Next Article in Journal
Automated Ecological Assessment of Physical Activity: Advancing Direct Observation
Next Article in Special Issue
Refugee Health: An Ongoing Commitment and Challenge
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Approach to Motorcycle-Related Head Injury Prevention: Experiences from the Field in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Uganda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leveraging the Domain of Work to Improve Migrant Health
 
 
Article

Health Challenges in Refugee Reception: Dateline Europe 2016

London School of Economics, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(12), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121484
Received: 12 October 2017 / Revised: 21 November 2017 / Accepted: 21 November 2017 / Published: 30 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Refugee Health)
The arrival of more than one million migrants, many of them refugees, has proved a major test for the European Union. Although international relief and monitoring agencies have been critical of makeshift camps in Calais and Eidomeni where infectious disease and overcrowding present major health risks, few have examined the nature of the official reception system and its impact on health delivery. Drawing upon research findings from an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded project, this article considers the physical and mental health of asylum–seekers in transit and analyses how the closure of borders has engendered health risks for populations in recognised reception centres in Sicily and in Greece. Data gathered by means of a survey administered in Greece (300) and in Sicily (400), and complemented by in-depth interviews with migrants (45) and key informants (50) including representatives of government offices, humanitarian and relief agencies, NGOs and activist organisations, are presented to offer an analysis of the reception systems in the two frontline states. We note that medical provision varies significantly from one centre to another and that centre managers play a critical role in the transmission of vital information. A key finding is that, given such disparity, the criteria used by the UNHCR to grade health services reception do not address the substantive issue that prevent refugees from accessing health services, even when provided on site. Health provision is not as recorded in UNHCR reporting but rather there are critical gaps between provision, awareness, and access for refugees in reception systems in Sicily and in Greece. This article concludes that there is a great need for more information campaigns to direct refugees to essential services. View Full-Text
Keywords: refugee reception; health; medical; psychological services; Italy; Sicily; Greece; European Union refugee reception; health; medical; psychological services; Italy; Sicily; Greece; European Union
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Blitz, B.K.; D’Angelo, A.; Kofman, E.; Montagna, N. Health Challenges in Refugee Reception: Dateline Europe 2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121484

AMA Style

Blitz BK, D’Angelo A, Kofman E, Montagna N. Health Challenges in Refugee Reception: Dateline Europe 2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(12):1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blitz, Brad K., Alessio D’Angelo, Eleonore Kofman, and Nicola Montagna. 2017. "Health Challenges in Refugee Reception: Dateline Europe 2016" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 12: 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121484

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop