Next Article in Journal
Pregnancy Related Health Care Needs in Refugees—A Current Three Center Experience in Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
“Sacbe”, a Comprehensive Intervention to Decrease Body Mass Index in Children with Adiposity: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Reducing the Future Risk of Trauma: On the Integration of Global Disaster Policy within Specific Health Domains and Established Fields of Practice
Open AccessArticle

Profiles of Physical Fitness Risk Behaviours in School Adolescents from the ASSO Project: A Latent Class Analysis

1
Sport and Exercise Sciences Unit, SPPF Department, University of Palermo, Via Giovanni Pascoli 6, 90144 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington Rd Ewing, NJ 08628, USA
3
ISAFA—International Science and Football Association, 13 Musker Pl, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3LE, UK
4
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, P.za Lauro de Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy
5
Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Life-Course, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(9), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091933
Received: 26 July 2018 / Revised: 29 August 2018 / Accepted: 3 September 2018 / Published: 5 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pediatric Obesity Treatment and Prevention)

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to describe profiles of adolescents’ fitness level, identify latent classes of fitness-related risk behaviours, and describe their sociodemographic and environmental predictors. In total, 883 adolescents (16.4 ± 1.4 years; 167.3 ± 10.4 cm; 62.8 ± 13.5 kg; 62.2% males) were assessed for personal and lifestyle information and for physical fitness components. Eleven possible fitness determinants and seven predictors were included. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to determine fitness-related risk behaviours. Logistic regressions predicted class membership and assessed associations with fitness levels and fitness components. Five latent classes were recognised: 1—virtuous, 30.7% of respondents; 2—low physical activity/sport, 18.8%; 3—incorrect alcohol/food habits, 25.8%; 4—health risk/overweight, 15.9%; 5—malaise/diseases, 8.8%. Sex, age, parents’ overweightness/obesity and education, and school type predicted most classes significantly. Compared to class 1, class 2 had higher odds of having all poor fitness components except upper body maximal strength; class 4 had higher risk of low muscular endurance; and class 5 was likely to have lower maximal strength, muscular endurance, and speed/agility. Educating adolescents to reach a sufficient practice of PA/sport could help decreasing the risk of low health-related fitness more than discouraging them from using alcohol, addressing proper food behaviours and habits, and helping them understand their psychophysical malaise symptoms.
Keywords: latent class analysis; physical fitness; health; adolescents latent class analysis; physical fitness; health; adolescents

1. Introduction

Low levels of health-related physical fitness (HRF) in youth can influence mortality and morbidities in adulthood for several disorders, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, and metabolic syndrome [1,2,3,4,5]. It has been reported that fitness is a better predictor of health outcomes in adults than physical activity (PA) levels [6]. In children, data from cross-sectional and prospective studies have been used to suggest that increasing PA is insufficient since future cardiovascular risk is more dependent on fitness than on the amount of PA performed [7,8]. In particular, inadequate levels of aerobic fitness in children and adolescents can influence overweightness, metabolic disorders, and cognitive diseases that predict morbidities in adulthood [9,10,11,12]. Thus, it is important to establish healthy habits early in life to attain a desirable level of fitness during childhood and adolescence [13] by acting on the factors that could influence this behaviour [14]. As noted in other reports, adolescents’ low fitness levels could be due to several factors involving genetic, biological, familial, environmental, and behavioural aspects [13,15,16]. At present, female sex, low income, low consumption of dairy products and bread/cereals, increased consumption of sweetened beverages, insufficient PA level, excessive screen time, and excess body fat have been found to be associated with low aerobic fitness levels in youth [17,18,19,20]. Additionally, the contemporary construct of paediatric dynapenia, an acquired condition characterized by low levels of muscular strength and power, has been used to identify youth with consequent functional limitations not caused by neurologic or muscular disease [21].
The latent class analysis (LCA) is a promising statistical tool that has been frequently used in recent years to identify small homogenous groups based on behavioural patterns related to health, obesity, diet, PA, sedentariness, substance use, and smoking [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, LCA allows the identification of latent classes that can be used to target proper interventions [28,29,30]. Of interest, previous investigations have used cluster analysis to identify potential patterns of health-related behaviours in adolescents [31,32,33,34,35], and other colleagues have already used LCA to determine patterns of behaviours related to obesity or to PA and sedentariness on different population targets [26,27,36,37,38,39,40,41]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have identified distinctive classes of patterns with respect to low fitness risk factors. The aims of this paper were to describe profiles of adolescents’ fitness level, identify latent classes of fitness-related risk behaviours, describe sociodemographic and environmental predictors of class membership, and evaluate the association of the identified patterns with overall fitness level and single health-related fitness components.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Sample

The ASSO (Adolescents Surveillance System for the Obesity prevention) Project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health was aimed at developing a surveillance system in schools to collect data on adolescents’ lifestyles and food consumption, and anthropometric and fitness measurements [42,43,44].
A total of 883 students were recruited, through a multistage sampling, during the years 2012 and 2013 from the classes 1 to 4 of seven public and private high schools within Palermo city (Italy). All participants were provided with information sheets and had to supply the informed consent signed by their parents before starting the study.
A standardized methodology with standard operating procedures (SOPs) has been developed for the data collection, and training sessions were organized for all the ASSO team members and teachers of the participating schools.
The principles of the Italian data protection (196/2003) were guaranteed and the Ethical Committee of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico “Paolo Giaccone” in Palermo approved the project and the study protocol (approval code n.9/2011).
Fitness measures were collected through the ASSO-Fitness Tests Battery (ASSO-FTB) [45,46], composed by five accurately selected tests for the assessment of five physical fitness components: (1) the hand-grip strength test (HG) to assess upper body maximal strength; (2) the standing broad jump test (SBJ) to assess lower body strength and power; (3) the sit-up test to exhaustion (SUe) to assess local muscular endurance; (4) the 4 × 10 m shuttle run test (4 × 10 m SR) to assess speed and agility; and (5) the 20 m shuttle run test (20m SR) to assess endurance/aerobic capacity. Classes of fitness levels were derived, and the detailed description of the applied methodology can be found in Bianco et al. [45]. Fitness measures were complete for all five components for a total of 544 students aged 13–19, with mean age 16.3 ± 1.4 years; M = 369 (67.8%); F = 175 (32.2%). Anthropometric measurements of weight, height, and waist circumference were collected by the teachers through the use of a calibrated scale, a stadiometer, and a nonelastic meter, respectively, all available within the schools. Personal information and lifestyle aspects were collected through the web-based questionnaires of the ASSO-NutFit software administered within the schools: ASSO-PIQ (Personal Information Questionnaire), ASSO-PASAQ (Physical Activity, Smoke, and Alcohol Questionnaire) and ASSO-FHQ (Food Habits Questionnaire). The ASSO-PIQ included questions regarding participant and family information and neonatal and clinical assessment. The ASSO-PASAQ consisted of three sections: physical activity, smoking, and alcoholic drinks and other beverages. Finally, the ASSO-FHQ consisted of six items, regarding: breakfast, school break, lunch, afternoon break, dinner, and various habits such as eating out, eating ready meals, organic food, fresh food, or food from vending machines [42,44,47,48,49].

2.2. Variables

Fitness levels and the five fitness components considered (upper body maximal strength, lower body maximal strength, muscular endurance, speed and agility, and endurance/aerobic capacity) were categorized into three classes (0 = high, 1 = medium, and 2 = low), and subsequently for the purpose of the logistic regression analysis into two classes (0 = high/medium and 1 = low).
Variables eventually associated with fitness level and single components addressed in the survey included initially 87 items. Since including too many variables in the model for LCA could negatively affect the analysis, a total of 18 variables (included in Table 1) out of the 87 items contained in the ASSO questionnaires were selected and gathered into the following three dimensions: (1) biological and genetic; (2) sociocultural and environmental; (3) life habits. The inclusion of items in the different dimensions was based on previous literature suggesting risks within the context of a larger conceptual framework for health characteristics and for sedentary behaviours [50,51,52] and subsequently was adapted to fitness.
Moreover, among these factors, a total of eleven latent class indicators were chosen to represent multiple dimensions of fitness risks, i.e., biological (health risk/status) and lifestyle (physical activity/sedentariness, alcohol/smoking, and meal patterns and habits) dimensions; the other seven variables were investigated in a multivariate analysis for their role as possible predictors of class membership (gender, age, having at least one parent overweight/obese, parents’ education, family affluence scale (FAS), town of residence’s size, and school type) [50,51,52,53].
Binary latent class indicators were created for convenience of use, with a recoding scheme that dichotomized fitness-related behaviours, with ‘0’ representing a healthier behaviour and ‘1’ representing a less healthy behaviour.
Among the biological and genetic determinants, weight status, health risk, malaise frequency and diagnosed diseases were selected for the latent classes’ assessment, while sex, age, and having at least one parent overweight/obese were selected as predictors.

2.3. LCA and Logistic Regression Analyses

An LCA was performed to identify latent classes of fitness-related risk behaviours. The number of classes that best fit the data was chosen by evaluating an increasing number of classes, through the log likelihood, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [23], sample-size-adjusted Bayesian information criterion (adjusted BIC), and a consistent version of AIC (CAIC) [54]. Latent classes were then defined by the probabilities that individuals in each class met the criteria for the considered eleven variables.
The chi-squared test was applied to assess differences between the classes, and multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between latent classes and predictors and between latent classes and overall fitness level and single fitness components. All regressions were controlled for potential confounders, and adjusted odds ratios (Adj ORs) were obtained.
Alpha level was set at 0.05, and 95% CIs were calculated for the ORs derived.
In this study, Stata/MP 12.0 software was used, and LCA was performed using the LCA Stata Plugin (PennState).
The ethical approval was given by the ethical committee of the “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone” (approval code n.9/2011). All the participant students provided an informed consent form signed by their parents.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

A statistical description of the possible determinants of fitness levels across the population sample is provided in Table 1.
The fitness level and fitness component details in the whole sample and by gender and age are provided in Table 2, and indicate that males perform significantly better than females, and they also show an incremental trend amongst fitness levels with age in all physical components. These correlations with continuous data of fitness components and further details are presented in a previously published paper [45].
The fit statistics for two- to six-class LCA models are shown in the Supplementary Table S1. The log likelihood values and the information criteria index AIC decreased substantially for models with two to five classes and moderately for additional classes. The adjusted BIC of the five-class solution had the lowest values and subsequent class addition showed an increase in its values. Thus, the five-class model was selected as the best model and used in subsequent analyses.
The following five classes were identified: class 1—virtuous; class 2—low PA/sport; class 3—incorrect alcohol/food habits; class 4—health risk/overweight; class 5—malaise/diseases.
Table 3 shows the conditional probabilities of unhealthy lifestyles and health risks/unhealthy status across different classes of fitness-related risk behaviours.
The first latent class (“Virtuous”) represents 30.7% of respondents. Almost all adolescents in this class show good fitness levels and physically active behaviours, with a high percentage practicing sport for 3 or more h/week. They have the lowest probability of screen-watching for more than 2 h/day and of having inadequate meals and food habits. None of them are at health risk and almost all of them have low malaise frequency and do not have diagnosed diseases. Almost 90% show a correct weight status.
The second latent class (“Low PA/sport”, 18.8% of respondents) is characterized by low levels of PA and all adolescents belonging to this class practice sport less than 3 h/week. The majority (60.8%) have nonadequate meals and around 31% are overweight/obese.
The third class (“Incorrect alcohol/foods habits”) is represented by 25.8% of respondents, with 77% of adolescents usually drinking alcohol at least 3 times/week, 94% having nonadequate meals, and 76% nonadequate food habits.
With regard to adolescents belonging to the fourth class (“Health risk/overweight”, 15.9%), 80% have higher risk of overweight/obesity and almost all of them are at health risk (99.9%). A total of 66% drink usually alcohol at least 3 times/week.
The last class (“Malaise/diseases”, 8.8%) is made of subjects reporting the highest probability of excessive malaise frequency, and around 70% of them have diseases diagnosed by a medical doctor. Around 40% of them are overweight/obese, 32.6% at health risk, and 66% usually drink alcoholics. With the exception of the first virtuous class, half of the sample population in each class watches TV, plays PC or videogames more than 2 h/day. Smoking is also equally distributed among classes, with 10% to 18% of subjects being current smokers.

3.2. Predictors of Latent Class Membership

Table 3 shows the frequencies of predictors for each class; the relative associations of the five identified latent classes with predictors are showed in Table 4.
Subjects from class 2 compared to class 1 are mainly older, come from low educated families, and attend professional/technical schools (Table 4).
Classes 3 and 5 present a higher probability of having male adolescents compared to class 1 (Table 4). Class 3 also has high odds of having older adolescents, with OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.71–3.75, p < 0.001. In class 5, adolescents are more likely to have at least one parent overweight/obese, low educated parents, and attend mostly technical/professional schools compared to class 1 (Table 4).

3.3. Fitness Level and Fitness Components by Latent Classes

In Table 4, the associations between latent classes and fitness levels and the single five fitness components assessed through the ASSO-FTB are shown, with ORs adjusted for gender, age, education, having at least one parents overweight/obese, and school type.
The poorest fitness levels were found in adolescents belonging to class 2—low PA/sport (20.0%). In the logistic regression with class 1 being the reference, subjects with low PA and sport practising from class 2 have ten times higher significantly likelihood of having poor fitness levels (Adj OR 10.39, 95% CI 4.46–24.21, p < 0.001) (Table 4).
Despite their high usual alcohol consumption and inadequate food habits, a total of 21.8% of adolescents from class 3 have high fitness levels, but a nonsignificant difference was found for fitness levels when compared to class 1 (Table 4).
Despite classes 4 and 5 showing, respectively, 19.0% and 26% of subjects with high fitness levels and 12.0% and 7.4% with low fitness levels, poor fitness levels were found to be significantly higher than class 1, with Adj OR 10.31, 95% CI 3.52–30.19, p < 0.001 and Adj OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.03–6.42, p < 0.05, respectively (Table 4).
The descriptive analysis of fitness components by latent classes shows that higher frequencies of low abilities were found in classes 2 and 4, while classes 1 and 3 showed fewer subjects with low fitness levels.
When analysing associations with single fitness components, significant higher risk of having all low health-related fitness components, with the exception of the upper body maximal strength, were found for class 2—low PA/sport (Table 4).
Adolescents in class 4 had a higher risk of low muscular endurance (Adj OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.26–5.64, p < 0.05), while class 5 showed significantly increased risk of lower body maximal strength, muscular endurance, and speed and agility (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The present data describe underlying patterns of HRF factors and their sociodemographic and environmental predictors, and report on the association of latent classes with fitness level and single fitness components.
Cluster analysis has been previously adopted to identify potential patterns of health-related behaviours in adolescents [31,32,33,34,35], and LCA has also been frequently used to determine patterns of behaviours on different population targets [26,27,36,37,38,39,40,41]. To our knowledge, there are no studies investigating fitness patterns in adolescents. Therefore, although comparison of our results with findings from other studies is limited, this study adds important information on possible predictors of low fitness levels in adolescents.
Five latent classes of fitness-related lifestyle patterns and health risk/status have been identified in our model. A first class was composed mainly of virtuous subjects, and this is consistent with one study on patterns of PA, sedentariness, and diet that identified a “healthful” class characterized by participants meeting recommendations for PA, consuming healthy foods, and showing a high overall health status and life satisfaction or low depression [22,26]. Moreover, other studies found a positive association of high PA levels, low sedentariness, and healthful diet with other physical and psychological factors in children, adolescents, and adults [30,55]. With regard to latent class 2, the major risk for unhealthy behaviours in this class was in the dimension of PA/sedentariness. The suboptimal food intake and overweight/obese status could be presumably related to their low PA and sport practice. Of note, subjects from this class were mostly males, older (more than 16 years), had low educated parents, and attended professional/technical vocational schools. This is consistent with findings from other studies that found that younger participants were generally more active than older youth [56,57] or that adolescents with low socioeconomic status (SES) were less active [58,59]. These observations suggest that interventions to enhance PA and sport involvement, which in turn may improve food intake and weight status, could be addressed to help fighting the global pandemic of physical inactivity among children and adolescents [60].
Moreover, it is likely that the lack of daily PA in this class could contribute to lower fitness levels and lower fitness abilities (excepted for upper body maximal strength) assessed through the ASSO-FTB reported in this class. This is also consistent with latent class 5, where almost all adolescents comply with the PA recommendations and a small number had low fitness levels. These results are in line with several studies. Morrow et al. in 2013 showed that adolescents failing to meet national aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA guidelines have higher odds of not achieving healthy physical fıtness levels of aerobic capacity [2]. Other longitudinal studies showed that PA interventions and PA combined with nutrition interventions were effective at increasing fitness levels in school-age youth [61,62,63]. Of interest, Silva et al. recently reported an association between hand-grip strength, body mass, body height, and PA levels in youth. The authors found that performance on these measures was positively related with greater body mass (probably muscle mass) and greater height (probably reflecting greater leverage) and only partially related with PA levels [64]. Collectively, these findings can indirectly explain the lack of association found in our study between latent class 2 and low upper body maximal strength (Table 4).
In the third latent class, unhealthy lifestyles characterize a high proportion of adolescents, who are mostly males and older compared to latent class 1, and this could explain the higher frequency of alcohol consumption that is generally more common in males and older adolescents [65] and poor food habits that are more common in males [66]. Despite these unhealthy behaviours, there is a high proportion of adolescents belonging to this class that have a high fitness level. This pattern was also found in one study [26], where adolescents from an “unhealthy” class were found to consume huge quantities of energy-dense foods, while not taking advantage of the health benefits associated with their more active lifestyle [39,55,67,68]. Moreover, since no association was found for fitness level and for all single fitness components in this class compared to the virtuous class, it is possible that these behaviours are not mere determinants of fitness levels. Currently, there is not a consensus on the relationship between fitness/PA and alcohol consumption in adolescents [65,69,70]. One study showed that adolescents with low upper-body musculoskeletal strength had a lower risk of alcohol consumption [71].
Thus, this alcohol-related behaviour should be further analysed before suggesting strategies and interventions aimed at decreasing the risk of low fitness. When, for example, latent class 4 is considered, where almost all subjects are at health risk, a strong association was found with fitness level; health risk was assessed through two components, one of this being the alcoholic risk; it could be suggested that in itself, drinking more than 12 g of ethanol per day could be a risk factor for low overall fitness level, while drinking alcoholic beverages in amounts <12 g of ethanol per day is not a risk factor in people more than 15 years old [72]. Moreover, adolescents from latent class 4 are more likely to be overweight/obese. The findings of the strong positive association evidenced between this class and low fitness level are in line with other studies confirming that fatness is inversely related to fitness [18,73,74]. A positive association in latent class 4 was also found with low muscular endurance. In accordance with Chen et al., our study confirms that overweight/obese adolescents have poorer performance in muscle endurance tests [75].
Subjects from latent class 5 are characterized by a health status that can be interrelated to the high probabilities of being overweight/obese, being at health risk, and practising sport less than 3 h/week that could be found in this class, as well as drinking alcohol. For example, high rates of adolescent sedentary behaviours have been associated with patterns of physical and psychological health in one study by Ussher et al. [76]. Different variables were found as predictors of this class, and this is in line with several studies that found children and adolescents with highly-educated parents as being more likely to display positive psychological health and fewer health complaints than youth with less educated parents, which highlights the need for programs helping people access university studies [77]. Although adolescents from class 5 show the highest percentage of high fitness levels, they are significantly more at risk of lower body maximal strength, muscular endurance, and speed and agility compared with class 1. This is partially in line with findings from other authors showing that children and adolescents with both upper- and lower- body muscular fitness had higher ORs of reporting fair (vs. excellent) perceived health status [78,79].
Importantly, it should be noted that the relationship between malaise and poor fitness level could be reciprocal. Generally, it could be hypothesised that the relationship is indirect, with those with a high malaise level, frequent health complaints, and diseases diagnosed by a medical doctor, and at the same time drinking alcohol and tending to be overweight, would likely have a less active lifestyle, which could lead to a low overall fitness level. Of interest, Farooq et al. recently reported that moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) begins to decline at age 7 years [80], so it may be too late to start interventions during adolescence. This is an important public health message as interventions need to start early in life before risk factors such as low PA/sport (class 2) or incorrect alcohol/food habits (class 3) become present. Moreover, our research findings support the modern-day concept of exercise deficit disorder, which is aimed at identifying children with low levels of MVPA before they become more resistant to exercise interventions during adolescence [14,81].
It can be suggested that subgroups of adolescents with high malaise frequency and diseases, coming from low educated families, and attending technical/professional schools could be targets of interventions aimed at improving fitness levels and, in particular, muscular fitness. Secular trends indicate levels of muscular fitness in contemporary youth are decreasing [82], and therefore targeted interventions are needed to address growing concerns related to paediatric dynapenia in youth [21]. In our study, there was not a particular class characterized by a high level of sedentary behaviours, and this is in contrast with other studies comparing PA, sedentary behaviour, and diet contributing to obesity. One study analysing PA and sedentary behaviours [38] found three distinctive classes for boys and girls of active, sedentary, and low/moderate PA behaviour; another study applied LCA to PA and sedentary behaviours, showing a model with five patterns for average intensity, sedentary behaviour, light activity, MVPA, and vigorous activity [37]. However, since time spent watching TV, PC, and videogames are equally distributed in almost all classes of our study (from classes 2 to 5), interventions to increase fitness could convey the message of reducing screen time to all the subgroups identified.
One of the main strengths of the present study is that it used the LCA to identify latent patterns underlying possible fitness-related behaviours, which has been demonstrated to be a valid approach to clustering subjects with similar characteristics. Risk factor clustering is an important tool in terms of public health and prevention to plan targeted interventions early in life. The choice of the LCA as the method of analysis was guided by the numerous categorical variables originally collected within the project through the ASSO toolkit. Compared to other clustering methods, this model-based clustering approach allows deriving clusters using a probabilistic model that describes distribution of data through a top-down approach. The classes’ identification can effectively improve our understanding of specific joint behaviours that should be modified to improve the health of school-age youth [27].
Moreover, the logistic regression analysis for the association of the latent patterns with overall fitness level and single fitness components was carried out for the purpose of checking the validity of the identified latent classes, and this is a valid approach for addressing proper strategies and interventions. Another strength of this paper is that the different fitness components were assessed through the ASSO-FTB, a validated tool that assessed various health-related fitness components [46]; these components were subsequently used to evaluate the overall fitness level through a principal components analysis (PCA) described in detail in another previous published paper [45]. One of the limitations of the present study is that for the assessment of PA and sedentariness, a validated web-based questionnaire was used with self-reported information, but no motor skills, muscular strength, or MVPA levels have been directly assessed. Moreover, statistical testing power of the regression analyses could have been decreased for some predictors, such as non-sedentary activities, FAS, or town size, because one of the groups of the binary variables was too small. It has to be also considered that dichotomizing variables, even if this is a common approach applied in LCA, could have reduced sensitivity and lost some key information. Another limitation is that the study sample was composed of adolescents from an area in Southern Italy, thus the sample was not representative of the entire national population. This did not allow the comparison of behaviours with adolescents from the northern and central parts, and can help with suggesting strategies that are valid at the local but not at the national level.

5. Conclusions

Data from this study can be used to help designing and implementing multifactorial interventions aimed at enhancing fitness levels and fitness abilities in school adolescents and consequently contribute to the prevention of chronic diseases in adulthood.
Both parental education and structured fitness interventions that enhance fundamental movement skills and muscular fitness in the school environment (e.g., physical education) as well as support for community-based outdoor active play and sport activities could be adopted. The risk of low physical fitness levels in adolescents could be reduced by daily participation in MVPA, regular physical education and sport practices, improvement of weight status and control of abdominal obesity (i.e., waist circumference), discouragement from using alcohol, education on correct food behaviours and habits, and improving understanding of their psychophysical malaise symptoms. Future studies within the ASSO project can be used to obtain representative national data in order to support the planning of appropriate strategies to enhance health behaviours and improve fitness abilities in youth.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/9/1933/s1, Table S1: Model fit statistics for the 2- to 6-class LCA models of fitness-related behaviours (N = 883).

Author Contributions

G.T. performed the conception and design of the study, carried it out, analysed and interpreted data, and drafted the article. A.F. interpreted the data and critically revised the paper. M.J. selected the tests for the FTB. A.P., L.C., E.T., and J.B. critically revised the article. A.B. selected the tests for the FTB, interpreted the data, and critically revised the article.

Funding

The work has been performed within the Adolescents and Surveillance System for the Obesity prevention (ASSO) Project (code GR-2008-1140742, CUP I85J10000500001), a young researchers project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. João Breda is a staff member of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.

References

  1. Hogstrom, G.; Nordstrom, A.; Nordstrom, P. Aerobic fitness in late adolescence and the risk of early death: A prospective cohort study of 1.3 million swedish men. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Morrow, J.R., Jr.; Tucker, J.S.; Jackson, A.W.; Martin, S.B.; Greenleaf, C.A.; Petrie, T.A. Meeting physical activity guidelines and health-related fitness in youth. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 44, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arngrimsson, S.A.; Olafsdottir, A.S. The relation between physical activity, fitness, and fatness in adolescents: A mediation analysis. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2016, 28, 584–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ruiz, J.R.; Castro-Pinero, J.; Artero, E.G.; Ortega, F.B.; Sjostrom, M.; Suni, J.; Castillo, M.J. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: A systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2009, 43, 909–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eisenmann, J.C. Aerobic fitness, fatness and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Acta Paediatrica 2007, 96, 1723–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Blair, S.N.; Cheng, Y.; Holder, J.S. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001, 33, S379–S399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Twisk, J.W.; Kemper, H.C.; van Mechelen, W. The relationship between physical fitness and physical activity during adolescence and cardiovascular disease risk factors at adult age. The amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Int. J. Sports Med. 2002, 23 (Suppl. 1), S8–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Froberg, K.; Andersen, L.B. Mini review: Physical activity and fitness and its relations to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children. Int. J. Obes. 2005, 29 (Suppl. 2), S34–S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sandercock, G.; Voss, C.; Cohen, D.; Taylor, M.; Stasinopoulos, D.M. Centile curves and normative values for the twenty metre shuttle-run test in English schoolchildren. J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Castelli, D.M.; Hillman, C.H.; Buck, S.M.; Erwin, H.E. Physical fitness and academic achievement in third- and fifth-grade students. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2007, 29, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pate, R.R.; Wang, C.Y.; Dowda, M.; Farrell, S.W.; O’Neill, J.R. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels among us youth 12 to 19 years of age: Findings from the 1999-2002 national health and nutrition examination survey. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2006, 160, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tomkinson, G.R.; Leger, L.A.; Olds, T.S.; Cazorla, G. Secular trends in the performance of children and adolescents (1980–2000): An analysis of 55 studies of the 20m shuttle run test in 11 countries. Sports Med. 2003, 33, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ortega, F.B.; Ruiz, J.R.; Castillo, M.J.; Sjostrom, M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: A powerful marker of health. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Faigenbaum, A.D.; Best, T.M.; MacDonald, J.; Myer, G.D.; Stracciolini, A. Top 10 research questions related to exercise deficit disorder (edd) in youth. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2014, 85, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Goncalves, R.; Szmuchrowski, L.A.; Prado, L.S.; Couto, B.P.; Machado, J.; Damasceno, V.O.; Lamounier, J.A. Selected anthropometric variables and aerobic fitness as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in children. Biol. Sport/Inst. Sport 2015, 32, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hainer, V.; Toplak, H.; Stich, V. Fat or fit: What is more important? Diabetes Care 2009, 32 (Suppl. 2), S392–S397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goncalves, C.G.; Glade, M.J.; Meguid, M.M. Metabolically healthy obese individuals: Key protective factors. Nutrition 2016, 32, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Goncalves, E.C.; Silva, D.A. [factors associated with low levels of aerobic fitness among adolescents]. Rev. Paul. Pediatr. 2016, 34, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Santos, I.S.; Matijasevich, A.; Assuncao, M.C.; Valle, N.C.; Horta, B.L.; Goncalves, H.D.; Gigante, D.P.; Martines, J.C.; Pelto, G.; Victora, C.G. Promotion of weight gain in early childhood does not increase metabolic risk in adolescents: A 15-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 2749–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jakubowski, T.L.; Faigenbaum, A.D.; Lindberg, C. Increasing physical activity in children: From evidence to action. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2015, 40, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Faigenbaum, A.D.; MacDonald, J.P. Dynapenia: It’s not just for grown-ups anymore. Acta Paediatr. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Leech, R.M.; McNaughton, S.A.; Timperio, A. The clustering of diet, physical activity and sedentary behavior in children and adolescents: A review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lanza, S.T.; Collins, L.M.; Lemmon, D.R.; Schafer, J.L. Proc lca: A sas procedure for latent class analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. 2007, 14, 671–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Berge, J.M.; Wall, M.; Bauer, K.W.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Parenting characteristics in the home environment and adolescent overweight: A latent class analysis. Obesity 2010, 18, 818–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Reboussin, B.A.; Song, E.Y.; Shrestha, A.; Lohman, K.K.; Wolfson, M. A latent class analysis of underage problem drinking: Evidence from a community sample of 16-20 year olds. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006, 83, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Iannotti, R.J.; Wang, J. Patterns of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet in U.S. Adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 2013, 53, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pereira, S.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Gomes, T.N.; Borges, A.; Santos, D.; Souza, M.; dos Santos, F.K.; Chaves, R.N.; Champagne, C.M.; Barreira, T.V.; et al. Profiling physical activity, diet, screen and sleep habits in portuguese children. Nutrients 2015, 7, 4345–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Saneei, P.; Esmaillzadeh, A.; Keshteli, A.H.; Feizi, A.; Feinle-Bisset, C.; Adibi, P. Patterns of dietary habits in relation to obesity in iranian adults. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016, 55, 713–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Laska, M.N.; Pasch, K.E.; Lust, K.; Story, M.; Ehlinger, E. Latent class analysis of lifestyle characteristics and health risk behaviors among college youth. Prev. Sci. 2009, 10, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Huh, J.; Riggs, N.R.; Spruijt-Metz, D.; Chou, C.P.; Huang, Z.; Pentz, M. Identifying patterns of eating and physical activity in children: A latent class analysis of obesity risk. Obesity 2011, 19, 652–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Landsberg, B.; Plachta-Danielzik, S.; Lange, D.; Johannsen, M.; Seiberl, J.; Muller, M.J. Clustering of lifestyle factors and association with overweight in adolescents of the kiel obesity prevention study. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1708–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ottevaere, C.; Huybrechts, I.; Benser, J.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Cuenca-Garcia, M.; Dallongeville, J.; Zaccaria, M.; Gottrand, F.; Kersting, M.; Rey-Lopez, J.P.; et al. Clustering patterns of physical activity, sedentary and dietary behavior among european adolescents: The helena study. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. van der Sluis, M.E.; Lien, N.; Twisk, J.W.R.; Steenhuis, I.H.M.; Bere, E.; Klepp, K.I.; Wind, M. Longitudinal associations of energy balance-related behaviours and cross-sectional associations of clusters and body mass index in norwegian adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1716–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nunes, H.E.G.; Goncalves, E.C.D.; Vieira, J.A.J.; Silva, D.A.S. Clustering of risk factors for non-communicable diseases among adolescents from southern brazil. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ferrar, K.; Golley, R. Adolescent diet and time use clusters and associations with overweight and obesity and socioeconomic position. Health Educ. Behav. 2015, 42, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, J.H.; Kim, J.; Colabianchi, N.; Ortaglia, A.; Pate, R.R. Co-varying patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their long-term maintenance among adolescents. J. Phys. Act. Health 2010, 7, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Evenson, K.R.; Wen, F.; Hales, D.; Herring, A.H. National youth sedentary behavior and physical activity daily patterns using latent class analysis applied to accelerometry. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. 2016, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Patnode, C.D.; Lytle, L.A.; Erickson, D.J.; Sirard, J.R.; Barr-Anderson, D.J.; Story, M. Physical activity and sedentary activity patterns among children and adolescents: A latent class analysis approach. J. Phys. Act. Health 2011, 8, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Iannotti, R.J.; Janssen, I.; Haug, E.; Kololo, H.; Annaheim, B.; Borraccino, A.; Group, H.P.A.F. Interrelationships of adolescent physical activity, screen-based sedentary behaviour, and social and psychological health. Int. J. Public Health 2009, 54 (Suppl. 2), 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Kim, Y.; Barreira, T.V.; Kang, M. Concurrent associations of physical activity and screen-based sedentary behavior on obesity among us adolescents: A latent class analysis. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 26, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Carson, V.; Faulkner, G.; Sabiston, C.M.; Tremblay, M.S.; Leatherdale, S.T. Patterns of movement behaviors and their association with overweight and obesity in youth. Int. J. Public Health 2015, 60, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tabacchi, G.; Bianco, A.; Alessi, N.; Filippi, A.R.; Napoli, G.; Jemni, M.; Censi, L.; Breda, J.; Schumann, N.L.; Firenze, A.; et al. Design, implementation, and evaluation of the adolescents and surveillance system for the obesity prevention project. Medicine 2016, 95, e3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tabacchi, G.; Jemni, M.; Viana, J.L.; Bianco, A. Adolescence surveillance system for obesity prevention (asso) in Europe: A pioneering project to prevent obesity using e-technology. In Smart Technology Applications in Business Environments; IGI Global, Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 83–108. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tabacchi, G.; Filippi, A.R.; Amodio, E.; Jemni, M.; Bianco, A.; Firenze, A.; Mammina, C. A meta-analysis of the validity of ffq targeted to adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 1168–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bianco, A.; Mammina, C.; Jemni, M.; Filippi, A.R.; Patti, A.; Thomas, E.; Paoli, A.; Palma, A.; Tabacchi, G. A fitness index model for Italian adolescents living in southern italy: The asso project. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2016, 56, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bianco, A.; Jemni, M.; Thomas, E.; Patti, A.; Paoli, A.; Ramos Roque, J.; Palma, A.; Mammina, C.; Tabacchi, G. A systematic review to determine reliability and usefulness of the field-based test batteries for the assessment of physical fitness in adolescents—The asso project. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2015, 28, 445–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tabacchi, G.; Filippi, A.R.; Breda, J.; Censi, L.; Amodio, E.; Napoli, G.; Bianco, A.; Jemni, M.; Firenze, A.; Mammina, C. Comparative validity of the asso-food frequency questionnaire for the web-based assessment of food and nutrients intake in adolescents. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 59, 26216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Filippi, A.R.; Amodio, E.; Napoli, G.; Breda, J.; Bianco, A.; Jemni, M.; Censi, L.; Mammina, C.; Tabacchi, G. The web-based asso-food frequency questionnaire for adolescents: Relative and absolute reproducibility assessment. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  49. Tabacchi, G.; Amodio, E.; Di Pasquale, M.; Bianco, A.; Jemni, M.; Mammina, C. Validation and reproducibility of dietary assessment methods in adolescents: A systematic literature review. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 2700–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chastin, S.F.; De Craemer, M.; Lien, N.; Bernaards, C.; Buck, C.; Oppert, J.M.; Nazare, J.A.; Lakerveld, J.; O’Donoghue, G.; Holdsworth, M.; et al. The sos-framework (systems of sedentary behaviours): An international transdisciplinary consensus framework for the study of determinants, research priorities and policy on sedentary behaviour across the life course: A dedipac-study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2016, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  51. Condello, G.; Ling, F.C.; Bianco, A.; Chastin, S.; Cardon, G.; Ciarapica, D.; Conte, D.; Cortis, C.; De Craemer, M.; Di Blasio, A.; et al. Using concept mapping in the development of the eu-pad framework (european-physical activity determinants across the life course): A dedipac-study. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Condello, G.; Capranica, L.; Stager, J.; Forte, R.; Falbo, S.; Di Baldassarre, A.; Segura-Garcia, C.; Pesce, C. Physical activity and health perception in aging: Do body mass and satisfaction matter? A three-path mediated link. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stierlin, A.S.; De Lepeleere, S.; Cardon, G.; Dargent-Molina, P.; Hoffmann, B.; Murphy, M.H.; Kennedy, A.; O’Donoghue, G.; Chastin, S.F.; De Craemer, M.; et al. A systematic review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in youth: A dedipac-study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  54. Yang, C.C. Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2006, 50, 1090–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hallal, P.C.; Victora, C.G.; Azevedo, M.R.; Wells, J.C. Adolescent physical activity and health: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2006, 36, 1019–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Troiano, R.P.; Berrigan, D.; Dodd, K.W.; Masse, L.C.; Tilert, T.; McDowell, M. Physical activity in the united states measured by accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kahn, J.A.; Huang, B.; Gillman, M.W.; Field, A.E.; Austin, S.B.; Colditz, G.A.; Frazier, A.L. Patterns and determinants of physical activity in U.S. Adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 2008, 42, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stalsberg, R.; Pedersen, A.V. Effects of socioeconomic status on the physical activity in adolescents: A systematic review of the evidence. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 20, 368–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Borraccino, A.; Lemma, P.; Iannotti, R.J.; Zambon, A.; Dalmasso, P.; Lazzeri, G.; Giacchi, M.; Cavallo, F. Socioeconomic effects on meeting physical activity guidelines: Comparisons among 32 countries. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tremblay, M.S.; Barnes, J.D.; Gonzalez, S.A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Onywera, V.O.; Reilly, J.J.; Tomkinson, G.R.; Global Matrix 2.0 Research Team. Global matrix 2.0: Report card grades on the physical activity of children and youth comparing 38 countries. J. Phys. Act. Health 2016, 13, S343–S366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Langford, R.; Bonell, C.; Jones, H.; Pouliou, T.; Murphy, S.; Waters, E.; Komro, K.; Gibbs, L.; Magnus, D.; Campbell, R. The world health organization’s health promoting schools framework: A cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Eather, N.; Morgan, P.J.; Lubans, D.R. Improving the fitness and physical activity levels of primary school children: Results of the fit-4-fun group randomized controlled trial. Prev. Med. 2013, 56, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kriemler, S.; Zahner, L.; Schindler, C.; Meyer, U.; Hartmann, T.; Hebestreit, H.; Brunner-La Rocca, H.P.; van Mechelen, W.; Puder, J.J. Effect of school based physical activity programme (kiss) on fitness and adiposity in primary schoolchildren: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010, 340, c785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  64. Silva, S.; Bustamante, A.; Nevill, A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Freitas, D.; Prista, A.; Maia, J. An allometric modelling approach to identify the optimal body shape associated with, and differences between Brazilian and Peruvian youth motor performance. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pauperio, T.; Corte-Real, N.; Dias, C.; Fonseca, A. Sport, substance use and satisfaction with life: What relationship? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2012, 12, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Harter, S. Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 505–570. [Google Scholar]
  67. Menschik, D.; Ahmed, S.; Alexander, M.H.; Blum, R.W. Adolescent physical activities as predictors of young adult weight. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2008, 162, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Strong, W.B.; Malina, R.M.; Blimkie, C.J.; Daniels, S.R.; Dishman, R.K.; Gutin, B.; Hergenroeder, A.C.; Must, A.; Nixon, P.A.; Pivarnik, J.M.; et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J. Pediatr. 2005, 146, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Delisle, T.T.; Werch, C.E.; Wong, A.H.; Bian, H.; Weiler, R. Relationship between frequency and intensity of physical activity and health behaviors of adolescents. J. Sch. Health 2010, 80, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Taliaferro, L.A.; Rienzo, B.A.; Donovan, K.A. Relationships between youth sport participation and selected health risk behaviors from 1999 to 2007. J. Sch. Health 2010, 80, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Grao-Cruces, A.; Fernandez-Martinez, A.; Nuviala, A. Association of fitness with life satisfaction, health risk behaviors, and adherence to the mediterranean diet in spanish adolescents. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 2164–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Word Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2014; WHO, Ed.; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 100. [Google Scholar]
  73. Gutin, B.; Yin, Z.O.; Humphries, M.C.; Barbeau, P. Relations of moderate and vigorous physical activity to fitness and fatness in adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Serrano-Sanchez, J.A.; Delgado-Guerra, S.; Olmedillas, H.; Guadalupe-Grau, A.; Arteaga-Ortiz, R.; Sanchis-Moysi, J.; Dorado, C.; Calbet, J.A.L. Adiposity and age explain most of the association between physical activity and fitness in physically active men. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, L.J.; Fox, K.R.; Haase, A.; Wang, J.M. Obesity, fitness and health in taiwanese children and adolescents. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 60, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ussher, M.H.; Owen, C.G.; Cook, D.G.; Whincup, P.H. The relationship between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2007, 42, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Padilla-Moledo, C.; Ruiz, J.R.; Castro-Pinero, J. Parental educational level and psychological positive health and health complaints in Spanish children and adolescents. Child Care Health Dev. 2016, 42, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Padilla-Moledo, C.; Ruiz, J.R.; Ortega, F.B.; Mora, J.; Castro-Pinero, J. Associations of muscular fitness with psychological positive health, health complaints, and health risk behaviors in spanish children and adolescents. J. Strength Cond. Res./Natl. Strength Cond. Assoc. 2012, 26, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Padilla-Moledo, C.; Castro-Pinero, J.; Ortega, F.B.; Mora, J.; Marquez, S.; Sjostrom, M.; Ruiz, J.R. Positive health, cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness in children and adolescents. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 22, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Farooq, M.A.; Parkinson, K.N.; Adamson, A.J.; Pearce, M.S.; Reilly, J.K.; Hughes, A.R.; Janssen, X.; Basterfield, L.; Reilly, J.J. Timing of the decline in physical activity in childhood and adolescence: Gateshead millennium cohort study. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 52, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Stracciolini, A.; Myer, G.D.; Faigenbaum, A.D. Exercise-deficit disorder in children: Are we ready to make this diagnosis? Phys. Sportsmed. 2013, 41, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Faigenbaum, A.D.; Lloyd, R.S.; MacDonald, J.; Myer, G.D. Citius, altius, fortius: Beneficial effects of resistance training for young athletes: Narrative review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2016, 50, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of possible fitness level determinants in adolescents from the ASSO project (N = 883).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of possible fitness level determinants in adolescents from the ASSO project (N = 883).
Biological/Genetic
N% N%
Gender Age
Male55062.3<16 years33137.5
Female33337.7≥16 years55262.5
Weight status Overweight/obese parents
Normal/under58371.9None22731.0
Overweight/obese22828.1At least one50669.0
Malaise frequency Diagnosed diseases
Never/rarely58983.1No65187.1
Weekly/daily12016.9Yes9612.9
Health riska
No62973.7
Yes22526.3
Sociocultural and environmental
N% N%
Parents’ educationb Family affluence scale
High school or higher44360.3Medium/high71896.1
Middle school or lower29239.7Low293.9
Town of residence’s size Study course type
Big centre67290.0Lyceum40245.5
Small centre7510.0Professional/technical48154.5
Life habits
Physical activity/Sedentariness
Non sedentary activitiesc (min/day) Sport (h/week)
60 or more72693.43 or more47761.8
Less than 60516.6Less than 329538.2
Total screen time (h/day)
Less than 244857.1
2 or more33642.9
Alcohol consumption/Smoking
Drinking alcoholics Smoking
No27635.8Never smoked/former smoker66586.1
Yes49664.2Current smoker10713.9
Meal patterns/Habits
Meals’ adequacyd Food habitse
Yes33643.5Correct38850.3
No43656.5Incorrect38449.7
a Adolescents at health risk are those who are both at metabolic risk (estimated through the waist circumference percentiles) and alcoholic risk (i.e., drinking 12 g or more of ethanol per day). Health risk is referred to the possibility of developing chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular, alcohol-related, and other metabolic diseases. b Parents’ middle school or lower education was defined by the presence of at least one parent with middle school or lower education. c Non sedentary activities: getting ready in the morning, walking or biking to school or back from school, practising physical activity at school, doing home-based physical jobs (cleaning, hovering, cooking, etc.), outdoor activities or walking during free time, and practising sport. d Meals’ adequacy consisted of the presence of at least 3 adequate main daily meals. A proper meal excluded carbonated and sugar-sweetened drinks or “junk food” for breakfast or morning and afternoon breaks; and a proper meal including a first or a second course with vegetables, fruit, bread, and excluding carbonated and sugar-sweetened drinks or junk food, for lunch and dinner. e Food habits were derived by summing up eating out, eating ready meals, eating organic food, eating fresh food, and eating food from vending machines. They were considered “correct” if subjects had at least 4 correct behaviours among those.
Table 2. Fitness levels and health-related fitness components in the total sample and by gender and age.
Table 2. Fitness levels and health-related fitness components in the total sample and by gender and age.
TotalGenderAge
MalesFemalesAge < 16Age ≥ 16
Fitness level aN%N%N%N%N%
Low7714.2256.85229.73316.84412.7
Medium36967.825769.611264.013468.023567.7
High9818.08723.6116.33015.26819.6
544 369 175 197 347
Upper body maximal strength a
Low12516.17615.84916.54917.27615.4
Medium50464.829962.020569.318063.232465.7
High14919.110722.24214.25619.69318.9
778 482 296 285 493
Lower body maximal strength
Low14118.69219.64917.16121.88016.8
Medium43657.726456.317259.915254.528459.5
High17923.711324.16623.06623.711323.7
756 469 287 279 477
Muscular endurance
Low11015.87216.73814.34216.96815.2
Medium45365.127062.618369.116666.728764.2
High13319.18920.64416.64116.49220.6
696 431 265 249 447
Speed and agility
Low13719.68218.85521.15120.18619.4
Medium42961.526360.216663.615962.627060.8
High13218.99221.14015.34417.38819.8
698 437 261 254 444
Aerobic capacity
Low13622.09122.44521.15223.98421.0
Medium33353.821653.211754.910950.022455.9
High15024.29921.45123.95726.19323.1
619 406 213 218 401
a significant difference within gender.
Table 3. Conditional probabilities and descriptive statistics of unhealthy lifestyles and health risks/unhealthy status across classes of fitness-related risk behaviors.
Table 3. Conditional probabilities and descriptive statistics of unhealthy lifestyles and health risks/unhealthy status across classes of fitness-related risk behaviors.
Class 1: Virtuous
(30.7%)
Class 2: Low PA/Sport
(18.8%)
Class 3: Incorrect Alcohol/Food Habits
(25.8%)
Class 4: Health Risk/Overweight
(15.9%)
Class 5: Malaise/Diseases
(8.8%)
PA/Sedentariness
Moderate PA < 60 min/day00.3350.01600.004
Sport < 3 h/week0.17910.2820.2570.367
Screen watching > 2 h/day0.2750.4620.5070.4980.518
Alcohol/Smoking/Food habits
Alcohol consumption0.5700.5560.7690.6550.662
Smoking0.1830.0950.1350.0980.165
Nonadequate meals0.3230.6080.9390.4300.458
Nonadequate food habits0.3130.4550.7560.4880.457
Health risk/Status
Overweight/obese0.1320.3070.0490.8000.389
At health risk00.2150.1370.9990.326
High malaise frequency0.0410.1970.13100.999
Diagnosed diseases0.0670.0350.0850.1170.691
Predictor frequencies
N.%N.%N.%N.%N.%
Males *18458.413263.29568.37157.33179.5
Age ≥ 16 **18358.513564.69266.27359.83076.9
At least one parent ow/ob16067.512770.68674.16667.32674.3
Low parents’ education9439.56636.75345.74141.41645.7
Low FAS145.852.732.533.000.0
Technical/professional school *17054.011052.69064.76955.62153.8
Small town of residence2711.22312.686.71010.0514.3
Note: (*) indicate significant differences between classes; percentage frequencies are calculated on the total subjects within each class. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; PA: physical activity; ow/ob: overweight/obese; FAS: family affluence scale.
Table 4. Associations between latent classes and possible predictors of class membership.
Table 4. Associations between latent classes and possible predictors of class membership.
Class 1: Virtuous
(30.7%)
Class 2: Low Pa/Sport
(18.8%)
Class 3: Incorrect Alcohol/Food Habits
(25.8%)
Class 4: Health Risk/Overweight
(15.9%)
Class 5: Malaise/Diseases
(8.8%)
Predictors OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Gender (males vs. females)ref.0.79 (0.55–1.17)1.95 (1.33–2.87) **NS2.88 (1.84–4.52) ***
Age (≥16 vs. <16)ref.1.80 (1.20–2.69) **2.53 (1.71–3.75) ***NS1.20 (0.81–1.77)
At least one parent ow/ob a (yes vs. no)ref.NSNSNS1.74 (1.08–2.79) *
Parents’ education (low vs. high)ref.1.94 (1.26–2.98) **NSNS1.64 (1.07–2.52) *
FAS b (low vs. high)ref.NSNSNSNS
Town size (small vs. big)ref.NSNSNSNS
School type (technical/professional vs. lyceum)ref.1.75 (1.19–2.59) **NSNS1.91 (1.28–2.84) **
Fitness level (low vs. medium/high)ref.10.39 (4.46–24.21) ***NS10.31 (3.52–30.19) ***2.57 (1.03–6.42) *
Fitness components
Upper body maximal strength cref.NSNSNSNS
Lower body maximal strength dref.4.24 (2.54–7.08) ***NSNS3.22 (2.00–5.18) ***
Muscular endurance eref.3.28 (1.93–5.58) ***NS2.67 (1.26–5.64) *2.54 (1.57–4.11) ***
Speed and agility fref.2.25 (1.33–3.83) **NSNS1.91 (1.66–3.12) *
Endurance/Aerobic capacity gref.2.14 (1.21–3.76) **NSNSNS
a ow/ob: overweight/obese; b FAS: family affluence scale; c assessed through the hand-grip test; d assessed through the standing broad jump test; e assessed through the sit-up test to exhaustion; f assessed through the 4 × 10 m shuttle run test; g assessed through the 20 m shuttle run test; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; OR: odds ratio, adjusted for gender, age, education, having at least one parent overweight/obese, school type; NS: not significant.
Back to TopTop