Next Article in Journal
A Pill in the Lifeworld of Women in Burkina Faso: Can Misoprostol Reframe the Meaning of Abortion
Previous Article in Journal
The Changing Process of Women’s Smoking Status Triggered by Pregnancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Roles of Relative Humidity in Aerosol Pollution Aggravation over Central China during Wintertime

1
Chinese Antarctic Centre of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
2
Hubei Environmental Monitoring Centre, Wuhan 430079, China
3
School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(22), 4422; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224422
Submission received: 26 September 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 6 November 2019 / Published: 12 November 2019

Abstract

:
Aerosol pollution elicits considerable public concern due to the adverse influence on air quality, climate change, and human health. Outside of emissions, haze formation is closely related to meteorological conditions, especially relative humidity (RH). Partly due to insufficient investigations on the aerosol hygroscopicity, the accuracy of pollution prediction in Central China is limited. In this study, taking Wuhan as a sample city, we investigated the response of aerosol pollution to RH during wintertime based on in-situ measurements. The results show that, aerosol pollution in Wuhan is dominated by PM2.5 (aerodynamic particle size not larger than 2.5 μm) on wet days (RH ≥ 60%), with the averaged mass fraction of 0.62 for PM10. Based on the RH dependence of aerosol light scattering (f (RH)), aerosol hygroscopicity was evaluated and shows the high dependence on the particle size distribution and chemical compositions. f (RH = 80%) in Wuhan was 2.18 (±0.73), which is comparable to that measured in the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta regions for urban aerosols, and generally greater than values in Beijing. Ammonium (NH4+), sulfate (SO42−), and nitrate (NO3) were enhanced by approximately 2.5-, 2-, and 1.5-fold respectively under wet conditions, and the ammonia-rich conditions in wintertime efficiently promoted the formation of SO42− and NO3, especially at high RH. These secondary ions play an important role in aggravating the pollution level and aerosol light scattering. This study has important implications for understanding the roles of RH in aerosol pollution aggravation over Central China, and the fitted equation between f (RH) and RH may be helpful for pollution forecasting in this region.

1. Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols, consisting of large amounts of solid and liquid particles, could directly or indirectly affect the climate system [1,2,3,4]. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that aerosols are consistently the leading contributors to the uncertainty of global climate change [5,6]. What is more, numerous epidemiological studies have indicated that the suspended particles in the atmosphere, especially those with an aerodynamic diameter not larger than 2.5 µm (PM2.5), would produce serious adverse effects on human bodies, hence increasing deaths from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and even lung cancer [7,8]. As such, aerosols have drawn considerable concern [9,10,11]. In recent years, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the formation mechanisms of aerosol pollution, and some of them implied the important role of relative humidity (RH) in this issue because of the aerosol hygroscopicity [12,13].
On the one hand, the volume of hydrophilic aerosols increases after water uptake, thereby enhancing light scattering and, consequently, affecting horizontal visibility and the earth–atmosphere radiation budget [14,15]. To assess the effect of aerosols on the radiation budget, numerous in-situ measurements of aerosol light scattering are carried out. However, these measurements are commonly performed under dry conditions through heating air mass samples. It is necessary to transform the measured dry aerosol optical properties into corresponding values at ambient RH [16]. In order to quantify the relationship between the two aerosol scattering properties, the scattering hygroscopic growth factor, f (RH), was established to picture the response of aerosol optical properties to the different ambient RH [17]. Notably, the value of f (RH) presents significant spatial variety [16]. Quantifying f (RH) is necessary to estimate the aerosol direct radiative forcing.
On the other hand, the increased conserved water could accelerate the gas–liquid–solid reactions of gaseous precursors with particles, thereby strengthening the hygroscopicity of aerosols [14,18]. Since the 1980s, China has witnessed rapid urbanization and industrialization accompanied by a continuous increase in total emissions of air pollutants and gradual deterioration of air quality [19,20,21]. Specifically, traditional coal–smoke air pollution, which includes sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particles as the main components, remains severe due to the coal-dominated energy structure of China [22]. Furthermore, the concentration of photochemical precursors in the atmosphere, such as NOx and volatile organic compounds, has continued to increase with vehicle ownership [23]. Other than primary emissions, secondary particle generation has become another notable cause of haze formation in the country, and may even play a decisive role occasionally [13,24,25]. Understanding the aerosol hygroscopicity is vital to further explain the physicochemical processes in the atmosphere and local haze pollution.
Notably, aerosol hygroscopicity not only has significant impacts on climate and environment, but also aggravates the threats to human health by affecting the transmission and deposition of inhaled particles into the respiratory system [26,27]. Therefore, it has elicited wide research attention, especially in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region [28,29,30], the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region [25,31,32], and the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region [33,34]. For example, Xie et al. (2017) [25] focused on a wintertime haze episode in Shanghai in 2014, and found that both hygroscopicity and effective density of the particles increased with particle size, indicating the key role of secondary particles generated from the gaseous precursors in the particle growth. However, to the best of our knowledge, systemic studies on the aerosol hygroscopicity and its impact on pollution aggravation in Central China, one of the most polluted areas in the country, are still quite limited. Herein, observations from an environmental monitoring facility in Wuhan were adopted to explore the hygroscopic growth distributions and response of aerosol pollution to RH variations in Central China.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Data

Observations from an environmental monitoring super site (114.37° E, 30.53° N) of the Hubei Environmental Monitoring Centre located in Wuhan, China, were adopted. This site is surrounded by commercial blocks and dwelling quarters, and can be considered a representative urban site. Various aerosol-related observation instruments are installed at this site, including the ambient particulate monitor (Model TEOM-1405, USA), nephelometer (Model Ecotech-Aurora1000, Australia), online ion chromatographic analyzer (Model METROHM-MAGAR 1S, Holland), automatic organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) analyzer (Model RT4, USA), various gas analyzers and meteorological monitors, etc. The datasets used here included ground-based concentration measurements of solid and gaseous pollutants, chemical compositions in particles, and aerosol light scattering. Meteorological parameters, such as RH (%) and T (°C), were also obtained from in-situ measurements. Only data that met the quality requirements established by the local environmental agency were adopted, and data recorded with RH > 95% were excluded from this study to avoid the influence of wet deposition. The sampling time range was from December 2017 to February 2018.
The mass concentrations of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10, that is, particles with aerodynamic diameters not larger than 1.0, 2.5 and 10 µm, were measured using the micro-oscillation balance method with a time resolution of 1 h. Mass concentrations of main water-soluble ionic components in PM2.5, including cations (e.g. NH4+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) and anions (e.g. SO42−, NO3, and Cl), were measured via the ion chromatography method with a sampling velocity of 1 m3/h. OC and EC were monitored based on the thermal–optical transmittance method with a measuring sensitivity of 0.5 μgC/m3. Aerosol scattering coefficients (SC) were monitored using the integral method with a minimum detection limit of 0.3 Mm−1 by the nephelometer. During the experiment, the RH of sampled aerosols was controlled by a heating process. The mass concentrations of gas pollutants, namely, SO2, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3), were measured through fluorescence analysis, chemi-luminescence method, and ultraviolet spectrophotometry, respectively.
In order to evaluate the influence of hygroscopic growth on aerosol observations measured by satellite remote sensing, aerosol optical depth (AOD) data provided by Himawari-8 was also used in this work. Himawari-8 is a stationary orbit satellite, which was launched in October 2014 and is operated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. Until now, only two kinds of AOD products (L2 and L3) have been published, and they have the same spatial resolution of 0.05°. However, the temporal resolution of L2 products is 10 min and that of L3 products includes 1 h, 1 day, and 1 month. There are four confidence levels, namely, very good, good, marginal, and no confidence for AOD quality assurance. Herein, hourly AOD data with the highest confidence level from L3 were adopted.

2.2. Method

2.2.1. Parameterization of Scattering Hygroscopic Growth

The RH dependence of aerosol light scattering is one of the physical parameters commonly applied to describe aerosol hygroscopicity, and could be characterized by the scattering hygroscopic growth factor, denoted by f (RH), which is defined as the ratio of aerosol light scattering coefficient at a given RHRH) and under dry conditions (σdry), which is usually defined as RH < 40% [14,17]. This factor is used to represent the overall aerosol light scattering enhancement and is determined by the particle size distribution, chemical composition, density, and refractive index [14,35]. Several models, such as the exponential [35] and binomial models [29], have been developed to describe the relationship between f (RH) and RH. Herein, two widely used models, namely, the two-parameter fit equation [36,37] and the kappa equation [37,38], were adopted to investigate the hygroscopic growth for light scattering in Central China:
(1) Two-parameter fitting equation
f ( R H ) = a ( 1 R H 100 ) b
where a and b are empirical fitting parameters. The scattering growth in this equation is normalized by the parameter of a, and the magnitude of the hygroscopic increase in the scattering coefficient is represented by the parameter of b [37,39]. This equation is related to both particle size and chemical composition.
(2) Kappa equation
f ( R H ) = 1 + k R H 100 R H ,
where k is a fitting parameter, related to the average water activity of aerosol components [37]. The hygroscopic growth of aerosol scattering in this equation is theoretically expressed in terms of volume growth based on the Mie equation [37,38].
Under the condition of low RH, the change of f (RH) is not obvious, while at high RH, f (RH) changes greatly with the increase of RH. Based on the aircraft measurements, Beyersdorf et al. (2016) [40] concluded that at low RH, aerosol loadings and hygroscopic growth accounted for about 88% and 10% of the extinction variability respectively, while when RH > 60%, 95% of the extinction diurnal variability and 62% of the spatial variability should be attributed to aerosol water uptake. Chen et al. (2014) [14] also indicates that when RH < 60%, the influence of aerosol water uptake on the f (RH) is indistinct. Therefore, in order to better analyze the influence of aerosol hygroscopicity on local pollution, particular attention was paid to aerosol distribution and optical properties when RH ≥ 60%, defined as wet conditions here.

2.2.2. Evaluation of Secondary Aerosols

Here, analysis of secondary aerosol formation focused on sulfate (SO42−), nitrate (NO3), and ammonium salt (NH4+), generally considered as the main composition of secondary inorganic aerosols, remarkably contributing to the moisture absorption of atmospheric particles [41]. The oxidation of gaseous precursors is the main chemical pathway for secondary particle formation. Among them, the oxidation property of gaseous precursors (SO2 and NO2) can be evaluated by the oxidation ratio, calculated following Li et al. (2013) [42] and Pani et al. (2018) [43]:
S O R = n ( S O 4 2 ) n ( S O 4 2 ) + n ( S O 2 )
N O R = n ( NO 3 ) n ( NO 3 ) + n ( NO 2 )
where SOR and NOR are the sulfur oxidation ratio and nitrogen oxidation ratio respectively, indicating the conversion degree of gas-phase SO2 and NO2 to particulate sulfate (SO42−) and nitrate (NO3). n(SO42−), n(SO2), n(NO3−), and n(NO2) are the molar concentration of each component. Previous studies have indicated that the value of SOR (NOR) is generally less than 0.10 in the primary pollutants, and a higher SOR (NOR) denotes the significant generation of sulfates (nitrates) in the atmosphere [44,45].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Overview

During the sampling period, the averaged concentrations of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 were 29.89, 51.87, and 95.39 µg/m3, respectively, and the mean mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10 was 0.55. Compared with dry conditions (RH ≤ 40%), although the average concentration of PM10 only increased by 14% on wet days (RH ≥ 60%), the mean contents of PM1 and PM2.5 almost doubled, which resulted in a remarkable increase in the proportion of fine particles, with the ratio of PM2.5/PM10 increasing from 0.38 to 0.62 (Table 1). When RH ≤ 70%, the concentrations of PM1 and PM2.5 both increased with RH increasing, as shown in Figure 1a,b. However, when RH > 70%, the concentration of PM1 decreased, whereas that of PM2.5 continued to increase. The above results suggest that the enhancement of PM2.5 concentration at high RH is dominated by particles with aerodynamic diameters between 1.0 and 2.5 µm.

3.2. Aerosol Scattering Hygroscopic Growth

The ambient aerosols absorb or lose water in response to the change of ambient RH and consequently the particle size and refractive index change, altering the aerosol scattering properties ultimately [16]. Compared with dry conditions (RH ≤ 40%), the averaged SC enhanced by 228.26 Mm−1 on wet days (RH ≥ 60%), from 189.71 Mm−1 to 441.99 Mm−1, which indicates the remarkable impact of aerosol hygroscopicity on the extinction for light. Here, the RH dependence of light scattering, f (RH), was fitted by the two-parameter fitting equation and the kappa equation respectively, as shown in Figure 2a,b. Aerosol hygroscopic growth was inconspicuous at low RH, only leading to slight changes in f (RH). With the increase of RH, especially when RH > 60%, aerosol hygroscopic growth leads to significant changes in light scattering.
Comparison of the fitting performance between two models indicates that the two-parameter fitting equation was more suitable for representing the actual hygroscopic growth in Wuhan in terms of a higher determination coefficient (R2 = 0.97). Therefore, the final parametric form of f (RH) is presented as follows:
f ( R H ) = 0.95 ( 1 R H 100 ) 0.49
Based on the parametric form above, the correlation between satellite AOD from Himawari-8 and the concentration of dry particles observed from the ground stations improved from 0.56 to 0.65 after a simple hygroscopic correction considering scattering hygroscopic growth ( AOD ~ PM 2.5 dry vs. AOD ~ PM 2.5 dry × f ( R H ) ), as shown in Figure 2c.
So far, researchers in China have conducted numerous studies investigating the hygroscopic factor for aerosol scattering. In order to further analyze the difference of aerosol hygroscopicity between Central China and other regions in the country, we focused on the parameter of f (RH = 80%), which has been widely used to compare the aerosol hygroscopicity in different regions or different pollution levels, and it was summarized in Table 2. Comparisons implied that the hygroscopicity of aerosols varies in different regions with various pollution levels and aerosol types. In this study, f (RH = 80%) is 2.18   ( ± 0.73 ) , which is comparable to 2.4 measured in Nanjing and 2.0   ( ± 0.3 ) measured in Guangzhou for urban aerosols, but it was generally greater than that measured in BTH regions. This is partly due to drier conditions and a higher dust fraction in BTH regions. Additionally, it could be found that f (RH) of urban aerosols is higher than that of rural aerosols. This may be because of the higher mass fraction of anthropogenic hydrophilic inorganic salts, organic acids, and/or organic acid salts, which need to be further investigated. The marine aerosols show the strongest hygroscopicity because of the high solubility of sea salt, which is more than twice as strong as dust aerosols.
Herein, a sensitivity analysis of particulate scattering hygroscopic growth at RH = 80% was further conducted (Figure 3). There is a high linear correlation between f (RH = 80%) and the mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10, with the correlation coefficient of 0.85, as presented in Figure 3a. With the mass fraction of inorganic salts (including NH4+, SO42−, NO3, Ca2+, Na+, K+, M2+, and Cl) in PM2.5 increasing, f (RH = 80%) showed an increasing tendency, with the correlation coefficient of 0.57. Rather, a gradual decrease was observed with the enhanced mass fraction of organic matter in PM2.5. This is because most organic particles are hydrophobic. The similar findings were also noted by Wu et al. (2017) [29] and Chen et al. (2014) [14]. These statistical results indicate the high dependence of f (RH) on the aerosol particle size distribution and hygroscopicity, which is correlated to chemical compositions.

3.3. Secondary Aerosol Formation

On the basis of aerosol chemical composition measurements, Liu et al. (2014) [49] reported that three inorganic ions of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3, mainly generated by secondary processes, were significantly correlated to particle hygroscopic growth, while other inorganic ions (Ca2+, Na+, K+, M2+, and Cl) showed little correlation. Therefore, we focus on the variation of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3 to further investigate the relationship between aerosol chemical compositions and RH in Wuhan.
During the sampling period, the averaged concentrations of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3 were 10.71, 7.53, and 6.01 µg/m3, respectively (Table 3). Compared with dry conditions (RH ≤ 40%), the mean concentrations of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3 increased by about 2.5-, 2-, and 1.5-fold on wet days, respectively. Figure 4 shows the detailed variation of SO42− and NO3 with the increase of RH during winter, further suggesting RH plays an important role in the transformation and evolution of secondary sulfate and nitrate. SOR (Figure 4d) and NOR (Figure 4e) indicate strong oxidation during humid conditions in Wuhan, especially when RH > 80% and T < 10 °C.
The averaged molar ratio of NH4+ to SO42− was 6.7 during the sampling period, implying that Wuhan exhibits ammonia-rich conditions in wintertime. That is, SO42− and NO3 could be neutralized by NH4+, and particulate sulfate and nitrate could be generated by gas-phase reactions of acid precursors with NH3 [50]. In accordance with Pathak et al. (2009) [51], herein we applied the excess ammonium ( excess   [ NH 4 + ] = ( [ NH 4 + ] [ SO 4 2 ] 1.5 ) × [ SO 4 2 ] ) as a function to show the reaction between ammonia and nitric acid, and the other formation processes of nitrate in different (relative) concentrations of sulfate (Figure 4c). The result shows that the nitrate concentration increased with an almost similar increase in excess ammonium, suggesting the neutralizing process related to NH4+ plays an important role in the formation of SO42− and NO3.
The correlation between secondary aerosol ions and particles of different sizes (i.e., PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) under wet conditions (RH > 60%) was assessed, as presented in Figure 5. The results show that secondary aerosol ions (i.e. the sum of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3) varied more consistently with PM2.5 (R = 0.72) than with PM1 (R = 0.24), or PM10 (R = 0.44). This phenomenon implies that secondary aerosols are mainly enriched in PM2.5, especially in particles with aerodynamic diameters between 1.0 and 2.5 µm, which could partly explain why PM2.5 and PM1 presented different trends with RH in Figure 1. These secondary ions would further promote the pollution level and light scattering.

4. Conclusions

Quantification of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth is critical for determining the response of aerosol optical properties on various ambient RH and then modeling the aerosol direct radiative effects. In this study, in-situ measurements in Wuhan were adopted to explore the hygroscopic growth distributions and response of aerosol pollution to RH variations in Central China during wintertime from December 2017 to February 2018, and the main findings are as follows:
(1) Aerosol pollution in Wuhan is dominated by fine particles at high RH. Compared with dry conditions (RH ≤ 40%), the mean contents of PM1 and PM2.5 on wet days (RH ≥ 60%) almost doubled, and the averaged mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10 increased to 62% from 38%. The ratio of PM2.5/PM10 presented significant increase with RH, however, compared with conditions of RH ≤ 70%, the enhancement of PM2.5 concentrations when RH > 70% should be mainly attributed to the particles with aerodynamic diameters between 1.0 and 2.5 µm, rather than PM1;
(2) Aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth could be well fitted by the two-parameter equation, and the correlation between satellite-based AOD and in-situ particle measurements increased from 0.56 to 0.65 after a simple hygroscopic correction based on the fitting equation, further indicating the influence of particle water uptake in the light extinction. f (RH = 80%) in Wuhan was 2.18 (±0.73), comparable to that measured in the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta regions for urban aerosols;
(3) The atmosphere showed a high oxidation property under wet conditions, especially when RH > 80% and T < 10 °C. Compared with dry conditions, the averaged concentrations of NH4+, SO42−, and NO3 on wet days increased by approximately 2.5-, 2-, and 1.5-fold, respectively, which were mainly enriched in PM2.5. The ammonia-rich conditions in wintertime played an important role in the formations of SO42− and NO3.
This study has important implications for understanding the roles of relative humidity in aggravating aerosol pollution over Central China, and the fitted equation between f (RH) and RH may be helpful for pollution forecasting and evaluating aerosol radiative forcing in this region. The parameter f (RH) presents the high dependence on the aerosol particle size distribution and chemical compositions. Therefore, the new parameterization scheme for f (RH) in terms of the size distribution and chemical compositions should be developed in the future.

Author Contributions

Data curation, B.Z.; methodology, L.Z.; software, Y.Z.; supervision, Z.W.; validation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.W.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0212600 and 2016YFC0200900) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41701381 and 41627804). We are grateful to the Hubei Environmental Monitoring Centre and the ECMWF for providing the datasets used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pan, Z.; Mao, F.; Gong, W.; Min, Q.; Wang, W. The warming of tibetan plateau enhanced by 3d variation of low-level clouds during daytime. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 198, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Twomey, S.A.; Piepgrass, M.; Wolfe, T. An assessment of the impact of pollution on global cloud albedo. Tellus B 1984, 36, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mao, F.Y.; Pan, Z.X.; Henderson, D.S.; Wang, W.; Gong, W. Vertically resolved physical and radiative response of ice clouds to aerosols during the indian summer monsoon season. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 216, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, X.; Mao, F.Y.; Pan, Z.X.; Gong, W.; Wang, W.; Tian, L.Q.; Fang, S.H. Three-dimensional physical and optical characteristics of aerosols over central china from long-term calipso and hysplit data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dominici, F.; Peng, R.D.; Bell, M.L.; Pham, L.; McDermott, A.; Zeger, S.L.; Samet, J.M. Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2006, 295, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gauderman, W.J.; Avol, E.; Gilliland, F.; Vora, H.; Thomas, D.; Berhane, K.; McConnell, R.; Kuenzli, N.; Lurmann, F.; Rappaport, E.; et al. The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, W.; Mao, F.Y.; Gong, W.; Pan, Z.X.; Du, L. Evaluating the governing factors of variability in nocturnal boundary layer height based on elastic lidar in wuhan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, W.; Gong, W.; Mao, F.Y.; Zhang, J.Y. Long-term measurement for low-tropospheric water vapor and aerosol by raman lidar in wuhan. Atmosphere 2015, 6, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, B.M.; Ma, Y.Y.; Gong, W.; Zhang, M. Observations of aerosol color ratio and depolarization ratio over wuhan. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017, 8, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, K.; Zhuang, G.; Wang, Q.; Fu, J.; Lin, Y.; Liu, T.; Han, L.; Deng, C. Extreme haze pollution in beijing during january 2013: Chemical characteristics, formation mechanism and role of fog processing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2014, 14, 7517–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, X.; Zhao, P.; Xu, J.; Meng, W.; Pu, W.; Dong, F.; He, D.; Shi, Q. Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the north china plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 5685–5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Ma, N.; Yan, P. Aerosol hygroscopicity parameter derived from the light scattering enhancement factor measurements in the north china plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 8105–8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, S.; Hu, M.; Zamora, M.L.; Peng, J.; Shang, D.; Zheng, J.; Du, Z.; Wu, Z.; Shao, M.; Zeng, L. Elucidating severe urban haze formation in china. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 17373–17378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yu, Y.L.; Zhao, C.S.; Kuang, Y.; Tao, J.C.; Zhao, G.; Shen, C.Y.; Xu, W.Y. A parameterization for the light scattering enhancement factor with aerosol chemical compositions. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 191, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Covert, D.S.; Charlson, R.J.; Ahlquist, N.C. A study of the relationship of chemical composition and humidity to light scattering by aerosols. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1972, 11, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Yao, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Ji, D.; Tang, G.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Hu, B.; Xin, J. Mechanism for the formation of the january 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern china. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2014, 57, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qin, K.; Wu, L.; Man, S.W.; Letu, H.; Hu, M.; Lang, H.; Sheng, S.; Teng, J.; Xiao, X.; Yuan, L. Trans-boundary aerosol transport during a winter haze episode in china revealed by ground-based lidar and calipso satellite. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 141, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, S.; Joseph, E.; Min, Q.; Yin, B. Multi-year ground-based observations of aerosol-cloud interactions in the mid-atlantic of the united states. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2017, 188, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, W.; Mao, F.Y.; Du, L.; Pan, Z.X.; Gong, W.; Fang, S.H. Deriving hourly PM2.5 concentrations from himawari-8 aods over beijing-tianjin-hebei in china. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quan, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, M.; Jin, H. Analysis of the formation of fog and haze in north china plain (ncp). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 8205–8214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ye, X.; Chen, J. Haze and hygroscopic growth. Chin. J. Nat. 2013, 35, 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, D.; Wang, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, X. Airborne submicron particulate (pm1) pollution in shanghai, china: Chemical variability, formation/dissociation of associated semi-volatile components and the impacts on visibility. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xie, Y.; Ye, X.; Ma, Z.; Tao, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, H. Insight into winter haze formation mechanisms based on aerosol hygroscopicity and effective density measurements. Atmos. Chem Phys. 2017, 17, 7277–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Haddrell, A.E.; Davies, J.F.; Miles, R.E.H.; Reid, J.P.; Dailey, L.A.; Murnane, D. Dynamics of aerosol size during inhalation: Hygroscopic growth of commercial nebulizer formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 463, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Darquenne, C.; Fleming, J.S.; Katz, I.; Martin, A.R.; Schroeter, J.; Usmani, O.S.; Venegas, J.; Schmid, O. Bridging the gap between science and clinical efficacy: Physiology, imaging, and modeling of aerosols in the lung. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2016, 29, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Qu, Y.; Han, T.; Hou, L.; Gu, J.; Chen, C.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, T. Formation and evolution mechanism of regional haze: A case study in the megacity beijing, china. ACP 2013, 13, 4501–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, P.; Zhang, L.; Tao, J.; Liu, X.; Tian, P.; Han, Z.; Zhang, R. Investigation of hygroscopic growth effect on aerosol scattering coefficient at a rural site in the southern north china plain. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 599, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yan, P.; Pan, X.; Tang, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, R.; Zeng, L. Hygroscopic growth of aerosol scattering coefficient: A comparative analysis between urban and suburban sites at winter in beijing. Particuology 2009, 7, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ye, X.; Ma, Z.; Hu, D.; Yang, X.; Chen, J. Size-resolved hygroscopicity of submicrometer urban aerosols in shanghai during wintertime. Atmos. Res. 2011, 99, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ye, X.; Tang, C.; Yin, Z.; Chen, J.; Ma, Z.; Kong, L.; Yang, X.; Gao, W.; Geng, F. Hygroscopic growth of urban aerosol particles during the 2009 mirage-shanghai campaign. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 64, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Hu, M.; Han, T. Aerosol hygroscopicity and its impact on atmospheric visibility and radiative forcing in guangzhou during the 2006 pride-prd campaign. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 60, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tan, H.; Cai, M.; Fan, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, F.; Chan, P.; Deng, X.; Wu, D. An analysis of aerosol liquid water content and related impact factors in pearl river delta. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zieger, P.; Fierz-Schmidhauser, R.; Weingartner, E.; Baltensperger, U. Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: Results from different european sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 10609–10631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kasten, F. Visibility forecast in the phase of pre-condensation. Tellus 1969, 21, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jefferson, A.; Hageman, D.; Morrow, H.; Mei, F.; Watson, T. Seven years of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from sgp: Factors influencing water uptake. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017, 122, 9451–9466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brock, C.A.; Wagner, N.L.; Anderson, B.E.; Attwood, A.R.; Beyersdorf, A.; Campuzano-Jost, P.; Carlton, A.G.; Day, D.A.; Diskin, G.S.; Gordon, T.D.; et al. Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern united states in summer—Part 1: Hygroscopic growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 4987–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fernández, A.; Apituley, A.; Veselovskii, I.; Suvorina, A.; Henzing, J.; Pujadas, M.; Artíñano, B. Study of aerosol hygroscopic events over the cabauw experimental site for atmospheric research (cesar) using the multi-wavelength raman lidar caeli. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 120, 484–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Beyersdorf, A.; Ziemba, L.; Chen, G.; Corr, C.; Crawford, J.; Diskin, G.; Moore, R.; Thornhill, K.; Winstead, E.; Anderson, B. The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on aerosol extinction variability in the baltimore–washington, dc region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. An, Z.; Huang, R.-J.; Zhang, R.; Tie, X.; Li, G.; Cao, J.; Zhou, W.; Shi, Z.; Han, Y.; Gu, Z. Severe haze in northern china: A synergy of anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 8657–8666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Ji, D.; Wen, T.; Pan, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y. Characterization of the size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions in the jing-jin-ji urban agglomeration: Spatial/temporal variability, size distribution and sources. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 77, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pani, S.K.; Lin, N.H.; Chantara, S.; Wang, S.H.; Khamkaew, C.; Prapamontol, T.; Janjai, S. Radiative response of biomass-burning aerosols over an urban atmosphere in northern peninsular southeast asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 892–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pierson, W.R.; Brachaczek, W.W.; McKee, D.E. Sulfate emissions from catalyst-equipped automobiles on the highway. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1979, 29, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Truex, T.J.; Pierson, W.R.; McKee, D.E. Sulfate in diesel exhaust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 1118–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cui, F.; Chen, M.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, S.; Qi, L.; Wang, L. An intensive study on aerosol optical properties and affecting factors in nanjing, china. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 40, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cheng, Z.; Wang, S.; Jiang, J.; Fu, Q.; Chen, C.; Xu, B.; Yu, J.; Fu, X.; Hao, J. Long-term trend of haze pollution and impact of particulate matter in the yangtze river delta, china. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 182, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pan, X.; Yan, P.; Tang, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, Z.; Gbaguidi, A.; Sun, Y. Observational study of influence of aerosol hygroscopic growth on scattering coefficient over rural area near beijing mega-city. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 7519–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Liu, H.J.; Zhao, C.S.; Nekat, B.; Ma, N.; Wiedensohler, A.; van Pinxteren, D.; Spindler, G.; Muller, K.; Herrmann, H. Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the north china plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 2525–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pathak, R.K.; Chan, C.K. Inter-particle and gas-particle interactions in sampling artifacts of PM2.5 in filter-based samplers. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 1597–1607. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pathak, R.K.; Wu, W.S.; Wang, T. Summertime PM2.5 ionic species in four major cities of china: Nitrate formation in an ammonia-deficient atmosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 1711–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Variation in (a) PM1, (b) PM2.5 and (c) mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10 with increasing RH during winter.
Figure 1. Variation in (a) PM1, (b) PM2.5 and (c) mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10 with increasing RH during winter.
Ijerph 16 04422 g001
Figure 2. Parameterization of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth based on (a) the two-parameter fitting equation and (b) the kappa equation. (c) Hygroscopic correction of satellite-based AOD during winter. Measured PM2.5 is dry PM2.5, and corrected PM2.5 is dry PM2.5 multiplied by hygroscopic growth factor.
Figure 2. Parameterization of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth based on (a) the two-parameter fitting equation and (b) the kappa equation. (c) Hygroscopic correction of satellite-based AOD during winter. Measured PM2.5 is dry PM2.5, and corrected PM2.5 is dry PM2.5 multiplied by hygroscopic growth factor.
Ijerph 16 04422 g002
Figure 3. Hygroscopic growth of aerosol scattering at RH = 80% as a function of (a) mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10, and (b) mass fraction of inorganic aerosols, as well as (c) organic matter in PM2.5.
Figure 3. Hygroscopic growth of aerosol scattering at RH = 80% as a function of (a) mass fraction of PM2.5 in PM10, and (b) mass fraction of inorganic aerosols, as well as (c) organic matter in PM2.5.
Ijerph 16 04422 g003
Figure 4. Variation of secondary inorganic salts: (a) SO42− vs. RH, (b) NO3 vs. RH, (c) NO3 vs. excess ammonium, (d) sulfur oxidation ratio, and (e) nitrogen oxidation ratio. The black line in (c) represents the 1:1 reference line.
Figure 4. Variation of secondary inorganic salts: (a) SO42− vs. RH, (b) NO3 vs. RH, (c) NO3 vs. excess ammonium, (d) sulfur oxidation ratio, and (e) nitrogen oxidation ratio. The black line in (c) represents the 1:1 reference line.
Ijerph 16 04422 g004
Figure 5. Correlation between secondary aerosol ions with (a) PM1, (b) PM2.5, and (c) PM10 under wet conditions. The black lines represent the 1:1 reference lines.
Figure 5. Correlation between secondary aerosol ions with (a) PM1, (b) PM2.5, and (c) PM10 under wet conditions. The black lines represent the 1:1 reference lines.
Ijerph 16 04422 g005
Table 1. Variation statistics of particles under dry and wet conditions.
Table 1. Variation statistics of particles under dry and wet conditions.
ItemsPM1 (µg/m3)PM2.5 (µg/m3)PM10 (µg/m3)PM1/PM2.5PM2.5/PM10
Average29.89
(13.78)
51.87
(24.03)
95.39
(37.65)
0.59
(0.19)
0.55
(0.16)
Dry
(RH ≤ 40%)
16.11
(9.57)
31.44
(13.36)
84.83
(29.59)
0.51
(0.19)
0.38
(0.10)
Wet
(RH ≥ 60%)
33.56
(13.04)
57.25
(20.22)
96.40
(38.19)
0.60
(0.17)
0.62
(0.14)
Increase17.4525.8111.570.090.24
Note: Numbers in parentheses represent the standard deviation.
Table 2. Summary of scattering hygroscopic growth factors at RH = 80% in different regions.
Table 2. Summary of scattering hygroscopic growth factors at RH = 80% in different regions.
Study AreaSiteStudy PeriodAerosol Typef (RH = 80%)Reference
YRDNanjing2012.11Urban2.4Cui et al. (2016) [46] Cui et al. (2016) [44]
YRDShanghai2011.5–2012.4Mixed3.5Cheng et al. (2013) [47]
PRDGuangzhou2006.7Urban
Mixed
Marine
2.0   ( ± 0.3 )
2.3   ( ± 0.3 )
2.7   ( ± 0.6 )
Liu et al. (2012) [33]
BTHRural site of Beijing2006.4–2006.5Dust
Clean
Urban
1.20   ( ± 0.02 )
1.31   ( ± 0.03 )
1.57   ( ± 0.02 )
Pan et al. (2009) [48]
BTHUrban site of Beijing2007.10–2007.11Urban 1.9   ( ± 0.3 ) Liu et al. (2013) [28]
BTHWuqing2009.10–2010.1Clean
Polluted
1.46   ( ± 0.15 )
1.58   ( ± 0.19 )
Chen et al. (2014) [14]
BTHRaoyang2014.6–2014.8Polluted 2.28   ( ± 0.69 ) Wu et al. (2017) [29]
Central ChinaWuhan2017.12–2018.2Urban 2.18   ( ± 0.73 ) This study
Table 3. Variation statistics of secondary inorganic salts and gaseous precursors during winter (µg/m3).
Table 3. Variation statistics of secondary inorganic salts and gaseous precursors during winter (µg/m3).
ItemNO3NH4+SO42SO2NO2
Average10.71
(7.56)
7.53
(6.40)
6.01
(4.82)
14.47
(11.85)
60.11
(25.99)
Dry
(RH ≤ 40%)
5.55
(3.03)
2.68
(1.96)
2.43
(1.21)
17.54
(8.94)
51.10
(25.69)
Wet
(RH ≥ 60%)
12.91
(8.32)
9.67
(6.97)
7.50
(5.32)
12.41
(12.63)
61.72
(25.75)
Increase7.366.995.07−5.1310.62
Note: Numbers in parentheses represent the standard deviation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zang, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, Y. Roles of Relative Humidity in Aerosol Pollution Aggravation over Central China during Wintertime. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224422

AMA Style

Zang L, Wang Z, Zhu B, Zhang Y. Roles of Relative Humidity in Aerosol Pollution Aggravation over Central China during Wintertime. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(22):4422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zang, Lin, Zemin Wang, Bo Zhu, and Yu Zhang. 2019. "Roles of Relative Humidity in Aerosol Pollution Aggravation over Central China during Wintertime" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 22: 4422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop