carbide exposed workers using a quantitative job matrix (JEM) regarding total dustLongitudinal cohortWorkers in Norwegian silicon carbide plantsSee Table S2a,b.
Examinations = 1499
N/AN/AQuestionnaires, spirometry, JEM (dust exposure matrix)Dust exposure, expressed by quantitative JEM, was found to be associated with an increased yearly decline in FEV1. A dose-response relationship was found.Norway
Kahraman et al. [46]Document pulmonary function and prevalence of pneumoconiosis in dental prosthetic techniciansCross-sectionalDental prosthetic technicians
16.7 ± 8.4 (4–43)
n = 76Male32 ± 8, (18–55)Physical examination, Pulmonary function test, HRCTFirst prevalence study in dental prosthetic technicians using HRCT. Pneumoconiosis was detected in 46%, possible because HRCT is able to detect very early changes. Turkey
Kamaludin et al. [47]Determine biomarker to be used in diagnosis of occupational airways inflammation from occupational inorganic dust exposure.ReviewN/AN/AN/AN/ABiomarkersThree biomarkers were identified. Malaysia
Larici et al. [48]Highlight the current role of imaging, describe classic as well as uncommon HRCT patterns helpful in guiding diagnosis.ReviewN/AN/AN/AN/AHRCTHRCT is the best imaging modality. Imaging plays a role in diagnosis, surveillance, and prediction. N/A
Lee et al. [49]Review the roles of previously identified molecules in silicosis-related lung fibrosis from the literature.ReviewN/AN/AN/AN/ABiomarkersSerum Npnt was higher in silicosis patients compared to healthy controls. Serum Npnt seems to play a role in progression of fibrosis with other cytokines, and may therefore be a suitable biomarker. N/A
Lee and Choi [50]Evaluate the reliability and validity of soft copy images based on flat-panel detector of digital radiography compared to analog radiographs in pneumoconiosis classification and diagnosis.Cross-sectionalRetired workers exposed to inorganic dustsn = 349N/a62.4 ± 7.8Digital and analog radiographyFlat-panel detector of digital radiography soft copy images showed more accurate and reliable results in pneumoconiosis classification and diagnosis than analog radiographs.Korea
19.8 ± 8.1
Lee and Choi [51]Compare digital and analog radiography for screening of pneumoconiosis with respect to radiation dose, image quality, and classification.Cross-sectionalExposed to inorganic dustn = 531Male61.1 ± 8.3 (43–79)Digital and analog radiographyCompared to analog radiography, digital radiography provides improved image quality with a significant reduction of up to 23.6% in radiation dose and more accurate pneumoconiosis classification.Korea
19.5 ± 8.2 (3–45)
Lee et al. [52]Develop an improved set of standard digital images to be used in the recognition and classification of pneumoconiosis.Cross-sectionalExposed to inorganic dustn = 531Male63.1 ± 7.9 (42–84)Digital and analog radiographyA set of 120 standard digital images was developed with more various pneumoconiosis findings than the ILO SARS. They can be used for the digital reference images for recognition and classification of pneumoconiosis.Korea
19.5 ± 8.2 (3–45)
Lewis and Fishwick [27]Identify areas of good practice within respiratory health surveillance and to formulate recommendations for practiceReviewN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ARespiratory health surveillance remains relatively disparate and would benefit from standardisation. N/A
Liu et al. [53]Study expression changes in inflammation-related genes in peripheral blood of patients with pneumoconiosis and explore the possibility of these genes as biomarkers.Cross-sectionalN/AVarious populationsMaleVarious populationsBlood samplesIL6 was identified as being possibly involved in the development of pneumoconiosis.China
Mao et al. [54]Evaluate the applicability of digital radiography.Cross-sectionalDust exposed workers192Male 95.3%Mean = 55.7Film screen and digital radiographsFindings demonstrate that digital systems are equivalent to traditional film-screen radiography in the recognition and classification of small opacities.China
McBean et al. [6]Understand the radiological presentation of individuals diagnosed with coal mine dust lung disease since 2015 in Queensland. Case seriesIndividuals identified as having coal mine dust lung disease (CMDLD) since 201579Male Mean = 58.9 years (range: 35–90)Questionnaires, X-ray and/or CT, spirometryFirst study in over 30 years to investigate the radiological presentation of CMDLD in QLD, and the first ever to incorporate HRCT. Approximately 30% of subjects had advanced disease. Findings of interest included the high burden of opacities observed and the presence of RCS-related features in the majority of subjects.Australia
Mean: 26.2 years (range: 6–45)
Miao et al. [55]Conduct proteomic profiling for the early stages of silicosis to investigate the pathophysiology and to identify potential candidate proteins for early diagnosis.Case-controlDust-exposed workers without silicosis; silicosis patients; Healthy controls45N/A55–64X-ray, blood sampleA number of proteins involved in silicosis development were identified, with a large number of proteins and peptides being dramatically altered during early development. This may contribute to future work to identify potential biomarkers.China
Nardi et al. [56]Evaluate inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters as potential early biomarkers for RCS exposure.Case-controlCS exposed minersWorkers exposed to CS = 38MaleVarious, see Table 1 in articleBlood sample, anthropometric measurements, For the first time, this study suggested L-selectin surface protein expression in lymphocytes might be a potential biomarker for monitoring CS toxicity in workers with at least 16 years exposure.Brazil
With silicosis = 24
Unexposed workers = 30
Okumura et al. [57]Investigate the effects of parameters on overall classification performance. Develop enhancement methods to reduce false-positive and false-negative values in a CAD scheme for pneumoconiosis.Retrospective, cross-sectionalN/AN/AN/AN/AChest radiographsSuccessfully developed a CAD system using three new enhancement methods for classification of pneumoconiosis chest radiographs.Japan
Ophir et al. [58]Screen exposed workers using quantitative biometric monitoring of functional and inflammatory parameters.Case-controlArtificial stone workersExposed workers: 68MaleExposed workers: 48.6 ± 11.4Questionnaires, PFT, induced sputumReports first application of XRF technology for quantifying elements in biological samples. PFT were significantly lower for exposed workers. Also IS in exposed workers showed significantly higher neutrophilic inflammation. Particle size in IS of exposed workers was similar to the artificial stone dust.Israel
Up to 20 yearsControls: 48 Controls: 38.0 ± 17.1
Palabiyik et al. [12]Investigate if occupational silica exposure results in alterations in neopterin levels, tryptophan degradation, and activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase, agents in the antioxidant defense system.Case-controlDenim sandblasting workersSilicosis patients: 55MaleSilicosis patients: 30 ± 1 (21–48)Questionnaires, PFT, blood samplesDenim sandblasters exposed to silica had increased neopterin levels and tryptophan degradation confirming the possibility of their use as indicators of cellular immune response.Turkey
33.6 ± 23.8 (2 to 120) monthsControls: 22Controls: 36 ± 10 (18–52)
Pelclová et al. [59]Evaluate the potential impact of lung fibrosis on the levels of oxidative stress markers in blood and urine of workers exposed to silica.Case-controlVarious occupations with exposureAsbestos exposed workers: 45Asbestos exposed workers: 24 maleAsbestos exposed workers: 69.6 ± 2.0Questionnaires, physical examination, X-ray, CT, blood sample, urine sample, lung function, EBC8-isoprostane appears to be the optimal oxidative stress marker for respiratory disorders. HNE can be used as a marker for pneumoconiosis. Findings support the suggestion that EBC can contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of silicosis.Czech Republic
Silica exposed workers: 37Silica exposed workers: 36 maleSilica exposed workers: 69.1 ± 2.9
Controls: 29Controls: 20 maleControls: 67.0 ± 4.6
Pelclová et al. [60]Measure multiple markers in the EBC, plasma and urine of exposed workers to determine the possible impact of systemic disease, pharmaceuticals and diet on EBC levels.Case-controlVarious occupations with exposureAsbestos exposed workers: 45Asbestos exposed workers: 24 maleAsbestos exposed workers: 69.6 ± 2.0Questionnaires, physical examination, X-ray, CT, blood sample, urine sample, EBCFindings suggest that for the detection of pneumoconiosis EBC is the most useful compared to plasma and urine.Czech Republic
Silica exposed workers: 37Silica exposed workers: 36 maleSilica exposed workers: 69.1 ± 2.9
Controls: 27Controls: 18 maleControls: 66.0 ± 6.9
Sato et al. [61]Identify predictive factors of excess decline in FEV1 in patients with chronic silicosis.Cross-sectionalExposed workersn = 33Male73.5 ± 5.7Questionnaires, X-ray, spirometry, blood samplesSerum H01 may be a useful marker of lung function decline and disease progression in silicosis patients.Japan
21.9 ± 12.3
Sauni et al. [62]Investigate responses to silica exposure, by testing the effects of silica dust on exhaled nitric oxide.Case-controlExposed workers in prefabrication factories, quarries and stone-cutting industryExposed workers: 94MaleExposed workers: 60.4 (40–78)Exhaled NO, blood samples, spirometryMeasurement of nitric oxide concentration, plasma cytokine and adipokine levels appears to offer a novel method of demonstrating the inflammatory effects of silica exposure. Measurement of exhaled NO is safe, easy to perform and inexpensive.Finland
31.0 (SD8.1)Controls: 35Controls: 62.1 (49–72)
Şener et al. [63]Compare the ability of chest X-ray (ILO classification) and HRCT (ICOERD) to make an early diagnosis of pneumoconiosis.Retrospective, cross-sectionalVarious exposed workers diagnosed with pneumoconiosis83Male44.46 ± 11.45Chest X-rays, CT, PFTILO categories and ICOERD grades were significantly correlated. HRCT performed better when detecting pneumoconiosis in an early stage, however not in evaluating pulmonary functions.Turkey
Sundararajan et al. [64]Investigate a method to automatically detect pneumoconiosis on the basis of digital chest X-rays.Cross-sectionalN/AN/AN/AN/AChest X-raysThe method successfully allows practitioners to classify normal versus pneumoconiosis patients.N/A
Syslová et al. [65]Determine concentration levels of oxidative stress biomarkers in the EBC of patients with pneumoconiosis.Clinical studyPneumoconiosis patients with exposure to silica or asbestos for 22 ± 6 yearsn = 10MalePatients: 69 ± 8EBC, There was a statistically significant difference in biomarkers’ concentration levels between the pneumoconiosis patients and the control subjects.Czech Republic
Control: 67 ± 4
Trakultaweesuk et al. [66]Estimate FEV1 decline at one year follow-up among workers with normal or early abnormal ILO classified chest X-rays.Descriptive, longitudinalExposed sandstone workers (median exposure 6.5 years)n = 52Female (65.4%)48 ± 8.9 (27–65)Questionnaire, spirometry, chest X-rayA significant loss of lung function was found, despite being only a one-year follow-up. Spirometry was found to be effective in monitoring the effect of exposure on sandstone workers.Thailand
Uygur et al. [67]Investigate the relationship between platelet indices and CWP.Case-controlRetired coal minersRetired workers with CWP: 97MaleRetired workers with CWP: 61.9 ± 4.8Questionnaire, blood sample, chest X-rayPlatelet indices may be considered as biomarkers for the progression of pneumoconiosis.Turkey
20.5 ± 3.6Controls: 50Controls: 62.3 ± 1.9
Weissman [68]Provide update on literature relevant to using CT as a tool for preventing occupational respiratory disease.ReviewN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAlthough HRCT is more sensitive than X-ray there are insufficient data to determine the effectiveness of HRCT in improving individual outcomes. However, if HRCT is used to screen populations, the ICOERD classification has been shown to be an important tool.N/A
Xing et al. [69]Compare film-screen radiography and HRCT for the recognition of the profusion of small opacities and to evaluate the role of HRCT in CWP diagnosis.Cross-sectionalCoal minersCoal miners with CWP: 96MaleCoal miners with CWP: 49.01 ± 6.16Film-screen radiography, HRCTHRCT was more sensitive than film-screen radiography in recognising the profusion of small opacities. Findings provide evidence of the advantages of HRCT in diagnosis of pneumoconiosis.China
Healthy coal miners: 67Healthy coal miners: 47.12 ± 7.35
Controls:37Controls: 46.67 ± 6.76
Xue et al. [70]Investigate and evaluate the diagnostic values of pneumocyte-derived biomarkers in various pneumoconioses.Case-controlPatients with asbestosis/silicosis and dust exposed workersPatients with asbestosis: 43Patients with asbestosis: 19 malePatients with asbestosis: 68.2 ± 8.6HRCT, X-ray, blood samples, pulmonary function testThe combination of KL-6, SP-D and MMP-2 may improve the diagnostic sensitivity for asbestosis and silicosis.China
Patients with silicosis: 45Patients with silicosis: 23 malePatients with silicosis: 65.1 ± 11.3
Dust exposed workers: 40Dust exposed workers: 21 maleDust exposed workers: 63.1 ± 8.7
Controls; 45Controls; 22 maleControls; 65.6 ± 11.4
Yang et al. [71]Develop a breath test to detect pneumoconiosis using volatile organic compounds generated from lipid peroxidation.Case-controlExposed stone workersCases:25Cases: 68.0%Cases: 60.0 (9.2)Questionnaires, physical examination, X-ray, pulmonary function test, fractional exhaled nitric oxide test, blood and urine samples.Analysis of VOCs in breath is a novel respiratory screening method. Three VOCs were identified as constituting a distinct fingerprint in the breath of pneumoconiosis patients, demonstrating exhaled breath could be used in screening.Taiwan
Cases: 19.8 (14.5)Controls:154Control: 46.1%Controls: 50.3 (11.8)
Controls: 17.6 (13.8)
Young et al. [72]Evaluate the use of CAD to diagnose both TB and silicosis in a population with a high burden of both diseases.QuantitativeN/AN/AN/AN/AX-rayUsing CAD as a mass screening tool for TB and silicosis shows promise, however current ability to differentiate between the two is limited. The successful use of CAD to streamline the process of detection requires knowledge of the local context.South Africa
Yu et al. [73]Establish an automated scheme for CAD of pneumoconiosis in X-raysQuantitativeN/ANormal: 300N/AN/AX-rayFindings show high classification performances. The fully automated scheme developed in this study has a higher accuracy and a more convenient interaction compared to previous methods. Scheme may be helpful to clinicians using CAD for mass chest screening and interpreting and differentiating between normal and pneumoconiosis cases.China
Pneumoconiosis: 125
Zhang et al. [74]Construct a phage display human antibody library (PDHAL) against pneumoconiosis for the diagnosis and treatment of CWP.Case-controlN/APatients with pneumoconiosis: 25MaleCoal workers: 37.51 ± 6.75Blood samples, BALFA PDHAL against CWP was established and six strong positive clones were selected, sequenced and identified. Protective factors were identified. Serum and antibodies that could be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of CWP were identified.China
Coal workers with CWP: 558Controls: 36.88 ± 9.39
Coal workers without CWP: 309
Control: 393
Zhao et al. [75]Describe a CAD method to classify pneumoconiosis on HRCT images.QuantitativeN/ASubjects:112N/AN/AHRCTFindings indicate that the method developed could be helpful in classifying pneumoconiosis on HRCT.Japan
HRCT scans: 175
Zhu et al. [76]Propose a multi-scale opacity detection approach to detect suspected opacities from X-rayQuantitativeN/AN/AN/AN/AX-rayFindings demonstrate the approach to be effective in detecting and recognising silicosis opacity. The approach successfully revealed changes in silicosis pathology and may be adopted as an appropriate tool for automatic silicosis diagnosis.China
Table 3. List of grey literature included in the review.
Table 3. List of grey literature included in the review.
Author/OrganisationAvailable at
Alif et al. [1]https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/occupational-lung-diseases-australia-2006-2019
International Labour Organisation (ILO)https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/areasofwork/occupational-health/WCMS_108548/lang--en/index.htm
Australian and New Zealand Society of Occupational Medicine (ANZSOM)https://www.anzsom.org.au/
Coal Services NSWhttps://www.coalservices.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/20180625_Order-43_Information-for-employers_updated-Nov2019.pdf
Icarehttps://www.icare.nsw.gov.au/news-and-stories/reducing-worker-risks-for-silica
Lung Foundation Australiahttps://lungfoundation.com.au/drive-change/
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/silica/default.html
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/surveillance/ORDS/
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/surveillance/ords/workermedicalmonitoring.html
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-110/nmed0205.html;
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/81-123/default.html
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR)https://www.ranzcr.com/search/silicosis-position-statement
Royal Australian College of Physicianshttps://www.racp.edu.au/advocacy/division-faculty-and-chapter-priorities/faculty-of-occupational-environmental-medicine/accelerated-silicosis/faqs
Safe Work Australiahttps://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/silica
SafeWork NSWhttps://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/hazards-a-z/hazardous-chemical/priority-chemicals/crystalline-silica
SafeWork Qldhttps://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/silicosis/background-to-silicosis
Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealandhttps://www.thoracic.org.au/respiratorylaboratoryaccreditation/spirometry-standards
TSANZhttps://www.thoracic.org.au/documents/item/407
WorkCover WAhttps://www.workcover.wa.gov.au/workers/silicosis-claims/
WorkSafe ACThttps://www.accesscanberra.act.gov.au/app/answers/detail/a_id/4646/~/silica-dust
WorkSafe NZhttps://worksafe.govt.nz/topic-and-industry/dust/silica-dust-in-the-workplace/
WorkSafe Tasmaniahttps://worksafe.tas.gov.au/silicasafe
WorkSafe Victoriahttps://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/crystalline-silica
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Austin, E.K.; James, C.; Tessier, J. Early Detection Methods for Silicosis in Australia and Internationally: A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158123

AMA Style

Austin EK, James C, Tessier J. Early Detection Methods for Silicosis in Australia and Internationally: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(15):8123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Austin, Emma K., Carole James, and John Tessier. 2021. "Early Detection Methods for Silicosis in Australia and Internationally: A Review of the Literature" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 15: 8123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop