Next Article in Journal
The Internet as a New Tool in the Rehabilitation Process of Patients—Education in Focus
Next Article in Special Issue
When Self-Reliance Is Not Safe: Associations between Reduced Help-Seeking and Subsequent Mental Health Symptoms in Suicidal Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of a Risk Management Plan on Legionella Contamination of Dental Unit Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suicide Risks among Adolescents and Young Adults in Rural China
Review

Gender Differences in Suicide Prevention Responses: Implications for Adolescents Based on an Illustrative Review of the Literature

1
Educational Psychology Department, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station Austin, TX 78712, USA
2
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(3), 2359-2372; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302359
Received: 8 January 2015 / Accepted: 11 February 2015 / Published: 23 February 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Suicide Prevention among Youth)
Background: There are well-documented gender differences in adolescent suicidal behavior; death by suicide is more common in males, while nonfatal suicide attempts are more common among females. Over the past three decades, researchers have documented the effectiveness of a myriad of suicide prevention initiatives. However, there has been insufficient attention to which types of suicide prevention interventions are effective in changing attitudes and behaviors for young males and females. In this review of the literature, we consider common examples of primarily universal suicide prevention programs from three implementation settings: school-based, community-based, and healthcare-based. Our purpose is to delineate how the potential gender bias in such strategies may translate into youth suicide prevention efforts. Methods: Research in which gender was found to moderate program success was retrieved through online databases. Results: The results that feature programming effects for both males and females are provocative, suggesting that when gender differences are evident, in almost all cases, females seem to be more likely than males to benefit from existing prevention programming. Conclusions: We conclude by considering recommendations that may benefit males more directly. Implications for adolescent suicide prevention in particular are discussed. Personalization of suicide intervention is presented as a promising solution to reduce suicide rates. View Full-Text
Keywords: gender; suicide; prevention; programming; adolescents gender; suicide; prevention; programming; adolescents
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamilton, E.; Klimes-Dougan, B. Gender Differences in Suicide Prevention Responses: Implications for Adolescents Based on an Illustrative Review of the Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 2359-2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302359

AMA Style

Hamilton E, Klimes-Dougan B. Gender Differences in Suicide Prevention Responses: Implications for Adolescents Based on an Illustrative Review of the Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(3):2359-2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamilton, Emma, and Bonnie Klimes-Dougan. 2015. "Gender Differences in Suicide Prevention Responses: Implications for Adolescents Based on an Illustrative Review of the Literature" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, no. 3: 2359-2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302359

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop