Next Article in Journal
Role of Emerging Environmental Risk Factors in Thyroid Cancer: A Brief Review
Previous Article in Journal
Status Quo of Professional–Patient Relations in the Internet Era: Bibliometric and Co-Word Analyses
Review

Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators

1
School of Health Sciences, College of Health Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
2
Centre of Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(7), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071184
Received: 19 February 2019 / Revised: 22 March 2019 / Accepted: 25 March 2019 / Published: 2 April 2019
The underlying values and priorities that drive policy responses depend largely on the constructs that researchers and decision makers select to measure and the metrics used. Despite much recent attention being given to sustainable diets and food systems and to the importance of clearly measuring sustainability to meet targets, to achieve goals, and to appraise dietary and environmental policies, it is not commonly agreed how the different indicators of sustainable diets are assessed. The evidence base for assessment of these indicators are frequently weak, fragmented, and arbitrary. The aim of this paper was to compare a range of published methods and indicators for assessing sustainable diets and food systems in order to harmonise them. Keyword and reference searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, and Web of Knowledge. Fifty-two studies (21 proposed methods and 31 used methods) that combined environment, nutrition and health, and socioeconomic aspects of sustainable diets were reviewed. The majority (over 90%) of the studies focused on high-income countries. Twenty-eight studies assessed the environmental effects of different dietary practices, eight of the studies examined the nutrition and health indicators used for assessing sustainable food systems, and seven studies assessed the social and economic costs of diets. A classification of the elements was developed, and common elements are proposed for standardizing. These elements were categorized into nutrition and health indicators, environment indicators, and socioeconomic indicators. Standardized or harmonized indicators can be used for consistency and applicability purposes and to support, implement, and monitor relevant policies. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable diets; food systems; indicators; health; economic; nutrition sustainable diets; food systems; indicators; health; economic; nutrition
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Eme, P.E.; Douwes, J.; Kim, N.; Foliaki, S.; Burlingame, B. Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071184

AMA Style

Eme PE, Douwes J, Kim N, Foliaki S, Burlingame B. Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(7):1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eme, Paul E., Jeroen Douwes, Nicholas Kim, Sunia Foliaki, and Barbara Burlingame. 2019. "Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 7: 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071184

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop