Next Article in Journal
Association between Shift Work and Neurocognitive Function among Firefighters in South Korea: A Prospective before–after Study
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Air Conditioning Systems on the Outdoor Thermal Environment during Summer in Berlin, Germany
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Palustrine Wetlands, China

1
College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
2
Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
3
Department of Geography, Ocean College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
4
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(13), 4646; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134646
Submission received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 21 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020 / Published: 28 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environment and Applied Ecology)

Abstract

:
Wetlands regulate the balance of global organic carbon. Small changes in the carbon stocks of wetland ecosystem play a crucial role in the regional soil carbon cycle. However, an accurate estimation of carbon stocks is still be debated for China’s wetlands ecosystem due to the limitation of data collection and methodology. Here, we investigate the soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in a 1-m depth in China’s palustrine wetlands. A total of 1383 sample data were collected from palustrine wetlands in China. The data sources are divided into three parts, respectively, data collection from published literature, data from books, and actual measurement data of sample points. The results demonstrate that there is considerable SOC storage in China’s palustrine wetlands (9.945 Pg C), primarily abundant in the northeast, northwest arid and semi-arid as well as Qinghai-Tibet Plateau regions. The SOC density in per unit area soil was higher in the wetland area of northeast, southwest and Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Within China terrestrial scale, the temperature and precipitation differences caused by latitude were the main environmental factors affecting the organic carbon content. Furthermore, except for the southeast and south wetland region, SOC content decreased with depth.

1. Introduction

Wetlands are important ecosystems located at the water-land interface, and have a significant effect on regulating the source-sink mechanism of soil organic carbon (SOC) [1]. With respect to optimal water-incubated conditions [2], wetlands, which only account for 5–8% of terrestrial land [3,4], contain 20–30% of soil organic carbon pool [5]. Palustrine wetlands refer to marshes, swamps, bogs, and fens, and are the major wetlands types investigated in this study [6]. In China, palustrine wetlands were primarily distributed in the northeast, southwest and south temperature-incubated regions, as well as the northwest and coastal water-incubated regions [7,8]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that there are various differences in SOC storage enriched in different geographic regions, which is strongly influenced by vegetation type, landscapes and hydrological conditions [9,10]. For instance, experiments in Wang et al. [11] indicated that SOC storage in tropical mangrove wetlands varies by 1–8 times along the tidal flooding gradient. Additionally, Li et al. [12] determined that long-term centralized management distinctly reduces SOC storage. Further, Liu et al. [13] concluded that soil carbon dioxide (CO2) shows seasonal changes with routine. Although, many studies have been conducted to identify the physical, chemical and biological factors on SOC biogeochemical circulation, only a few parameters in these analyses could account for the correlation between SOC and soil properties on a national-scale [14,15,16]. Thus, a thorough understanding on SOC biogeochemical circulation is needed.
At present, there are still many uncertainties in SOC estimations, which limits the understanding of the important role of wetlands in the global carbon circulation and climate change mitigation. Firstly, the total wetland area has been reduced by 68% due to climate change and anthropogenic activities [10,17], resulting in uncertainty in SOC estimations on regional and global scales [18]. Secondly, using the average peat layer thickness of 2.3 m, the estimated global wetland SOC storage is 445 Pg [19], which is nearly 2-times higher than earlier estimate (225 Pg) with the average peat layer thickness of 1.0 m [18]. Finally, scholars believe that the variability of wetland carbon stocks in different climate zones is evident [9,10], and thus the practicality of estimation methods needs further verification. Therefore, conducting a research on SOC storage at a national-scale will advance our understanding of spatial variation in SOC.
Despite considerable efforts directed at understanding SOC distribution and storage on global [20,21], country [22,23], and regional [24] scales, numerous studies primarily focused on agro-ecosystems [25,26], forest-ecosystems [27,28], grassland-ecosystems [29,30], while an accurate understanding of the distribution and storage of SOC in national-scale marshlands in still lacking. The spatial distribution of carbon storage in palustrine wetlands is affected by different factors from forests and farmland. The original theory suggests that the development process of wetlands is mainly affected by small-scale geomorphologic and hydrological processes [31] and has non-zonal characteristics. However, wetland productivity is also affected by solar energy on a large scale. Therefore, the distribution characteristics of wetland carbon reserves on a national scale, and whether there is a significant latitude effect, needs to be further discussed and verified. To address these issues, the central objectives of this study are threefold: (1) to investigate the SOC storage in China’s palustrine wetlands; (2) to identify the spatial and vertical distribution with profile depth in different geographic regions; and (3) to analyze the dominant environmental controls on SOC content at regional and national scales.

2. Database and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

In order to ensure the validity and accuracy of the data, the data sources of this paper are divided into three parts: literature data collection, field survey and measurement data, and preliminary data sorting. A systematic literature search was conducted with Web of Science, Elsevier Science Direct, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure using the following keyword combinations ‘marsh wetland’, ‘swamp wetland’, bogs’, ‘fens’, and ‘soil organic carbon OR soil organic matter’ in the title, abstract and keywords. The research on carbon storage in China’s palustrine wetland began in the late 1990’s, limiting this study to a more recent timespan which was represented in the literature. The oldest relevant paper was published in 2000, while the most recent research was published in 2019. A total of 1267 studies were entered into databases and analyzed for relevance. Articles which were deemed irrelevant or repetitive were exclude during a preliminary screening procedure, while the remaining publications were evaluated to extract data on SOC or SOM and the influencing environmental factors, including longitude, latitude, altitude, mean annual precipitation (AMP), mean annual temperature (AMT), moisture content (MC) and acid-base property (pH). To improve the spatial distribution of data points extracted from the literature, historical data and additional measured datapoints are used in supplement to this paper. Historical data was obtained from the book “China Marsh Annals”, from which data including relevant information of longitude, latitude, soil organic carbon content, soil bulk density, water content and pH of each point was extracted, totaling 67 sample points. However, the distribution of data from literature and historical resources is considerably lower in wetlands in the Great Hing’an Mountains, in the northeast of China. The Great Hing’an Mountains area is located along the southern margin of the Eurasian tundra, and is sensitive to climate change. Therefore, study on the carbon storage of palustrine wetlands in this area is of great importance for the estimation of SOC in China’s palustrine wetlands. Given this, 49 effective samples were collected in the Great Hing’an Mountains to improve the spatial distribution of the data. In addition, in order to verify the accuracy of the mathematical model use in this paper, three 1-m soil cores were collected in each wet area for error analysis. The distribution of sample points was shown in Figure 1.
Based on the distribution of wetlands in China, and considering the natural variation in these characteristics across different regions (e.g., hydrological and geomorphic features, wetland functions, etc.), China’s wetland resources are divided into eight wetland regions, the northeast wetland region (C1), the southwest wetland region (C2), wetlands in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River region (C3), the southeast and south wetland regions (C4), coastal wetland region (C5), wetlands in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau region (C6), wetlands in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River regions (C7) and wetlands in the northwest arid and the semi-arid regions (C8). Further information on geography of these regions is showed in Table 1.

2.2. Methodology

As an indicator of soil physical structure, bulk density (BD), which is related to the water holding capacity of soil and SOC biogeochemical circulation, was used in the construction of soil mathematical model [32,33]. In theory, BD can be evaluated through dividing the dried weight of soil by the total volume, but to undertake measurements of BD on a large scale is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and cost-expensive [34,35]. As a result, BD measurements are often missing from soil databases. To overcome this issue, Han et al. [36] used a stepwise multiple regression procedure and established two simulation equations (Equations (1) and (2)) for estimating BD calculating from SOM or SOC content using 1560 sampling points. However, China has a vast territory and diverse soil types, so the applicability of these transfer functions for BD to different soil ecosystems is also worth exploring. In 2016, Han et al. [37] evaluated the prediction accuracy and applicability of the afore mentioned simulation equations in different soil classes and proposed a modified relationship equation between BD and SOM (Equation (3)), which holds true to gleysols. In palustrine wetlands, soil is characterized as bog soil incubated via the processes of submergence, septic, and peatification. Thus, missing BD values were calculated using Equation (3). Simulation results shown that predicted values presented an acceptable error compared to measured values.
BD = 0.167 × 0.526 1.526 × SOM + 0.167 × ( 1 SOM )
ln BD = 0.5379 0.0653 × SOM 0.5
ln BD = 0.215 0.0025 × SOM + 0.0017 × H
where, BD (g/cm3), SOM (g/kg) and H (m), represent soil bulk density, soil organic matter content and soil depth. In this study, the downcore was divided into five layers: 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 and 80–100 cm).
Soil organic carbon density (SOCDi) per unit area is estimated for each layer of i [38] and is derived from BD (Equation (4)) [39,40].
SOCD i = C i × BD i × H i
where Ci and BDi represent SOC content and BD within a layer of i, and Hi represents the depth of the soil in that layer.
In this study, only SOC or SOM content in the soil surface layer was available, while the vertical distribution of SOC content is also essential information for estimating SOC storage. Numerous studies demonstrated that SOC content decreased rapidly with depth as a function of soil types, land-use, and vegetation communities [38]. In recent years, many measured data fitting results indicated that the changes in SOC content associated with profile depth can be quantitatively described in a form of equation, such as negative exponential function [26,41] (Equation (5)), power function [42] and logarithmic function [43]. By comparing the error analysis between the predicted value and the measured value, we selected negative exponential function to estimate SOC content in the lower layer. The parameters of the aforementioned equations can be estimated simple soil properties to overcome the shortage of sample data. Subsequently, SOC content per unit volume of 1 m depth was obtained with integral method, and SOC density was multiplied by the area (Equation (6)).
S SOC = C a exp ( k × H ) + C b
T SOC   = 1 5 [ ( S SOC ) ] × S
where Ca, Cb, and K were constants calculated from exponential function to calculate a region’s SOC storage (T-SOC, kg) per unit area (S, m2). The specific information about each area is shown in Table 1.
Most of the SOC data collected was from surface layers with a few datapoints from deeper layers (1 m). To ensure the reliability of the mathematical model, we selected some data to verify the mathematical model. The verification data were divided into two parts: one was the measured SOC content at 1 m depth collected from published literature; the second part was from the survey undertaken at the sample site. We sampled each wetland regions, collecting 1 m core of undisturbed soil which was analyzed in the laboratory for measurement.
Several measured values were selected to verify the applicability of equation, and demonstrated a maximum error of 18.61%, a minimum of 1.31%, and a mean error of 8.93% between measured and estimated SOC values (Figure 2).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Experimental data was processed with Excel software Ver. 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) to calculate BD. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was completed with Canoco software Ver. 4.5 (Biometris-Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands) to identify the explanatory capacity of environmental variables to SOC content. Using the statistical software SPSS Ver. 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), the direct and indirect influence of environmental variables on SOC distribution were assessed with path analysis (PA). Structural equation models (SEMs) was conducted with Amos Ver. 20.0. All figures were generated using Origin Ver. 9.0 (Microcal, Malvern, UK).

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Simulated SOC Storage

Results showed there is a considerable SOC storage in China’s palustrine wetlands, with a total of 9.945 Pg (Figure 3). However, significant difference was observed across the eight geographic regions. The carbon storage of palustrine wetlands in China is mainly distributed in Qinghai-Tibet plateau, the northeast and northwest of China. SOC reserves in these regions accounted for 53.28%, 32.69%, and 13.14% of the total reserves in all marsh and wetland, respectively, accounting for 99.11% in total. In C1, C6 and C8 geographic regions, SOC storage was high at 3.251, 5.299, and 1.307 Pg C, respectively; while C2, C3, C5, and C7 geographic regions had 0.0137, 0.0272, 0.0185, and 0.0274 Pg C, respectively; The lowest SOC at only 0.0009 Pg C was measured in the C4 geographic region. Specially, a total of 3.456 Pg C was estimated with a depth profile of 0–0.3 m.
SOC density showed clear variation between geographic regions (Figure 4). In the C1, C2, C6, and C8 geographic regions, SOC density was higher with values of 43.29, 41.71, 53.06, and 36.23 kg/m2, respectively, followed by the C4 (20.31 kg/m2), C3 (17.04 kg/m2), C7 (10.98 kg/m2), and C5 (10.84 kg/m2) geographic regions. The average SOC density was 27.17 ± 16.54 kg/m2.
With respect to SOC storage and content, the C6 and C1 geographic regions showed higher values, particularly C6 (Figure 5). SOC storage and content showed irregular trends due to the spatial distribution of sample points. With exception of the C4 geographic region which showed an SOC content increase the sub-layer of 0.8–1.0 m, a continuous decrease was observed in all other geographic regions. This phenomenon can be interpreted as soluble organic carbon accumulates in the bottom layer of the soil because water migrates to deep layer following precipitation. SOC content in each sub-layer was higher in the C6 geographic region, followed by C1, C2, C8, C4, C3, and the lowest SOC content in the C5 and C7 geographic regions. Although SOC content in the surface layer was relatively higher in the soils from the C6, C2, C1, and C8 geographic regions, SOC showed a rapid decrease with soil depth.

3.2. Environmental Controls on SOC Content

RDA showed that the first two axis components explained 76.10% of the variance in the correlation between SOC content and environmental controls (Table 2). More than 57.90% of the change in SOC content was explained by the combination of longitude, latitude, altitude, MAP, MAT, MC, and pH, indicating that environmental controls identified in the literature have a significant influence on SOC biogeochemical circulation. Of these, MAT was identified as the factor which explained the most amount of variance (23.74%), followed by longitude (18.2%), latitude (7.12%), altitude (5.02%), MAP (3.75%), and finally pH (0.75%).
Best-fit stepwise regression results indicated that when combined, these selected environmental controls can account for 99.9% variation in SOC content (Table 3). Latitude had a positive effect on SOC content with a direct path coefficient of 0.856. Meanwhile, MAP and MAT variation as a function of latitude had a negative influence on SOC content with an indirect path coefficient of −0.594 and −0.659, respectively. The direct path coefficients of MAP and MAT was 0.823, and was the second most significant environmental factors which influenced SOC content. PA results showed that the dominating environmental factors related to SOC content was latitude, followed by MAP, MAT, longitude, altitude, MC, and pH. In summary, the difference in MAP and MAT caused by latitude was the main reason for the spatial differentiation in SOC content. Notably, in the C1 geographic region, MAT presents a significant effect on SOC content, while no similar result was observed in the C6 geographic region. However, pH and MAP generally (p < 0.05) and significantly (p < 0.01) correlated with SOC content in both C1 and C6 geographic regions.
Due to the significant differences in climate characteristics, topography and geomorphology in the different geographical areas, the migration and transformation of SOC are affected by different environmental factors. In this study, the typical wetland regions of northeast China and Qinghai-Tibet plateau were selected for analysis (Figure 6). The results of the structural equation model (SEMs) show that in the wetland regions of northeast China, the pH difference caused by longitude and altitude is the main environmental factor affecting SOC content. The SOC content in the wetland regions of Qinghai-Tibet plateau is mainly controlled by altitude.

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatial Distribution and Characteristics of SOC on a National-Scale

With respect to wetland formation, palustrine wetlands is the manifestation of bidirectional ecological evolution processes between the land and surface water, which is formed under the comprehensive action of various natural factors, such as regional climate, hydrology, geological landform, and vegetation [44]. Climate is an important factor affecting the global biochemical cycle and plays an important role in the accumulation of organic carbon in the wetland ecosystem. Precipitation and air temperature are very important environmental factors affecting the local climate. Climate changes caused by water and temperature will have a significant impact on the input and decomposition of organic carbon in wetland soil. Firstly, climate conditions restrict the types of vegetation and affects the productivity of the ecosystem, thus affecting the input of SOC. Secondly, soil microorganisms are the main driving force for the decomposition and transformation of SOC. Climate affects the activity of microorganisms by affecting the hydrothermal conditions of soil, thus affecting the decomposition and transformation of SOC by microorganisms. In this study, SOC content was higher in the C1, C2, C6, and C8 geographical regions. This result can be explained by the complex influence associated with wetland development, climatic characteristic, and vegetation abundance. However, SOC storage showed a disparate spatial trend compared to SOC content. SOC storage was primarily distributed in the C1 and C6 geographical regions, which maybe contributed to the high density of SOC and large spatial distribution. Generally, SOC content is closely related to its parent materials on a national-scale. Except for the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, in the south of the Qinling-Huaihe region of China, it belongs to the subtropical to tropical climate. Due to the influence of the humid monsoon, soil types such as yellow-brown soil, yellow soil, krasnozem, and latosol appear from north to south. In these areas, soil leaching is intense and the soil is more acidic (pH = 5.0–5.5) [45], which inhibits the influence of microorganisms and hence the accumulation of SOC. In the north of the Qinling-Huaihe region, from south to north there is, a transition from a brown soil to a black soil region. Typical black soil is derived from river-lake sediments and enriched with carbon [46], resulting in higher SOC content in these palustrine wetlands. In general, SOC distribution in zones with latitude across China. However, due to the complexity and diversity of China’s climate and terrain, in some small areas, there are still non-zonal features that are affected by the integrated environment.
Climatic factors, especially hydrothermal conditions, are an important influence on the formation and development of palustrine wetlands and indirectly regulate SOC source-sink processes through affecting vegetation community assemblage and growth, as well as plant-residue decomposition quality and intensity [47]. The considerable SOC content in the C1, C2, and C6 geographical regions may be attributed to the control of temperature. High temperature accelerates vegetation to trap more carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere [48], enhancing plant photosynthesis; this can explain why SOC content in the C2 geographical region was higher, while higher SOC content in the C1 and C6 geographical regions was due to low temperatures which inhibit microorganisms and enzyme activity, reducing the decomposition rate of plant residues and facilitating SOC accumulation [49]. China’s tropical and subtropical regions have a hot climate with high temperatures, and large quantities of vegetation in the marshlands; however, the temperature is too high, which accelerates decomposition of vegetation residues, and inhibits SOC accumulation. Additionally, from cold temperate zones to the tropical zones, vegetation respiration increases, as seen in the results from the C3, C4, and C7 geographical regions which showed lower SOC content than that in the C1 geographical region. Explicitly, SOC storage in marsh is dominated by the amount of vegetation litter and decomposition [50].

4.2. Environmental Factors Controlling SOC Content

Soil physical properties, such as MC and BD [51,52], and biological properties including pH and microbial communities [15,53], can control SOC spatio-temporal distribution through regulating SOC accumulation-decomposition, precipitation-dissolution, adsorption-desorption, and oxidation-reduction process [54,55]. In the C1 and C6 geographic regions, SOC content per unit volume was higher than that in the C2, C3, C4, and C7 geographic regions. This phenomenon could be attributed to the difference in the temperature caused by latitude and altitude, confirming the conclusion that reduced temperature can restrict SOC mineralization and accelerate SOC accumulation [56,57]. Two possible reasons for this result include that lower temperatures inhibited soil microbial communities, resulting in a decrease in SOC mineralization rate [58], or that, compared to hotter geographic regions, plants, and animals respiration rate is significantly lower than that in colder geographic regions, leading to a decrease in CO2 emissions [13]. Additionally, decomposition rate of plant residues by soil microorganisms was relatively lower in the C1 and C6 geographic regions, resulting in an increase in SOC sources.
Generally, MC plays an important role in the SOC source-sink process through regulating the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), microbial biomass and vegetation types [48,59,60]. Heikkinen et al. [61] demonstrated that anaerobic environments inhibited SOC mineralization and biological respiration, which accelerated the SOC accumulation. This is seen in the results presented in this paper which showed that SOC content per unit volume in the C2 geographic region was higher than that in the C3 and C7 geographic regions. On the other hand, SOC content per unit volume in the C8 geographic region was markedly higher compared to C3, C4, and C7 geographic regions, which may be attributed to the fact that the climate of this region is characterized by frequent droughts and less biomass, so the disturbance of original SOC is small. Experiments in Sun et al. [62] and Meng et al. [63] demonstrated that the binning points on the surface of fine-aggregates are occupied by metal ions under highly-saline condition, thus releasing abundant dissolve organic carbon (DOC), which provides more available carbon sources for the mineralization and decomposition by soil microorganisms. Similarly, the surface soil of coastal wetlands is significantly eroded by flowing waters, which in turn are inundated with seawater, thus causing the loss of a large amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by seawater erosion. This corresponds results presented here, which showed that SOC content in coastal wetlands (C5 geographic region) was lower than that in other geographic regions.

5. Conclusions

There was a considerable SOC storage in China’s palustrine wetlands with a value of 9.945 Pg C, primarily abundant in the northeast and northwest arid and semi-arid regions as well as Qinghai-Tibet Plateau regions, account for 99.11% of total SOC storage. Specially, within China terrestrial scale a total of 3.456 Pg C was estimated with a depth profile of 0–0.3 m. The variation in MAP and MAT as a result of latitude was primary reason for the spatial differences in SOC content. Under the influence of climatic conditions and soil parent material, SOC content in per-unit volume was the highest in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau region (C6 geographic region), while that of coastal wetlands (C5 geographic region) was the lowest.

Author Contributions

L.H. was responsible for data collection and manuscript writing; Y.G., Z.W., and C.S. designed manuscript structure; S.J. and Y.Z. performed experimental work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0503906), the NSFC Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges (No. 41620104005), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41571097, 41730643 and 41101271).

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the National Key Research and Development Program of China for funding the present work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitra, S.; Wassmann, R.; Vlek, P.L.G. An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitsch, W.J.; Bernal, B.; Nahlik, A.M.; Mander, U.; Zhang, L.; Anderson, C.J.; Jorgensen, S.E.; Brix, H. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bridgham, S.D.; Megonigal, J.P.; Keller, J.K.; Bliss, N.B.; Trettin, C. The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 2006, 26, 889–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Roulet, N.T. Peatlands, carbon storage, greenhouse gases, and the Kyoto Protocol: Prospects and significance for Canada. Wetlands 2000, 20, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lal, R. Carbon sequestration. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 815–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lehner, B.; Döll, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 2004, 296, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mu, C.; Han, S.; Luo, J.; Wang, X. Biomass distribution patterns of ecotones between forest and swamp in Changbai Mountain. J. For. Res. 2000, 11, 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mu, C.; Lu, H.; Wang, B.; Bao, X.; Cui, W. Short-term effects of harvesting on carbon storage of boreal Larix gmelinii—Carex schmidtii forested wetlands in Daxing’anling, northeast China. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 293, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bai, J.; Ouyang, H.; Deng, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q. Spatial distribution characteristics of organic matter and total nitrogen of marsh soils in river marginal wetlands. Geoderma 2004, 124, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neher, D.A.; Barbercheck, M.E.; El-Allaf, S.M.; Anas, O. Effects of disturbance and ecosystem on decomposition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 23, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, G.; Guan, D.; Peart, M.R.; Chen, Y.; Peng, Y. Ecosystem carbon stocks of mangrove forest in Yingluo Bay, Guangdong Province of South China. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 310, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chang, S.X.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, G.; Fu, S.; Yan, E.; Wu, J.; Lin, L. Long-term intensive management effects on soil organic carbon pools and chemical composition in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests in subtropical China. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 303, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, J.; Jiang, P.; Wang, H.; Zhou, G.; Wu, J.; Yang, F.; Qian, X. Seasonal soil CO2 efflux dynamics after land use change from a natural forest to Moso bamboo plantations in subtropical China. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bai, J.; Ouyang, H.; Xiao, R.; Gao, J.; Gao, H.; Cui, B.; Huang, L. Spatial and variability of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content and storage in an alpine wetland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Austrilian J. Soil Res. 2010, 48, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Feng, J.; Wu, H.; Lin, G. Distribution patterns and controlling factors for the soil organic carbon in four mangrove forests of China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 17, e00575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mao, D.H.; Wang, Z.M.; Li, L.; Miao, Z.H.; Ma, W.H.; Song, C.C.; Ren, C.Y.; Jia, M.M. Soil organic carbon in the Sanjiang Plain of China: Storage, distribution and controlling factors. Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 1635–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jenkinson, D.S.; Adams, D.E.; Wild, A. Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming. Nature 1991, 351, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Armentano, T.V.; Menges, E.S. Patterns of change in the carbon balance of organic soil-wetlands of the temperate zone. J. Ecol. 1986, 74, 755–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gorham, E. Northern peatlands: Role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol. Appl. 1991, 1, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bohn, H.L. Estimate of Organic Carbon in World Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1982, 46, 1118–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eswaran, H.; Van Den Berg, E.; Reich, P. Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Arrouays, D.; Deslais, W.; Badeau, V. The carbon content of topsoil and its geographical distribution in France. Soil Use Manag. 2001, 17, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Krogh, L.; Noergaard, A.; Hermansen, M.; Greve, M.H.; Balstroem, T.; Breuning-Madsen, H. Preliminary estimates of contemporary soil organic carbon stocks in Denmark using multiple datasets and four scaling-up methods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 96, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, W.; Shi, X.; Yu, D.; Wang, K.; Wang, H. Estimation of Soil organic carbon density and storage of northeast china. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2004, 41, 298–300. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, M.; Han, X.; Du, S.; Li, L.J. Profile stock of soil organic carbon and distribution in croplands of Northeast China. Catena 2019, 174, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meersmans, J.; van Wesemael, B.; De Ridder, F.; Van Molle, M. Modelling the three-dimensional spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium). Geoderma 2009, 152, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nord-Larsen, T.; Vesterdal, L.; Bentsen, N.S.; Larsen, J.B. Ecosystem carbon stocks and their temporal resilience in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 447, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Santini, N.S.; Adame, M.F.; Nolan, R.H.; Miquelajauregui, Y.; Pinero, D.; Mastretta-Yanes, A.; Cuervo-Robayo, A.P.; Eamus, D. Storage of organic carbon in the soils of Mexican temperate forests. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 446, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Du, Y.G.; Zhou, G.; Guo, X.W.; Cao, G.M. Spatial distribution of grassland soil organic carbon and potential carbon storage on the Qinghai Plateau. Grassl. Sci. 2019, 65, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, X.; Hu, S.Y.; Dong, J.; Ren, M.; Zhang, X.L.; Dong, K.H.; Wang, C.H. Effects of spring fire and slope on the aboveground biomass, and organic C and N dynamics in a semi-arid grassland of northern China. J. Arid Land 2019, 11, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bernal, B.; Mitsch, W.J. Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetland communities. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Acutis, M.; Donatelli, M. SOILPAR 2.00: Software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heuscher, S.A.; Brandt, C.C.; Jardine, P.M. Using soil physical and chemical properties to estimate bulk density. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  34. Benites, V.M.; Machado, P.; Fidalgo, E.C.C.; Coelho, M.R.; Madari, B.E. Pedotransfer functions for estimating soil bulk density from existing soil survey reports in Brazil. Geoderma 2007, 139, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, R.M. Mechanisms of soil organic carbon storage response to Spartina alterniflora invasion and climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 690, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Han, G.Z.; Zhang, G.L.; Gong, Z.T.; Wang, G.F. Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Soil Bulk Density in China. Soil Sci. 2012, 177, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, G.Z.; Wang, D.C.; Xie, D.J. Study on soil bulk density transfer function of main soil types in China. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2016, 53, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  38. Minasny, B.; McBratney, A.B.; Mendonça-Santos, M.L.; Odeh, I.O.A.; Guyon, B. Prediction and digital mapping of soil carbon storage in the Lower Namoi Valley. Soil Res. 2006, 44, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cambule, A.H.; Rossiter, D.G.; Stoorvogel, J.J.; Smaling, E.M.A. Soil organic carbon stocks in the Limpopo National Park, Mozambique: Amount, spatial distribution and uncertainty. Geoderma 2014, 213, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, B. Determining the influence factors of soil organic carbon stock in opencast coal-mine dumps based on complex network theory. Catena 2019, 173, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Meersmans, J.; Van Wesemael, B.; De Ridder, F.; Dotti, M.F.; De Baets, S.; Van Molle, M. Changes in organic carbon distribution with depth in agricultural soils in northern Belgium, 1960-2006. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 15, 2739–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, F.; Zhang, G.L.; Sun, Y.J.; Zhao, Y.G.; Li, D.C. Mapping the three-dimensional distribution of soil organic matter across a subtropical hilly landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2013, 77, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jobbagy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chimner, R.A.; Ewel, C. A tropical freshwater wetland: II. production, decomposition, and peat formation. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 13, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, K.; Huang, J.; Li, D.M.; Yu, X.C.; Ye, H.C.; Hu, H.W.; Hu, Z.H.; Huang, Q.H.; Zhang, H.M. Comparison of carbon sequestration efficiency in soil aggregates between upland and paddy soils in a red soil region of China. J. Integr. Agr. 2019, 18, 1348–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ren, X.; Cheng, C.; Wang, S. Quantitative assessment of soil productivity and predicted impacts of water erosion in the black soil region of northeastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637–638, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bonner, M.T.L.; Herbohn, J.; Gregorio, N.; Pasa, A.; Avela, M.S.; Solano, C.; Moreno, M.O.M.; Almendras-Ferraren, A.; Wills, J.; Shoo, L.P.; et al. Soil organic carbon recovery in tropical tree plantations may depend on restoration of soil microbial composition and function. Geoderma 2019, 353, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pérez-Rojas, J.; Moreno, F.; Quevedo, J.C.; Villa, J. Soil organic carbon stocks in fluvial and isolated tropical wetlands from Colombia. Catena 2019, 179, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhong, Q.; Wang, K.; Nie, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, Y. Responses of wetland soil carbon and nutrient pools and microbial activities after 7 years of experimental warming in the Yangtze Estuary. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 136, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vicente-Vicente, J.L.; Gómez-Muñoz, B.; Hinojosa-Centeno, M.B.; Smith, P.; Garcia-Ruiz, R. Carbon saturation and assessment of soil organic carbon fractions in Mediterranean rainfed olive orchards under plant cover management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 245, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wang, W.; Akhtar, K.; Ren, G.; Yang, G.; Feng, Y.; Yuan, L. Impact of straw management on seasonal soil carbon dioxide emissions, soil water content, and temperature in a semi-arid region of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yin, S.; Bai, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, G.; Jia, J.; Cui, B.; Liu, X. Effects of soil moisture on carbon mineralization in floodplain wetlands with different flooding frequencies. J. Hydrol. 2019, 574, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tu, C.; He, T.; Lu, X.; Luo, Y.; Smith, P. Extent to which pH and topographic factors control soil organic carbon level in dry farming cropland soils of the mountainous region of Southwest China. Catena 2018, 163, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Martinsen, V.; Munera-Echeverri, J.L.; Obia, A.; Cornelissen, G.; Mulder, J. Significant build-up of soil organic carbon under climate-smart conservation farming in Sub-Saharan Acrisols. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Peng, F.; Xue, X.; You, Q.; Huang, C.; Dong, S.; Liao, J.; Duan, H.; Tsunekawa, A.; Wang, T. Changes of soil properties regulate the soil organic carbon loss with grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 93, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Epron, D.; Farque, L.; Lucot, É.; Badot, P.M. Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: Dependence on soil temperature and soil water content. Ann. Sci. 1999, 56, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Fang, C.; Moncrieff, J.B. The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.; Yan, D.; Pendall, E.; Pei, J.; Noh, N.J.; He, J.S.; Li, B.; Nie, M.; Fang, C. Depth dependence of soil carbon temperature sensitivity across Tibetan permafrost regions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sahrawat, K.L. Organic matter accumulation in submerged soils. Adv. Agron. 2004, 81, 169–201. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhan, C.L.; Cao, J.J.; Han, Y.M.; Wang, P.; Huang, R.J.; Wei, C.; Hu, W.G.; Zhang, J.Q. Spatial patterns, storages and sources of black carbon in soils from the catchment of Qinghai Lake, China. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2015, 66, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Heikkinen, J.E.P.; Elsakov, V.; Martikainen, P.J. Carbon dioxide and methane dynamics and annual carbon balance in tundra wetland in NE Europe, Russia. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16, 62-1-62-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, H.; Jiang, J.; Cui, L.; Feng, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Soil organic carbon stabilization mechanisms in a subtropical mangrove and salt marsh ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 673, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Meng, W.; Feagin, R.A.; Hu, B.; He, M.; Li, H. The spatial distribution of blue carbon in the coastal wetlands of China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 222, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Selected sampling points distribution diagram.
Figure 1. Selected sampling points distribution diagram.
Ijerph 17 04646 g001
Figure 2. Relative error analysis between SOC measured value and estimated value.
Figure 2. Relative error analysis between SOC measured value and estimated value.
Ijerph 17 04646 g002
Figure 3. SOC storage in eight geographic regions.
Figure 3. SOC storage in eight geographic regions.
Ijerph 17 04646 g003
Figure 4. SOC density in the eight geographic regions.
Figure 4. SOC density in the eight geographic regions.
Ijerph 17 04646 g004
Figure 5. Changes in SOC content with soil depth for each geographic region.
Figure 5. Changes in SOC content with soil depth for each geographic region.
Ijerph 17 04646 g005
Figure 6. SEMs, representing hypothesized causal relationships between SOC content and physio-chemical parameters. Note: “*” effect is significant at p < 0.05 level; “**” effect is significant at p < 0.01 level; “***” effect is significant at p < 0.001 level.
Figure 6. SEMs, representing hypothesized causal relationships between SOC content and physio-chemical parameters. Note: “*” effect is significant at p < 0.05 level; “**” effect is significant at p < 0.01 level; “***” effect is significant at p < 0.001 level.
Ijerph 17 04646 g006
Table 1. Natural properties of geographical regions.
Table 1. Natural properties of geographical regions.
Geographical RegionPalustrine Wetlands Area × 104 km2Altitude mMAP mmMAT °CClimatic Characteristic
C17.5204327.15501.4Temperate monsoon climate
C20.03291847.289818Subtropical monsoon climate
Tropical monsoon climate
C30.159525.5132016.6Subtropical monsoon climate
C40.004643.6228321.3Subtropical monsoon climate
C50.17107.287914.1Temperate monsoon climate
Subtropical monsoon climate
Tropical monsoon climate
C69.98653539.16553.3Plateau mountain climate
C70.249311.751013.5Temperate monsoon climate
C83.60892730874.5Temperate continental climate
Table 2. RDA results between SOC content and environmental variables.
Table 2. RDA results between SOC content and environmental variables.
ItemAX 1AX 2
Eigenvalues0.5790.421
Species-environment correlation0.7610.000
Cumulative % variance of species57.90100.00
Cumulative % variance of species-environment100.000.00
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues0.579
Table 3. PA results between SOC content and environmental variables
Table 3. PA results between SOC content and environmental variables
Response VariableVariableR2Direct Path CoefficientIndirect Path CoefficientTotal Path CoefficientResidual Path Coefficient
MAPMATLatitudeLongitudeAltitudeMcpH
SOCMAP0.9990.823--0.682−0.618−0.082−0.027−0.003−0.000−0.0470.001
MAT0.8230.682--−0.686−0.1180.039−0.011−0.002−0.095
Latitude0.856−0.594−0.659--0.2750.2310.0090.002−0.736
Longitude0.375−0.179−0.2590.627--0.2530.0050.0020.449
Altitude−0.2860.077−0.111−0.692−0.332--−0.013−0.001−1.072
MC0.025−0.088−0.3540.3220.0780.144--0.0010.104
pH−0.0030.0650.427−0.573−0.263−0.140−0.012--−0.496
Note: ‘--‘ represents that there is no indirect path coefficient between the same environmental factor.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, L.; Wan, Z.; Guo, Y.; Song, C.; Jin, S.; Zuo, Y. Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Palustrine Wetlands, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134646

AMA Style

Han L, Wan Z, Guo Y, Song C, Jin S, Zuo Y. Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Palustrine Wetlands, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(13):4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Lu, Zhongmei Wan, Yuedong Guo, Changchun Song, Shaofei Jin, and Yunjiang Zuo. 2020. "Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Palustrine Wetlands, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 13: 4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop