Next Article in Journal
Study on Autophagy Death of Alpha TC1 Clone 6 (αTC1-6) Cells Induced by Trametenolic Acid Through PI3K/AKT Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Ethacridine Targets Bacterial Biofilms in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Multi-Target Mechanism Revealed by Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Clinical RT-qPCR Validation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 47
Issue 10
10.3390/cimb47100869
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship of Dendrobium linawianum (Orchidaceae) Based on Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes

by
Fengping Zhang
*,
Qiyong Huang
,
Yaqiong Zhang
,
Dongqin Lǚ
,
Rui Chen
,
Yanshu Jia
and
Qiongchao Li
College of Ethnic Medicine, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Dai and Yi Medicines, Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of China-Laos Traditional Medicine, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(10), 869; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100869
Submission received: 5 September 2025 / Revised: 9 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 21 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Dendrobium is an orchid genus with high economic and ecological importance, but its taxonomy based on morphology remains controversial. Dendrobium linawianum, a critically endangered species with both ornamental and medicinal value, represents a key taxon within this genus. However, its phylogenetic relationship has long been unplaced due to similar morphological traits. Despite its conservation and taxonomic importance, its complete chloroplast genome has not been previously characterized. Here, we newly sequenced and assembled the complete chloroplast genome of D. linawianum. The 150,497 bp genome exhibits a typical quadripartite structure, encoding 119 genes. A total of 161 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified, predominantly mononucleotide and dinucleotide motifs. Condon usage analysis revealed leucine as the most abundant amino acid. Phylogenetic analysis based on complete chloroplast genome sequences strongly supported the close relationship of D. linawianum with D. hercoglossum, D. thyrsiflorum, and D. moniliforme, resolving its taxonomic position within the genus. The complete chloroplast genomes successfully resolved the phylogenetic relationships among 35 Dendrobium species, demonstrating their efficacy as powerful molecular markers for resolving taxonomic ambiguities within this morphologically complex genus. Our findings provide a genomic foundation for precise species identification and molecular breeding of D. linawianum, and enhance understanding of phylogenetic relationships in this taxonomically challenging group.

1. Introduction

Dendrobium Sw., one of the largest genera in the Orchidaceae family, comprises over 1500 species distributed across tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands [1,2,3]. For centuries, numerous Dendrobium species have been highly valued in Asian traditional medicine and horticulture [4,5,6,7]. Owing to population declines driven by overharvesting and habitat loss, many Dendrobium species are listed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) [8]. However, the high commercial value of these orchids has resulted in frequent species adulteration in commercial markets [9,10]. Consequently, developing reliable species identification methods is crucial for enabling effective conservation of endangered populations, promoting the sustainable utilization of Dendrobium genetic resources, and facilitating the targeted development of new horticultural hybrids within this genus. Notably, the taxonomy of Dendrobium is widely regarded as one of the most complex challenges in Orchidaceae, largely due to vegetative similarity among closely related species [11,12,13]. Traditional classification relied primarily on morphological characteristics [5,14,15,16,17,18,19], with supplementary support from analytical techniques including capillary electrophoresis [20] and high-performance liquid chromatography [21]. However, these methods are often insufficient for resolving closely related species within specific clades, such as the one containing D. linawianum. This species exhibits high morphological similarity and overlapping morphological character states (such as stem shape and leaf number) with D. nobile, leading to persistent uncertainties in its delineation and classification [22]. This ambiguity directly underscores the necessity of employing more powerful molecular tools for achieving a reliable and definitive phylogenetic resolution [1,23].
Recent advances in molecular techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of Dendrobium species identification [7,24,25,26]. Among these techniques, DNA barcoding, whether utilizing single or combined markers, has proven particularly valuable for clarifying interspecific relationships [1,22,27]. Nevertheless, phylogenetic uncertainties persist for certain closely related species within the genus [1,28]. This gap highlights the need for more informative molecular tools to achieve robust species discrimination. Chloroplast genomes (cpDNA) have emerged as powerful alternatives for phylogenetic reconstruction and species authentication in Dendrobum [29,30,31]. As maternally inherited, semi-autonomous genetic units, chloroplast genomes exhibit high conservation in gene content and syntenic arrangements across most angiosperms [32], typically featuring a canonical quadripartite structure: two inverted repeat (IR) regions flanking a large single-copy (LSC) region and a small single-copy (SSC) region [33]. Compared to nuclear genomes, chloroplast genomes have lower base substitution rates and fewer genomic rearrangements, which ensure stable phylogenetic signals while still retaining sufficient variation to distinguish closely related species [29,31,34]. These characteristics make chloroplast DNA ideal for resolving the taxonomic complexities and phylogenetic uncertainties that plague Dendrobium classification.
Dendrobium linawianum Rchb. f. is a commercially and ecologically valuable orchid, prized both for its ornamental floral traits and its medicinal potential [35,36] (Figure 1). However, the complete chloroplast genome of D. linawianum, a key resource for genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis, remains unreported. This knowledge gap has hindered comprehensive efforts to clarify its genomic features, guide germplasm preservation, and resolve its evolutionary placement within the Dendrobium genus. To address these limitations, we used Illumina Hiseq high-throughput sequencing to generate chloroplast genome data for D. linawianum, followed by de novo assembly and detailed annotation to construct a complete chloroplast genome map. The specific objectives of this study were: (1) to characterize the structural features of D. linawianum chloroplast genome and compare it with closely related Dendrobium species; and (2) to reconstruct the phylogenetic position of D. linawianum within Dendrobium using complete chloroplast genome sequences. Our findings provide foundational genomic data for D. linawianum, which will not only facilitate accurate species identification but also advance broader phylogenetic and conservation genetic studies of the taxonomically complex Dendrobium genus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Leaf Sample from Dendrobium linawianum and DNA Sequencing

Fresh, healthy leaves of D. linawianum were collected from the Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, leaf samples were immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [37]. High-quality DNA samples were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.2. Chloroplast Genome Assembly and Annotation

Clean data were filtered using GetOrganelle [38] were subsequently assembled into a complete chloroplast genome using SPAdes v.3.11.1 [39]. Genome annotation was performed using CpGAVAS2 [40]. The assembled chloroplast genome had an average coverage depth of 2741.92× with 100% genome coverage (Figure S1). A circular map of the D. linawianum chloroplast genome was visualized using the Organellar Genome DRAW [41]. The final annotated chloroplast genome sequence of D. linawianum has been deposited in GenBank under accession number NC087858.

2.3. Repeat and Codon Usage Analyses, Genome Comparison

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in the D. linawianum chloroplast genome were identified using MISA v2.1 [42] with minimum repeat thresholds set to 8, 5, 4, 3, 3, and 3 for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides, respectively. Codon preference was analyzed using CodonW v1.4.4 [43] to calculate relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU). The boundaries of inverted repeats (IRs), small single-copy (SSC), and large single-copy (LSC) regions were compared among D. linawianum, D. strongylanthum, D. nobile, D. thyrsiflorum, D. parishii, D. brymerianum, D. chrysotoxum, D. jenkinsii, D. moniliforme, and D. strongylanthum using the online tool IRscope [44] (https://irscope.shinyapps.io/irapp/) (accessed on 4 November 2024).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using complete chloroplast genome sequences from 37 species, with Phalaenopsis equestris and P. Aphrodite designated as outgroups. The sequence of D. linawianum was newly generated in this study, while chloroplast genomes of the remaining 34 Dendrobium species and the two outgroup taxa were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database. All chloroplast genome sequence was aligned with MAFFT v7.307 [45]. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (BI) and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) methods. The BI analysis was performed using MrBayes v3.2 [46] with four Markov chains running for 10 million generations. The NJ tree was constructed in MEGA11 [47] with 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Genomic Features of Dendrobium linawianum Complete Chloroplast Genome

The complete chloroplast genome of D. linawianum was sequenced and assembled. The genome is 150,497 bp in length and exhibits the typical structural features of angiosperm chloroplast genomes: a circular, double-stranded DNA with a quadripartite structure. Specifically, it consists of two Inverted Repeats regions (IRs) (25,970 bp each), a Large Single-Copy region (LSC) (84,770 bp), and a Small Single-Copy region (SSC) (13,787 bp) (Table 1; Figure 2). The total GC content of the D. linawianum chloroplast genome is 37.56%, corresponding to an AT content of 62.44%, indicating a clear AT bias. GC content varies across the four genomic regions: the highest GC content is observed in the IRs (43.42%), followed by the LSC (35.13%) and the SSC region (30.48%) (Table 1).
The complete chloroplast genome of D. linawianum was annotated to contain 119 genes, consisting of 74 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. These genes were functionally classified into four categories: (1) photosynthesis-related genes, (2) self-replication genes, (3) other genes, and (4) genes with unknown functions. Six protein-coding genes (rps19, rpl2, rpl 23, ycf2, ndhB, rps7), eight tRNA genes (trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU, trnL-CAA, trnV-GAC, trnI-GAU, trnA-UGC, trnR-ACG, trnN-GUU), and all four rRNA genes (rrn5S, rrn4.5S, rrn23S, and rrn16S) are located in the IRs region. Chloroplast genome annotation revealed that 16 genes contain introns: two genes (clpP, ycf3) contain two introns, while the remaining 14 genes have a single intron (Table 2).
The chloroplast genome of D. linawianum encoded 37 tRNAs, 20 of which are duplicated. These duplicated genes include 10 tRNAs (trnS-GGA, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU, trnL-CAA, trnV-GAC, trnI-GAU, trnA-UGC, trnR-ACG, trnN-GUU), all 4 rRNAs (rrn5S, rrn4.5S, rrn23S, rrn16S), and 6 protein-coding genes (rps19, rps12, rpl23, ycf2, ndhB, rps7) (Table 2). Among all intron-containing genes in the D. linawianum chloroplast genome, the trnK-UUU gene contained the largest intron (2781 bp). Analysis of start codons revealed that genes rps16, atpF, rpoC1, ycf3, clpP, petB, petD, rp116, and dhB used ATG as a start codon, rp12 initiated with ATA, while trnK-UUU, trnL-UAA, trnI-GAU, and trnA-UGC began with GGG (Table 3). The chloroplast genome of D. linawianum had 16 intron-containing genes, among which 14 (eight protein-coding genes and six tRNA genes) had a single intron, and two genes (ycf3 and clpP) had two introns each. Twelve genes (eight protein-coding and four tRNA genes) were located in the LSC region, and four genes (two protein-coding and two tRNA genes) in the IR regions. The pattern of intron presence was a common feature of a variety of genes in the chloroplast genomes of the Orchidaceae.

3.2. Repeat Sequence and Codon Usage Analyses of Complete Chloroplast Genome in D. linawianum

A total of 161 SSRs were identified in the D. linawianum chloroplast genome, comprising 99 mononucleotides (61.49%), 51 dinucleotides (31.68%), 3 trinucleotides (1.86%), 6 tetranucleotides (3.73%), 1 pentanucleotide (0.62%), and 1 hexanucleotide (0.62%) (Figure 3a). This dominance of mono- and di-nucleotide repeats is consistent with the AT-rich compositional bias of D. linawianum chloroplast genomes. Distribution analysis further revealed 108 SSRs (67.08%) in the LSC region, 26 (16.15%) in the IRs, and 27 (16.77%) in the SSC (Figure 3b).
The chloroplast genome of D. linawianum contains 43,456 protein-coding codons, encoding 20 amino acids with variation in frequency. Leucine (Leu) was the most frequently encoded amino acid (4381 codons, 10.08%), while cysteine (Cys) was the least frequent with only 530 codons (1.22%) (Figure 4; Table 4). In terms of synonymous codon diversity, tryptophan (Trp, encoded exclusively by UGG) and methionine (Met, encoded exclusively by AUG) were the only amino acids specified by a single codon. In contrast, leucine (Leu), arginine (Arg), and serine (Ser) each utilized six synonymous codons, while alanine (Ala), glycine (Gly), proline (Pro), threonine (Thr), and valine (Val) each employed four. The remaining amino acids (Cys, Asp, Glu, Phe, His, Lys, Asn, Gln, Tyr) use two synonymous codons. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis of 64 total codons revealed a strong AT-biased preference: 32 codons had RSCU values >1, of which 29 ended in A or U and only three ended in G or C. Among these, the arginine-encoding codon AGA was the most frequently used (RSCU = 1.88), while the arginine-encoding codon CGC was the least preferred (RSCU = 0.33) (Table 4).

3.3. IR/SC Boundary Analysis of Chloroplast DNA in D. linawianum

The chloroplast genome of Dendrobium species was analyzed by examining the SC/IR boundaries of chloroplast gene sequences of 10 species of Dendrobium species from different branches, which presented four boundaries, LSC-IRb, SSC-IRb, SSC-IRa, and LSC-IRa, respectively. Among them, the LSC-IRb boundary is relatively conservative, mostly located within the coding region of the rpl22 gene. The boundaries of SSC-IRb largely vary. D. linawianum and D. strongylanthum miss the ndhF gene on the right side, D. nobile and D. thyrsiflorum miss both ycf1 and ndhF genes, the boundaries of SSC-IRb of the other six Dendrobium species are located in the overlapping region of ycf1 and ndhF genes, and extend into the coding region of the ndhF gene. The boundaries of SSC-IRa are located on the inside of the ycf1 gene, only D. linawianum miss the ycf1 gene. The boundaries of LSC-IRa of D. parishii, D. brymerianum, D. chrysotoxum, and D. jenkinsii were located in the non-coding region between the rpl22 and psbA genes, and tend to be closer to the rpl22 gene, while the boundaries of LSC-IRa of D. nobile, D. moniliforme, D. thyrsiflorum, and D. strongylanthm lack the rpl22 gene. Overall, among the four boundaries of the complete chloroplast gene sequence in Dendrobium species, the SSC-IR boundary exhibits significant variation, while the LSC-IR boundary is relatively conservative (Figure 5).

3.4. Characteristics of the Genus Dendrobium Chloroplast Genome

The complete chloroplast genome lengths of the 35 analyzed Dendrobium species ranged from 150,497 bp (D. linawianum) to 160,024 bp (D. longicornu) (Table S1). The chloroplast genome of D. linawianum was relatively smaller compared to the chloroplast genomes of other Dendrobium species. Furthermore, the size of the complete chloroplast genome from the studied Dendrobium species was positively significantly correlated with the sizes of the large single-copy region (LSC) and small single-copy region (SSC), but not correlated with inverted repeat regions (IRs) (Figure 6). The AT content of 35 Dendrobium chloroplast genomes was highly conserved, ranging only from 62.3% (D. strongylanthum) to 62.9% (D. cariniferum and D. longicornu) (Table S1).

3.5. Phylogenetic Relationships

Phylogenetic relationships among D. linawianum and 34 other Dendrobium species were referred using complete chloroplast genome sequences. All branch nodes received strong support in both Bayesian inference (BI) (Figure 7) and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) (Figure 8) analyses. In both phylogenetic trees, all the sampled Dendrobium species formed a well-supported monophyletic clade. D. linawianum was most closely related to D. hercoglossum, with strong support from both analytical methods: a posterior probability (PP) of 1.00 in the BI tree and a bootstrap value (BS) of 100% in the NJ tree.

4. Discussion

The complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum, a critically endangered orchid of ecological and medicinal significance provides critical insights into its genomic architecture, evolutionary relationships, and conservation-oriented breeding. This study reveals that D. linawianum chloroplast genome conforms to the canonical structural pattern of most angiosperms, featuring a quadripartite organization (LSC, SSC, and two IR regions) and conserved gene content [30,31], it also exhibits distinct characteristics that reflect both its adaptive strategies and its phylogenetic placement within the genus Dendrobium. These findings not only enrich our understanding of Dendrobium chloroplast genome evolution but also lay a foundation for targeted conservation efforts for this endangered species.
The chloroplast genome of D. linawianum adheres to the canonical quadripartite structure characteristic of land plant chloroplasts, comprising two identical inverted repeat (IR) regions, one large single-copy (LSC) region, and one small single-copy (SSC) region [48]. With a total length of 150,497 bp, it is among the smaller chloroplast genomes in Dendrobium, where genome sizes range from 150,497 bp (D. linawianum) to 160,024 bp (D. longicornu). This interspecific size variation aligns with broader trends observed in angiosperm chloroplast genomes: total genome length is primarily shaped by expansions or contractions of the LSC and SSC regions, while the IR regions remain relatively stable [49,50,51]. The correlation analysis further supports this pattern: we detected a significant positive correlation between total chloroplast genome size and the lengths of both the LSC and SSC regions, but no significant association with IR length. This suggests that Dendrobium chloroplast genome evolution is driven predominantly by size changes in the single-copy regions, possibly driven by insertions, deletions, or gene rearrangements.
The GC content of D. linawianum chloroplast genome (37.56%) and its regional distribution pattern across regions (IRs > LSC > SSC), which is consistent with that of other Dendrobium species and most Orchidaceae taxa [30,31]. The higher GC content in IRs (43.42%) likely reflects the presence of rRNA and tRNA genes, which are GC-rich to stabilize secondary structures critical for translation [32]. The overall AT bias (62.44%) of the D. linawianum is a common feature of chloroplast genomes, attributed to the uniparental inheritance and reduced recombination of chloroplast DNA, which limits the correction of AT-enriched mutations [32,52]. The gene content of the D. linawianum chloroplast genome encodes 119 unique genes, including 74 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNAs, and 8 rRNAs. This gene set closely mirrors that of closely related Dendrobium species [29,30,53]. Functional categorization of these genes into photosynthesis-related, self-replication, and other roles highlights the chloroplast’s dual function as a site of photosynthetic energy production and a semi-autonomous genetic unit capable of self-maintenance. The six protein-coding genes, ten tRNAs, and four rRNAs are duplicated in the IRs, a phenomenon thought to protect these essential genes from deleterious mutations through recombination-dependent repair [54].
Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in chloroplast genomes are widely recognized as valuable molecular markers for studying genetic diversity and population structure due to their high polymorphism [55,56,57,58]. In the D. linawianum chloroplast genome, we identified 161 SSRs, with a clear dominance of mono- and di-nucleotide repeat motifs, accounting for 93.17% of all detected SSRs. This motif distribution exhibits a strong AT bias, which aligns with the overall AT-rich composition of the D. linawianum chloroplast genome. Most SSRs are localized in the LSC region (67.08%), which is known to accumulate more mutations than the IR regions due to lower selective constraint [59]. These SSRs can serve as species-specific markers for monitoring wild populations of D. linawianum, aiding in the detection of illegal trade and supporting ex situ conservation efforts. We propose two key research directions. First, the development of a standardized molecular identification toolkit based on a panel of highly polymorphic SSRs is essential for the rapid and accurate authentication of D. linawianum, which is crucial for curbing illegal trade. Second, a comprehensive population genetics study utilizing these markers should be undertaken to assess the genetic diversity and structure of remaining wild populations. Understanding the distribution of genetic variation will reveal potential inbreeding depression, identify genetically unique populations, and provide a scientific basis for prioritizing conservation units and designing effective breeding programs in germplasm banks.”
Codon usage analysis of D. linawianum chloroplast genome reveals that leucine was the most abundant amino acid (10.08%), while cysteine was the least (1.22%). This amino acid abundance pattern is highly conserved, not only observed in other Dendrobium species [30,31], but also across angiosperm chloroplast genomes more broadly. The strong AT bias in codon usage 29 of 32 preferred codons end in A/U) likely reflects the chloroplast genome’s AT-rich composition and may enhance translation efficiency by matching the tRNA pool [60]. Variation, contraction, and expansion of inverted repeat (IR) regions represent common evolutionary phenomena in flowering plants [61]. These structural changes frequently occur at IR-single copy region junctions (LSC/IRa, IRb/SSC), resulting in boundary shifts that relocate genes between IR and single-copy regions [62]. Furthermore, ndhF genes were absent in D. linawianum, D. nobile, D. thyrsiflorum, and D. strongylanthum. Such chloroplast ndh gene losses typically result from functional degradation or nuclear genome transfer [63,64], with fungal symbiosis potentially contributing to this phenomenon as observed in other orchids [65]
Comparative analysis of the D. linawianum chloroplast genome with those of 34 Dendrobium species confirms that D. linawianum has a relatively small genome, a trait that may reflect adaptive evolution to its ecological niche. Smaller chloroplast genomes are often associated with increased energy efficiency or reduced genetic load [66,67], which could be advantageous for D. linawianum in its native montane forest habitats, where resources are limited [5,6]. We speculate that this genomic streamlining might have a complex relationship with the species’ current endangered status [68]. Historically, a more compact, energetically efficient genome could have been beneficial for survival in stable but resource-limited niches. However, this potential specialization might come at a cost of reduced genetic plasticity. In the face of rapid environmental changes, such as habitat fragmentation and climate change, a smaller, highly conserved genome could potentially harbor less adaptive variation, thereby limiting the species’ ability to respond to new stressors and increasing its vulnerability to extinction. The conserved AT content (62.3–62.9%) across Dendrobium further supports the genus’s genetic cohesion, despite its morphological diversity.
Accurate identification of medicinal plants is essential for safe utilization, hybrid breeding, and genetic resource conservation. However, Dendrobium species are notoriously challenging to discriminate morphologically due to high phenotypic similarities among closely related taxa, particularly during non-flowering stages [11,12,13]. In recent years, chloroplast genomes, with their abundant variable sites, have emerged as powerful tools for phylogenetic reconstruction and species authentication in taxonomically complex plant genera including Orychophragmus, Cymbidium, Schima, and Dendrobium [69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. In this study, complete chloroplast genomes were used to authenticate D. linawianum and resolve its phylogenetic relationships with closely related Dendrobium species. Phylogenetic analysis based on 35 Dendrobium chloroplast genomes robustly resolved D. linawianum as sister to D. hercoglossum (PP = 1.00, BS = 100), clarified relationships among morphologically D. linawianum and D. nobile, which were previously unplaced species based on stem shape and leaf number alone [22]. This resolution highlights the utility of complete chloroplast genomes in overcoming taxonomic challenges posed by convergent morphology and hybridization in Dendrobium [73].
Future studies that integrate whole nuclear genome data will be crucial for investigating several key processes. Specifically, nuclear genomes can reveal histories of hybridization and introgression events by detecting discordant gene trees and introgressed alleles, which are invisible to chloroplast data. They are also essential for deciphering the role of polyploidization, a common phenomenon in orchids, in the evolution of this genus. Furthermore, a combined analysis of nuclear and chloroplast markers would provide a more holistic view of genetic diversity, allowing us to assess whether patterns of cytoplasmic (chloroplast) diversity align with those of nuclear diversity, and to identify genomic regions under selection that may be linked to local adaptation and the species’ critically endangered status.

5. Conclusions

Comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of Dendrobium linawianum with 34 congeneric species sheds light on the evolution of Dendrobium chloroplast genomes. Our findings demonstrate that D. linawianum exhibits highly conserved genome content and arrangement, which are consistent with other Dendrobium species. Its chloroplast genome size is shaped primarily by LSC and SSC lengths. Phylogenetic analyses using complete chloroplast genomes confirm its close affinity to other Dendrobium species, particularly D. hercoglossum. The D. linawianum chloroplast genome provides a robust reference for resolving phylogenetic ambiguities in Dendrobium and offers practical tools for species authentication. The genomic resources generated in this study, including complete D. linawianum chloroplast sequences, SSR markers, and phylogenetic insights, support both basic research on orchid evolution and applied efforts to conserve and improve ornamental and medicinal Dendrobium germplasm. Integrating chloroplast and nuclear genomic approaches in future studies will further clarify the evolutionary processes shaping this ecologically and economically important genus.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb47100869/s1.

Author Contributions

F.Z. conceived and designed the paper; F.Z. analyzed the experiments data; F.Z. execute the manuscript; F.Z. revised the manuscript; Q.H., Y.Z., D.L., R.C., Y.J. and Q.L. collected the samples. The final manuscript was approved by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32560093, 32360257), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department-Applied Basic Research Joint Special Funds of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine (202101AZ070001-049, 202001AZ070001-041), the Project of High Level Talent Research of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine (30970101878), and the “Young Top Talents” of the Ten Thousand Talents Plan in Yunnan Province (YNWR-QNBJ-2018-337).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Xiang, X.G.; Schuiteman, A.; Li, D.Z.; Huang, W.C.; Chung, S.W.; Li, J.W.; Zhou, H.L.; Jin, W.T.; Lai, Y.J.; Li, Z.Y.; et al. Molecular systematics of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae, Dendrobieae) from mainland Asia based on plastid and nuclear sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69, 950–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiang, X.G.; Mi, X.C.; Zhou, H.L.; Li, J.W.; Chung, S.W.; Li, D.Z.; Huang, W.C.; Jin, W.T.; Li, Z.Y.; Huang, L.Q.; et al. Biogeographical diversification of mainland Asian Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) and its implications for the historical dynamics of evergreen broad-leaved forests. J. Biogeogr. 2016, 43, 1310–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cakova, V.; Bonte, F.; Lobstein, A. Dendrobium: Sources of active ingredients to treat age-related pathologies. Aging Dis. 2017, 8, 827–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bao, X.S.; Shun, Q.S.; Chen, L.Z. The Medicinal Plants of Dendrobium (Shi-hu) in China; Shanghai Medicinal University Press: Shanghai, China; Fudan University Press: Shanghai, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wood, H.P. The Dendrobiums; A.R.G Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhu, G.H.; Ji, Z.H.; Wood, J.J.; Wood, H.P. Dendrobium. In Flora of China; Wu, C.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y., Eds.; Scientific Press: Beijing, China, 2009; pp. 367–397. [Google Scholar]
  7. Teixeirada Silva, J.A.; Jin, X.; Dobránszki, J.; Lu, J.; Wang, H.; Zotz, G.; Cardoso, J.C.; Zeng, S. Advancesin Dendrobium molecular research: Applications in genetic variation, identification and breeding. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 95, 196–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, S.; Xie, Y. The Red List of Chincese Species; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2004; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ding, G.; Zhang, D.Z.; Ding, X.Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, W.C.; Li, X.X. Genetic variation and conservation of the endangered Chinese endemic herb Dendrobium officinale based on SRAP analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. 2008, 276, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Ge, S.; Jensen, J.D.; Hu, F.Y.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Gutenkunst, R.N.; Fang, L.; Huang, L.; et al. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yukawa, T.; Uehara, K. Vegetative diversification and radiation in subtribe Dendrobiinae (Orchidaceae): Evidence from chloroplast DNA phylogeny and anatomical characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 1996, 201, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, T.; Wang, Z.T.; Xu, L.S.; Zhou, K.Y. Application of mitochondrial nad 1 intron 2 sequences to molecular identification of some species of Dendrobium Sw. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2005, 36, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar]
  13. Niu, Z.; Pan, J.; Xue, Q.; Zhu, S.; Liu, W.; Ding, X. Plastome-wide comparison reveals new SNV resources for the authentication of Dendrobium huoshanense and its corresponding medicinal slice (Huoshan Fengdou). Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 8, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yukawa, T.; Kita, K.; Handa, T. DNA phylogeny and morphological diversification of Australian Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). In Monocots: Systematics and Evolution; Wilson, K.L., Mossison, D.A., Eds.; CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2000; pp. 465–471. [Google Scholar]
  15. Clements, M.A. Molecular phylogenetic systematics in the Dendrobiinae (Orchidaceae), with emphasis on Dendrobium section Pedilonum. Telopea 2003, 10, 247–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Clements, M.A. Molecular phylogenetic systematics in Dendrobieae (Orchidaceae). Aliso 2006, 22, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burke, J.M.; Bayly, M.J.; Adams, P.B.; Ladiges, P.Y. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae), with emphasis on the Australian section Dendrocoryne, and implications for generic classification. Aust. Sys.Bot. 2008, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adams, P.B. Systematics of Dendrobiinae (Orchidaceae), with special reference to Australian taxa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 166, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schuiteman, A. Dendrobium (Orchidaceae): To split or not to split? Gard. Bull. Singap. 2011, 63, 245–257. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zha, X.Q.; Luo, J.P.; Wei, P. Identification and classification of Dendrobium candidum species by fingerprint technology with capillary electrophoresis. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2009, 75, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Xu, L. Simultaneous determination of phenols (bibenzyl, phenanthrene, and fluorenone). Dendrobium species by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1104, 230–237. [Google Scholar]
  22. Takamiya, T.; Wongsawad, P.; Sathapattayanon, A.; Tajima, N.; Suzuki, S.; Kitamura, S.; Iijima, H.; Yukawa, T. Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of morphologically diverse groups, Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allies. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hou, B.W.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Y.S.; Niu, Z.T.; Xue, Q.Y.; Ding, X.Y. Iteration expansion and regional evolution: Phylogeography of Dendrobium officinale and four related taxa in southern China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shen, J.; Ding, X.; Liu, D.; Ding, G.; He, J.; Li, X.; Tang, F.; Chu, B. Intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) molecular finger printing markers for authenticating populations of Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, S.G.; Lu, J.J.; Gao, L.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, H.Z. Molecular phylogeny analysis and species identification of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) in China. Biochem. Genet. 2014, 52, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang, J.Y.; Lu, J.J.; Qiu, S.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, H.Z. Dendrobium SSR markers play a good role in genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of Orchidaceae species. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 183, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, C.C.; Peng, C.I.; Huang, S.C.; Huang, P.L.; Chou, C.H. Determination of the genetic relationship of Dendrobium species (Orchidaceae) in Taiwan based on the sequence of the internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 101, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, S.Z.; Li, D.Z.; Li, J.W.; Xiang, X.G.; Jin, W.T.; Huang, W.C.; Jin, X.H.; Huang, L.Q. Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from mainland Asia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, B.; Gan, C.C.; Wang, H.C. Characteristics of the complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium thyrsiflorum and its phylogenetic relationship analysis. Biotechnol. Bull. 2021, 37, 38–47. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Z.W.; Qiu, Q.; Lang, J.Q.; Wu, Y.M.; Du, H.H.; Zhou, N. Sequence analysis of complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium heterocarpum Lindl. and Dendrobium trigonopus Rchb. f. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2022, 53, 5159–5169. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shang, M.Y.; Wang, J.L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.C.; Liu, Y.L.; Duan, B.Z. Analysis of chloroplast genome structure and phylogeny of endangered Dendrobium devonianum. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drug 2023, 54, 6424–6433. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wicke, S.; Schneeweiss, G.M.; de Pamphilis, C.W.; Muller, K.F.; Quandt, D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: Gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N.; Brinkmann, H.; Burey, S.C.; Roure, B.; Burger, G.; Löffelhardt, W.; Bohnert, H.J.; Philippe, H.; Lang, B.F. Monophyly of primary photosynthetic eukaryotes: Green plants, red algae, and glaucophytes. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1325–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Du, X.Y.; Zeng, T.; Feng, Q.; Hu, L.; Luo, X.; Weng, Q.; He, J.; Zhu, B. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.) and its phylogenetic relationship to other Brassicaceae species. Gene 2020, 731, 144340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lo, S.F.; Nalawade, S.M.; Mulabagal, V.; Matthew, S.; Chen, C.L.; Kuo, C.L.; Tsay, H.S. In vitro propagation by asymbiotic seed germination and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity studies of tissue culture raised plants of three medicinally important species of Dendrobium. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, L.; Chen, S.Q.; Zhuang, L.B. Evaluation on Ornamental Characters of 35 Species of Dendrobium. Subtop. Plant Sci. 2019, 48, 269–273. [Google Scholar]
  37. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin, J.J.; Yu, W.B.; Yang, J.B.; Song, Y.; De Pamphilis, C.W.; Yi, T.S.; Li, D.Z. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, L.C.; Chen, H.M.; Jiang, M.; Wang, L.Q.; Wu, X.; Huang, L.F.; Liu, C. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W65–W73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lohse, M.; Drechsel, O.; Bock, R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW): A tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Genet. 2007, 52, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Beier, S.; Thiel, T.; Münch, T.; Scholz, U.; Mascher, M. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2583–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Amiryousefi, A.; Hyvönen, J.; Poczai, P. IRscope: An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 3030–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Daniell, H.; Lin, C.S.; Yu, M.; Chang, W.J. Chloroplast genomes: Diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, K.J.; Lee, H.L. Complete chloroplast genome sequences from Korean ginseng (Panax schinseng nees) and comparative analysis of sequence evolution among 17 vascular plants. DNA Res. 2004, 11, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, S.; An, B.; Park, S. Reconfiguration of the plastid genome in Lamprocapnos spectabilis: IR boundary shifting, inversion, and intraspecific variation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, W.C.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, X.Z. Whole-genome comparison reveals divergent IR borders and mutation hotspots in chloroplast genomes of herbaceous bamboos (bambusoideae: Olyreae). Molecules 2018, 23, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Basak, S.; Ghosh, T.C. Nature of selective constraints on synonymous codon usage of rice differs in GC-poor and GC-rich genes. Gene 2007, 400, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, Y.X.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Xie, Y.; Feng, L.; Shen, S.G. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of an endangered Orchidaceae species Dendrobium monilforme and its phylogenetic implications. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2018, 10, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, A.; Guo, W.; Gupta, S.; Fan, W.; Mower, J.P. Evolutionary dynamics of the plastid inverted repeat: The effects of expansion, contraction, and loss on substitution rates. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Saha, M.C.; Cooper, J.D.; Mian, M.A.; Chekhovskiy, K.; May, G.D. Tall fescue genomic SSR markers: Development and transferability across multiple grass species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113, 1449–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Curci, P.L.; De Paola, D.; Danzi, D.; Vendramin, G.G.; Sonnante, G. Complete chloroplast genome of the multifunctional crop globe artichoke and comparison with other Asteraceae. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yap, J.Y.; Rohner, T.; Greenfield, A.; Van Der Merwe, M.; McPherson, H.; Glenn, W.; Kornfeld, G.; Marendy, E.; Pan, A.Y.; Wilton, A.; et al. Complete chloroplast genome of the Wollemi pine (Wollemia nobilis): Structure and evolution. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Park, I.; Kim, W.J.; Yeo, S.M.; Choi, G.; Kang, Y.M.; Piao, R.Z.; Moon, B.C. The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences of Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim. and Fritillaria cirrhosa D. Don, and Comparative Analysis with Other Fritillaria Species. Molecules 2017, 22, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wolfe, K.H.; Li, W.H.; Sharp, P.M. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 9054–9058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Plotkin, J.; Kudla, G. Synonymous but not the same: The causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Huang, H.; Shi, C.; Liu, Y.; Mao, S.Y.; Gao, L.Z. Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: Genome structure and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014, 14, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Raubeson, L.A.; Peery, R.; Chumley, T.W.; Dziubek, C.; Fourcade, H.M.; Boore, J.L.; Jansen, R.K. Comparative chloroplast genomics: Analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus. BMC Genom. 2007, 8, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chang, C.C.; Lin, H.C.; Lin, I.P.; Chow, T.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Chen, W.H.; Cheng, C.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Liu, S.M.; Chang, C.C.; et al. The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 299–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Martín, M.; Sabater, B. Plastid ndh genes in plant evolution. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Selosse, M.A.; Albert, B.; Godelle, B. Reducing the genome size of organelles favours gene transfer to the nucleus. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Adams, K.L.; Palmer, J.D. Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: Gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gomez, S.M.; Brown, M.J.M.; Pironon, S.; Bureš, P.; Verde Arregoitia, L.D.; Veselý, P.; Elliott, T.L.; Zedek, F.; Pellicer, J.; Forest, F.; et al. Genome size is positively correlated with extinction risk in herbaceous angiosperms. New Phytol. 2024, 243, 2470–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, J.B.; Tang, M.; Li, H.T.; Zhang, Z.R.; Li, D.Z. Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: Lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hu, H.; Hu, Q.; Al-Shehbaz, I.A.; Luo, X.; Zeng, T.; Guo, X.; Liu, J. Species delimitation and interspecific relationships of the genus Orychophragmus (Brassicaceae) inferred from whole chloroplast genomes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Du, Y.P.; Bi, Y.; Yang, F.P.; Zhang, M.F.; Chen, X.Q.; Xue, J.; Zhang, X.H. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Lilium: Insights into evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic analyses. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, X.Q.; Drew, B.T.; Yang, J.B.; Gao, L.M.; Li, D.Z. Comparative chloroplast genomes of eleven Schima (Theaceae) species: Insights into DNA barcoding and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhu, S.Y.; Niu, Z.T.; Xue, Q.Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, X.Z.; Ding, X.Y. Accurate authentication of Dendrobium officinale and its closely related species by comparative analysis of complete plastomes. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, Y.K.; Jo, S.; Cheon, S.H.; Kwak, M.; Kim, Y.D.; Kim, K.J. Plastome evolution and phylogeny of subtribe Aeridinae (Vandeae, Orchidaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2020, 144, 106721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, D.K.; Tu, X.D.; Zhao, Z.; Zeng, M.Y.; Zhang, S.; Ma, L.; Zhang, G.Q.; Wang, M.M.; Liu, Z.J.; Lan, S.R.; et al. Plastid phylogenomic data yield new and robust insights into the phylogeny of Cleisostoma-Gastrochilus clades (Orchidaceae, Aeridinae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2020, 145, 106729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 47 00869 g001
Figure 1. The flowering plant of Dendrobium linawianum.
Figure 1. The flowering plant of Dendrobium linawianum.
Cimb 47 00869 g001
Cimb 47 00869 g002
Figure 2. Gene maps of the complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum. Genes on the inside of the circle are transcribed clockwise, while those on the outside are transcribed counterclockwise. The same gene type is represented by the same color.
Figure 2. Gene maps of the complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum. Genes on the inside of the circle are transcribed clockwise, while those on the outside are transcribed counterclockwise. The same gene type is represented by the same color.
Cimb 47 00869 g002
Cimb 47 00869 g003
Figure 3. Distribution of SSRs (simple sequence repeat) in the Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast (CP) genomes. (a) SSR type and the proportion in the Dendrobium linawianum CP genomes; (b) The number of SSRs in different genomic regions of Dendrobium linawianum CP genomes. Mono, mononucleotide SSRs; dinu, dinucleotide SSRs; trin, trinucleotide SSRs; tetr, tetranucleotide SSRs; pent, pentanucleotide SSRs; hexa, hexanucleotide SSRs; LSC, large single-copy region; SSC, small single-copy region; IR, inverted repeat region.
Figure 3. Distribution of SSRs (simple sequence repeat) in the Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast (CP) genomes. (a) SSR type and the proportion in the Dendrobium linawianum CP genomes; (b) The number of SSRs in different genomic regions of Dendrobium linawianum CP genomes. Mono, mononucleotide SSRs; dinu, dinucleotide SSRs; trin, trinucleotide SSRs; tetr, tetranucleotide SSRs; pent, pentanucleotide SSRs; hexa, hexanucleotide SSRs; LSC, large single-copy region; SSC, small single-copy region; IR, inverted repeat region.
Cimb 47 00869 g003
Cimb 47 00869 g004
Figure 4. Codon distribution in the chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum. PCG, Protein-coding gene.
Figure 4. Codon distribution in the chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum. PCG, Protein-coding gene.
Cimb 47 00869 g004
Cimb 47 00869 g005
Figure 5. Comparison of the regions flanking inverted repeat/single copy (IR/SC) junctions among ten Dendrobium species.
Figure 5. Comparison of the regions flanking inverted repeat/single copy (IR/SC) junctions among ten Dendrobium species.
Cimb 47 00869 g005
Cimb 47 00869 g006
Figure 6. Pearson’s correlations among the sizes of whole genome, large single-copy, small single-copy, and inverted Repeats for the 34 studied Dendrobium species. Circle sizes and colors represent the significance and correlation coefficient (r). Significant levels are shown. *** p < 0.001. TL, total length of whole genome; LSC, large single-copy region; SSC, small single-copy region; IR, inverted repeat region.
Figure 6. Pearson’s correlations among the sizes of whole genome, large single-copy, small single-copy, and inverted Repeats for the 34 studied Dendrobium species. Circle sizes and colors represent the significance and correlation coefficient (r). Significant levels are shown. *** p < 0.001. TL, total length of whole genome; LSC, large single-copy region; SSC, small single-copy region; IR, inverted repeat region.
Cimb 47 00869 g006
Cimb 47 00869 g007
Figure 7. Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Dendrobium linawianum and other 34 Dendrobium species based on chloroplast genomes.
Figure 7. Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Dendrobium linawianum and other 34 Dendrobium species based on chloroplast genomes.
Cimb 47 00869 g007
Cimb 47 00869 g008
Figure 8. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogeny of Dendrobium linawianum and other 34 Dendrobium species based on the complete chloroplast genome sequences. Numbers above the branches indicate bootstrap percentages (BS).
Figure 8. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogeny of Dendrobium linawianum and other 34 Dendrobium species based on the complete chloroplast genome sequences. Numbers above the branches indicate bootstrap percentages (BS).
Cimb 47 00869 g008
Table 1. General features of Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast genome.
Table 1. General features of Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast genome.
RegionSize (bp)T%C%A%G%A+T%G+C%
Whole genome150,49731.4518.9430.9918.6262.4437.56
LSC84,77133.1817.9531.6917.1864.8735.13
SSC13,78832.714.5936.8215.8969.5230.48
IRA25,96928.2820.9628.322.4656.5843.42
IRB25,96928.2820.9628.322.4656.5843.42
Notes: LSC, Large Single-Copy; SSC, Small Single-Copy; IRA, Inverted Repeat A; IRB, Inverted Repeat B.
Table 2. Annotation of genes of the chloroplast genome in Dendrobium linawianum.
Table 2. Annotation of genes of the chloroplast genome in Dendrobium linawianum.
Types of GenesGroup of GenesName of Genes
Photosystem I genepsaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Photosystem II genepsbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ
PhotosynthesisCytochrome b/f complex genepetA, petB *, petD *, petG, petL, petN
ATP synthase geneatpA, atpB, atpE, atpF *, atpH, atpI
Rubisco generbcL
NADH-dehydrogenase genendhB a*
Self-replication genesRNA polymerase generpoA, rpoB, rpoC1 *, rpoC2
Large subunit of the ribosomerpl14, rpl16 *, rpl2 a*, rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 a, rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
Small subunit of the ribosomerps11, rps14, rps15, rps16 *, rps18, rps19 a, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 a, rps8
Ribosomal RNAs generrn4.5S a, rrn5S a, rrn16S a, rrn23S a
Transfer RNAs genetrnK-UUU *, trnQ-UUG, trnG-GCC a*, trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnY-GUA, trnE-UUC, trnT-GGU, trnS-UGA, trnS-GGA a, trnT-UGU, trnL-UAA *, trnF-GAA, trnV-UAC *, trnW-CCA, trnP-UGG, trnH-GUG a, trnM-CAU, trnL-CAA a, trnV-GAC a, trnI-GAU a*, trnI-CAU a, trnfM-CAU, trnA-UGC a*, trnR-ACG a, trnN-GUU a, trnL-UAG
Other genesTranslational initiation factor geneinfA
Maturase K genematK
Subunit of the Acetyl-CoA-carboxylase geneaccD
Envelope membrane protein genecemA
c-type cytochrom synthesis geneccsA
Protease geneclpP **
Unkown genes Conserved open reading framesycf1, ycf2 a, ycf3 **, ycf4
Notes: a represents duplicate copy genes; * and ** represent one intron and two introns in protein-coding genes, respectively.
Table 3. The intron types of Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast genes.
Table 3. The intron types of Dendrobium linawianum chloroplast genes.
GeneLocationStart CodonStop CodonExon I/bpIntron I/bpExon II/bpIntron II/bpExon III/bp
trnK-UUULSCGGGCCA37278135
rps16LSCATGTAA40891248
trnG-GCCLSCGCGGCT3167159
atpFLSCATGTAG145939410
rpoC1LSCATGTAG4327611608
ycf3LSCATGTAA124721230745153
trnL-UAALSCGGGCCA3579350
trnV-UACLSCAGGCTA3958137
clpPLSCATGTAA71959294671229
petBLSCATGTAG6728642
petDLSCATGTAA8860496
rpl16LSCATGTAG91170399
rpl2IRATATAG385663431
ndhBIRATGTAG775699758
trnI-GAUIRGGGCCA3794435
trnA-UGCIRGGGTCC3880134
Notes: LSC, Large Single-Copy; SSC, Small Single-Copy; IRA, Inverted Repeat A; IRB, Inverted Repeat B.
Table 4. Codon usage in the chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum.
Table 4. Codon usage in the chloroplast genome of Dendrobium linawianum.
Amino AcidCodonNumberRSCUAmino AcidCodonsNumberRSCU
AlaGCA6421.19ProCCA4731.09
GCC2860.53 CCC3860.89
GCG2370.44 CCG2180.50
GCU9861.83 CCU6531.51
CysUGC1580.60GlnCAA12131.48
UGU3721.40 CAG4250.52
AspGAC3450.38ArgAGA8541.88
GAU14791.62 AGG3330.73
GluGAA17821.46 CGA5901.30
GAG6550.54 CGC1490.33
PheUUC9830.78 CGG2030.45
UUU15461.22 CGU6011.32
GlyGGA10601.55SerAGC2130.36
GGC2830.41 AGU7001.18
GGG5030.74 UCA6601.12
GGU8891.30 UCC6001.01
HisCAC2570.45 UCG3280.55
CAU8771.55 UCU10501.77
IleAUA10290.88ThrACA6481.22
AUC7870.68 ACC3780.71
AUU16761.44 ACG2510.47
LysAAA18051.42 ACU8551.60
AAG7450.58ValGUA7881.40
LeuCUA6170.85 GUC3020.54
CUC3170.43 GUG3730.66
CUG3410.47 GUU7851.4
CUU9111.25TrpUGG8121.00
UUA12531.72TyrUAC3130.42
UUG9421.29 UAU11651.58
MetAUG10011.00TerminaterUAA1141.08
AsnAAC4830.47 UAG1061.01
AAU15751.53 UGA950.90
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, F.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lǚ, D.; Chen, R.; Jia, Y.; Li, Q. Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship of Dendrobium linawianum (Orchidaceae) Based on Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100869

AMA Style

Zhang F, Huang Q, Zhang Y, Lǚ D, Chen R, Jia Y, Li Q. Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship of Dendrobium linawianum (Orchidaceae) Based on Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(10):869. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100869

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Fengping, Qiyong Huang, Yaqiong Zhang, Dongqin Lǚ, Rui Chen, Yanshu Jia, and Qiongchao Li. 2025. "Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship of Dendrobium linawianum (Orchidaceae) Based on Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 10: 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100869

APA Style

Zhang, F., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., Lǚ, D., Chen, R., Jia, Y., & Li, Q. (2025). Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship of Dendrobium linawianum (Orchidaceae) Based on Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(10), 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47100869

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop