Next Article in Journal
Environmental Policy Integration in the Energy Sector of China: The Roles of the Institutional Context
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Foreign Sector in the Spanish Bioeconomy: Two Approaches Based on SAM Linear Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technical Efficiency of Regional Public Hospitals in China Based on the Three-Stage DEA

1
School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
2
Institute of Journalism and Communication, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100026, China
3
School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
4
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Vilnius 03220, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(24), 9383; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249383
Submission received: 4 November 2020 / Revised: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 13 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020

Abstract

:
Many countries are facing the increasing cost of healthcare services and the low efficiency of public hospitals. These issues are also evident in China. This paper offers a comprehensive assessment of the efficiency of public hospitals operating in China’s 31 regions. The impact of the third round of reform of the health system in 2009 is assessed based on the three-stage data envelopment analysis procedure. The time period from 2011 to 2018 is covered in this study. Due to different functions performed by the public hospitals and other ones, the number of patients with infectious diseases is incorporated as an output variable reflecting the social function. The outpatient visits and inpatient visits are considered to reflect the outputs related to the private functions. The results imply an increase in the mean efficiency of public hospitals from 0.927 to 0.981 after taking the impact of environmental variables and statistic noise into account. These results indicate that the efficiency of public hospitals is dependent in the operational environment. There are 11 regions whose hospitals operate on the efficiency frontier during the whole period covered. Therefore, the Chinese government should reasonably design and apply the regulatory tools to improve the efficiency of public hospitals.

1. Introduction

It is the increasing cost of health care services delivery that has caused concerns in some countries. China has also faced such challenges. Specifically, China has been experiencing an increase in population, rapid aging of the population and improvement of living standards of residents. All of these factors have led to the increasing demand for health services. In the meantime, China entered the “new normal stage” of the economy in 2014, so it is impossible to increase the supply of health services through building new medical institutions and expanding the operation scale of hospitals as before. Therefore, the health system and institutions are forced to adapt to the changes in economy, society, market, and regulation. As the main provider of health services in China, public hospitals are facing great pressures related to the increasing demand for the medical services. Therefore, policy-makers need to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the use of the scarce medical resources.
China has been implementing the third round of reforms to the medical system since 2009. Differently from the previous two rounds of health care reform, this round does not stress the social benefits, yet seeks for balance between the social benefits and efficiency of the public hospitals. Since 2009, the Chinese government gradually carried out a series of reforms in public hospitals to improve their performance, including the establishment of the basic medical security system, national essential medicine system, improving the primary medical and health service system, promoting the gradual equalization of basic public health services, and the pilot reform of public hospitals.
To increase the bargaining power of the demand side, China established the basic medical insurance program with the widest coverage in the world in 2018. The program allows exploiting the scale effect as it is the largest healthcare service buyer and is able to share the underlying risk among the insured. To control the rapid surge in medical service prices, the drug markup policy in public hospitals had been gradually phased out in some pilot public hospitals since 2009 and eventually abolished nationwide in 2017. The resulting revenue gap is to be covered through the increases in prices of health service, financial subsidies and health insurance. The regulation concerning the price of health service was relaxed. Basic health services were priced according to guidelines set by the regional government while others were priced at the discretion of the public hospitals. To increase the competition in the public hospital sector in China, Chinese government encouraged for-profit hospitals to compete with public hospitals in 2010. Public hospitals were directed towards maintaining public welfare and non-profit activities in 2009. In addition, public hospitals generate revenue by providing health services and public services to patients instead of getting financial subsidy from government directly. The role of government changed from supply side to demand side. The technical efficiency assessment of public hospitals, implying maximum output for minimum input, is an important facet of healthcare sector performance and can provide evidence on the effects of the abovementioned reforms in China.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a versatile tool able to assess the relative efficiency. As such, it has been widely adopted in studies on the health industry. Relying on non-parametric estimation, DEA is suitable for economic analysis when parametric methods face certain obstacles. For example, DEA assumes some basic axioms of production theory without assuming particular functional form of the production function [1], which is required by Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) as a parametric method. Even so, DEA still has drawbacks. The conventional DEA only estimates efficiency of decision making units (e.g., public hospitals), but cannot identify the impact of environmental factors and statistical noise on efficiency, which can be taken into account by the SFA. Therefore, the three-stage DEA approach is employed in the paper. The latter approach is able to overcome the aforementioned shortcomings. DEA is used to estimate the efficiency of public hospitals producing multiple outputs with multiple inputs. For the reasonable assessment, it is crucial to select appropriate inputs and outputs. Bin et al. [2] divided input variables into three categories: physical, human and financial resources. Some studies did not incorporate financial resources into input variables [3,4], whereas some studies attached great importance to human resources and distinguished between different types of personnel [5]. In addition, the number of beds is often used as a proxy of physical resources [2,3,4].
The objective of the paper is to evaluate the efficiency of public hospitals and take into consideration the influence of environmental factors and statistical noise for the case of China. The paper adds to the existing literature in the two aspects, namely method applied and the output variables used. First, to avoid over- or underestimating the efficiency of public hospitals, we employ the three-stage DEA to assess the efficiency of public hospitals. We take the regions as the decision making units, which allows capturing the effects of public hospital reform across different regions during the period covered. Second, the outputs for efficiency assessment include positive externalities reflecting public welfare gains due to the public hospitals. This represents the objectives of Chinese government and is seldom reflected in the previous literature. This study employs the three-stage DEA to estimate the efficiency of the regional public hospitals covering 31 regions in China from 2011 to 2018. The empirical results provide policy implications for decision-makers.
In the next section of the paper, we review research on the assessed efficiency of healthcare providers, especially public hospitals in China. Then, the methodological approach is introduced in Section 3, followed by the data sources and indicators presented in Section 4. The empirical results are given in Section 5. We conclude with a discussion and policy recommendations in Section 6.

2. Literature review

2.1. DEA Literature

It is crucial for accurate evaluation to select the appropriate method. In efficiency analysis, relative performance evaluation is a basis to identify the performance gaps. The technical efficiency refers to how well a public hospital uses inputs to produce outputs. The more outputs are produced with a given amount of inputs, the higher the efficiency. Alternatively, less inputs are used to produce a given amount of outputs, the higher the efficiency. Two different approaches are often employed to evaluate the institution efficiency: SFA and DEA. Both of the methodologies infer efficiency from a residual. The difference between them is that DEA assumes that departures from efficient frontier reflect inefficiency while SFA assumes that the residual reflects inefficiency and random factors. However, SFA requires assuming particular functional form of the production function, though it can analyze the impact of environmental factors and statistical noise on efficiency. Wrongly specified functional form may produce distorted results. Accordingly, DEA is often used as a methodology to assess the efficiency of public hospitals.
The different methods based on DEA have been adopted to evaluate the efficiency of institutions and health system in general. The conventional DEA was employed to gauge the technical efficiency of public hospitals in India [6], Jordan [7,8], Portugal [9], Austria [10], and China [2,11] with input or output orientation. The literature on Chinese public hospital efficiency focuses on the third round of medical reform in China since 2009. Bin et al. [2] adopted DEA to assess efficiency of 19 tertiary general public hospitals in Tianjin and found that the majority of the observations were technical and scale efficient and that health resource constraints and resource waste coexist. Xu et al. [11] used three methods, including DEA, to measure the efficiency of 50 tertiary public hospitals in Beijing.
Another strand of literature focuses on efficiency assessment of health institutions by means of the two-stage DEA. Such an approach allows analyzing the impact of efficiency factors [3,12,13,14,15,16,17], such as reforms of health insurance [3], payment system of medical insurance [12], finance management [17]. In addition, Cho et al. [14] also employed the two-stage approach to evaluate the impact of health information technology adoption and hospital-physician integration on hospital efficiency. Afonso and St. Aubyn [15] used DEA to assess health efficiency of 30 OECD countries and regressed efficiency scores on environmental variables. Hu et al. [3] used two-stage DEA to investigate the regional hospital efficiency before and after health insurance reform of New Rural Cooperative Medical System and the impact of the reform on the efficiency of hospitals in China. Jing et al. [4] employed DEA to evaluate the technical efficiency of public and private hospitals in Beijing and analyzed the factors of technical efficiency.
With few exceptions, most of the previous studies employed the conventional DEA or two-stage DEA to examine the efficiency and its factors of the healthcare systems. DEA and SFA have their own disadvantages, which are easy to overcome in the three-stage DEA approach. The three-stage DEA, proposed by Fried et al. [18], takes the environmental effects and statistical noise into account throughout efficiency assessment. This can provide more accurate efficiency scores and allow eliminating the impact of statistical noise and putting decision-making units (DMUs) under the same external environment.

2.2. Output Variables

Another important issue in efficiency analysis is to determine the input and output variables that characterize the production process in the best possible way. Inputs should incorporate all the necessary resources, and outputs need to describe the managerial objectives of the DMU [19]. The research on hospital performance have little difference in the choice of inputs, mainly including physical, human and financial resources [2]. As regards the choice of outputs, there can be more variety besides the outpatients and inpatients being treated as outputs. Such outputs as patient mortality can enter the model as undesirable outputs [3], successful rescue of critical patients—as a measure of the outputs quality [20]. The selected DEA studies and outputs used are shown in Table 1. Most of the existing literature assumes that the outputs of public hospitals were the same as that of other types of hospitals (i.e., the same outputs are used).
According to China’s strategy towards the public hospitals, they not only undertake the task of providing basic medical services, but also embark on the tasks related to public welfare (e.g., infectious disease prevention, health education, disaster relief). The latter dimension is often neglected in the previous studies. Mead Over and Naoko Watanabe [24] divided the functions of public hospital into social functions and private functions. Social functions refer to the outputs that serve objectives beyond those of the individual patient, including public goods and goods with positive externalities. The examples of such services include dissemination and research, treatment of communicable diseases and a healthcare safety net. Private function is the health services providing benefits for an individual patient. If the choice of the outputs does not conform to the managerial objectives of public hospitals, the results of efficiency analysis will obviously be biased. Therefore, the outputs corresponding to social functions must be incorporated into the outputs.

3. Methods

Fried et al. [18] argued that inefficiency of decision-making units is attributable to managerial inefficiency, environmental factors and statistical noise. These factors are necessary to separate from each other for accurate efficiency assessment. Therefore, the three-stage DEA method was proposed.

3.1. Stage 1: Input-Oriented DEA

In the first stage, the conventional DEA is implemented using the original input and output data. We apply the constant returns to scale input-oriented DEA that corresponds to the cost minimization problem. The efficiency scores for each DMU can be obtained by solving the following linear programming problem:
min θ ε 1 S + 1 S s . t . j = 1 n X j λ j + S = θ X 0 j = 1 n Y j λ j S + = Y 0 λ j 0 , S , S + 0
where θ represents the efficiency score bounded at unity from below; j is the index of DMUs , j = 1 , 2 , , n and X   j and Y   j represent input vector and output vector of DMU j respectively; S + and S denote non-radial slack variables for outputs and inputs respectively; λ j is a weight of DMU   j (intensity variable). Thus, the total slack comprises the radial part captured by θ and the non-radial part captured by S .

3.2. Stage 2: Effects of the Environmental Variables

In the second stage, the slacks of inputs obtained from (1) are used as the explained variables that are regressed on environmental variables. Subsequently, the original input data are adjusted according to the regression results. If the input slacks are regressed separately, the different impact of environmental variables on each input can be assessed at the cost of degrees of freedom [25]. The SFA formulation is applied according to Fried et al. [18] as follows:
S i j = f ( Z j ; β i ) + ν i j + μ i j ; j = 1 , 2 , , n ; i = 1 , 2 , , I ,
where S i j represents the slack of input i of the j-th DMU; Z   j denotes the environmental variables for DMU j ; f ( Z i ; β n ) represents function (impact) of environmental variables affecting input slack S i j , the linear regression is considered so that f ( Z j ; β i ) = β i Z   j ; ν n i + μ n i represents composite error term, with ν n i and μ n i representing the statistical noise and managerial inefficiency respectively. Assuming ν ~ N ( 0 , σ v 2 ) and μ ~ N + ( 0 , σ μ 2 ) , let γ = σ μ i 2 / ( σ μ i 2 + σ ν i 2 ) . The closer the value of γ is to 1, the more managerial inefficiency dominates the composite error of the model.
Fried et al. [18] decomposed mixed error term according to Jondrow et al. [26]. However, Jondrow et al. [26] adopted the composite error of the production function ε = ν μ , whereas the consideration of the input slacks requires the form of the cost function with the composite error ε = ν + μ . The random error is obtained according to Luo [27] as:
E μ ε = σ * ϕ ( λ ε σ ) Φ ( λ ε σ ) + λ ε σ
where σ * = σ μ σ ν σ , σ = σ μ 2 + σ ν 2 and λ = σ μ / σ ν ; ϕ and Φ are the density function and distribution function for the standard normal variables respectively.
The adjusted input value is obtained through
X i j A = X i j + [ max ( f ( Z j ; β i ) ) f ( Z j ; β i ) ] + [ max ( ν i j ) ν i j ] , j = 1 , 2 , , n ; i = 1 , 2 , , I
where X i j and X i j A represents the original input quantity and the adjusted input quantity respectively; [ max ( f ( Z i ; β n ) ) f ( Z i ; β n ) ] adjusts the DMU to external environment; [ max ( ν n i ) ν n i ] adjusts the DMU with regards to the statistical noise. The adjustments place the DMUs (regions) in the most beneficial situation with regards to the operation environment and statistical noise.

3.3. Stage 3: Recalculation of the Efficiency Scores

In the third stage, we replace the original input quantities with the adjusted input quantities from (3), and repeat the first stage analysis by applying DEA in (1) to the adjusted data. Then, the efficiency scores from the third stage are compared to those from the first stage.

4. Data

This paper uses the following inputs:
(1)
The number of licensed (assistant) doctors.
(2)
The number of other technical staff, including registered nurses, pharmacists, and other technicians.
(3)
The number of managers.
(4)
The number of beds.
With regard to the selection of outputs, we add an output variable reflecting the output of public hospitals’ social functions besides outpatients and inpatients services. Still, there is no consensus on the measurement of social functions (output). Jin and Song [28] used incidence rate of infectious diseases as a measure of social function (output) of public health sector. Following Jin and Song [28], we use the number of infectious patients treated in public hospitals as a measure of social function (output). The infectious diseases refer to class A and B notifiable infectious diseases in China covering 27 species, including plague, cholera, viral hepatitis, syphilis. Thus, the outputs in our study include:
(1)
The number of outpatient visits.
(2)
The number of inpatients visits.
(3)
The number of infectious patients treated in public hospitals.
Generally, the number of DMUs is required to be twice the sum of the numbers of input variables and output variables [19]. This condition is met in this study (31 > 2 × (4 + 3)). The descriptive statistics for inputs/outputs are given in Table 2.
In the DEA model, input variables and output variables should satisfy the monotonicity property, i.e., the outputs should not decrease with increase in input quantities. The Pearson correlation coefficient is employed to examine this issue (Table 3). The correlation coefficients among inputs and output are positive and range from 0.665 to 0.955. This indicates that the choice of the input and output indicators conforms to the theoretical requirements.
Hospital performances is not only influenced by the controllable factors, such as inputs and outputs, but also by environmental variables beyond its control. Hu et al. [3] categorized the environmental variables influencing performance of public hospitals into market conditions, ownership, and regulation of government. Based on the aforementioned approach, we consider the following environmental variables for China’s public hospitals:
(1)
The price of medical services. The high levels of medical service price have been a common concern in China. Indeed, high prices of the health services induce economic burden resulting in reduction in demand for medical services. The expenditure per outpatient visit and expenditure per inpatient visit are used to measure the price of outpatient services and the price of inpatient service respectively.
(2)
Insurance penetration. Due to the differences in medical insurance plans, the ratio of the covered by the basic medical insurance to population in a region is adopted to reflect the reform of medical insurance. The insurance penetration can affect both supply and demand side of medical services. As a professional third buyer, the insurance can force public hospitals to improve efficiency and quality of medical services, because insurance can adjust the patients’ demand for some hospital’ medical services via the reimbursement policies. Increasing insurance penetration allows sharing economic risks among the insured, so that patients access the medical services in a timely manner. Thus, reasonable medical insurance is expected to be positively related to the efficiency of public hospitals.
(3)
Public subsidies. Public subsidies represent government’s responsibility for medical service. The subsidy is measured by the ratio of government subsidies to the total public hospitals’ income. Public subsidies are expected to improve efficiency through hiring more skilled staff and purchasing advanced equipment. Still, a moral hazard problem may arise as public hospitals can survive even if they reduce their efforts to produce high-quality medical services.
(4)
Competition. Chinese government expects public hospitals to improve their performance through competition with for-profit hospitals. The ratio of the number of for-profit hospitals to total hospitals in a province is employed to measure the intensity of competition. The for-profit hospitals are expected to force public hospitals to get more revenue by improvement in quality and reduction in cost, which lead improvement in efficiency.
(5)
Quality of health services. The ratio of tertiary public hospitals to total hospitals in a region is employed to measure the quality of health services in the market. The higher the ratio, the better the quality of health services is expected. The tertiary hospitals can combinate the advanced medical equipment and skilled staff to provide more healthcare services. So, quality of health services is also expected to be positively correlated with hospital efficiency.
(6)
Demand for medical services. Children and elderly are likely to exhibit higher demand for health services. Thus, the ratio of population aged 0–14 and above 65 years to the total populations in a region is used to measure the demand for health service. In general, the increase in demand for medical service may lead to more skilled doctors, resulting in improvement in efficiency of public hospitals.
The environmental variables are described in Table 4 and Table 5.
Since 2009, China has been implementing the third round of the health system reform. Once the reform policies are effective, a certain lag period is required to manifest their effects. Accordingly, 2011 is selected as the starting year for the analysis. The most recent data can be obtained for 2018. Accordingly, the period of 2011–2018 is chosen for the analysis. The province-level data describing performance of the public hospitals are obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics of China and Statistical Information Center of the National Health Commission. Due to absence of relevant data of Tibet in 2012, this paper applies interpolation in this case.

5. Results

The efficiency scores based on (1) for 31 regions during 2011–2018 are given in Table 6. The efficiency scores in the first and third stages are estimated separately for each year. The results are provided in Table 6 and Table 9. Note that the second stage assumes independent distribution of the error terms and utilizes the pooled data.
In general, the performance of regional public hospitals in China slightly decreased during the period of 2011–2018 as the mean efficiency score declined from 0.926 in 2011 down to 0.915 in 2018. The inverse U-shaped trend peaking in 2015 is observed for the mean efficiency scores. Indeed, it was in 2015 that China entered the “new normal stage” of economy when the growth rate of government investment in the health system began to decline. The numbers of efficient regions range from 13 to 17. This is related to relatively high number of the input and output variables. Eleven regions are fully efficient during 2011–2018. These regions include Shanghai, Zhejiang, Shandong, Hunan, Guangdong, Guangxi, Yunnan, Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai, and Xinjiang. It is found that the efficiency score of regional public hospitals in Shanxi is the lowest among the regions (0.653). In the first stage, the efficiency of public hospitals may be biased due to differences in the operation environment and statistical noise. We proceed to the SFA-based analysis to isolate the managerial inefficiency (i.e., performance in transforming inputs into outputs) from effects of the environmental variables and statistical noise.
Table 7 presents the average slacks (including both radial and non-radial part) for the four inputs. These values indicate the possible contraction in the input quantities for a given technology and output levels. The annual results are presented in Appendix A.
Table 8 shows the SFA results for the second stage analysis. The likelihood ratio test indicates that each regression is significant at 1% significance level, indicating that it is reasonable to apply the SFA model. In addition, most of the estimated coefficients for environmental variables pass the significance test at acceptable level of significance. Therefore, the environmental variables exert significant effects on the slacks and, hence, technical efficiency.
The positive regression coefficients for environmental variables imply that an increase in the environmental variable will result in an increase in the slack variable under evaluation. Thus, an increase in the environmental variable will further increase the input redundancy to and reduce the efficiency of public hospitals. On the contrary, a negative regression coefficient of environmental variables to some slack variable implies that the increase in environmental variable will result in a decrease in the slack variable which will improve the performance of public hospitals.
In all the models, regression coefficients associated with the average medical expenses of outpatients are significantly positive at the 1% significance level, indicating positive correlation between average medical expenses of outpatients and input slacks. An increase in the price of outpatient services will lead to the increase of the input redundancy in licensed doctors, registered nurse, other technical staff, and beds, which had negative effects on the efficiency of public hospitals. The possible reason is that the high price of outpatient service hinders the patients’ access to outpatient service, resulting in idle resources and reducing the efficiency of public hospitals.
The regression coefficients for the average medical expenses of inpatients are negative and significant (except for licensed doctors). The increase in the price of inpatient services results in the decrease of the input redundancy in registered nurses, other technical staff, and beds. Such changes lead to improved efficiency of public hospitals. China’s government reduced the prices of outpatient and inpatient services simultaneously during the latest round of the reform. However, the difference between the prices of outpatient and inpatient service is so small that patients with common diseases and chronic diseases tend to replace outpatient services with inpatient service, which results in congestion of inpatient services which undermines the efficiency of public hospitals.
The regression coefficient for Insura is negative and statistically significant in the input slack of beds regression, whereas the corresponding regression coefficients in the regressions for other input slack variables are positive. Thus, Insura exerts two opposite effects: the increase in the ratio of the covered by the basic medical insurance to the total population is accompanied by a decrease in the input redundancy of beds (which increases efficiency of public hospitals), and increase in the input redundancy of licensed doctors, registered nurses, other technical staff which reduced the technical efficiency. The aim of improving the efficiency of public hospitals by increasing the penetration of the health insurance may not be achieved in case the existing insurance systems are not redesigned.
Public subsidies show significant negative impact on the slacks of licensed doctors and number of beds, whereas significantly positive effects are observed for other inputs. It may be explained by the fact the public subsidies are likely to have dual effects towards opposite directions. The Chinese government subsidizes public hospitals on a per-person basis, rather than financing healthcare services, which may be the cause of the problem. Thus, the Chinese government needs to reform the subsidy schemes to induce efficiency gains in the public hospitals.
Competition show no significant effect on technical staff (even though a negative value is observed), whereas the other coefficients are significantly positive suggesting that the increase in the intensity of competition will be accompanied by an increase in the input redundancy of licensed doctors, registered nurses, and beds. Obviously, this pattern indicates that increasing competition tends to decrease the efficiency of public hospitals. China’s government expects to public hospitals to improve their efficiency through competition with for-profit hospitals. However, due to apparent monopoly of the public hospitals, the for-profit hospitals do not compete directly with public ones, rather embark on the monopolistic competition by providing services that are not available at the public hospitals. This situation does not provide the public hospitals the incentives to improve their performance.
The quality of health services (as represented by the share of the tertiary level hospitals) affects negatively all the input slack variables (significant at the 1% level). The increase in the quality of health services reduces the input redundancy thereby improving the performance of public hospitals. The higher ratio of tertiary public hospitals to total hospitals implies that more skilled staff and advanced equipment are available in a certain province which induces efficiency gains.
Similar to the case of the quality of medical services, the regression coefficients on demand for medical services are significantly negative (at the 1% level) against all the inputs. Accordingly, an increase in demand for medical services is to be associated with a reduced input redundancy and improved performance of the public hospitals. A region with the higher ratio of population aged 0−14 and above 65 years to the total populations exhibits higher demand for medical services and, likely, a higher level of efficiency.
In the second stage, we isolated statistical noise according to (2) (inefficiency term in the SFA model remained ignored), and obtained the adjusted input quantities that take into account the impact of environmental variables and statistical noise as per (3). Then, the third stage embarked on calculation of the efficiency scores by exploiting (1) and the adjusted input quantities along with the initial output quantities. The adjusted efficiency scores are presented in Table 9.
Comparison of data in Table 6 and Table 9 suggests that the average of efficiency of the for 31 regions increased up to 0.981 from 0.927 due to adjustment in accordance with the environmental variables and statistical noise. This implies that efficiency of public hospitals was underestimated in the first stage, i.e., the operational environment affects the input quantities in a negative manner: input quantities are increased to take the environment-implied constraints into account which renders lower levels of efficiency. Even, so, the efficiency change trend persists as the mean efficiency scores reported in Table 9 follow the inverse U-shaped trend. The average of number of efficient DMUs also increases from 15.25 to 18.75 after input variables are adjusted via the three-stage procedure.
As for individual regions, 11 regions remained fully efficient over the period covered after implementing the three-stage procedure. The regions with fully efficient public hospital operation (after adjustment for environmental conditions) include Tianjin, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Shandong, Hunan, Guangdong, Yunnan, Tibet, Gansu, Ningxia, and Xinjiang. Compared with the regions on the efficient frontier in the first stage, Guangxi and Qinghai were replaced by Tianjin and Ningxia. It can be also found that the efficiency values of 17 regional public hospitals are underestimated, including those in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Jiangsu, Anhui, Fujian, Hainan, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Ningxia in case the environmental variables are not accounted for. Public hospitals in Shanxi have the poorest performance (0.899) after accounting for environmental context, yet this province experienced the highest increase in the efficiency score (the change of 0.246). In addition, the efficiency scores of 5 regions are overestimated in case the environmental factors are not taken into account: Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Guangxi, and Qinghai. The efficiency score for Jiangxi declined to the highest extent (from 0.991 to 0.983) during the three-stage procedure.

6. Conclusions

The three-stage DEA was employed to assess the efficiency of public hospital performance across 31 regions in China during 2011–2018. The inputs included the numbers of licensed doctors, registered nurses, other technical staff and beds. The output variables included the numbers of outpatients, inpatients and infectious patients. Note that the output variables used in this study reflect both the private and social functions. Indeed, the latter functions were often ignored in the previous literature.
The results showed that the efficiency across and ranking of the regions is altered due to the introduction of the environmental variables describing the operation context of the public hospitals across the regions. Therefore, it is necessary to eliminate the effects of environmental factors and statistic noise when assessing the performance of China’s public hospitals in order to obtain robust results. In general, the efficiency of public hospital operation was underestimated. The mean efficiency score increased from 0.927 to 0.981 after accounting for the impact of environmental variables and statistical noise. The trend of the efficiency scores followed an inverted U-shape with an upturn during 2011–2015 and a decline thereafter.
Most of environmental variables adopted in this analysis had significant effects on the performance of public hospitals. The government should reasonably set the price of medical service and appropriately expand the price gap between outpatient service and inpatient service. For the patients’ accessibility to medical services, the Chinese government attempted to keep the prices of outpatient service and inpatient service unchanged or to even reduce the prices by price regulation, which will damage the performance of public hospitals according to the viewpoint of this paper. The government should decrease the price of outpatient service to ensure the patients’ accessibility, and increase the price of inpatient service to prevent outpatients’ abusing inpatient services due to the difference in reimbursement plan.
The results indicate that the Chinese government should change the subsidy basis in order to avoid different treatment of the provinces. As an important means of regulation, public subsidies should act as an impetus to induce efficiency gains in the public hospitals. Currently, however, the moral hazard occurs and renders negative effects of the subsidies. Accordingly, the Chinese government is suggested to subsidize public hospitals on the basis of the healthcare services provided rather than on a per person basis. In addition, higher subsidies should be allocated to the social functions of the public hospitals. This will allow producing safety nets though prevention and treatment of infectious diseases that are becoming more and more important.
The insurance schemes should also be redesigned. The insurance can influence the patients’ demand for medical services through reimbursement plan. A reasonable reimbursement plan can guide patients to visit to hospital dependent on their condition. Patients with mild diseases should be encouraged to visit the primary hospitals for outpatient services while ones with sever diseases visit to the second-level hospitals and tertiary hospitals for inpatient services. In addition, the insurance can force public hospitals to improve their performance, as insurance can adjust patients’ demand for certain healthcare services through reimbursement schedules. So far, insurance needs to be further improved as the environment of the public hospital operation is distorted by the presence of the currently existing insurance systems.
This paper focused on the efficiency patterns. Further research could attempt to identify the productivity change and its drivers in order to gain insights into the dynamics of the public hospital performance in China. The sources of productivity growth could also be identified. Furthermore, different sets of the input and output variables could be tested.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Z.C., T.B., and X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C., X.C., L.C., and K.B.; writing—review and editing, X.G. and T.B.; project administration, L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 71663034) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No 9192018).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. The Input Slacks for 2011–2018

Table A1. The slack of licensed doctors over 2011–2018.
Table A1. The slack of licensed doctors over 2011–2018.
20112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing15,988 17,439 16,407 17,250 19,517 19,511 18,934 26,551
Tianjin5378 5447 5453 5463 6799 7286 9051 9539
Hebei0 0 0 0 23,487 0 28,552 36,823
Shanxi23,643 23,135 23,623 23,553 23,805 22,814 22,191 24,189
Inner Mongolia9645 9935 11,070 10,310 11,528 11,415 10,622 11,218
Liaoning17,753 17,072 12,322 11,204 12,265 11,939 18,924 23,839
Jilin11,267 10,947 10,436 9590 11,596 12,557 11,693 13,443
Heilongjiang15,795 15,283 12,803 13,932 11,368 8533 0 14,340
Shanghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jiangsu10,900 15,265 13,685 12,893 13,048 12,899 22,654 24,580
Zhejiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anhui4479 7593 6128 5729 4238 6174 7403 9795
Fujian0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2752
Jiangxi1092 1283 355 0 0 0 0 2624
Shandong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Henan0 0 0 0 0 1380 2116 0
Hubei0 797 16 0 0 0 0 0
Hunan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangdong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangxi0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hainan1263 1142 976 1015 1061 1051 0 1101
Chongqing1763 2107 3047 3451 3332 7399 5461 9853
Sichuan2720 3793 4734 7297 3107 0 44282 13,788
Guizhou3302 5047 4095 3088 3767 7375 4988 8345
Yunnan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tibet0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shaanxi6977 6511 6569 6437 5563 8743 0 9614
Gansu0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qinghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ningxia291 0 269 538 262 1005 1224 939
Xinjiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table A2. The slack of registered nurses over 2011–2018.
Table A2. The slack of registered nurses over 2011–2018.
20112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing22,02722,24419,16321,67724,00921,77515,43930,828
Tianjin36083899355239604922525162807529
Hebei000013930408412,802
Shanxi24,06522,49526,43026,59428,94829,93934,72931,797
Inner Mongolia937010,90612,96714,74017,14917,19918,37314,949
Liaoning23,25622,35919,62318,18216,11919,72423,52632,817
Jilin10,40296679820989011,27315,96514,02417,300
Heilongjiang18,05918,40916,66916,51614,16613,564017,891
Shanghai00000000
Jiangsu19,35125,48723,65124,40523,70222,97033,12038,559
Zhejiang00000000
Anhui903812,33211,27110,59211,09011,779861916,227
Fujian000000011,553
Jiangxi379041674023000010,323
Shandong00000000
Henan00000247737650
Hubei06372900000
Hunan00000000
Guangdong00000000
Guangxi00000000
Hainan34204135436149795241492706026
Chongqing3048472156626536732414,72012,01419,390
Sichuan43166328816312,97710,418088,85727,495
Guizhou6113834570925826712814,292968116,525
Yunnan00000000
Tibet00000000
Shaanxi13,45814,42116,48616,00914,61818,516023,218
Gansu00000000
Qinghai00000000
Ningxia198801368873558139136713279
Xinjiang00000000
Table A3. The slack of other technical staff over 2011–2018.
Table A3. The slack of other technical staff over 2011–2018.
20112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing4297 4414 4585 5249 5378 5071 4227 6749
Tianjin3357 3650 3660 3704 3491 3285 3290 3059
Hebei0 0 0 0 136 0 927 1796
Shanxi3266 3026 3607 3297 3387 4086 3861 4081
Inner Mongolia1068 1367 1906 2575 2757 2927 3134 3361
Liaoning3119 3612 3201 3071 2967 4196 4401 4808
Jilin3777 3937 4219 3971 4427 4896 4315 5256
Heilongjiang5106 5511 5370 5340 4872 4930 0 5639
Shanghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jiangsu2149 2636 2259 2117 2158 1926 3407 4094
Zhejiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anhui782 1204 1022 927 686 987 724 1350
Fujian0 0 0 0 0 0 0 203
Jiangxi91 204 52 0 0 0 0 17
Shandong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Henan0 0 0 0 0 1423 2369 0
Hubei0 122 114 0 0 0 0 0
Hunan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangdong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangxi0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hainan353 554 655 744 855 964 0 783
Chongqing994 1266 1815 2081 2503 4284 3986 3921
Sichuan2985 3278 4017 5763 3725 0 12,426 5308
Guizhou1095 1770 1371 871 1719 3095 2683 2964
Yunnan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tibet0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shaanxi5009 5322 5929 6333 6635 7603 0 9077
Gansu0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qinghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ningxia52 0 44 90 7 157 361 256
Xinjiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table A4. The slack of beds over 2011–2018.
Table A4. The slack of beds over 2011–2018.
20112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing7905 7454 3528 6888 4078 372 17,543 9866
Tianjin1257 4549 5876 7082 8128 7153 9681 9141
Hebei0 0 0 0 8614 0 25,582 42,245
Shanxi42,944 40,256 42,434 42,708 49,704 49,898 58,443 53,914
Inner Mongolia17,090 20,364 23,937 26,877 30,804 29,903 32,266 26,288
Liaoning44,460 43,789 38,802 39,751 33,600 51,487 67,758 76,685
Jilin21,486 20,162 21,162 21,180 23,816 33,927 28,612 34,953
Heilongjiang34,838 36,532 33,541 34,281 30,014 28,680 0 58,769
Shanghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jiangsu43,864 56,405 60,558 62,028 54,313 59,537 81,385 84,580
Zhejiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anhui14,126 22,141 20,333 19,187 14,475 21,021 15,582 29,533
Fujian0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4246
Jiangxi1569 3885 1137 0 0 0 0 456
Shandong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Henan0 0 0 0 0 33031 46339 0
Hubei0 1146 840 0 0 0 0 0
Hunan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangdong0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guangxi0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hainan847 1860 292 564 971 792 0 69
Chongqing15,108 21,897 27,185 26,650 35,344 29,069 46,442 38,057
Sichuan10,876 38,725 42,204 52,037 40,443 0 238,709 86,017
Guizhou10,696 20,792 25,462 39,597 41,320 29,004 48,153 32,432
Yunnan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tibet0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shaanxi21,091 20,591 22,086 33,954 32,117 30,009 0 32,417
Gansu0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qinghai0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ningxia878 0 1786 1638 122 2505 3682 2512
Xinjiang0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

References

  1. Färe, R.; Primont, D. Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun, B.; Zhang, L.; Yang, W.; Zhang, J.; Luo, D.; Han, C. Data envelopment analysis on evaluating the efficiency of public hospitals in Tianjin, China. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2016, 22, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, H.-H.; Qi, Q.; Yang, C.-H. Analysis of hospital technical efficiency in China: Effect of health insurance reform. China Econ. Rev. 2012, 23, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jing, R.; Xu, T.; Lai, X.; Mahmoudi, E.; Fang, H. Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Comparative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chilingerian, J.A.; Sherman, H. Health-Care Applications: From Hospitals to Physicians, from Productive Efficiency to Quality Frontiers. In Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis; Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jat, T.R.; Sebastian, M.S. Technical efficiency of public district hospitals in Madhya Pradesh, India: A data envelopment analysis. Glob. Health Action 2013, 6, 21742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ajlouni, M.M.; Zyoud, A.; Jaber, B.; Shaheen, H.; Al-Natour, M.; Anshasi, R.J. The Relative Efficiency of Jordanian Public Hospitals Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Pabon Lasso Diagram. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 7, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sultan, W.I.; Crispim, J. Evaluating the Productive Efficiency of Jordanian Public Hospitals. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rego, G.; Nunes, R.; Costa, J. The challenge of corporatization: The experience of Portuguese public hospitals. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2010, 11, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Czypionka, T.; Kraus, M.; Mayer, S.; Röhrling, G. Efficiency, ownership, and financing of hospitals: The case of Austria. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2013, 17, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, G.-C.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, Z.-J.; Zhou, C.-K.; Zhao, Y. Comparative Study of Three Commonly Used Methods for Hospital Efficiency Analysis in Beijing Tertiary Public Hospitals, China. Chin. Med. J. 2015, 128, 3185–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cavalieri, M.; Guccio, C.; Lisi, D.; Pignataro, G. Does the Extent of per Case Payment System Affect Hospital Efficiency? Public Financ. Rev. 2018, 46, 117–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Biørn, E.; Hagen, T.P.; Iversen, T.; Magnussen, J. How different are hospitals’ responses to a financial reform? The impact on efficiency of activity-based financing. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2010, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cho, N.-E.; Chang, J.; Atems, B. The effects of health information technology adoption and hospital-physician integration on hospital efficiency. Am. J. Manag. Care 2014, 20, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Afonso, A.; Aubyn, M.S. Assessing health efficiency across countries with a two-step and bootstrap analysis. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2011, 18, 1427–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, H.; Zelenyuk, V. Performance of hospital services in Ontario: DEA with truncated regression approach. Omega 2016, 63, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Marschall, P.; Flessa, S. Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis. Health Econ. Rev. 2011, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fried, H.O.; Lovell, C.A.K.; Schmidt, S.S.; Yaisawarng, S. Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Prod. Anal. 2002, 17, 157–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kohl, S.; Schoenfelder, J.; Fügener, A.; Brunner, J.O. The use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2019, 22, 245–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. XUE Xin-dong. The Productive Efficiency of China’s Health Care System and its Determinants-Evidence on Provincial Panel Data from 2003–2006. J. Shanxi Financ. Econ. Univ. 2012, 3, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, R.C.; Tangsoc, J.C.; See, S.L.; Cantor, V.J.M.; Tan, M.L.L.; Yu, R.J.S. A DEA-based Performance Measurement Mathematical Model and Software Application System Applied to Public Hospitals in the Philippines. DLSU Bus. Econ. Rev. 2016, 25, 166–196. [Google Scholar]
  22. Barnum, D.T.; Walton, S.M.; Shields, K.L.; Schumock, G.T. Measuring Hospital Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis: Nonsubstitutable vs. Substitutable Inputs and Outputs. J. Med. Syst. 2011, 35, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giménez, V.; Prieto, W.; Prior, D.; Tortosa-Ausina, E. Evaluation of efficiency in Colombian hospitals: An analysis for the post-reform period. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2019, 65, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Over, M.; Watanabe, N. Evaluating the impact of organizational reforms in hospitals. In Innovations in Health Service Delivery: The Corporatization of Public Hospitals; Preker, A.S., Harding, A., Eds.; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 105–166. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wei, C.; Xuan, W.; Jinqiu, L.; Zhijun, F. Study on the relationship between enterprises social network position and R&D efficiency: Based on the method of three-stage DEA model. Manag. Rev. 2020, 3, 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jondrow, J.; Lovell, C.K.; Materov, I.S.; Schmidt, P. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J. Econ. 1982, 19, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dengyue, L. A Note on Estimating Managerial Inefficiency of Three-Stage DEA Model. Stat. Res. 2012, 29, 104–107. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jin, R.; Song, X. Performance analysis of public health expenditure in China under the background of new health care reform—Empirical Analysis Based on DEA and Mulmquist productivity index. Public Financ. Res. 2012, 9, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Selected DEA studies.
Table 1. Selected DEA studies.
ReferenceContextOutputs
Li et al. [21]Public hospitals in the PhilippinesTotal patients;
Laboratory services;
Net Death Rate
Hu et al. [3]Chinese regional hospitalsThe total number of outpatient and emergency room visits;
The total number of inpatient days;
Patient mortality (undesired outputs).
Ajlouni et al. [7]Jordanian public hospitalsThe annual number of patient days;
Number of minor surgical operations per year;
Number of major surgical operations per year.
Barnum et al. [22]Community hospitals in the Units StatesAnnual Inpatients;
Annual Outpatients.
Giénez et al. [23]Colombian public hospitalssum of the weighted services provided by hospitals’ relative value unit.
Paul and Steffen [17]The primary care facilities in rural Burkina FasoGeneral consultation and nursing care;
Deliveries;
Immunization;
Special services.
Sultan and Crispim [8]Jordanian public hospitalsInpatient days;
Outpatient services;
Ambulance and emergency services.
Bin et al. [2]Public hospitals in ChinaNumber of outpatient and emergency visits;
Number of discharged inpatients;
Total revenue.
Jing et al. [4]Public hospitals in ChinaOutpatient and emergency visits;
Inpatient discharges;
Revenue.
Xue [20]China’s health care systemOutpatient visits;
Discharged inpatients;
Surgical operations;
Successful rescue of critical patients.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for inputs and outputs (2011–2018).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for inputs and outputs (2011–2018).
CategoryVariableMeanS.D.MinMax
InputsLicensed doctors53,06034,1862341166,567
Registered nurses92,02659,5351951279,184
Other technical staff96615593.02136723,898
Beds164,182106,0775385460,703
OutputsInfectious patients100,30068,8207061387,240
Outpatient84,499,41567,081,4862,901,304339,038,474
Inpatients4,275,4222,775,257101,51012,005,845
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficients for input and output indicators.
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficients for input and output indicators.
CorrelatesLicensed DoctorsRegistered NurseOther Technical StaffBeds
Outpatient0.6920.8460.7720.757
Inpatient0.7670.9550.8610.946
Infectious patients0.6890.7180.6650.704
Table 4. Description of the environmental variables.
Table 4. Description of the environmental variables.
NotationUnitDefinition
OpriceYuan per visitAverage medical expenses of outpatients
IpriceYuan per visitAverage medical expenses of inpatients
Insura%ratio of the insured of basic medical insurance to population
Subsid%ratio of government subsidy to the public hospital income
Compet%ratio of the number of for-profit hospitals to total hospitals
Qualit%ratio of tertiary public hospitals to total hospitals
Demand%ratio of population aged 0–14 and above 65 years to populations
Table 5. Descriptive statistics for environmental variables.
Table 5. Descriptive statistics for environmental variables.
VariableMeanS.D.MinMax
Oprice218.1862.4275.4530.9
Iprice8574.633241.693906.322645.8
Insura0.46770.25380.12861.084
Subsid0.32670.09470.20090.7155
Compet0.47800.15040.04850.7846
Qualit0.07740.03120.01890.1574
Demand0.2640.0350.1620.336
Note: The basic medical insurance includes medical insurance for urban and rural residents, medical insurance for urban employees, and free medical services for retirees. In case the categories of insurance overlap for some residents, the insurance penetration ratio can exceed 1. For example, an employee retires in the middle of the year, which is recorded twice that year. However, due to the small proportion, it does not affect the measurement of the insured ratio.
Table 6. The efficiency scores of regions in the first stage (2011–2018.).
Table 6. The efficiency scores of regions in the first stage (2011–2018.).
Province20112012201320142015201620172018Mean
Beijing0.910.920.9630.9330.9610.9970.8460.9150.931
Tianjin0.9690.8980.8870.8820.8610.8750.8390.8490.883
Hebei11110.98910.9740.9230.986
Shanxi0.6120.6640.6690.6810.6460.6610.6210.670.653
Inner Mongolia0.7650.7520.7390.7290.7070.7270.7280.7920.742
Liaoning0.740.7640.8030.8250.8520.8310.810.7480.797
Jilin0.7730.7990.8010.8140.7980.7390.7740.7510.781
Heilongjiang0.7310.7410.7780.790.8270.84210.8040.814
Shanghai111111111
Jiangsu0.8510.820.850.8660.8720.8850.8410.8270.852
Zhejiang111111111
Anhui0.90.860.8810.8980.9290.9030.9330.8840.899
Fujian11111110.9710.996
Jiangxi0.9820.9620.9911110.9970.991
Shandong111111111
Henan111110.9880.98310.996
Hubei10.9931111110.999
Hunan111111111
Guangdong111111111
Guangxi111111111
Hainan0.960.9190.9880.9790.9680.97510.9980.973
Chongqing0.920.9130.8850.8830.8950.7870.8570.7650.863
Sichuan0.960.950.9430.9180.96710.5840.8780.900
Guizhou0.8640.8170.8680.9060.8980.8180.8890.8290.861
Yunnan111111111
Tibet111111111
Shaanxi0.8160.8380.8460.8570.8850.83410.8410.865
Gansu111111111
Qinghai111111111
Ningxia0.9610.9690.9430.9960.9220.8940.930.952
Xinjiang111111111
Mean0.9260.9230.9310.9320.9370.9290.9220.9150.927
Efficient DMUs151515161516171315.25
Table 7. Mean values of the four slack variables for 2011–2018.
Table 7. Mean values of the four slack variables for 2011–2018.
ProvinceLicensed DoctorsRegistered NurseOther Technical StaffBeds
Beijing18,95022,14549967204
Tianjin6802487534376608
Hebei11,10822853579555
Shanxi23,36928,125357647,538
Inner Mongolia10,71814,457238725,941
Liaoning15,66521,951367249,541
Jilin11,44112,293435025,662
Heilongjiang11,50714,409459632,082
Shanghai0000
Jiangsu15,74126,406259362,834
Zhejiang0000
Anhui644211,36996019,550
Fujian344144425531
Jiangxi669278846881
Shandong0000
Henan4377804749921
Hubei1028329248
Hunan0000
Guangdong0000
Guangxi0000
Hainan9514136613674
Chongqing45529177260629,969
Sichuan996519,819468863,627
Guizhou50019375194630,932
Yunnan0000
Tibet0000
Shaanxi630214,591573824,033
Gansu0000
Qinghai0000
Ningxia56616411211640
Xinjiang0000
Table 8. The SFA results for the second-stage analysis.
Table 8. The SFA results for the second-stage analysis.
Environmental VariablesInput Slack Variables
Licensed DoctorsRegistered NursesOther Technical StaffBeds
Constant17,123.43 ***
(713.82)
21,039.96 ***
(1453.02)
5762.96 ***
(345.2)
21,653.04 ***
(1.06)
Oprice38.08 ***
(14.32)
63.35 ***
(18.67)
18.38 ***
(4.6)
88.86 **
(43.13)
Iprice−0.37
(0.29)
−1.2 ***
(0.38)
−0.26 ***
(0.07)
−1.72 *
(1.02)
Insura2155.1 *
(1260.77)
3207.5 *
(1721.54)
565.8
(390.04)
−4801.3 ***
(1.01)
Subsid−1723.9 ***
(308.9)
4163.1 ***
(591.78)
968.3 ***
(283.61)
−21,164.7 ***
(1.01)
Compet5609.2***
(2.07)
11,418.7***
(812.85)
−559.5
(1013.59)
48,806.9 ***
(1.04)
Qualit−72,477.4 ***
(49.34)
−58,172.4 ***
(122.63)
−14,628.4 ***
(649.94)
−102,167.1 ***
(1)
Demand−79,566.6 ***
(245.47)
−108,809.2 ***
(408.48)
−26,107.1 ***
(1098.74)
−141,534.5 ***(1)
Sigma-squared74,340,902 ***
(1)
149,417,560 ***
(1)
5,798,688.6 ***
(2.12)
890,435,570 ***
(1)
γ0.79 ***
(0.02)
0.79 ***
(0.02)
0.83 ***
(0.01)
0.77 ***
(0.02)
Log likelihood−2454.19−2533.56−2101.38−2761.6
One-sided LR Test132.22 ***143.60 ***180.09 ***133.2 ***
Note: *, **, *** denote significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% statistical levels respectively; Figures in parentheses are standard errors.
Table 9. The efficiency scores of 31 regional public hospitals adjusted for operation environment and statistical noise (2011–2018).
Table 9. The efficiency scores of 31 regional public hospitals adjusted for operation environment and statistical noise (2011–2018).
Province20112012201320142015201620172018Mean
Beijing1111110.97710.997
Tianjin111111111
Hebei11111110.9740.997
Shanxi0.8990.9290.90.9120.8910.9010.8610.8980.899
Inner Mongolia0.9860.9610.9350.9340.9310.9390.9070.9620.944
Liaoning0.8790.8970.9250.9410.9480.9430.9260.8790.917
Jilin0.9570.9770.9830.980.9750.950.9550.9450.965
Heilongjiang0.9090.9070.9310.9410.9550.9610.9470.944
Shanghai111111111
Jiangsu0.9470.9140.920.9360.9350.9350.9050.8970.924
Zhejiang111111111
Anhui0.9670.9690.9710.9860.9760.9740.9680.960.971
Fujian11111110.9981.000
Jiangxi0.9640.9650.9751110.9720.9890.983
Shandong111111111
Henan111110.9840.98510.996
Hubei0.9980.9940.994111110.998
Hunan111111111
Guangdong111111111
Guangxi1111110.99110.999
Hainan0.9860.998110.9890.989110.995
Chongqing0.9910.991110.96410.950.987
Sichuan0.9910.9890.9770.9650.98810.7210.9280.945
Guizhou0.9650.9480.9570.9820.980.9580.9880.9590.967
Yunnan111111111
Tibet111111111
Shaanxi0.970.9930.997110.984110.993
Gansu111111111
Qinghai0.99310.995111110.999
Ningxia111111111
Xinjiang111111111
Mean0.9810.9820.9830.9860.9860.9830.9730.9770.981
Efficient DMUs161718222119191818.75
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Gan, X.; Bai, K.; Baležentis, T.; Cui, L. Technical Efficiency of Regional Public Hospitals in China Based on the Three-Stage DEA. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249383

AMA Style

Chen Z, Chen X, Gan X, Bai K, Baležentis T, Cui L. Technical Efficiency of Regional Public Hospitals in China Based on the Three-Stage DEA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(24):9383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhensheng, Xueli Chen, Xiaoqing Gan, Kaixuan Bai, Tomas Baležentis, and Lixin Cui. 2020. "Technical Efficiency of Regional Public Hospitals in China Based on the Three-Stage DEA" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 24: 9383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop