Next Article in Journal
Determination of Glyphosate in Water from a Rural Locality in México and Its Implications for the Population Based on Water Consumption and Use Habits
Previous Article in Journal
What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 19
10.3390/ijerph17197101
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Distribution of Toxic Metal(loid)s and Microbial Community Analysis in Soil Vertical Profile at an Abandoned Nonferrous Metal Smelting Site

by
Jiejie Yang
1,2,†,
Siqi Wang
1,2,†,
Ziwen Guo
1,2,
Yan Deng
1,2,
Menglong Xu
1,2,
Siyuan Zhang
1,2,
Huaqun Yin
1,2,
Yili Liang
1,2,
Hongwei Liu
1,2,
Bo Miao
1,2,
Delong Meng
1,2,
Xueduan Liu
1,2 and
Luhua Jiang
1,2,*
1
School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Biometallurgy of Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors contribute equally to present work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(19), 7101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197101
Submission received: 10 September 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 23 September 2020 / Published: 28 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study soils at different depths were collected in a Zn smelting site located in Zhuzhou City, China, in order to understand toxic metal(loid)s distribution and microbial community in vertical soil profile at a smelting site. Except Soil properties and metal(loid)s content, the richness and diversity of microbial communities in soil samples were analyzed via high-throughput Illumina sequencing of 16s rRNA gene amplicons. The results showed that the content of As, Pb, Cu, Cd, Zn, and Mn was relatively high in top soil in comparison to subsoil, while the concentration of Cr in subsoil was comparable with that in top soil due to its relative high background value in this soil layer. The bioavailability of Cd, Mn, Zn, and Pb was relative higher than that of As, Cr, and Cu. The diversity of soil microbial communities decreased with increasing depth, which might be ascribed to the decrease in evenness with increase in depth duo to the influence by environmental conditions, such as pH, TK (total potassium), CEC (cation exchange capacity), ORP (oxidation reduction potential), and Bio-Cu (bioavailable copper). The results also found Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexi were dominant phyla in soil samples. At the genus level, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Gp7 were dominant soil microorganism. Besides, Environmental factors, such as SOM (soil organic matter), pH, Bio-Cu, Bio-Cd (bioavailable cadmium), and Bio-Pb (bioavailable lead), greatly impacted microbial community in surface soil (1–3 m), while ORP, TK, and AN concentration influenced microbial community in the subsoil (4–10 m).

1. Introduction

As a critical component for terrestrial ecosystems, soil plays a crucial role in the survival of living beings through providing habitats and nutrient resources [1,2]. However, with rapid industrialization over the last century, a series of anthropogenic activities have led to the release potential toxic metal(loid)s into the soil ecosystem due to the lack of environmental management and monitoring [3]. 16.1% of soil is contaminated in China and inorganic pollutants, such as Hg, Cd, As, Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn, and Ni are found in high quantities in 82.8% soil of contaminated sites, as reported by the China Soil Pollution Survey published in 2014 [4]. Among anthropogenic activities, the nonferrous metal smelting is one of the main sources contributing the potential toxic metal(loid)s pollution on the soil, especially in central south and southwest regions of China [5]. During the extraction of metal from mineral ores, a large number of slags were deposited on the dumps at some historical smelting sites. After weathering and rainwater leaching, the irregular disposed slags inevitably released metal(loid)s into the soil, which resulted in soil contamination and threating the health of the soil ecosystem and nearby habitats [6,7].
Recently, many studies have mainly been conducted on spatial distribution and risk assessment of metal(loid)s in polluted soil [8,9,10,11]. For instance, Qu et al. investigated the spatial distribution of metal(loid)s and assessed their potential ecological risks in urban soils [12]. Wang et al. examined metal(loid)s spatial distribution in soils that were collected from a typical industrial area and also evaluated their ecological risk [13]. In addition, metal(loid)s are generally toxic to microorganisms [14]. Thus, the existence of high concentration of metal(loid) level in contaminated soils will influence the microbial communities because of its toxicity ability. There have been reports that metal(loid)s could affect various microbiological vital functions in soil, including growth, morphology, adhesion and biochemical activities, respiration, and nitrogen and phosphorus geochemical cycles, therefore resulting in a reduction in microbial diversity and changes in microbial community structure [3,15]. Based on this, previous researches, by using fingerprint methods, have revealed that metal(loid)s pollution had obvious impacts on soil microbial communities either in a short-term or long-term period [16]. Nevertheless, the fingerprint techniques can only provide limited information on microbial communities [16]. A more comprehensive study on microbial diversity and the abundance of microbes in soil has recently been obtained using high-throughput sequencing methods, i.e., Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, due to their access to more information on the phylogenetic compositions of microbial communities in soil [3,17]. For example, some studies have obviously shown that the investigation in microbial diversity via the high-throughput methods is 100 times more in comparison to the traditional culture-dependent techniques [15]. Accordingly, studying the richness and diversity of microbes based on the 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing method will be helpful in offering significant information to soil risk management and bioremediation of the metal(loid)s polluted areas.
Keeping these in view, research on the spatial distribution of potential toxic metal(loid)s in soil, as well as its effects on microbial communities, was conducted at an abandoned nonferrous smelting site in Zhuzhou City, Central-South China. Specifically, soil samples from different soil profile in the smelting site were collected in order to examine their properties and metal(loid)s distribution. In addition, microbial communities in the metal(loid)s polluted soil were also investigated through the Illumina MiSeq sequencing (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to analyze the microbial composition and diversity. Moreover, the influences of soil characteristics and metal(loid)s pollutant on the soil microbial communities were further explored.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Soil Sampling

The abandoned nonferrous smelting site with a total area of 22294.65 m2 is situated in Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China (coordinates 27°52′51.4′′ N and 113°4′15.6′′ E), as shown in Figure 1. This smeltery discontinued in 2011 was mainly engaged in the production of zinc oxide using zinc-containing waste residue through pyrometallurgy. The south and west of the site is adjacent to residential areas and the east and northeast of the site is adjacent to a cement plant. In this study, soil samples in different section of soil profile were collected in June, 2019 from three holes, as shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Material). Soil samples at 1–10 m in depth were obtained by a percussion drilling from the location in the central area of the nonferrous smelting site, because this area is close to the manufacturing shop, which might contaminated by high concentration of metal(loid)s. The background sample was collected in the northwest of the site, where no human disturbance was found and percussion drilling worked until struck a hard rock layer in the soil. The obtained soil cores were divided in 1 m slices and then preserved in polyethylene bags respectively and immediately brought back to our laboratory. After removing large particles of slag and stones, the soil samples utilized to microbial analyses were stored in −80 °C refrigerator and the samples used to physicochemical examination were air-dried and ground to pass through a 100-mesh sieve and then stored at 4 °C refrigerator.

2.2. Soil Properties and Metal(loid)s Determination

The moisture content (MC) of soil is represented as the ratio of the mass of water held in the soil to the dry soil. The mass of water was examined by the difference before and after drying the soil in 104°C for 24 h [18]. The soil pH and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) were measured under a soil: water ratio of 1:2.5 (wt/vol) by a digital pH/ORP meter with a glass electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (BPH–220, Bell Instrument Equipment Co. Ltd., Dalian, China), respectively [19]. The contents of ammonia nitrogen (AN) was examined by shaking 10 g of air-dried soil in 100 mL of 2 M KCl for 1 h and then recorded by indophenol blue method. Nitrate nitrogen (NN) was analyzed by shaking 5 g of air-dried soil in 50 mL of 2 M KCl for 1 h and then determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry (UV–2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The available phosphorus (AP) was extracted by NaHCO3 in soil and then analyzed through using Mo–Sb antispetrophotography method. The soil total potassium (TK) was determined by the NaOH fusion method and then recorded by atomic absorption spectroscopy (GGK-830, Haiguang Instrument, Beijing, China); available potassium (AP) was extracted through shaking 1 g of air-dried soil in 10 mL of 1 M NH4OAc for 5 min.; after being filtered, the filtrate was also determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (GGK-830, Haiguang Instrument, Beijing, China). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) in soil was examined by the spectrophotometry (UV–1800PC, Mapada Instruments, Shanghai, China) with hexaamminecobalt(III) chloride as exchange ion [20]. The soil organic matter (SOM) was analyzed by using potassium dichromate oxidation-ammonium ferrous sulfate titration. Soil texture was investigated via hydrometer and sieve, in which the grain size groups were determined: clay (<0.002 mm), silt (0.002–0.02 mm), and sand (0.02–2 mm). The total metal concentrations were determined, as follows: after being ground to pass through 100 mesh sieves, 0.50 g soil sample was accurately weighed into polytetrafluoroethylene tube and then 10 mL HNO3, 5 mL HF, and 2 mL HClO4 was added with shaking 60 s. After that, the samples were placed on the electric heating plate (XJS20–42, Laboratory Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) in ordinary pressure. In the temperature procedure, the temperature was set of 110 °C for 30 min., 140 °C for 30 min., and 180 °C until soil was completely digested and obtained clarified digestion fluid. Subsequently, the supernatant in the tube was transferred to 25 mL volumetric flask. Finally, the concentration of metal(loid)s (As, Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Cr, and Mn) in the supernatant was examined via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) [8]. Reagent blanks and standard reference materials (GBW07430) were used in each batch of digestion to guarantee the relative standard deviations (<5%) in order to control the quality of the analytical method. Besides, the three-step sequential extraction procedure was conducted based on the modified BCR; and, the metal(loid)s was divided into four fractions in this procedure, including weak acid soluble fraction, reducible fraction, oxidizable fraction, and residual fraction [21]. In this study, all of the physicochemical parameters were analyzed in triplicate.

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and High Throughput Sequencing

The genomic DNA in soil was extracted by Fast DNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals Inc., California, USA) based on the manufacturer’s protocol. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in V4 region was conducted at the Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (ABI Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) via using primer pair 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) in order to amplify the 16s rRNA gene of bacteria and archaea. The PCR system (25 μL) included 2 μL of template DNA, 0.5 μL (10 nM) of each primer, 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and 9.5 μL of DNase-Free deionized water. PCR procedure was set, as follows: an initial denaturation was set at 94 °C for 5 min. followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 25 s annealing and 68 °C for 45 s extension, with final extension at 68 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis for recovery through E.Z.N.A. TM Gel Extraction Kit (OMEGA Biotek Inc., Doraville, GA, USA). After that, the quality of recovered PCR products was examined by using Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (ND-1000 Spectrophotometer, Nanodrop products, Wilmington, DE, USA). Finally, the sequencing library was constructed using the mixture of each recovered PCR product (150 ng). The Miseq 500 cycles kit was used to 2 × 250 bp paired-ends sequencing on Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) [19]. In each soil depth, triplicate samples were determined and 90 samples were analyzed. In above process, all of the tubes and weighing scoops that were used in weighing samples were sterile and disinfected with alcohol in order to ensure no cross contamination between samples. Experimental tools, such as centrifuge tube spear and suction head of pipette used in the extraction of soil DNA samples, were sterilized by high-pressure steam at 101 kPa and 121 °C. The suction head of pipette was also replaced after used. Besides, the PCR procedure was performed on a super-clean bench, and sequencing was also performed in a sterile room, and the operation was performed in strict accordance with the aseptic operation standards.

2.4. Data Process and Statistical Analyses

Amplicon libraries were constructed using the VAHTSTM Small RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and adding the adapter as identification tags between different libraries. Double-end sequencing of 2 × 250 bp cycle was performed on the library using Miseq 500 cycle kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Approximately, 2.5 GB raw reads were generated after Illumina sequencing. The sequencing data were merged, trimmed, filtered, aligned, and clustered by the Galaxy pipeline that was developed by Prof. Zhou’s lab (http://zhoulab5.rccc.ou.edu/) at University of Oklahoma. Sequences with 97% identity were assigned to the same OUT using UPARSE. Taxonomic assignment was performed using RDP classifier (http://rdp.cme. msu.edu/classifier/classifier.jsp). When the similarity was lower than 50%, the unit was assigned to unclassified. The samples were resampled to the 11,000-sequence depth in order to eliminate the impact led by different sequencing depth.
Shannon diversity index, Simpson’s index of diversity, Pielou evenness index, Chao1 index, Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA), Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA), Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS), and Analysis of Similarities (ANOSIM) were calculated by using the base R package vegan (v. 2.5.6). The Venn diagram was plotted using ‘VennDiagram’ Package. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) statistical analysis was conducted at the online interface Galaxy (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy) with an alpha value < 0.05 and a linear discriminant analysis score > 2. The genera with relative abundance greater than 1.5% were selected for analysis. Pearson correlation analyses between microbial and environmental variables were calculated by using Minitab 17.0 software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). The Mean and the Standard Deviation were calculated using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Statistics 20, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The graph of relative abundance and rarefaction curve was plotted by Origin 2020b (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). The graph of CCA was plotted by R package ggplot2 (v. 3.2.1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soils Characteristics and Vertical Distribution of Metal(loid)s

Table 1 shows the soil properties, including pH, ORP, granulometry, MC, SOM, AN, NN, AP, AK, TK, and CEC in different depth of contaminated soils. As seen, soil deposited in the top layer (0–1 m) is mainly composed of sand (the content of 54.3%). The layer (2–3 m) of polluted soil had the highest content of clay fraction contained about 44.9–51.6% of this fraction. In the subsoil (4–10 m), silt fraction contained about 45.1–54.2% (the highest value). The granulometry results were consistent with the lithology of the contaminated soil (0–10 m), as reflected in Figure 2. the main components in the soil depth of 0–1 m was concrete and plain fill; in 2–3 m the main components were silty clay and in 4–10 m was semi-weathering slate. The soil pH values in different depth varied from 4.5 (7 m) to 7.5 (1 m), indicating the soil as neutralalkaline in 1–3 m and acidic in 4–10 m, as listed in Table 1. Higher pH values were obtained in the upper layer of soil possibly due to the effect of slags which contained alkaline minerals; and the lower pH values in the subsoil might ascribe to the acid red soil [22]. Besides, the ORP in different depth of soil was generally less than 300 mV, which mainly contributed to the anaerobic environment of soil [23]. The MC values in soil were about 20% and the values in top layer was slightly larger than the lower soil layer. The layer in 0–3 m of soil showed several times higher CEC values than the lower soil layer (4–10 m). The SOM content showed a range of 0.3–6.5%. However, soil at depths of 1 m and 2 m exhibited relatively higher values, i.e., 6.5% and 2.2%, respectively. The contents of AP and AK in the upper soil were significantly higher than those in the lower soil. The contents of AN in soil vertical profile greatly fluctuated, possibly due to the denitrification under anaerobic conditions in subsoil [24].
Figure 2 plots the mean concentration of As, Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu, Cr, and Mn in the vertical soil profile. The concentration ranges of metal(loid)s in different depth of soil were: 37.3–619.7 mg/kg for As, 0–368.8 mg/kg for Cd, 88.3–215.0 mg/kg for Cr, 45.4–918.6 mg/kg for Cu, 222.5–3392.0 mg/kg for Mn, 25.3–2767.7 mg/kg for Pb, and 97.4–50541 mg/kg for Zn. Besides, the background values of metal(loid)s at this site for As, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu are rather low, while these values for Mn and Zn are comparative high, as reflected by Figure S2. Mn, Zn, Pb, and Cu were abundant in the studied soil. The high concentrations of the majority of metal(loid)s in the vertical profile were found mainly in 1–2 m of soil. However, the concentration of Mn was maintained at a high level, even at a depth of 10 m with concentration of 510 mg/kg, and the concentrations of Cr in 3–10 m were comparable with that in top soil. This might be ascribed to its relative high background value in the subsoil, as shown in Figure S2. As, Cd Pb, and Mn were the risk pollutants in the soil vertical profile, according to the risk control standard for soil contamination of development land. The concentration of As in 1–2 m exceed the risk intervention values for soil pollution of first type development land (120 mg/kg) and 3–10 m was above the risk screening values for soil pollution of first type development land (20 mg/kg); for Cd, only the concentration in 1–2 m exceeded the risk intervention values for soil pollution of first type development land (47 mg/kg); the concentrations of Pb were high at a depth of 1 m (2765.7 mg/kg), exceeding the risk intervention values (800 mg/kg) [25]. Four metal(loid)s’ fractions were also analyzed by using modified BCR, as shown in Figure 3. As seen, residual fraction was the predominant in all samples of As and Cr; and reducible fraction of As only significantly enriched at 1 m depth. Metal(loid)s in residual fraction were tightly bound to the crystalline structures of the minerals that existed in the soil matrices. This suggested that Cr and As are less likely to be released. Besides, 80% Cr existed as Cr(III) and 70% As presented as As(V), as shown in speciation distributions of As and Cr (Figure S3). This indicated that the toxicity to soil microorganisms of Cr and As was very small. For Cu, the weak acid soluble fraction slightly occurred at 1–2 m depth and residual fraction was the predominant in other samples at 3–10 m depth. This suggested that the mobility of Cu was comparative high at 1–2 m depth. In addition, the fractions of Cd, Mn, Pb, and Zn were distributed unevenly at different depth. As a whole, the weak acid soluble fraction accounted for a large proportion. This indicated that Cd, Mn, Pb, and Zn in the soils of this site might lead to a major ecological risk, because of the ease with which they might be leached in slightly acidic, or neutral conditions, followed by assimilation by soil organisms. Chemical fractionation analysis can also provide information regarding the bioavailability of metal(loid)s. The first step of the BCR was considered as bioavailable fraction, which was likely ready to be absorbed by organism [26]. Table S1 summarizes the bioavailable forms of different metal(loid)s in various soil depths.

3.2. Alpha-Diversity and Composition of Archaea and Bacterial Communities

A total of 1,129,918 quality 16s rRNA gene sequence reads were obtained from the high-throughput sequencing for soil samples at different depths, which could be clustered into 8217 OTUs. The rarefaction curve, as shown in Figure S4, indicated the sequencing depths were adequate to downstream analyze; and, the sequencing reads for soil sample at different depths were comparable, whereas the category of observed OTUs decreased with the increase in depths in the soil profile. In total, the observed OTUs could be classified into 47 phyla, 83 classes, 115 orders, 262 families, and 704 genera. Besides, the alpha-diversity indexes, such as Chao1 index, Pielou’s evenness index, Shannon’s diversity index, and Simpson’s index of diversity, were analyzed in order to examine the soil microbes in different depths based on 97% OTU cluster (Figure 4). There was little difference in the Chao1 index of soil at different depths, which suggested that it was identified a comparable quantity of different individuals in different depths of soil, as shown in Figure 4a. As reflected by Figure 4b, however, Pielou’s evenness index was slightly higher in top soil (1–3 m) than in subsoil (4–10 m). As shown in Table S2, the diversity indexes were impacted by soil properties and the contents of metal(loid)s, indicating environmental conditions, such as pH, TK, CEC, ORP, and Bio-Cu (p < 0.05), impacted the soil microbial evenness through limiting the survival of certain microorganisms [27,28]; while, soil microbes adapt to higher metal(loid)s pollution in top soil by changing microbial communities, rather than changing their evenness [29]. Moreover, Shannon’s diversity index and Simpson’s index of diversity exhibited a decreasing trend from 1 m to 10 m of soil depth, which might be ascribed to the decrease in evenness with increase in depth, as shown in Figure 4c,d. In addition, OTU composition and structure exhibited difference in a series of soil depth, as reflected by Venn diagram, ANOSIM, NMDS, and DCA analysis at Figure 5. Venn diagram (Figure 5a) revealed that there were 599 core OTUs among ten depth points, and soils in 1 m–10 m had similar unique OTUs. This suggested that distinct microbial communities existed in different depths of soil, because the quantity of core OTUs was less than that of unique OTUs. ANOSIM analysis (Figure 5b) that was based on the Bray Curtis matrix found that the differences of inter-layers were significantly greater than intra-layers due to p = 0.001. NMDS analysis (Figure 5c) that was performed on Bray Curtis dissimilarity at OTU level reflected that the microbial communities of 1 m depth, 2 m depth, and 4 m depth soil layers were grouped separately from other depth soil layers. DCA analysis (Figure 5d) also revealed that the coordinate components (DCA1 and DCA2) could explain 27.84% and 11.12% of the total variations, respectively.
LEfSe as a reliable method for examining biomarkers in microbiome has been successfully utilized to analyze bacterial biomarkers in metal(loid)s polluted soils [30]. Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria were generally present under phylum level in soil samples at all depths, As exhibited in Figure 6. Proteobacteria accounts for a major proportion of the traditional gram-negative bacteria and plays a crucial act in ecological energy cycle relating to the metabolization of organic and inorganic matters to gain energy [31]. Acidobacteria contains an enormous level of morphological, physiological, and metabolic diversity, and both of them are play a crucial role in global soil carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling [32]. However, soil samples at different depths also have their biomarkers in genus level. As seen, Thiobacillus, Nitrososphaera, and GP1 were the main biomarkers in top soil (1–3 m). Previous studies have revealed that all of Thiobacillus, Nitrososphaera, and GP1 exhibited resistance to metal(loid)s in various environment [33,34,35], which suggested their adaptations to the long-term pollution of high-concentration metal(loid)s. The prominent biomarkers in subsoil (4–10 m) were Limnobacter, Anoxybacillus, and Acinetobacter. Among them, the genus Anoxybacillus is a relatively new genus of gram-positive bacteria; and, biochemical and genomic researches found Anoxybacillus genus could act as important role in soil carbon recycling in extreme anaerobic environment [36]. This suggested that, although the concentration of metal(loid)s in the subsoil was low, the extreme environment below affected the community structure of microorganisms; and, environmental conditions, including pH, nutrient, and oxygen content, might has selective pressure on soil microbial community.
Besides, the relative abundances of the phyla in different depths of soil is shown in Figure 7a. As seen, Proteobacteria (42.8–79.5%), Acidobacteria (1.8–16.5%), Firmicutes (0.9–41.9%), and Chloroflexi (1.0–10.6%) were dominant phyla with high relative abundances in all of the soil sample, which was consistent with the results shown in LEfSe analysis. These predominant phyla also obtained in other metal(loid)s contaminated soil, such as paddy soil, mining sites, and sediment [37,38,39,40], which indicated these phyla might be closely related to metal(loid)s-contaminated soil. For example, Liu et al. also found that Proteobacteria (33.0–96.7%), Actinobacteria (0.3–6.9%), Firmicutes (0.0–5.8%), and Chloroflexi (0.0–13.1%) dominated the indigenous soil microbial communities at a chromium salt factory [41]. Except Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria play a key role in global ecological function on soil energy cycle, the subordinate dominant phyla of Firmicutes and Chloroflexi were also reported to participate in organic and mineral composition cycles [42,43]. This indicated that these dominant phyla had high metabolic activity and exhibited well adaptability to the metal(loid)s-containing living surroundings. However, for the relative abundance in different depths of soil in this study, the proportion of individuals in different depths existed different. This could demonstrate different in Pielou’s evenness index, as exhibited at Figure 4b. The relative abundance Proteobacteria in 1–3 m maintained at about 40%, while it increased to about 70%. Nevertheless, the relative abundance of certain phyla decreased with increase in depth. For example, Actinobacteria decreased from about 10% in 1–3 m to 1% in 4–10 m; Bacteroidetes decreased from about 3% in 1–3 m to 1% in 4–10 m. This suggested that metal(loid)s pollution and local environmental conditions, including pH, nutrient, and oxygen content, might have selective pressure on soil microbial community [44,45]. At the genus level Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Gp7 were dominant genus in soil sample, as reflected by Figure 7b. Acinetobacter was the dominant genus in soil samples in 4–10 m and the maximum relative abundance value reached 50%. This might be attributed to the high concentration metal(loid)s pressure in top limiting the growth of this microbe. Pseudomonas maintained similar relative abundance in all soil samples, which might due to it as one of the most diverse genera with ubiquitous and versatile microorganisms presenting various metabolic capabilities [46]. In comparison to topsoil, Gp7 was enriched in subsoil, likely because it prefers to grow in an environment with nutrition deficiency [47].

3.3. Relationship between the Environmental Variables and Microbial Communities

CCA, as one of Multivariate ordination methods, was used to analyze the significant environmental variables (i.e., pH, ORP, MC, SOM, AN, NN, AP, AK, TK, CEC, and bioavailable metal(loid)s), which influence the microbial community composition, based on OTUs -level data in this study. The CCA method was performed because the length of first DCA axis was more than four SD, suggesting a unimodal ordination technique, as exhibited by Figure 8. As seen, the weights of the community variations explained for the first axis and the second axis were 20.29% and 17.74%, respectively. The relationship between the environmental variables and the microbial community was significant due to p < 0.001 in the Monte Carlo permutation test. The results showed that the environmental parameters, such as TK, SOM, ORP, pH, AN, Bio-Cu, Bio-Cd, and Bio-Pb, had a great effect on the abundance and composition of the microbial community (0.001 < p < 0.01). Among these parameters, TK, ORP, and AN corresponded more to the subsoil (4–10 m) microbial community, while other remarkable environmental factors were relative to microbial community in the surface soil (1–3 m). Besides, three phyla identified in microbial communities, Crenarchaeota, Gemmatimonadetes, and Verrucomicrobia, exhibited significant positive correlation with pH, and Firmicutes showed significant negative correlation with pH, as shown in the Pearson correlation between phylum/genus abundance and soil environmental variables (Tables S3 and S4). As genus leval, Limnobacter and Acinetobacter also showed significant negative correlation with pH. Indeed, some previous researches had revealed that soil pH value could impact the soil microbial communities and activities through changing chemical forms, contents, and bioavailability of substrates, and then affect microbial cell growth and activity, which results in strong selective pressure for the microbial community structure [41,48]. SOM is related to many essential ecosystem functions and it can remain soil structure, bind mineral particles, and enhance water-holding capacity; in addition, SOM is also a dynamic store of nutrients that cycle to bioavailable forms [48]. Some previous studies also demonstrated that SOM could participate in metal(loid) adsorption, complexation, and precipitation processes, leading to the reduction of the metal(loid) mobility and bioavailability for soil microorganisms [2]. Thus, in this study, some soil microorganisms (Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatimonadetes at the phylum level; Hydrogenophaga and Thiobacillus at the genus level) were significantly affected by SOM. As shift in soil ORP conditions, soil microorganisms can switch to using alternative electron acceptors, such as nitrate, iron, and sulfate, and, thus, changing the microbial metabolic activity and structure in the soil [49]. Therefore, Limnobacter and Acinetobacter at the genus level were significantly relative to soil ORP. TK and AN were important nutrients for soil biota [50]. Accordingly, Genus Limnobacter and Acinetobacter were significantly positively related to these nutrients in this research.
Bioavailable metal(loid)s, including Bio-Cu, Bio-Cd, and Bio-Pb, significantly influenced the microbial community in soil samples. Phylum Actinobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes, and genus Hydrogenophaga and Thiobacillus were positive relative to Bio-Cu, Bio-Cd, and Bio-Pb, as exhibited in Tables S3 and S4. In previous studies, El Baz et al. found Actinobacteria that were isolated from abandoned mining areas exhibited a strong ability to resistance and accumulation for Cu, Cd, and Pb [51]. He et al. found that Gemmatimonadetes was one of the dominant bacterial phyla in the mixed heavy metal (Cd, Pb, and Zn) polluted paddy fields [52]. Hydrogenophaga was a common bacterium flora in contaminated environment, and it needed to obtain their energy through denitrification. Additionally, Liu et al. found it was one of typical denitrifying bacterium in alkaline copper mine drainage [53]. Besides, the genus Thiobacillus are chemolithotrophic and acidophilic and it can oxidize the reduced sulfur or ferrous ion and then generate acid that is favorable for metal removal. This genus is widely used to metal extraction from low-grade ores and mineral concentrates [54]. These indicated that metal(loid)s, including Cu, Cd, and Pb, acted as important environmental factors in the selection of soil microorganism, leading to affecting the diversity and composition of soil microbial community in this study [55]. Moreover, soil microbial communities in vertical soil profile could be impacted by the combined soil factors. The main reasons were that environmental factors, such as TK, SOM, and other nutrients, were generally needed in microbial survival; besides, metal(loid)s pollution, such as As, Mn, and Cd, led stress to microbial survival. Some researches revealed that the soil microbial community was driven by a combination of multiple factors, namely the soil physicochemical characteristics and effects of toxic metal(loid) contaminants [39,56,57]. In addition, the physicochemical characteristics of soil could decrease the toxicity of metal(loid)s, due to TK and SOM being able to provide substrate and nutrients for the growth of microorganisms and then effectively decrease the stress caused by metal(loid)s [58]. For example, some studies found that the nutrient conditions, such as organic matter and CEC, had an important effect on the toxicity of Cu [59]. Environmental conditions including nutrient availability, organic matter, and metal(loid)s bioavailability were also generally associated with soil pH and ORP and the change in pH and ORP could result in changes in the microbial community structure [60,61].

4. Conclusions

In the present study, the results revealed that most metal(loid)s mainly occurred at 1–2 m in the depth of soil and Mn, Pb, Zn, and Cu were relative abundant in the vertical soil profile, whereas As, Cd, Pb, and Mn were the risk metal(loid) pollutants. The bioavailability of As, Cr, and Cu was comparably low. Besides, the microbial community diversity decreased with an increase in soil depth due to the change in evenness. The dominant soil microbial community at the phylum level was Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexi and at genus level was Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Gp7. These microbes might play an important role in soil ecological function and the biogeochemistry of metal(loid)s. Environmental parameters, including TK, SOM, ORP, pH, AN, Bio-Cu, Bio-Cd, and Bio-Pb had great influence on composition and diversity of the microbial community in soil.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7101/s1, Figure S1: Soil samples in different depth of soil profile collected at three holes; Figure S2: The background values of metal(loid)s in this site; Figure S3: Speciation distributions of As and Cr in soil profile at different depths; Figure S4: Rarefaction curve of 16S rRNA sequencing in soil samples at different depths; Table S1: Distribution of metal(loid) bioavailable fractions in different soil depths; Table S2: Pearson correlation coefficient of soil environmental variables with microbial diversity index; Table S3: Pearson correlation between phylum abundance and soil physicochemical parameters and bioavailable metal(loid)s; Table S4: Pearson correlation between genus abundance and soil physicochemical parameters and bioavailable metal(loid)s.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y. and S.W.; methodology, J.Y., S.W. and Z.G.; software, J.Y., S.W., Y.D., M.X. and S.Z.; data curation, J.Y. and S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y., S.W. and L.J.; writing—review and editing, H.Y., Y.L., H.L., B.M., D.M., and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financial supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grants No. 2018YFC1800400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 51909282).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the members in the soil sampling and analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, B.K. Chapter 1—Soil Carbon: Introduction, Importance, Status, Threat, and Mitigation. In Soil Carbon Storage; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Race, M.; Marotta, R.; Fabbricino, M.; Pirozzi, F.; Andreozzi, R.; Guida, M.; Siciliano, A. Assessment of optimal conditions for the restoration and recovery of agricultural soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kasemodel, M.; Sakamoto, I.; Varesche, M.; Rodrigues, V. Potentially toxic metal contamination and microbial community analysis in an abandoned Pb and Zn mining waste deposit. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 675, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. MEP. China Soil Pollution Survey Communique in Chinese [EB/OL]. 110998. 2014. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm (accessed on 17 April 2014).
  5. Luo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Shu, J.; Wu, Z. Effect of particulate organic matter fractions on the distribution of heavy metals with aided phytostabilization at a zinc smelting waste slag site. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 253, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, S.; Wang, X.; Lei, J.; Ran, Q.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, J. Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in a typical Pb/Zn smelter in an arid area of northwest China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2019, 25, 1661–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, L.; Liu, X.; Yin, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H.; Miao, B.; Peng, Q.; Meng, D.; Wang, S.; Yang, J.; et al. The utilization of biomineralization technique based on microbial induced phosphate precipitation in remediation of potentially toxic ions contaminated soil: A mini review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 110009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, Y.; Jiang, L.; Xu, L.; Hao, X.; Zhang, S.; Xu, M.; Zhu, P.; Fu, S.; Liang, Y.; Yin, H.; et al. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of heavy metals in contaminated paddy fields—A case study in Xiangtan City, southern China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Adedeji, O.H.; Olayinka, O.O.; Tope-Ajayi, O.O. Spatial distribution and health risk assessment of soil pollution by heavy metals in Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2019, 9, 190601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naderi, A.; Delavar, M.A.; Kaboudin, B.; Askari, M.S. Erratum to: Assessment of spatial distribution of soil heavy metals using ANN-GA, MSLR and satellite imagery. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ding, Q.; Cheng, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhuang, D. Effects of natural factors on the spatial distribution of heavy metals in soils surrounding mining regions. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 578, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qu, M.; Li, W.; Zhang, C. Spatial distribution and uncertainty assessment of potential ecological risks of heavy metals in soil using sequential gaussian simulation. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2014, 20, 764–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, G.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, L.; Zhong, Q.; Li, L.; Xu, G.; Deng, O.; Pu, Y. Heavy metals in soils from a typical industrial area in Sichuan, China: Spatial distribution, source identification, and ecological risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 16618–16630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muhammad, N.; Hooke, A.M. Toxicity of heavy metals for microorganisms isolated from slow sand filter schmutzdecke. Environ. Technol. 2003, 24, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pradhan, S.K.; Singh, N.R.; Kumar, U.; Mishra, S.R.; Perumal, R.C.; Benny, J.; Thatoi, H. Illumina MiSeq based assessment of bacterial community structure and diversity along the heavy metal concentration gradient in Sukinda chromite mine area soils, India. Ecol. Genet. Genom. 2020, 15, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Meng, D.; Li, J.; Yin, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, X.; Cheng, C.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yan, M. Response of soil microbial communities and microbial interactions to long-term heavy metal contamination. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 231, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fierer, N.; Leff, J.W.; Adams, B.J.; Nielsen, U.N.; Bates, S.T.; Lauber, C.L.; Owens, S.M.; Gilbert, J.A.; Wall, D.H.; Caporaso, J.G. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 21390–21395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Van Wesemael, B.; Poesen, J.; de Figueiredo, T. Effects of rock fragments on physical degradation of cultivated soils by rainfall. Soil Tillage Res. 1995, 33, 229–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hao, X.; Zhu, P.; Zhang, H.; Liang, Y.; Yin, H.; Liu, X.; Bai, L.; Liu, H.; Jiang, H. Mixotrophic acidophiles increase cadmium soluble fraction and phytoextraction efficiency from cadmium contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, W.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Ye, C.; Zheng, J.; Guo, C.; Hao, M.; He, X.; Zhu, S. Fertilizer N application rate impacts plant-soil feedback in a sanqi production system. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 796–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pueyo, M.; Mateu, J.; Rigol, A.; Vidal, M.; Lopezsanchez, J.F.; Rauret, G. Use of the modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the study of trace element dynamics in contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Z.W.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, Y.; Yang, X.C.; Yuan, Q.S. Examining social-economic factors in spatial and temporal change of water quality in red soil hilly region of South China: A case study in Hunan Province. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 42, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hossain, S.; Ishiyama, T.; Hachinohe, S.; Oguchi, C.T. Leaching Behavior of As, Pb, Ni, Fe, and Mn from subsurface marine and nonmarine depositional environment in Central Kanto Plain, Japan. Geoences 2019, 9, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jetten, M.S.M. New pathways for ammonia conversion in soil and aquatic systems. Plant Soil 2001, 230, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, T.; Liu, Y.; Lin, S.; Liu, Y.; Xie, Y. Soil pollution management in China: A brief introduction. Sustainability 2019, 11, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Liu, B.; Ai, S.; Zhang, W.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Y. Assessment of the bioavailability, bioaccessibility and transfer of heavy metals in the soil-grain-human systems near a mining and smelting area in NW China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Teng, W.; Hu, H.; Shen, J.; He, J. Limited effects of depth (0–80 cm) on communities of archaea, bacteria and fungi in paddy soil profiles. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, H.M.; Lee, M.J.; Jung, J.Y.; Hwang, C.Y.; Kim, M.; Ro, H.-M.; Chun, J.; Lee, Y.K. Vertical distribution of bacterial community is associated with the degree of soil organic matter decomposition in the active layer of moist acidic tundra. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beattie, R.E.; Henke, W.; Campa, M.F.; Hazen, T.C.; Mcaliley, L.R.; Campbell, J.H. Variation in microbial community structure correlates with heavy-metal contamination in soils decades after mining ceased. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jin, H.U.; Meng, D.; Liu, X.; Liang, Y.; Yin, H.; Liu, H. Response of soil fungal community to long-term chromium contamination. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2018, 28, 1838–1846. [Google Scholar]
  31. Spain, A.M.; Krumholz, L.R.; Elshahed, M.S. Abundance, composition, diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria. ISME J. 2009, 3, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Fu, X.; Le, Y. The variability of soil microbial community composition of different types of tidal wetland in Chongming Dongtan and its effect on soil microbial respiration. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Navarro, A.; Faria, M.; Barata, C.; Pina, B. Transcriptional response of stress genes to metal exposure in zebra mussel larvae and adults. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Spang, A.; Poehlein, A.; Offre, P.; Zumbragel, S.; Haider, S.; Rychlik, N.; Nowka, B.; Schmeisser, C.; Lebedeva, E.V.; Rattei, T. The genome of the ammonia-oxidizing Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis: Insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 3122–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mangold, S.; Potrykus, J.; Bjorn, E.; Lovgren, L.; Dopson, M. Extreme zinc tolerance in acidophilic microorganisms from the bacterial and archaeal domains. Extremophiles 2013, 17, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Albalawi, T.H.A.; Wood, A.L.; Solis, A.; Cooper, T.; Barabote, R.D. Anoxybacillus sp. strain UARK-01, a new thermophilic soil bacterium with hyperthermostable alkaline laccase activity. Curr. Microbiol. 2017, 74, 762–771. [Google Scholar]
  37. Luo, L.Y.; Xie, L.L.; Jin, D.C.; Mi, B.B.; Wang, D.H.; Li, X.F.; Dai, X.Z.; Zou, X.X.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Y.Q.; et al. Bacterial community response to cadmium contamination of agricultural paddy soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 139, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hemmatjou, M.H.; Safarisinegani, A.A.; Mirzaieasl, A.; Tahmourespour, A. Analysis of microbial communities in heavy metals-contaminated soils using the metagenomic approach. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, X.; Huang, J.; Lu, J.; Sun, Y. Study on the influence of soil microbial community on the long-term heavy metal pollution of different land use types and depth layers in mine. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yin, H.; Niu, J.; Ren, Y.; Cong, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, J.; Xie, M. An integrated insight into the response of sedimentary microbial communities to heavy metal contamination. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, B.; Su, G.; Yang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhong, H.; He, Z. Vertical distribution of microbial communities in chromium-contaminated soil and isolation of Cr(VI)—Reducing strains. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pei, Y.; Yu, Z.; Ji, J.; Khan, A.; Li, X. Microbial community structure and function indicate the severity of chromium contamination of the Yellow river. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, Y.; Rossel, R.A.V.; Li, S.; Bissett, A.; Lee, J.; Shi, Z.; Behrens, T.; Court, L.N. Soil bacterial abundance and diversity better explained and predicted with spectro-transfer functions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 129, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wolinska, A.; Kuźniar, A.; Zielenkiewicz, U.; Izak, D.; Szafraneknakonieczna, A.; Banach, A.; Blaszczyk, M. Bacteroidetes as a sensitive biological indicator of agricultural soil usage revealed by a culture-independent approach. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Solyanikova, I.P.; Suzina, N.E.; Golovleva, L.A. The role of non-spore-forming actinobacteria in cleaning up sites contaminated by persistent pollutants and the ability of these microorganisms to survive under unfavourable conditions. Microbiol. Aust. 2018, 39, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jeong, H.; Rha, E.; Kim, H.; Lee, S.-G. Complete genome sequence of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas kribbensis strain 46-2(T). Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7, e01161-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, C.; Tayyab, M.; Abubakar, A.Y.; Yang, Z.; Pang, Z.; Islam, W.; Lin, Z.; Li, S.; Luo, J.; Fan, X. Bacteria with different assemblages in the soil profile drive the diverse nutrient cycles in the sugarcane straw retention ecosystem. Diversity 2019, 11, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kemmitt, S.J.; Wright, D.L.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Jones, D.L. pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 898–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peralta, A.L.; Ludmer, S.; Matthews, J.W.; Kent, A.D. Bacterial community response to changes in soil redox potential along a moisture gradient in restored wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cui, B.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, K.; Ren, H.; Bai, J. Temporal and spatial distributions of soil nutrients in Hani terraced paddy fields, Southwestern China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2010, 2, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Baz, S.E.; Baz, M.; Barakate, M.; Hassani, L.; Gharmali, A.E.; Imziln, B. Resistance to and accumulation of heavy metals by actinobacteria isolated from abandoned mining areas. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 761834. [Google Scholar]
  52. Huaidong, H.E.; Waichin, L.I.; Riqing, Y.U.; Zhihong, Y.E. Illumina-based analysis of bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities in paddy fields under mixed heavy metal contamination. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 569–578. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu, J.; Li, C.; Jing, J.; Zhao, P.; Luo, Z.; Cao, M.; Ma, Z.; Jia, T.; Chai, B. Ecological patterns and adaptability of bacterial communities in alkaline copper mine drainage. Water Res. 2018, 133, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qian, L.; Sun, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Kim, H.; Qiu, G. The dissolution and passivation mechanism of chalcopyrite in bioleaching: An overview. Miner. Eng. 2019, 136, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, Z.; Gao, G.; Wang, Y. Effects of soil properties, heavy metals, and PBDEs on microbial community of e-waste contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kamitani, T.; Oba, H.; Kaneko, N. Microbial biomass and tolerance of microbial community on an aged heavy metal polluted floodplain in Japan. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2006, 172, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pan, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhong, Q.; Gong, G.; Wang, G.; Guo, X.; Xu, X. Effects of soil chemical properties and fractions of Pb, Cd, and Zn on bacterial and fungal communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. García-Carmona, M.; Romero-Freire, A.; Sierra Aragón, M.; Martín Peinado, F.J. Effectiveness of ecotoxicological tests in relation to physicochemical properties of Zn and Cu polluted Mediterranean soils. Geoderma 2019, 338, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pérez-Esteban, J.; Escolástico, C.; Masaguer, A.; Moliner, A. Effects of sheep and horse manure and pine bark amendments on metal distribution and chemical properties of contaminated mine soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 63, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mei, J.; He, H.; Hong, F.F.; Leng, Y.; Zhao, Y.B.; Zheng, L.; Ma, C.; Tao, X. Microbial community structures and sulfur speciation characteristics in soil sample around the Xiang-tan Liejiaqiao coal gangue dump, Hunan Province in South of China. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kumar, R.N.; Nagendran, R. Influence of initial pH on bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated soil employing indigenous Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 1775–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 07101 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the studied site.
Figure 1. Location of the studied site.
Ijerph 17 07101 g001
Ijerph 17 07101 g002 550
Figure 2. The mean concentration of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn in soil vertical profile.
Figure 2. The mean concentration of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn in soil vertical profile.
Ijerph 17 07101 g002
Ijerph 17 07101 g003 550
Figure 3. Compositions of four fractions for each metal(loid) in different soil depths.
Figure 3. Compositions of four fractions for each metal(loid) in different soil depths.
Ijerph 17 07101 g003
Ijerph 17 07101 g004 550
Figure 4. Chao1 index (a), Pielou’s evenness index (b), Shannon’s diversity index (c), and Simpson’s index of diversity (d) in soil at different depths.
Figure 4. Chao1 index (a), Pielou’s evenness index (b), Shannon’s diversity index (c), and Simpson’s index of diversity (d) in soil at different depths.
Ijerph 17 07101 g004
Ijerph 17 07101 g005 550
Figure 5. Venn diagram (a), Analysis of Similarities (ANOSIM) (b), Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) (c), and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) (d) analysis in OUT among ten depth layers of soil.
Figure 5. Venn diagram (a), Analysis of Similarities (ANOSIM) (b), Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) (c), and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) (d) analysis in OUT among ten depth layers of soil.
Ijerph 17 07101 g005
Ijerph 17 07101 g006 550
Figure 6. LEfSe analysis of soil samples at different depths (golden circles mean non-significant difference (p > 0.05) in abundance among different soil depth layers; other colors mean biomarkers with significant differences (p < 0.05) in different soil depth layers).
Figure 6. LEfSe analysis of soil samples at different depths (golden circles mean non-significant difference (p > 0.05) in abundance among different soil depth layers; other colors mean biomarkers with significant differences (p < 0.05) in different soil depth layers).
Ijerph 17 07101 g006
Ijerph 17 07101 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative abundance (%) of dominant bacteria and archaea in vertical soil samples at phylum level (a) and genus level (b).
Figure 7. Relative abundance (%) of dominant bacteria and archaea in vertical soil samples at phylum level (a) and genus level (b).
Ijerph 17 07101 g007
Ijerph 17 07101 g008 550
Figure 8. Ordination diagrams from CCA of environmental conditions with overall microbial data.
Figure 8. Ordination diagrams from CCA of environmental conditions with overall microbial data.
Ijerph 17 07101 g008
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of studied soil samples.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of studied soil samples.
Depth (m)pHORP
(mV)		Sand
(%)		Silt
(%)		Clay
(%)		MC
(%)		SOM
(%)		AN
(mg/kg)		NN
(mg/kg)		AP
(mg/kg)		AK
(mg/kg)		TK
(mg/kg)		CEC
(cmol(+)/kg)
17.5 ± 0.3 a205 ± 38 b54.3 ± 5.9 a26.6 ± 1.6 a19.1 ± 6.7 b19.4 ± 2.9 a6.5 ± 1.4 a45.2 ± 18.1 a51.6 ± 2.3 a20.6 ± 9 a410 ± 1.8 a9157 ± 2588 d6 ± 1.3 a,b,c
27.5 ± 0 a229 ± 13 a,b19.8 ± 7.3 b35.4 ± 10.4 a44.9 ± 11.5 a,b21.9 ± 2.4 a2.2 ± 0.6 b55.7 ± 23.5 a45.7 ± 2.2 a9.1 ± 5.7 a,b246.7 ± 132.7 a,b15709 ± 427 c8.2 ± 0.5 a
37.3 ± 0.1 a243 ± 6 a,b13.4 ± 2.6 b35 ± 17.4 a51.6 ± 17.1 a23 ± 0.9 a0.8 ± 0.2 b56.6 ± 15.2 a46.3 ± 2.5 a4.2 ± 2 a,b238.4 ± 137 a,b18444 ± 589 c7.9 ± 1.4 a,b
46.6 ± 0.1 a280 ± 33 a,b14.8 ± 4.2 b49.3 ± 2.5 a35.9 ± 6.6 a,b22.9 ± 1.8 a0.9 ± 0.8 b65.7 ± 17.2 a48.6 ± 4.1 a5.4 ± 5.6 a,b162.2 ± 95.1 a,b26331 ± 2218 b5.1 ± 1.1 b,c,d
55 ± 0.4 b301 ± 44 a,b21 ± 6.7 b54.2 ± 9.2 a24.8 ± 4 b21.9 ± 0.8 a0.3 ± 0.1 b52.8 ± 9.5 a48.9 ± 4.5 a6.7 ± 7.7 a,b125.6 ± 59.3 b28155 ± 1581 a,b3.4 ± 0.6 c,d
64.5 ± 0.1 b323 ± 36 a26.1 ± 4.6 b47 ± 7.1 a26.9 ± 2.5 a,b20.6 ± 0.8 a0.4 ± 0.1 b59.2 ± 15.3 a55.2 ± 9.9 a3.6 ± 3.7 a,b80.8 ± 16.3 b28456 ± 1572 a,b3.6 ± 0.4 c,d
74.5 ± 0.2 b306 ± 15 a,b27.1 ± 6.9 b46.5 ± 5.2 a26.4 ± 4.2 a,b20.7 ± 1.4 a0.3 ± 0 b58.3 ± 10.4 a50.2 ± 3.2 a2.4 ± 2.5 b77.2 ± 14.2 b29470 ± 1267 a,b3 ± 0.5 d
84.9 ± 0.4 b290 ± 8 a,b23.9 ± 2.7 b51.7 ± 2.8 a24.4 ± 0.9 b20.4 ± 1 a0.5 ± 0.3 b73.6 ± 6.5 a45.9 ± 1.6 a2.7 ± 1.5 b66.8 ± 21 b31158 ± 547 a,b3.3 ± 0.5 c,d
94.8 ± 0.4 b278 ± 16 a,b26.3 ± 8.3 b45.1 ± 4.3 a28.6 ± 4 a,b18.7 ± 1.8 a0.5 ± 0.1 b70 ± 11.5 a47.8 ± 9.2 a4.7 ± 3.7 a,b77 ± 8.5 b32678 ± 497 a3.1 ± 0.3 d
104.6 ± 0.6 b272 ± 42 a,b26.6 ± 2.4 b49.4 ± 2.7 a24 ± 0.6 b17.9 ± 0.9 a0.8 ± 0.6 b48.9 ± 1.5 a47.2 ± 5.9 a3 ± 1.8 b90.1 ± 10.8 b31309 ± 1184 a,b3.2 ± 0.5 c,d
Different letters (a, b, c and d) in the same column reflect significant differences among samples at the level of p < 0.05 (based on the Duncan multiple range test).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Guo, Z.; Deng, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, S.; Yin, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H.; Miao, B.; et al. Spatial Distribution of Toxic Metal(loid)s and Microbial Community Analysis in Soil Vertical Profile at an Abandoned Nonferrous Metal Smelting Site. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197101

AMA Style

Yang J, Wang S, Guo Z, Deng Y, Xu M, Zhang S, Yin H, Liang Y, Liu H, Miao B, et al. Spatial Distribution of Toxic Metal(loid)s and Microbial Community Analysis in Soil Vertical Profile at an Abandoned Nonferrous Metal Smelting Site. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(19):7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jiejie, Siqi Wang, Ziwen Guo, Yan Deng, Menglong Xu, Siyuan Zhang, Huaqun Yin, Yili Liang, Hongwei Liu, Bo Miao, and et al. 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Toxic Metal(loid)s and Microbial Community Analysis in Soil Vertical Profile at an Abandoned Nonferrous Metal Smelting Site" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 19: 7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop