Next Article in Journal
A Population-Based, Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study on Influenza Vaccination Status among Cancer Survivors in Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Bacterial Community Naturally Present on Commercially Grown Basil Leaves: Evaluation of Sample Preparation Prior to Culture-Independent Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Mindfulness, Physical Activity and Avoidance of Secondhand Smoke: A Study of College Students in Shanghai
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors for Salmonella, Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Campylobacter Occurrence in Primary Production of Leafy Greens and Strawberries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbiological Food Safety for Vulnerable People

Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK,
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(8), 10117-10132; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120810117
Submission received: 30 June 2015 / Revised: 11 August 2015 / Accepted: 14 August 2015 / Published: 21 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety)

Abstract

:
Foodborne pathogens are more likely to cause infection and to result in serious consequences in vulnerable people than in healthy adults. People with some increase in susceptibility may form nearly 20% of the population in the UK and the USA. Conditions leading to increased susceptibility are listed. The main factors leading to foodborne disease caused by major pathogens are outlined and examples are given of outbreaks resulting from these factors. Measures to prevent foodborne disease include procedures based on Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point principles and prerequisite programmes and, especially for vulnerable people, the use of lower-risk foods in place of higher-risk products.

1. Introduction

A substantial proportion of people show increased susceptibility to foodborne illness compared with healthy adults. This susceptibility can result from chronic or acute illness, medication and/or age. The extent of this increased susceptibility differs according to the cause. In order to protect vulnerable people, who may be in hospitals, care homes or in the community, safeguards are needed in the production and supply of meals, and advice should be publicised to vulnerable people on the avoidance of certain foods.

2. Importance and Main Hazards of Foodborne Disease

In the United States it is estimated that each year major pathogens cause over 9 million cases of domestically acquired foodborne illness, over 55,000 hospitalizations and over 1000 deaths [1].
The estimated greatest numbers of cases of foodborne disease in the USA due to known pathogens in 2011 were caused by Norovirus, Salmonella spp., Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter spp., and Staphylococcus aureus, but the greatest numbers of deaths were caused by Salmonella, Toxoplasma gondii, Listeria monocytogenes, Norovirus and Campylobacter [1] (Table 1).
Table 1. Estimated annual number of domestically acquired foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths caused by major foodborne pathogens in the USA Data from [1].
Table 1. Estimated annual number of domestically acquired foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths caused by major foodborne pathogens in the USA Data from [1].
PathogenEstimated Mean Number of IllnessesEstimated Mean Number of HospitalizationsHospitalization Rate (%)Estimated Mean Number of DeathsCase-Fatality Rate
Norovirus5,461,73114,6630.271490.003
Salmonella spp. non-typhoidal1,027,56119,3361.883780.037
Clostridium perfringens965,9584380.04260.003
Campylobacter spp.845,02484631.00760.009
Staphylococcus aureus241,14810640.4460.002
E. coli (STEC) 0157 and non-O157175,90524091.37200.01
Shigella spp.131,25414561.11100.008
Yersinia enterocolitica97,6565330.55290.03
Toxoplasma gondii86,68644285.113270.38
Listeria monocytogenes1591145591.4525516.03
Estimates in Canada showed that norovirus, C. perfringens, Campylobacter spp. and non-typhoidal Salmonella accounted for 90% of the pathogen-specific, total cases of foodborne disease [2].
In the UK the estimated number of cases and hospitalizations associated with major foodborne pathogens in 2009 [3] are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Estimated number of food-related cases of disease caused by major foodborne pathogens. UK 2009. Data from [3].
Table 2. Estimated number of food-related cases of disease caused by major foodborne pathogens. UK 2009. Data from [3].
PathogenCasesHospital AdmissionsHospitalization Rate (%)
Campylobacter280,4005620.20
Clostridium perfringens79,5701860.23
Norovirus74,1003320.45
Salmonella non-typhoidal33,13024907.52
E. coli O1579886223322.59
Shigella1204332.74
Listeria monocytogenes183All reported outbreaks were among patients who were hospitalized
Toxoplasma gondii *>35,000 symptomaticnrnr
* From [4], the proportion of cases that are foodborne is not known; nr = not reported.
In the EU in 2013 the majority of reported cases of gastrointestinal disease were associated with Campylobacter spp., but the greatest number of deaths were caused by L. monocytogenes, with a case-fatality rate of 15.6% [5] (Table 3). The importance of norovirus as the cause of foodborne disease in the EU is illustrated by the report that the largest reported foodborne outbreak in the EU in 2012 was a norovirus outbreak in which 10,950 people were affected [6].
Table 3. Reported cases, hospitalization, deaths and case-fatality rates due to main zoonoses in confirmed human cases in the EU, 2013. Data from [5].
Table 3. Reported cases, hospitalization, deaths and case-fatality rates due to main zoonoses in confirmed human cases in the EU, 2013. Data from [5].
PathogenNumber of Confirmed Human CasesHospitalization Rate (%)Reported DeathsCase-Fatality Rate (%)
Campylobacter spp.214,77943.6560.05
Salmonella non-typhoidal82,69436.0590.14
Yersinia spp.647148.420.05
STEC604337.1130.36
Listeria monocytogenes176399.119115.6
The higher hospitalization rates in Table 3 than in Table 1 and Table 2 occur because the cases in Table 3 are reported, confirmed cases, whereas those in Table 1 and Table 2 are estimates, allowing for underreporting of cases which would include many cases that were not hospitalized.
In the Netherlands T. gondii and Campylobacter spp. were assessed as the foodborne pathogens with the highest disease burden, in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), on a population basis, while the burden per case was highest for perinatal listeriosis and congenital toxoplasmosis [7].
According to these reports, major foodborne pathogens in these countries include, Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Norovirus, C. perfringens, shiga-toxin-producing E. coli (STEC, E. coli O157 and similar bacteria), L. monocytogenes and T. gondii. The last 2 organisms are particularly important because of their high case-fatality rate. The effects of other foodborne pathogens on vulnerable people have been discussed previously [8,9,10]. For the majority of foodborne pathogens serious disease and deaths are associated particularly with vulnerable populations and people with underlying disease [3].

3. Groups of Vulnerable People

People who are particularly susceptible to foodborne disease include the very young, the elderly, and the immune compromised. These people may form nearly 20% of the population in the United States and the United Kingdom [8].Factors that lead to increased susceptibility are shown in Table 4 and discussed by Acheson [11]. Solid organ transplant patients are particularly susceptible to infections [12].
The extent to which vulnerability is increased differs greatly between these groups. An estimate of the relative susceptibility of groups to listeriosis, based on incidence in France has been published [13] (Table 5.). Goulet et al. [14] estimated that patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were the most vulnerable to listeriosis, with an incidence more than 1000 times greater than that in the population with no risk factors, and listed 14 underlying conditions associated with greater than 100-fold increase in susceptibility.
Table 4. Host factors that lead to increased susceptibility to foodborne infection and increased severity of illness.
Table 4. Host factors that lead to increased susceptibility to foodborne infection and increased severity of illness.
Primary Immunodeficiency, Caused by a Genetic Defect in Some Component of the Immune System
Secondary immune deficiencies:
 Immunosuppressive drugs in organ transplantation
 Leukaemia
 HIV/AIDS
 Chemotherapy for cancer
 Radiotherapy for cancer
 Treatment with corticosteroids
 Treatment with inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor e.g. for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease
 Diabetes, primary and secondary
 Pregnancy
 Age < 5 years
 Age > 65 years
Other factors:
 Malnutrition , involving protein, calories, vitamins or trace metals
 Use of acid-suppressing medication, particularly proton pump inhibitors
Table 5. Relative susceptibilities of different subpopulations to listeriosis, calculated using relative susceptibility information from France. Data from [13].
Table 5. Relative susceptibilities of different subpopulations to listeriosis, calculated using relative susceptibility information from France. Data from [13].
ConditionRelative Susceptibility
Transplant2584
Cancer—blood1364
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)865
Dialysis 476
Cancer—pulmonary229
Cancer—gastrointestinal/liver211
Noncancer liver disease143
Cancer—bladder and prostate112
Cancer—gynaecological66
Diabetes—insulin-dependent30
Diabetes—noninsulin-dependent25
Alcoholism18
Perinatals *14
Aged > 65 years7.5
Less than 65 years, no other condition (reference population)1
* Information from the USA.
Vulnerable groups may show a similar range of susceptibility to other pathogens.
The number of susceptible people will increase with the increase in number of elderly people, many of whom are affected by chronic illnesses, and also with the increasing sophistication of treatments. Many people with increased susceptibility to foodborne disease will be in hospitals, nursing or residential homes. Others will be living in their own homes, and with increasing emphasis on movement of care from hospitals to the community (care in the community) the number of susceptible people in the community is likely to increase.

4. Main Foods Associated with Hazards

Based on estimated disease burden, in terms of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QUALYs), the top 50 pathogen-food combinations in the USA were ranked by Batz et al. [15], the top 14 of which are shown in Table 6. An estimate of the main pathogen-food combinations, based on studies in the literature [3], is shown in Table 7.
Table 6. Top fourteen pathogen-food combinations in the USA estimated by annual disease burden. Data from [15].
Table 6. Top fourteen pathogen-food combinations in the USA estimated by annual disease burden. Data from [15].
RankPathogen-Food Combination
1Campylobacter—poultry
2T. gondii—pork
3L.monocytogenes—deli meats
4S. enterica—poultry
5L. monocytogenes—dairy
5Norovirus—complex foods
7S. enterica—complex foods
8S. enterica—produce
8T. gondii—beef
10S. enterica—eggs
11L. monocytogenes—complex foods
12S. enterica—beef
13S. enterica—pork
14Norovirus—produce
Table 7. Main foods associated with foodborne disease from food attribution studies in the UK, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, USA and the EU. Data from [3].
Table 7. Main foods associated with foodborne disease from food attribution studies in the UK, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, USA and the EU. Data from [3].
PathogenFoods
CampylobacterPoultry (40%–90%) dairy (10%–40%) red meat (up to 40%)
NorovirusSeafood up to 40%; produce 20%–40%
Clostridium perfringensBeef & lamb 40%–50%; poultry up to 20%; complex foods up to 20%
SalmonellaEggs 10%–80%; poultry up to 40%; produce up to 20%; poultry, pork, beef and lamb each up to 20%
E. coli O157Beef and lamb 40%–70%; produce 10%–30%
ListeriaUnspecified red meat up to 50%; dairy up to 40%; complex foods up to 40%; seafood up to 20%, other meats up to 20%; produce up to 10%
While foods of animal origin are associated with the major proportion of cases of foodborne illness, foods of non-animal origin are also associated with many outbreaks and cases. Studies in the US and the EU have identified top-ranking risk groups of non-animal foods as E. coli O157:H7 and leafy greens, Salmonella enterica and tomatoes, S. enterica and leafy greens, S. enterica and melons, and pathogenic E. coli and fresh pods, legumes and grains [16,17].
Information from outbreaks and from sporadic cases shows that foods likely to pose a risk of causing foodborne infection, include ready-to-eat foods (i.e., foods intended for consumption without further preparation or heating), that are produced or processed in such a way that does not kill pathogens.

5. Main Factors Leading to Foodborne Disease

Main factors leading to foodborne disease include: food from unsafe sources; inadequate cooking; improper holding temperatures, contaminated equipment and cross-contamination and poor personal hygiene.
In the light of these factors, foods that are of particular concern to vulnerable people have been outlined [9]. Examples of outbreaks that have resulted from these factors are shown in Table 8.
Outbreaks of toxoplasmosis are rarely reported, as immune competent people infected usually show mild or no symptoms. A range of outbreaks were described by Smith [18], of 17 outbreaks 13 were associated with consumption of raw or rare meat or raw goat’s milk. Several outbreaks have been associated with drinking water [19].

6. Prevention of Foodborne Disease in Vulnerable People

6.1. Control of Food Provision

The EU regulation on the hygiene of foodstuffs [20] and Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2006 and similar regulations in Scotland and Wales, include a requirement that food business operators should put in place, implement and maintain a permanent procedure or procedures based on hazard analysis and critical control point principles (HACCP) [21].This applies to meals supplied in hospitals and institutions as well as other food businesses. In order for a HACCP system to be effective, prerequisite programs must be in place to control factors such as Good Manufacturing Practice, raw material control, production control, pest control, sanitation and maintenance, use of approved suppliers and supplier auditing schemes.
It is particularly important that food for vulnerable groups of people is obtained from reputable suppliers who comply with legal requirements, have in place an appropriate food safety management system based on HACCP principles, and use safe food-handling techniques.

6.2. Avoid Food from Unsafe Sources

Avoidance of food from unsafe sources is particularly important in the case of foods that will not receive further processing, such as cooking, before consumption. Such foods include raw or unpasteurized milk, soft or mould-ripened cheese made with unpasteurized milk, unpasteurized fruit and vegetable juices, raw salad vegetables and fruit, shellfish harvested from unclassified areas, raw vegetable sprouts.
Table 8. Examples of foodborne outbreaks and contributing factors.
Table 8. Examples of foodborne outbreaks and contributing factors.
Place, DatePathogenSettingCases {Hospitalized} (Deaths)Food ImplicatedFactors Leading to OutbreaksReference
Austria, 2006C. jejuni, C. coliTertiary care hospital7 (0) patients, 14 staff (0)Poultry dishesPrepared in hospital kitchen with no HACCP system in place[22]
UK, 2011C. jejuni, C. coliWedding party49 {0} (0)Chicken liver pâtéUndercooked (cooked to 60 °C)[23]
USA, 2012C. jejuniCommunity148 {10} (0)Unpasteurized milkNo inactivation[24]
USA, 2012C. jejuniCommunity6 {2} (0)Chicken liverUndercooked[25]
USA 2001Clostridium perfringensResidential care facility for mentally ill7 {2} (2) Deaths associated with constipation resulting from medicationThanksgiving meal with turkeyLarge amount of food prepared well in advance of serving[26]
UK, 2005Clostridium perfringensBuffet lunch at event54 {nr} (nr)Chicken curryPrepared in a domestic kitchen, not registered with local authority, bulk of cooked curry left to cool at ambient temperature for ~10 h.[27]
USA, 2010Clostridium perfringensPsychiatric hospital42 (3) patients, 12 (0) staff. Deaths associated with impaired intestinal motilityCooked chickenCooked ~24 h before serving, not cooled adequately[28]
USA, 2012–2013E. coli O157Community17 {0} (0)Raw ground beefTraditional practice, previous outbreaks.[29]
Germany, 2011E. coli O104:H4Community3816 {~800} (54)Raw, sprouted seeds (fenugreek)Difficult to disinfect before sprouting.[30,31]
USA, 2012E. coli O157Schools, daycare, long-term care facilities17 {6} (2)Packaged salad lettucePossible contamination during growth in field[32]
Denmark, 2009ListeriaMeals-on-wheels7 {7} (2)Sliced beef with sauces and vegetables, intended for microwave cooking by consumerBeef had been cooked by the supplier at a lower temperature than usual. Four patient had cancer, one had systemic lupus erythematosus, three were aged >80[33]
Austria, Germany, Czech Republic 2009–2010ListeriaCommunity34 {nr} (8)‘Quargel’ cheese (Red smear cheese)Cheese made with pasteurized milk, but contamination probably occurred when cheeses were coated with a culture of Brevibacterium linens: subsequent holding at 12 °C–16 °C probably allowed multiplication of listeria[34,35]
USA, 2010ListeriaFive hospitals10 {5} (5)Diced celery, often in sandwiches.Probably contaminated in the field[36]
USA 2010–2015ListeriaHospital10 {10} (3)Milkshakes made with ice-cream productUnsatisfactory hygiene in factory producing ice-cream[37]
Denmark, 2005NorovirusHospital, nursing homes, meals-on-wheels service, restaurant, company canteen>1000 {~400} (0)Imported frozen raspberry pieces,Contamination during growth/harvesting on small farms[38]
Germany, 2012NorovirusMainly schools and canteens~11,000 {38} (0)Imported frozen strawberriesPossible contamination during growth/harvesting[39]
Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, 2013Hepatitis A virusCommunity>106 {nr} (nr)Imported frozen strawberriesPossible contamination during growth/harvesting[40,41]
Austria, 2009NorovirusHospital, rehabilitation centre and convalescent home114 (0) Patients and staff affectedSliced cold sausage; meat dish with salad; spinach pancakeContamination by one of five asymptomatic excreters among kitchen staff who prepared food. No HACCP in place[42]
UK, Norway, France, Sweden, Denmark, 2010NorovirusMainly restaurants334 cases, 65 clusters {nr} (nr)OystersProbably contaminated in oyster-growing areas and inadequately cooked[43]
Denmark, 2005S. Typhimurium DT104*Restaurant40 {11} (0)Carpaccio (thinly sliced, raw fillet of beef)Imported, contaminated beef uncooked[44]
Netherlands, 2005S. Typhimurium DT104Community, food from mobile caterers a risk factor169 {0} (0)Steak tartare (raw, minced beef)Imported, contaminated beef uncooked[45]
Germany, The Netherlands 2011S. NewportRehabilitation clinic and Asian restaurants in Germany, hospital in the Netherlands126 {30} (0)Mung bean sproutsSprouts served raw or undercooked[46]
Netherlands, 2012S. ThompsonCommunity>1149 {>46} (>4)Smoked salmonTransport of salmon on reusable, porous dishes on processing lines.[47]
UK, 2014 (part of multinational outbreak)S. EnteritidisHospital canteen, (patients, staff and visitors affected),three restaurants287 {78} (1)Eggs from a German producerNot reported, probably undercooked[48]
* MDR = multi antibiotic-resistant; nr = not reported.

6.3. Ensure Adequate Cooking

Conditions advised for cooking foods (Table 9) are based on a requirement to inactivate vegetative foodborne bacterial pathogens, including Campylobacter spp., STEC, Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes, the most heat-resistant of this group.
Table 9. Temperatures and times advised for thorough cooking of animal foods: A food thermometer should be used to check the internal temperature reached throughout the food.
Table 9. Temperatures and times advised for thorough cooking of animal foods: A food thermometer should be used to check the internal temperature reached throughout the food.
FoodTemperature to be Reached in All Parts of the FoodTime at Specified TemperatureReference
1. Meat, eggs, seafood, minced meats, rolled roasts, large joints of meat, whole poultry, soups, stews poultry70 °C-[49]
2. Burgers(ground, minced meat) poultry livers, and other foods70 °C At least 2 min[50]
or equivalent temperature/time combination [51]
[52]
3. Raw eggs broken and prepared for immediate service, Fish, meat, except as specified in 4, 5, 6.63 °C (145 °F) or above15 s[53]
4. Mechanically tenderized meat, injected meats, ratites, comminuted fish, meat, game animals commercially raised for food, raw eggs not prepared for immediate service68 °C (155 °F) 15 s [53]
or equivalent temperature/time combination
70 °C (158 °F) <1 s
66 °C (150 °F)1 min
63 °C (145 °F)3 min
5. Whole meat roasts including beef, corned beef, pork, cured pork roasts such as ham70 °C (158 °F) -[53]
Or equivalent temperature/time combination, e.g.
65 °C (149 °F)85 s
6. Poultry, baluts, wild game animals, stuffed fish, stuffed pasta, stuffed poultry stuffed ratites, stuffing containing fish, meat, poultry or ratites74 °C (165°F) or above15 s[53]
7. Raw animal food cooked in a microwave oven>74 °C (165 °F)Allow to stand for 2 min[53]
-, instantaneous.

6.4. Ensure Control of Holding Temperature

Clostridium perfringens forms spores that are heat-resistant and are not inactivated by cooking. Meals, particularly meat dishes, that are not eaten immediately but are prepared in advance, should be cooled within two hours from 57 °C to 21 °C and within 6 hours from 57 °C to 5 °C [53] and not allowed to remain at temperatures between 12 °C and 50 °C, which can allow the spores to germinate and the vegetative bacteria to multiply to numbers that can cause food-poisoning after consumption of the meal. Meals that are prepared and stored should be reheated to at least 74 °C for 15 sec before consumption [53].
Chilled foods should be maintained in a refrigerator at <5 °C to reduce growth of food-poisoning bacteria and maintain the safety and quality of the food. Listeria moncytogenes can grow slowly at temperatures as low as 3 °C–5 °C.

6.5. Prevent Cross-Contamination of Foods

Raw foods and ready-to-eat foods should be well-separated. Food-contact surfaces and equipment, including meat slicers, should be cleaned thoroughly. Separate equipment and utensils should be used for each item of raw food and for cooked food.

6.6. Maintain Good Personal Hygiene

Guidance in the UK specifies that staff who show symptoms of illness such as diarrhoea and/or vomiting must be excluded from working with or around open food, usually until at least 48 h after symptoms stop naturally [54]. In the case of people with symptoms caused by S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi, shiga-toxin-producing E. coli, and Hepatitis A virus more stringent requirements apply, and clearance by a medical professional is needed before a return to work. In the case of infection with norovirus, because of the ease with which the virus can be spread, it is advised that symptomatic food handlers should be excluded from the entire food business site, and remain away until at least 48 hours after symptoms stop.
Comparable directions are given in the FDA Food Code [53], with similar conditions applied to Shigella and STEC infections. More stringent requirements are given for employees working in a food establishment that serves a highly susceptible population than for those not working in such an establishment.
Persons who are asymptomatically infected may excrete small numbers of bacteria or viruses for weeks or more, those who show symptoms may continue to excrete the pathogen after they have recovered from symptoms of infection. Effective hand washing and good hygienic practices are important to prevent risk of infection.

6.7. Low—Microbial Diets

For clearly identified, vulnerable groups of people low-microbial diets or neutropenic diets have been advised by many organizations [9].The neutropenic diet prescribed by dieticians in the UK varies greatly [55]. According to Silk et al. [56] “evidence for the problem of unsafe food preparation and service for immune compromised and elderly patients is not only widespread, but also underestimated and can be expected to grow”. They proposed that professional organizations should promote, and large healthcare systems should establish, policies to prepare safe food for immune compromised patients and not serve them higher-risk foods, and that such practices could be implemented as the standard for hospital care. With the increase in vulnerable people in residential care and in the community, adherence to HACCP principles and policies for avoidance of higher—risk foods are needed in the supply of meals in these circumstances. It is important that general agreement be reached on recommendations for provision of safe food for vulnerable people and that arrangements should be made to review such recommendations in the light of new information and developments in the microbiological safety of food.

7. Conclusions

The number of people in the population with increased susceptibility to foodborne illness is significant and is expected to increase. Many vulnerable people will be in hospitals, nursing or care homes, others will be living in the community. It is particularly important that businesses who supply food to vulnerable people in all these situations should have in place food safety management systems based on Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point principles and safe food-handling techniques. For clearly identified vulnerable people generally agreed advice should be given on avoidance of higher-risk foods and the use of lower-risk alternatives.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to my colleague Dr Gary Barker for helpful comments on this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.-A.; Roy, S.H.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thomas, M.K.; Murray, R.; Flockhart, I.; Pintar, K.; Pollan, F.; Fazil, A.; Nesbitt, A.; Marshall, B. Estimates of the burden of foodborne illness in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents Circa 2006. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tam, C.C.; Larose, T.; O’Brien, S.J. Costed Extension to The Second Study of Infectious Intestinal Disease in the Community: Identifying the Proportion of Foodborne Disease in the UK and Attributing Foodborne Disease by Food Commodity Project B18021 (FS231043) 2014. Funder: UK Food Standards Agency. Available online: http://www.food.gov.uk (accessed on 26 June 2015).
  4. Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF) Ad hoc Group on Vulnerable Groups. Risk Profile in Relation to Toxoplasma in the Food Chain. 2012. Available online: http://acmsf.food.gov.uk (accessed on 26 June 2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-Borne Outbreaks in 2013. EFSA J. 2015, 1, 3991. [Google Scholar]
  6. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2012. EFSA J. 2014, 2, 1–312. [Google Scholar]
  7. Havelaar, A.H.; Haagsma, J.A.; Mangen, M.-J.; Kemmeren, J.M.; Verhoef, L.P.B.; Vijgen, S.M.C.; Wilson, M.; Friesema, I.H.M.; Kortbeek, L.M.; van Duynhoven, Y.T.H.P.; et al. Disease burden of foodborne pathogens in the Netherlands, 2009. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2012, 156, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lund, B.M.; O’Brien, S.J. The occurrence and prevention of foodborne disease in vulnerable people. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 961–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lund, B.M. Microbiological food safety and a low microbial diet to protect vulnerable people. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lund, B.M.; O’Brien, S.J. Public Health Measures: Food safety in hospitals and other healthcare settings. In Encyclopedia of Food Safety; Motarjemi, Y., Ed.; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 2014; Volume 4, pp. 140–148. [Google Scholar]
  11. Acheson, D. Iatrogenic high-risk populations and foodborne disease. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 27, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Obayashi, P.A.C. Food safety for the solid organ transplant patient: preventing foodborne illness while on chronic immunosuppressive drugs. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2012, 27, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. FAO/WHO. Risk Assessment of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods. 2014. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/y5394e/y5394e00.HTM (accessed on 26 June 2015).
  14. Goulet, V.; Hebert, M.; Hedberg, C.; Laurnent, E.; Vaillant, V.; de Valk, H.; Desenclos, J.-C. Incidence of listeriosis and related mortality among groups at risk of acquiring listeriosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Batz, M.B.; Hoffman, S.; Morris, J.G. Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1278–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Anderson, M.; Jaykus, L.-E.; Beulieu, S.; Dennis, S. Pathogen-produce pair attribution risk ranking tool to prioritize fresh produce commodity and pathogen combinations for further evaluation (P3ARRT). Food Control 2011, 22, 1865–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Da Silva Felίcio, M.T.; Hald, T.; Liebana, E.; Allende, A.; Hugas, M.; Nguyen-The, C.; Skoien Johanesen, G.; Niskanen, T.; Uyttendaele, M.; Mclauchlin, J. Risk ranking of pathogens in ready-to-eat unprocessed foods of non-animal origin (FoNAO) in the EU: Initial evaluation using outbreak data (2007–2011). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 195, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Smith, J.L. Documented outbreaks of toxoplasmosis: Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii to humans. J. Food Prot. 1993, 56, 630–639. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, J.L.; Dubey, J.P. Waterborne toxoplasmosis—Recent developments. Exp. Parasitol. 2010, 124, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. European Commission (EC) (2004) Regulation (EC) No. 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Hygiene of foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union. 25 June 2004: L226/3. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2004.226.01.0003 (accessed on 18 July 2015).
  21. International Life Sciences Institute Europe (ILSI). A Simple Guide to Understanding and Applying the Hazard Analysis Critical Point Concept. 3rd Eds 2004. Available online: http://www.ilsi.org (accessed on 24 June 2015).
  22. Jelovcan, S.; Schmid, D.; Lederer, I.; Hell, M.; Rehberger, K.; Arnhold, D.; Krassnig, G.; Lassnig, H.; Romanek, G.; Pless, P.; et al. Cluster of nosocomial campylobacteriosis, Austria 2006. J. Hosp. Infect. 2008, 69, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Edwards, D.S.; Milne, L.M.; Morrow, K.; Sheridan, P.; Verlander, N.Q.; Mulla, R.; Richardson, J.F.; Pender, A.; Lilley, M.; Reacher, M. Campylobacteriosis outbreak associated with consumption of undercooked chicken liver pâté in the East of England, September 2011: Identification of a dose-response risk. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Longenberger, A.H.; Palumbo, A.J.; Chu, A.K.; Moll, M.E.; Weltman, A.; Ostroff, S.M. Campylobacter jejuni infections associated with unpasteurized milk—Multiple states, 2012. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Multistate outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni infections associated with undercooked chicken livers—Northeastern United States, 2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2013, 62, 874–876. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bos, J.; Smithee, L.; McClane, B.; Distefano, R.F.; Uzal, F.; Songer, J.G.; Mallonee, S.; Crutcher, J.M. Fatal necrotizing colitis following a foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens Type A infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, e78–e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holtby, I.; Tebbutt, G.M.; Grant, K.A.; McLauchlin, J.; Kett, J.; Pinkney, S.A. Clostridium perfringens food poisoning outbreak associated with consumption of chicken curry supplied by a home caterer. Public Health 2008, 122, 1311–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatal foodborne Clostridium perfringens illness at a state psychiatric hospital—Louisiana, 2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2012, 61, 605–608. [Google Scholar]
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notes from the field: Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak associated with seasonal consumption of raw ground beef—Wisconsin, December 2012–January 2013. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2013, 62, 987–987. [Google Scholar]
  30. Frank, C.; Werber, D.; Cramer, J.P.; Askar, M.; Faber, M.; an der Heiden, M.; Bernard, H.; Fruth, A.; Prager, R.; Spode, A.; et al. Epidemic profile of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1771–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Soon, J.M.; Seaman, P.; Baines, R.N. Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak from sprouted seeds. Int. J. Hygiene Env. Health 2013, 216, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Marder, E.P.; Garman, K.M.; Ingram, L.A.; Dunn, J.R. Multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with bagged salad. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 593–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Smith, B.; Larsson, J.T.; Lisby, M.; Müller, L.; Madsen, S.B.; Engberg, J.; Bangsborg, J.; Ethelberg, S.; Kemp, M. Outbreak of listeriosis caused by infected beef meat from a meals-om-wheels delivery in Denmark 2009. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fretz, R.; Sagel, U.; Ruppitsch, W.; Pietzka, A.T.; Stögere, A.; Huhulescu, S.; Heuberger, S.; Pichler, J.; Much, P.; Pfaff, G.; et al. Listeriosis outbreak caused by acid curd cheese “Quargel”, Austria and Germany 2009. Euro. Surveill. 2010, 15. pii=19477. Available online: http:www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=19477 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. Schroder, D.; Rossmanith, P.; Glaser, K.; Wagner, M. Fluctuation in contamination dynamics of L. monocytogenes in quargel (acid curd cheese) lots recalled during the multinational listeriosis outbreak 2009/2010. Int .J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gaul, L.K.; Farag, N.H.; Shim, T.; Kingsley, M.A.; Silk, B.J.; Hyytia-Trees, E. Hospital-acquired listeriosis outbreak caused by contaminated celery—Texas, 2010. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 56, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. CDC Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Linked to Blue Bell Creameries Products (Final Update) 2015. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/ice-cream-03-15/index.html (accessed on 30 June 2015).
  38. Falkenhorst, G.; Krusell, L.; Lisby, M.; Böttiger, S.; Mølbak, K. Imported frozen raspberries cause a series of norovirus outbreaks in Denmark, 2005. Euro. Surveill. 2005, 10. pii=2795. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=2795 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  39. Mäde, D.; Trübner, K.; Neubert, E.; Höhne, M.; Johne, R. Detection and typing of norovirus from frozen strawberries involved in a large-scale gastroenteritis outbreak in Germany. Food Environ. Virol. 2013, 5, 162–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gillesberg Lassen, S.; Soborg, B.; Midgley, S.E.; Steens, A.; Vold, L.; Stene-Johansen, K.; Rimhanen-Finne, R.; Lofdahl, M.; Sundqvisr, L.; et al. Ongoing Multistrain Food-Borne Hepatitis A Outbreak with Frozen Berries as Suspected Vehicle: Four Nordic Countries Affected, October 2012 to April 2003. Euro. Surveill. 2013, 18. pii=20467. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=20467 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  41. Gossner, C.M.; Seven, E. Three Simultaneous, Food-borne, Multi-country Outbreaks of Hepatitis A Virus Infection Reported in EPIS-FWD in 2013: What does it Mean for the European Union? Euro. Surveill. 2014, 19. pii=20941. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance,org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=20941 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmid, D.; Kuo, H.-W.; Hell, M.; Kasper, S.; Lederer, S.; Mikula, C.; Springer, B.; Allerberger, F. Foodborne gastroenteritis outbreak in an Austrian healthcare facility caused by asymptomatic, norovirus-excreting kitchen staff. J. Hosp. Infect. 2011, 77, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Westrell, T.; Dusch, V.; Ethelberg, S.; Harris, J.; Hjertqvist, M.; Jourdan-da Silva, N.; Koller, A.; Lenglet, A.; Lisby, M.; Vold, L. Norovirus Outbreaks Linked to Oyster Consumption in the United Kingdom, Norway, France, Sweden and Denmark, 2010. Euro. Surveill. 2010, 15. pii=19524. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=19524 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Ethelberg, S.; Sørensen, G.; Kristensen, B.; Christensen, K.; Krusekll, L.; Hempel-Jørgensen, A.; Perge, A.; Nielsen, E.M. Outbreak of multi-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 linked to carpaccio, Denmark, 2005. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 135, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kivi, M.; Hofhuis, A.; Notermans, D.W.; Wannet, W.J.B.; Heck, M.E.O.C.; van de Giessen, A.W.; van Duynhoven, Y.T.H.P.; Stenvers, O.F.J.; Bosman, A.; van Pelt, W. A beef-associated outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in the Netherlands with implications for national and International policy. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 135, 890–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bayer, C.; Bernard, H.; Rabsch, W.; Hiller, P.; Malomy, B.; Pfefferkorn, B.; Frank, C.; de Jong, A.; Friesema, I.; Stark, K.; et al. An Outbreak of Salmonella Newport Associated with Mung Bean Sprouts in Germany and the Netherlands, October to November 2011. Euro. Surveill. 2014, 19. pii=20665. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=20665 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Friesema, I.; de Jong, A.; Hofhuis, A.; Heck, M.; van der Kerkhof, H.; de Jonge, R.; Hamerycke, D.; Nage, K.; van Vilsteren, G.; van Beek, P.; et al. Large outbreak of Salmonella Thompson Related to Smoked Salmon in the Netherlands, August to December 2012. Euro. Surveill. 2014, 19. pii =20918. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=20918 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  48. Inns, T.; Lane, C.; Peters, T.; Dallman, T.; Chatt, C.; McFarland, N.; Crook, P.; Bishop, T.; Edge, J.; Hawker, J.; et al. A Multi-Country Salmonella Enteritidis Phage Type 14B Outbreak Associated with Eggs from A German Producer: Near “Real-Time” Application of Whole Genome Sequencing and Food Chain Investigations, United Kingdom, May to September 2014. Euro. Surveill. 2015, 20. pii=21098. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?Articleid=21098 (accessed on 18 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  49. World Health Organization (WHO) Five Keys to Safer Food Manual. 2006. Available online: http://www.who.int (accessed on 24 June 2015).
  50. Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF). Report on the Safe Cooking of Burgers. Food Standards Agency 2007. Available online: http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/acmsfburgers0807.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2015).
  51. Food Standards Agency (FSA) Caterers Warned on Chicken Livers. 2010. Available online: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2010/jul/livers (accessed on 25 June 2015).
  52. Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF). Report from the Adhoc Group on Raw, Rare and Low Temperature (RRLT) Cooked Food. 2014. Available online: http://acmsf.food.gov.uk (accessed on 25 June 2015). [Google Scholar]
  53. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2013. Available online: http://www.fda.gov (accessed on 24 June 2013).
  54. Food Standards Agency (FSA) Food Handlers: Fitness to Work. Regulatory Guidance and Best Practice Advice for Food Business Operators; 2009. Available online: http://www.food.gov (accessed on 24 June 2015).
  55. Carr, S.E.; Halliday, V. Investigating the use of the neutropenic diet: A survey of UK dieticians. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Silk, B.J.; McCoy, M.H.; Iwamoto, M.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne listeriosis acquired in hospitals. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lund, B.M. Microbiological Food Safety for Vulnerable People. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 10117-10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120810117

AMA Style

Lund BM. Microbiological Food Safety for Vulnerable People. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(8):10117-10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120810117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lund, Barbara M. 2015. "Microbiological Food Safety for Vulnerable People" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, no. 8: 10117-10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120810117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop