Next Article in Journal
“Coach Really Knew What I Needed and Understood Me Well as a Person”: Effective Communication Acts in Coach–Athlete Interactions among Korean Olympic Archers
Previous Article in Journal
A Multilevel Model Approach for Investigating Individual Accident Characteristics and Neighborhood Environment Characteristics Affecting Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph17093108
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Patterns of Comorbidity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Perspective

by
Xiao-Min Mu
1,
Wei Wang
1,
Yu-Ying Jiang
1 and
Jia Feng
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Medical Informatics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
2
Cancer Systems Biology Center, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China
3
College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093108
Submission received: 27 March 2020 / Revised: 17 April 2020 / Accepted: 23 April 2020 / Published: 29 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and fatal cancer. People with HCC report higher odds of comorbidity compared with people without HCC. To explore the association between HCC and medical comorbidity, we used routinely collected clinical data and applied a network perspective. In the network perspective, we used correlation analysis and community detection tests that described direct relationships among comorbidities. We collected 14,891 patients with HCC living in Jilin Province, China, between 2016 and 2018. Cirrhosis was the most common comorbidity of HCC. Hypertension and renal cysts were more common in male patients, while chronic viral hepatitis C, hypersplenism, hypoproteinemia, anemia and coronary heart disease were more common in female patients. The proportion of chronic diseases in comorbidities increased with age. The main comorbidity patterns of HCC were: HCC, cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, portal hypertension, ascites and other common complications of cirrhosis; HCC, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction; and HCC, hypoproteinemia, electrolyte disorders, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hemorrhagic anemia. Our findings provide comprehensive information on comorbidity patterns of HCC, which may be used for the prevention and management of liver cancer.

1. Introduction

Patients with cancer often carry the dual burden of the cancer itself and other coexisting chronic conditions [1]. Patients with liver cancer have a higher proportion of multiple medical conditions, leading to liver cancer being a major cause of premature illness and death [2,3,4]. Individuals suffering from multiple medical conditions are referred to as having comorbidity [5,6]. Comorbidity potentially affects the stages of the cancer journey from diagnosis, through treatment, to outcomes [7]. Patients with comorbidities are substantially more likely to experience complicated treatment, increased cost of care, decreased quality of life and lower survival probabilities than those without comorbidity [8,9]. In China, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancer. Therefore, understanding the patterns of diseases that coexist with HCC is important for disease screening and management.
While patients with HCC are at increased risk of comorbidity, few data sources are available for evaluating the comorbidity patterns among patients with HCC. Most studies of HCC comorbidity have focused on the relationship and mechanism of coexistence between HCC and other specific diseases, such as hepatitis B virus infection [10], hepatitis C virus infection [11,12] and type 2 diabetes [13,14], or on the epidemiological and clinical aspects of special populations with HCC, such as patients with obesity and elderly patients [15]. Although some comorbidities such as chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus, and type 2 diabetes are generally well recognized [10,16], many others may remain undiagnosed and can be detected by clinical data. Therefore, there is a need for comprehensive information from large clinical databases to identify the prevalence of liver cancer-related comorbidities and the comorbidity pattern of HCC.
Investigating network structures to understand the relationship between diseases is a recent research area in clinical science and medical informatics [17,18]. Network analysis is an efficient approach to analyze and visualize complex networks of diseases through identifying highly connected individual nodes and specific communities of nodes called modules [19]. Thus, the network perspective provides a straightforward overview of the co-occurrence of multiple disorders in a network structure and how they may interact and overlap [20]. The approach can be used to mine the relationships of multiple comorbidities, which can confirm existing knowledge regarding disease comorbidity as well as discover previously unappreciated associations among diseases.
In this study, we used the clinical data, including diagnostic data, derived from hospitals in Northeast China, to quantify the risk of liver cancer-related comorbidities. We established an HCC comorbidity network to obtain correlations between comorbidities by network measurements and discovered the pattern of disease comorbidity through the community detection method. We hope this study will be helpful to understand and manage diseases better in clinical settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Preprocessing

The data were derived from electronic medical records of 16 tertiary hospitals in Jilin Province, China during 2016–2018. The data contained more than 2 million records, including demographic data (such as age and sex), diagnostic data and medication data. The diagnostic data consisted of one primary diagnosis and up to 15 secondary diagnoses, which were coded by trained coders with the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases [21]. We used demographic and diagnostic data to analyze the comorbidity pattern of HCC. Data collected at the initial visit was used for this analysis. Inclusion criteria: data for patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by clinical diagnosis, pathological diagnosis, etc., according to the Chinese practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma. A total of 14,891 patients were included in the analysis. Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China (grant number: ethical review 2020-02-01).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The differences among the groups were compared by χ2 test or continuity correction, or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. All p < 0.05 from two-sided tests were accepted as significant. We used relative risk to measure the correlations between disease pairs [22]. For specific diseases A and B, relative risk was calculated according to the ratio of the observed prevalence of the disease pair to the expected prevalence [23]. The expected prevalence of the disease pair was computed as (prevalence of disease A) × (prevalence of disease B) [24]. A correlation was considered significant with relative risk > 1.0.

2.3. Network Analysis

We constructed the HCC comorbidity network with disease pairs whose correlations were significant. The weights of the disease pairs of which the two diseases co-occurred frequently would be large. Visualization of comorbidity networks can intuitively display the disease associations. We used Gephi 0.9.2 (WebAtlas, Paris, France), which is an open source software, for exploring and manipulating networks [25], to visualize the comorbidity network graphics. Each comorbidity was represented in the graph by a specific node and the diameter and color of nodes showed the prevalence and degree of the comorbidity, respectively. Diseases with larger degrees had more relationships with other diseases in the network. Links between nodes represented significant associations. The edges’ thickness represented the strengths of their association.
The community detection method was used for discovering the patterns of disease comorbidities. We adopted a computational algorithm proposed by Blondel [26] included in the Gephi to detect the highly interlinked topological clusters in the network. This method was based on modularity optimization. Modularity was the fraction of the edges that fell within the given groups of nodes minus the expected such fraction if edges were distributed at random. It was superior to other community detection methods in terms of computation time. In addition, the quality of the communities detected was good.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the HCC group, which comprised 14,891 patients. The HCC cohort was predominantly represented by seniors, with a mean age of 60 ± 11 years. To account for the distribution of age, the study group was stratified by age group, as shown in Table 1. The largest age group was 60–69 years (5251, 35.26%). There was a marked difference in HCC, which was more common in men, with 11,319 incident cases compared with 3572 in women. HCC occurred more often in men than in women, which agrees with the previous observation [4].

3.2. Distribution of Comorbidities

In terms of the number of comorbidities (Figure 1A), 13.14% of patients had only HCC; 11.54% had one comorbidity, 17.45% had two, 15.41% had three, 12.54% had four, 10.6% had five, and 19.32% had six or more. The main population of HCC patients had two comorbidities. As the number of comorbidities increased, the number of patients gradually decreased.
Young people had the fewest comorbidities, and the older the age, the greater the number of comorbidities (Figure 1B–D). In patients younger than 50 years, the number of comorbidities was higher in male than in female patients. In contrast, female patients had more comorbidities than male patients at age ≥ 70 years. The distribution curves for the number of comorbidities between male and female patients aged < 50 years were similar, but the prevalence of comorbidity among male patients was generally higher than that of female patients. The distribution curves of the number of comorbidities in male patients aged 50–59 and 60–69 years were basically the same as those of the female patients aged 60–69 years, and most had two comorbidities. Most female patients aged 50–59 years had up to five comorbidities. Patients aged ≥ 70 years had the most complicated comorbidity curve, with male patients often having up to five comorbidities and female patients up to eight.

3.3. Diseases Frequently Accompanying HCC

Diseases that frequently accompany HCC are summarized in Figure 2. The five most frequent comorbidities were cirrhosis (8449, 56.74%), followed by chronic viral hepatitis B (4348, 29.20%), hypertension (1911, 12.83%), diabetes mellitus (1744, 11.71%), and chronic viral hepatitis C (1576, 10.58%).
The rankings for the top 15 most frequent comorbidities differed by sex (Table 2). The types of common comorbidities in male and female patients were similar. However, significant differences were observed between male and female patients regarding frequency of cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypersplenism, ascites, renal cysts, chronic viral hepatitis C, hypoproteinemia, anemia and coronary heart disease.
Table 3 shows prevalence of comorbidities by age group. The most common comorbidities in patients aged < 70 years were cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis B, while the most common comorbidities in patients aged ≥ 70 years were cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis C. In addition, some diseases could be considered as major comorbidities for specific age groups, for example, bone neoplasm and lymphoma for patients aged ≤ 39 years, and hypertension, cerebral infarction, coronary heart disease and heart failure for patients aged ≥ 60 years.

3.4. Comorbidities Network

We constructed the HCC comorbidity network with diseases with prevalence > 1% and relative risk > 1.0 (Figure 3). The diameter and color of nodes shows the prevalence and degree of the comorbidity, respectively. Larger nodes represent higher prevalence and darker circles represent higher degrees. The HCC comorbidity network comprised 47 nodes representing each comorbidity and a total of 670 links representing those correlations. The closest link in the network was cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis B with 3258 co-occurrences. Metabolic disorders had more relationships with other diseases in the network, such as hypoproteinemia, hypokalemia and hyponatremia. Cirrhosis and metabolic disorders were at the hub of the network.

3.5. Network-based Clustering: Comorbidities Modules

The network contained distinct clusters or modules of highly interlinked nodes and the visual representation revealed a central theme (Figure 4). We enumerated each module rather than provide a name to avoid taxonomic bias. Module 1 comprised 12 nodes containing cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, portal hypertension, hypersplenism, ascites, peritonitis and other diseases caused by abnormal liver function. Module 2 comprised 10 nodes resulting from hepatic cyst, renal cyst, nephrolithiasis, gallbladder diseases and lung disease. Module 3 comprised ten nodes around metabolic disorders (e.g., hypoproteinemia, electrolyte imbalance and hypokalemia) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Module 4 comprised nine nodes in which comorbidities clustered around chronic disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction and heart failure). Module 5 comprised six nodes around cancer (including lung cancer, lymphoma and bone neoplasm).

4. Discussion

We used network analysis to study common comorbidities in patients with HCC and the integrated relationship among different comorbidities, revealing high-impact comorbidities and patterns with meaningful clustering of diseases. These influential comorbidities could be targeted for specific intervention or for screening.
The results showed a strong association between HCC and cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis B and C. This finding supports those of previous studies, which have indicated that cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis B and C are strong risk factors for HCC [27,28,29]. Cirrhosis is the most important risk factor for HCC [30]. The most common causes for HCC include chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection [4]. HCC and cirrhosis had the highest association, and produced the following comorbidity pattern: HCC, cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, portal hypertension, ascites, hypersplenism, peritonitis and other common complications of cirrhosis. Previous comorbidity studies on cirrhosis revealed that portal hypertension, ascites and other above diseases are common comorbidities of cirrhosis [31,32]. Compared with the literature [33,34], our study reports a high rate of HCC without associated cirrhosis. There are probably three main reasons for this. The first reason is that there may be a variability in the methods used to monitor/diagnose fibrosis between different hospital centers. The second reason, which may be due to ethnicity, is that 20% of HCC patients do not have a background of cirrhosis in China [35]. The third reason is the time of data collection—the data comes from the first visit of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, rather than from the entire stage of HCC. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NALFD) are high risk factors for cirrhosis [36]. Possibly because of the time of data collection, most ALD and NAFLD have been developed into cirrhosis. It is difficult to determine whether cirrhosis is caused by NAFLD, because with the increase of fibrosis, liver fat decreases. Even if a pathological biopsy is performed, the characteristic changes of NAFLD are not obvious. HCC is frequently accompanied by one or more components of metabolic disorders such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypoproteinemia, electrolyte imbalance and hyperlipidemia. Metabolism is the most important function of the liver. The metabolism of sugar, protein, fat, vitamins and electrolytes is closely related to the liver. Metabolic disorder is associated with an increased risk of HCC [37,38]. Insulin resistance, glucose and lipid metabolic disorders and an abnormal release of inflammatory mediators are the common bases of HCC and diabetes mellitus [39]. Moreover, the results of the present study link HCC with metabolic dysfunction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction. Specifically, the association produced the following comorbidity patterns: HCC, hypertension with diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction; and HCC with hypoproteinemia, electrolyte disorders, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hemorrhagic anemia. Patients with HCC often suffer from severe cirrhosis, resulting in insufficient synthesis of coagulation factors, and as a result, HCC is often complicated with gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia [40]. However, the mechanism of relationship between electrolyte disorders and gastrointestinal bleeding is still unclear, which needs further experimental analysis.
Our study also found that different sexes and different age groups showed different comorbidity bias. With increasing age, patients had a significantly higher risk of comorbidities. Cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, hypertension and renal cysts were more common in male patients, while chronic viral hepatitis C, hypersplenism, hypoproteinemia, anemia and coronary heart disease were more common in female patients. The proportion of chronic diseases in comorbidities increases with age, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction. This shows that elderly patients face a higher risk of comorbidity of chronic diseases and lower quality of life. It is suggested that elderly patients should pay more attention to their chronic disease comorbidities and strengthen prevention and management of comorbidities.
This study had several limitations. First, the data came from medical institutions in Northeast China, so the results were regional. Second, the data lack information about lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity and medication, which may have influenced the results. Finally, this study was limited in determining precedence or causality of disease. On the basis of this study, we will further study the comorbidities of liver cancer and explore the relationship between comorbidities of liver cancer and patient physical status such as body mass index and alcohol consumption, to make a more detailed classification of different populations. Furthermore, we will attempt to analyze the differences of comorbidities in different stages and different types of liver cancer and incorporate comorbidity information into the staging system to predict the prognosis results.

5. Conclusions

This study explored the comorbidity patterns of HCC using network analysis and found that patients in different age groups and sexes also had significant differences in comorbidity risk. Cirrhosis is the comorbidity with the highest risk of HCC. The main comorbidity patterns of HCC were: HCC, cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis B, portal hypertension, ascites and other common complications of cirrhosis; HCC, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction; and HCC, hypoproteinemia, electrolyte disorders, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hemorrhagic anemia. These results can provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis and active prevention of HCC comorbidity and play a positive role in improving the quality of life of patients with HCC comorbidity.

Author Contributions

X.-M.M. proposed the research idea, carried out the data analysis and wrote the first draft. J.F. designed the research program and contributed to revising the paper after review. Y.-Y.J. carried out the data processing and data analysis. W.W. provided expert consultation and joined discussion of the findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Health Information Center of Jilin Province in the process of data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edwards, B.K.; Noone, A.M.; Mariotto, A.B.; Simard, E.P.; Boscoe, F.P.; Henley, S.J.; Jemal, A.; Cho, H.; Anderson, R.N.; Kohler, B.A.; et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 2014, 120, 1290–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sarfati, D.; Gurney, J.; Lim, B.T.; Bagheri, N.; Simpson, A.; Koea, J.; Dennett, E. Identifying important comorbidity among cancer populations using administrative data: Prevalence and impact on survival. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 12, e47–e56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fan, J.H.; Wang, J.B.; Jiang, Y.; Xiang, W.; Liang, H.; Wei, W.Q.; Qiao, Y.L.; Boffetta, P. Attributable causes of liver cancer mortality and incidence in China. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 14, 7251–7256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Akinyemiju, T.; Abera, S.; Ahmed, M.; Alam, N.; Alemayohu, M.A.; Allen, C.; Al-Raddadi, R.; Alvis-Guzman, N.; Amoako, Y.; Artaman, A.; et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Divo, M.J.; Martinez, C.H.; Mannino, D.M. Number 2 in the series “Multimorbidity and the lung”: Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Barnett, K.; Mercer, S.W.; Norbury, M.; Watt, G.; Wyke, S.; Guthrie, B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012, 380, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sarfati, D.; Koczwara, B.; Jackson, C. The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sogaard, M.; Thomsen, R.; Bossen, K.; Sorensen, H.T.; Horgaard, M. The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: A review. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013, 5, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Drzayich, A.D.; Waldman, C.A.; Khoury, R.; Michael, T.; Renda, A.; Hopson, S.; Parikh, A.; Stein, A.; Costantino, M.; Stemkowski, S.; et al. The relationship between comorbidity medication adherence and health related quality of life among patients with cancer. J. Patient Rep. Outcomes 2018, 2, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chuang, S.C.; La, V.C.; Boffetta, P. Liver cancer: Descriptive epidemiology and risk factors other than HBV and HCV infection. Cancer Lett. 2009, 286, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nyberg, A.H.; Sadikova, E.; Cheetham, C.; Chiang, K.M.; Shi, J.X.; Caparosa, S.; Younossi, Z.M.; Nyberg, L.M. Increased cancer rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 2020, 40, 3685–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ninio, L.; Nissani, A.; Meirson, T.; Domovitz, T.; Genna, A.; Twafra, S.; Srikanth, K.D.; Dabour, R.; Avraham, E.; Davidovich, A.; et al. Hepatitis C virus enhances the invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma via EGFR-mediated invadopodia formation and activation. Cells 2019, 8, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shau, W.Y.; Shao, Y.Y.; Yeh, Y.C.; Lin, Z.Z.; Kuo, R.; Hsu, C.H.; Hsu, C.; Cheng, A.L.; Lai, M.S. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality in patients receiving curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncologist 2012, 17, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Simon, T.G.; King, L.Y.; Chong, D.Q.; Nguyen, L.H.; Ma, Y.; VoPham, T.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Fuchs, C.S.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Corey, K.E.; et al. Diabetes, metabolic comorbidities, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from two prospective cohort studies. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1797–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Saitta, C.; Pollicino, T.; Raimondo, G. Obesity and liver cancer. Ann. Hepatol. 2019, 18, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. London, W.T.; Petrick, J.L.; McGlynn, K.A. Liver cancer. In Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 4th ed.; Thun, M.J., Linet, M.S., Cerhan, J.R., Haiman, C.A., Schottenfeld, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 635–660. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hofmann, S.G.; Curtiss, J.; McNally, R.J. A complex network perspective on clinical science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 11, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Borsboom, D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 2017, 16, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Barabási, A.L.; Gulbahce, N.; Loscalzo, J. Network medicine: A network-based approach to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fried, E.I.; van Borkulo, C.D.; Cramer, A.O.J.; Boschloo, L.; Schoevers, R.A.; Borsboom, D. Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2017, 52, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992; Volume 56, p. 65. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo, M.; Yu, Y.; Wen, T.; Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X. Analysis of disease comorbidity patterns in a large-scale China population. BMC Med. Genom. 2019, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gu, J.; Chao, J.; Chen, W.; Xu, H.; Wu, Z.; Chen, H.; He, T.; Deng, L.; Zhang, R. Multimorbidity in the community-dwelling elderly in urban China. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2017, 68, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Marengoni, A.; Rizzuto, D.; Wang, H.X.; Winblad, B.; Fratiglioni, L. Patterns of chronic multimorbidity in the elderly population. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2009, 57, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bastian, M.; Heymann, S.; Jacomy, M. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, USA, 17–20 May 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. Blondel, V.D.; Guillaume, J.L.; Lambiotte, R.; Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008, 10, P1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Goldacre, M.J.; Wotton, C.J.; Yeates, D.; Seagroatt, V.; Collier, J. Liver cirrhosis, other liver diseases, pancreatitis and subsequent cancer: Record linkage study. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 20, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Persson, E.C.; Quraishi, S.M.; Welzel, T.M.; Carreon, J.D.; Gridley, G.; Graubard, B.I.; McGlynn, K.A. Risk of liver cancer among US male veterans with cirrhosis, 1969–1996. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 107, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Poynard, T.; Peta, V.; Deckmyn, O.; Munteanu, M.; Moussalli, J.; Ngo, Y.; Rudler, M.; Lebray, P.; Pais, R.; Bonyhay, L.; et al. HECAM-FibroFrance Group. LCR1 and LCR2, two multi-analyte blood tests to assess liver cancer risk in patients without or with cirrhosis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 49, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rosmorduc, O. Relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Which clinical arguments? Ann. Endocrinol. 2013, 74, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carrier, P.; Debette-Gratien, M.; Jacques, J.; Loustaud-Ratti, V. Cirrhotic patients and older people. World J. Hepatol. 2019, 11, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jepsen, P. Comorbidity in cirrhosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 7223–7230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Serag, H.B. Current concepts: Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, X.P.; Wu, Z.D.; Huang, Z.Y.; Qiu, F.Z. Use of hepatectomy and splenectomy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhotic hypersplenism. Br. J. Surg. 2005, 92, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma (v.2011). J. Clin. Hepatol. 2011, 11, 22–40. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nayak, N.C.; Vasdev, N.; Saigal, S.; Soin, A.S. End-stage nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Evaluation of pathomorphologic features and relationship to cryptogenic cirrhosis from study of explant livers in a living donor liver transplant program. Hum. Pathol. 2010, 41, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Siegel, A.B.; Zhu, A.X. Metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma: Two growing epidemics with a potential link. Cancer 2009, 115, 5651–5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Osaki, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Tahara, A.; Okamoto, M.; Kishimoto, T. Metabolic syndrome and incidence of liver and breast cancers in Japan. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, 36, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.H.; Gong, J.P. Genes and molecular mechanisms affecting the correlation between liver cancer and diabetes mellitus. Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi Chin. J. Hepatol. 2018, 26, 718–720. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kerdsuknirun, J.; Vilaichone, V.; Vilaichone, R.K. Clinical outcome and predictive factors of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2018, 19, 3301–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 03108 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Distribution of the number of comorbidities in patients with HCC. (B) Average number of comorbidities of HCC patients with different age and sex. (C) Distribution of the number of comorbidities of male HCC patients in each age group. (D) Distribution of the number of comorbidities of female HCC patients in each age group.
Figure 1. (A) Distribution of the number of comorbidities in patients with HCC. (B) Average number of comorbidities of HCC patients with different age and sex. (C) Distribution of the number of comorbidities of male HCC patients in each age group. (D) Distribution of the number of comorbidities of female HCC patients in each age group.
Ijerph 17 03108 g001
Ijerph 17 03108 g002 550
Figure 2. High-frequency comorbidities in patients with HCC.
Figure 2. High-frequency comorbidities in patients with HCC.
Ijerph 17 03108 g002
Ijerph 17 03108 g003 550
Figure 3. The HCC comorbidities network.
Figure 3. The HCC comorbidities network.
Ijerph 17 03108 g003
Ijerph 17 03108 g004 550
Figure 4. The HCC comorbidity modules.
Figure 4. The HCC comorbidity modules.
Ijerph 17 03108 g004
Table
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
VariablesPatients with HCC (n = 14,891) n (%)
Age, year
≤ 39431 (2.89)
40–492172 (14.59)
50–594388 (29.47)
60–695251 (35.26)
≥702649 (17.79)
Sex
Female3572 (23.99)
Male11,319 (76.01)
Nationality
Han13,161 (88.38)
Korean1697 (11.40)
Man117 (0.79)
Other84 (0.56)
Marital status
Married13,987 (93.93)
Single904 (6.07)
Table
Table 2. Comorbidity prevalence and comparison between male and female patients with HCC.
Table 2. Comorbidity prevalence and comparison between male and female patients with HCC.
DiseaseMale Patients (n = 11,319)Female Patients (n = 3572)p-Value
n (%)Rankn (%)Rank
Cirrhosis6495 (57.38)11954 (54.70)10.0049
Chronic viral hepatitis B3557 (31.43)2791 (22.14)2<0.001
Hypertension1389 (17.02)3522 (14.61)4<0.001
Diabetes mellitus1365 (11.97)4379 (10.61)60.0189
Hepatic cyst1179 (10.42)5367 (10.27)70.809
Hypersplenism989 (10.20)6396 (11.09)5<0.001
Ascites971 (8.74)7250 (7.0)100.0027
Renal cyst961 (8.58)8191 (5.35)17<0.001
Chronic viral hepatitis C941 (8.49)9635 (17.78)3<0.001
Hypoproteinemia882 (8.31)10351 (9.83)8<0.001
Lung cancer700 (7.79)11219 (6.13)120.908
Gallbladder stones666 (5.88)12203 (5.68)130.655
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage614 (5.42)13193 (5.40)150.961
Anemia599 (5.39)14250 (7.00)9<0.001
Electrolyte imbalance580 (5.12)15198 (5.54)140.327
Coronary heart disease393 (3.47)25239 (6.69)11<0.001
Table
Table 3. Prevalence of comorbidities by age category (years).
Table 3. Prevalence of comorbidities by age category (years).
Disease≤39 (n = 431) n (%)40–49 (n = 2172) n (%)50–59 (n = 4388) n (%)60–69 (n = 5251) n (%)≥70 (n = 2649) n (%)p-Value
Cirrhosis206 (47.80)1368 (62.98)2654 (60.48)3008 (57.28)1213 (45.79)<0.001
Chronic viral hepatitis B139 (32.25)895 (41.21)1619 (36.90)1351 (25.73)344 (12.99)<0.001
Hypertension2 (0.46)161 (7.41)408 (9.30)841 (16.02)499 (18.84)<0.001
Diabetes mellitus3 (0.70)160 (7.37)571 (13.01)702 (13.37)308 (11.63)<0.001
Chronic viral hepatitis C1 (0.23)36 (1.66)267 (6.08)738 (14.05)534 (20.16)<0.001
Hepatic cyst24 (5.57)157 (7.23)460 (10.48)642 (12.23)263 (9.93)<0.001
Hypersplenism37 (8.58)231 (10.64)401 (9.14)523 (9.96)193 (7.29)<0.001
Hypoproteinemia20 (4.64)189 (8.70)326 (7.43)413 (7.87)285 (10.76)<0.001
Ascites35 (8.12)171 (7.873)418 (9.53)393 (7.48)204 (7.70)0.005
Renal cyst12 (2.78)125 (5.76)347 (7.91)443 (8.44)225 (8.49)<0.001
Lung cancer66 (15.31)149 (6.86)246 (5.61)316 (6.02)142(5.36)<0.001
Gallbladder stones9 (2.09)134 (6.17)217 (4.95)337 (6.42)172 (6.49)<0.001
Anemia11 (2.55)118 (5.43)243 (5.54)285 (5.43)192 (7.25)<0.001
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage21 (4.87)121 (5.57)248 (5.65)261 (4.97)156 (5.89)0.404
Electrolyte imbalance17 (3.94)144 (6.63)197 (4.49)266 (5.07)154 (5.81)0.002
Bone neoplasm25 (5.80)74 (3.41)151 (3.44)172 (3.28)62 (2.34)0.002
Lymphoma24 (5.57)68 (3.13)162 (3.69)197 (3.75)57 (2.15)<0.001
Splenomegaly18 (4.18)135 (6.22)231 (5.26)242 (4.61)78 (2.94)<0.001
Cerebral infarctionNA8 (0.37)83 (1.89)300 (5.71)226 (8.53)<0.001
Coronary heart disease2 (0.46)9 (0.41)94 (2.14)260 (4.95)267 (10.08)< 0.001
Heart failureNA2 (0.09)58 (1.32)144 (2.74)175 (6.61)<0.001
1 NA = not applicable.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mu, X.-M.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Feng, J. Patterns of Comorbidity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093108

AMA Style

Mu X-M, Wang W, Jiang Y-Y, Feng J. Patterns of Comorbidity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mu, Xiao-Min, Wei Wang, Yu-Ying Jiang, and Jia Feng. 2020. "Patterns of Comorbidity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Perspective" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 9: 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop