The Roles of Sales Technologies for Salespeople: Techno Demands and Resources Model Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Job Demands–Resources Model
2.2. Techno-Demands
2.3. Techno-Resources
2.4. Job Burnout
2.5. Job Satisfaction
2.6. Turnover Intention
2.7. Sales Performance
3. Hypotheses Development
3.1. Techno-Demands and Job Burnout
3.2. Techno-Resources and Job Satisfaction
3.3. Job Burnout and Turnover Intention
3.4. Job Burnout and Sales Performance
3.5. Job Satisfaction and Sales Performance
4. Method
4.1. Sample and Data Collection
4.2. Measurements
4.3. Common Method Bias
5. Results
5.1. Measurement Model Assessment
5.2. Structural Model Assessment
5.3. Mediation Test of an Alternate Model
6. Discussion and Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Managerial Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research Direction
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Roggeveen, A.L.; Sethuraman, R. Customer-interfacing retail technologies in 2020 & beyond: An integrative framework and research directions. J. Retail. 2020, 96, 299–309. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M.; Liu, H.; Chen, M.; Tang, X. Managerial ties: How much do they matter for organizational agility? Ind. Mark. Manag. 2022, 103, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogilvie, J.; Agnihotri, R.; Rapp, A.; Trainor, K. Social media technology use and salesperson performance: A two study examination of the role of salesperson behaviors, characteristics, and training. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 75, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conway, T.; Whitelock, J. Relationship marketing in the subsidised arts: The key to a strategic marketing focus? Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenzi, P.; Nijssen, E.J. The impact of digital transformation on salespeople: An empirical investigation using the JD-R model. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2021, 41, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarafdar, M.; Tu, Q.; Ragu-Nathan, B.S.; Ragu-Nathan, T.S. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2007, 24, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchiori, D.M.; Mainardes, E.W.; Rodrigues, R.G. Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers? Int. J. Hum. Comput. 2019, 35, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rayburn, S.W.; Badrinarayanan, V.; Anderson, S.T.; Gupta, A. Continuous techno-training and business-to-business salesperson success: How boosting techno-efficacy enhances sales effort and performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pullins, E.; Tarafdar, M.; Pham, P. The dark side of sales technologies: How technostress affects sales professionals. J. Organ. Eff. People Perform. 2020, 7, 297–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarafdar, M.; Bolman Pullins, E.; Ragu-Nathan, T.S. Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2014, 34, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christ-Brendemühl, S.; Schaarschmidt, M. The impact of service employees’ technostress on customer satisfaction and delight: A dyadic analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Erdem, M.; Anlamlier, E.; Chen, C.C.; Bai, B.; Putney, L. Technostress and hotel guests: A mere hurdle or a major friction point? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 55, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pflügner, K.; Maier, C.; Weitzel, T. The direct and indirect influence of mindfulness on techno-stressors and job burnout: A quantitative study of white-collar workers. Comp. Hum. Beh. 2021, 115, 106566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S.C.; Chandra, S.; Shirish, A. Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inf. Syst. J. 2015, 25, 355–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yener, S.; Arslan, A.; Kilinç, S. The moderating roles of technological self-efficacy and time management in the technostress and employee performance relationship through burnout. Inf. Technol. People 2020, 34, 1890–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, M.; Peterson, R.M.; Ajjan, H. CRM/social media technology: Impact on customer orientation process and organizational sales performance. J. Mark. Dev. Compet. 2015, 8, 85–97. [Google Scholar]
- Román, S.; Rodríguez, R. The influence of sales force technology use on outcome performance. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2015, 30, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allison, L.; Flaherty, K.E.; Jung, J.H. Salesperson brand attachment: A job demands-resources theory perspective. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2016, 36, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halbesleben, J.R.B. A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research; Bakker, A.B., Leiter, M.P., Eds.; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 102–117. [Google Scholar]
- Dormann, C.; Zapf, D. Customer-related social stressors and burnout. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2014, 9, 61–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Nachreiner, F.; Schaufeli, W. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 6, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Verbeke, W. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2004, 43, 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B. The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 2011, 37, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brod, C. Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Pers. J. 1982, 61, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bakker, A.B.; Van Emmerik, H.; Van Riet, P. How job demands, resources, and burnout predict objective performance: A constructive replication. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008, 21, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xanthopoulou, D.; Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Schaufeli, W.B. The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007, 14, 121B–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borle, P.; Reichel, K.; Niebuhr, F.; Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. How are techno-stressors associated with mental health and work outcomes? A systematic review of occupational exposure to information and communication technologies within the technostress model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, B.A. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement; A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004, 25, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, D.G.; Frechette, M. The impact of workload, productivity, and social support on burnout among marketing faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Mark. Educ. 2022, 44, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freudenberger, H.J. Staff burnout. J. Soc. Issues 1974, 30, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C. The measurement of experience burnout. J. Organ. Behav. 1982, 2, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.B. Historical and conceptual development of burnout. In Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research; Schaufeli, W.B., Maslach, C., Marek, T., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Enzmann, D. The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical Analysis; Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- McFarland, R.G.; Dixon, A.L. The impact of salesperson interpersonal mentalizing skills on coping and burnout: The critical role of coping oscillation. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2020, 41, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkman, B.L.; Shapiro, D.L. The Impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Acad. Manage. J. 2001, 44, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Doo, M.Y. The effect of organizational culture and HR practices on female managers’ commitment and job satisfaction. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2020, 44, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, H.C. Psychology of Industrial Behavior; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.K.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.Y. The impact of internal branding on employee engagement and outcome variables in the hotel industry. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2014, 19, 1359–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cranny, C.J.; Smith, P.C.; Stone, E. Job Satisfaction: How People Feel about their Jobs and How it Affects their Performance; Lexington Press: Lexington, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Matthews, L.M.; Rutherford, B.N. The impact of skill discretion and work demands on salesperson job satisfaction: The mediating influence of the burnout facets. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2020, 41, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Park, C. Leader-member exchange, sales performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment affect turnover intention. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2018, 46, 1909–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iverson, R.D.; Pullman, J.A. Determinants of voluntary turnover and layoffs in an environment of repeated downsizing following a merger: An event history analysis. J. Manag. 2000, 26, 977–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluedorn, A.C. A unified model of turnover from organization. Hum. Relat. 1982, 35, 135–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qaiser, N.; Sattar, N.; Arshi, S.; Asif, M.F.; Afridi, J.R. Impact of thriving on job performance, positive health and turnover intention: Consequences of thriving at workplace. Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manag. 2021, 13, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Mobley, W.H. Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control; Addison Wesley Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Darrat, M.; Atinc, G.; Babin, B.J. On the dysfunctional consequences of salesperson exhaustion. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2016, 24, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, R.A. Self-efficacy and personal selling: Review and examination with an emphasis on sales performance. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2020, 40, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, V.; Lyngdoh, T.; Guda, S.; Purani, K. Systematic review of determinants of sales performance: Verbeke et al.’s (2011) classification extended. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2020, 35, 1359–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, E.; Evans, K.R.; Zou, S. The moderating effect of goal-setting characteristics on the sales control systems-job performance relationship. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 1214–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inyang, A.E.; Jaramillo, F. Salesperson implementation of sales strategy and its impact on sales performance. J. Strateg. Mark. 2020, 28, 601–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plouffe, C.R.; Hulland, J.S.; Wachner, T. Customer-directed selling behaviors and performance: A comparison of existing perspectives. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2009, 37, 422–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, W.; Dietz, B.; Verwaal, E. Drivers of sales performance: A contemporary meta-analysis. Have salespeople become knowledge brokers? J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 39, 407–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyagari, R.; Grover, V.; Purvis, R. Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 831–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, R.S.; Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Derks, D.; Bakker, A. Smartphone use, work, home interference, and burnout-A diary study on the role of recovery. Appl. Psychol. 2014, 63, 411–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, S.T.; Kim, S. Meta-regression analyses of relationships between burnout and depression with sampling and measurement methodological moderators. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2022, 27, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khedhaouria, A.; Cucchi, A. Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cascio, R.; Mariadoss, B.J.; Mouri, N. The impact of management commitment alignment on salespersons’ adoption of sales force automation technologies: An empirical investigation. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2010, 39, 1088–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, J.; Lim, J. Organizational support in the workplace: The case of korean hospital employees. Hum. Relat. 1999, 52, 923–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarafdar, M.; Tu, Q.; Ragu-Nathan, T.S.; Ragu-Nathan, B.S. Crossing to the dark side-examining creators, outcomes and inhibitors of technostress. Commun. ACM 2011, 54, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ninaus, K.; Diehl, S.; Terlutter, R. Employee perceptions of information and communication technologies in work life, perceived burnout, job satisfaction and the role of work-family balance. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 136, 652–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollet-Haudebert, S.; Mulki, J.P.; Fournier, C. Neglected burnout dimensions: Effect of depersonalization and personal nonaccomplishment on organizational commitment of salespeople. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2011, 31, 411–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swider, B.W.; Zimmerman, R.D. Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 76, 487–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Cheong, K.K.; Feinberg, R.A. Moderating effects of supervisor support, monetary rewards, and career paths on the relationship between job burnout and turnover intentions in the context of call centers. Manag. Serv. Qual. 2012, 22, 492–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drake, B.; Yadama, G.N. A structural equation model of burnout and job exit among child protective services workers. Soc. Work Res. 1996, 20, 179–187. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z. The influence of customer’s verbal abuse on turnover intention and job burnout of sales service staff-the moderating effect of organizational atmosphere and psychological capital. Psychology 2018, 9, 2369–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, B.; Zhou, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X. Role stress and turnover intention of front-line hotel employees: The roles of burnout and service climate. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westbrook, K.W.; Peterson, R.M. Sales enablement and hindrance stressors’ effects on burnout, turnover intentions, and sales performance. J. Mark. Manag. 2020, 30, 64–85. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, W.H.; Ra, Y.A.; Park, J.G.; Kwon, B. Role of burnout on job level, job satisfaction, and task performance. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2017, 38, 630–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P. Salesforce performance and satisfaction as a function of individual difference. J. Mark. Res. 1978, 15, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowling, N.A.; Khazon, S.; Meyer, R.D.; Burrus, C.J. Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analytic examination. J. Bus. Psychol. 2015, 19, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.S.; Sohi, R.S. The curvilinear and conditional effects of product line breadth on salesperson performance, role stress, and job satisfaction. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2014, 42, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.J.; Churchill, G.A.; Peter, J.P. Improving the measurement of service quality. J. Retail. 1993, 69, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowling, N.A. Is the job satisfaction–job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination. J. Vocat. Behav. 2007, 71, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellman, C.M. Job satisfaction and intent to leave. J. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 137, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabia, R.; Boles, J.; Alejandro, T.G.B.; Sarin, S. Revisiting and replicating the dominant logic on salesperson job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 126, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popp, N.; Simmons, J.; McEvoy, C. Effects of employee training on job satisfaction outcomes among sport ticket sellers. Int. J. Sport Manag. Mark. 2019, 19, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyono, I.; Riyanto, S. Effect of organizational commitment, job stress, and job satisfaction on turnover intention. Int. J. Innov. Train. Res. 2020, 8, 286–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubinsky, A.J.; Howell, R.D.; Ingram, T.N.; Bellenger, D.N. Salesforce socialization. J. Mark. 1986, 50, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mobley, W.H. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. J. Appl. Psychol. 1977, 62, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, B.J.; Boles, J.S. The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance, and job satisfaction. J. Retail. 1996, 72, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malach-Pines, A. The Burnout Measure, Short Version. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2005, 12, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full-collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collab. 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N.; Lynn, G. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2012, 13, 546–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, N.F.; Cepeda-Carrion, G.; Roldán Salgueiro, J.L.; Ringle, C.M. European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Eur. Manag. J. 2016, 34, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hollingsworth, C.L.; Randolph, A.B.; Chong, A.Y.L. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, J.M.; Cheah, J.H.; Gholamzade, R.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 321–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, I.U.; Ji, S.; Kim, C. What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 75, 103440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F., Jr.; Cheah, J.H.; Becker, J.M.; Ringle, C.M. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas. Mark. J. 2019, 27, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, G.W.; Lau, R.S. Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 2008, 11, 296–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henshall, A. Can the ‘Right to Disconnect’ Exist in a Remote-Work World? Available online: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210517-can-the-right-to-disconnect-exist-in-a-remote-work-world (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Hudiburg, R.A. Psychology of computer use: VII. Measuring technostress: Computer-related stress. Psychol. Rep. 1989, 64, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadley, C.N.; Mortensen, M. Do We Still Need Teams? Harvard Business Review. Available online: https://hbr.org/2022/04/do-we-still-need-teams (accessed on 25 August 2023).
- Bush, M. Employee Experience is as Strong as Ever at the 100 Best Companies. Available online: https://fortune.com/2022/04/11/best-companies-work-culture/ (accessed on 25 August 2023).
Demographic Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 207 | 67.9% |
Female | 98 | 32.1% |
Age | ||
20–29 | 60 | 19.7% |
30–39 | 78 | 25.6% |
40–49 | 79 | 25.9% |
50–59 | 88 | 28.9% |
Marital status | ||
Married | 181 | 59.3% |
Un-married | 117 | 38.4% |
Others | 7 | 2.3% |
Job experience | ||
Less than one year | 60 | 19.7% |
One year | 79 | 25.9% |
Two years | 60 | 19.7% |
Three years and above | 106 | 34.8% |
Types of company | ||
B2C | 205 | 67.2% |
B2B | 76 | 24.9% |
B2G | 9 | 3.0% |
Overseas sales | 15 | 4.9% |
Total | 305 | 100% |
Constructs | Scale | Loadings | α | rho-A | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Techno- overload | TO1: I am forced to work much faster with new sales technologies (including systems and apps). | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.75 |
TO2: My new sales technology is forcing me to do more work than I can handle. | 0.86 | |||||
TO3: New sales technology has forced me to work on a very tight schedule. | 0.87 | |||||
Techno- invasion | TI1: I spend less time with my family due to new sales technology. | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.72 |
TI2: New sales technologies make it necessary to keep in touch with work-related contacts even while on vacation. | 0.83 | |||||
TI3: I have to sacrifice time to stay up to date on new sales technologies. | 0.84 | |||||
TI4: I feel that my privacy is being invaded by new sales technology. | 0.88 | |||||
Techno- complexity | TC2: It takes a long time to understand and use new sales technology. | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.74 |
TC3: I do not find enough time to study and upgrade my new sales technology. | 0.89 | |||||
TC4: I often find it too complex for me to understand and use new sales technology. | 0.86 | |||||
Techno- insecurity | TIN4: I do not share my knowledge of sales technology with my coworkers for fear of being replaced. | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.81 |
TIN5: I am increasingly reluctant to share my knowledge of sales technology with coworkers for fear of being replaced. | 0.88 | |||||
Techno- uncertainty | TUN3: The sales technology hardware changes frequently. | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.84 |
TUN4: The sales technology networks that are used in sales are frequently upgraded. | 0.88 | |||||
Techno- education | TED1: I am impressed with the educational program for sales technology. | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.71 |
TED2: I have a good impression of the educational program in sales technology. | 0.84 | |||||
TED3: Ongoing training program in sales technology is valuable for the business. | 0.86 | |||||
TED4: Ongoing educational programs related to sales technology are relevant to my work. | 0.80 | |||||
Supervisor support | SSUP1: When I have difficulty with sales technology, my supervisor provides different types of support. | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.84 |
SSUP2: When I am curious about sales technology, my supervisor kindly explains. | 0.92 | |||||
SSUP3: My supervisor informs me well about the sales technology needed for my job. | 0.93 | |||||
SSUP4: My supervisor gives me advice on sales technology needed for my job. | 0.88 | |||||
SSUP5: My supervisor immediately solves the sales technology that I need at work. | 0.91 | |||||
IT dept. support | ITS1: The IT department has competent employees who effectively support me with sales technology. | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
ITS2: The IT department quickly supports my sales technology-related requests. | 0.92 | |||||
ITS3: The IT department accurately responds to my sales technology-related requests. | 0.90 | |||||
Coworker support | CSUP1: My coworkers assist me with my sales technology work. | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.80 |
CSUP2: My coworkers try to help me with my sales technology problems. | 0.90 | |||||
CSUP3: When my work related to sales technology gets difficult, my coworker tries to help. | 0.89 | |||||
CSUP4: My coworker listens to me when I have difficulties with sales technology at work. | 0.88 | |||||
Job burnout | BO1: Tired. | 0.78 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
BO2: Being disappointed in people. | 0.85 | |||||
BO3: Hopeless | 0.76 | |||||
BO4: I feel like I’m trapped. | 0.84 | |||||
BO5: I can’t help. | 0.85 | |||||
BO6: I feel depressed. | 0.83 | |||||
BO7: I feel physically weak/sick. | 0.89 | |||||
BO8: I feel worthless/failure. | 0.78 | |||||
BO9: I have trouble in sleeping. | 0.83 | |||||
BO10: I am exhausted. | 0.82 | |||||
Job satisfaction | JS1: In general, I am very satisfied with my job. | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.79 |
JS2: I am generally satisfied with the type of work I do in this job. | 0.89 | |||||
JS3: I feel deep satisfaction working at this company. | 0.90 | |||||
JS4: I love my sales job. | 0.86 | |||||
JS5: I take pride in my sales work. | 0.90 | |||||
JS6: My sales work is rewarding. | 0.89 | |||||
Turnover intention | TI1: There are times when I want to work in a job other than my current one. | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.75 |
TI2: I want to move to another job in the same industry even if the working conditions are similar. | 0.86 | |||||
TI3: If I get a job offer from another company, I will change my job. | 0.89 | |||||
TI4: I am looking for information about job opportunities in other companies in the same industry. | 0.86 | |||||
Sales performance | SP1: Compared to my coworker, my sales performance is high. | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.73 |
SP2: I manage my business hours efficiently. | 0.83 | |||||
SP4: I achieve the company’s sales goals. | 0.86 | |||||
SP5: I am good at my sales job. | 0.87 |
Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Burnout | 0.82 | ||||||||||||
2. Co-worker support | 0.00 | 0.89 | |||||||||||
3. IT dept. support | −0.04 | 0.53 | 0.92 | ||||||||||
4. Job satisfaction | −0.30 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.89 | |||||||||
5. Sales performance | −0.07 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.85 | ||||||||
6. Supervisor support | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.91 | |||||||
7. Techno-insecurity | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.17 | −0.01 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.90 | ||||||
8. Techno-complexity | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.03 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.39 | 0.86 | |||||
9. Techno-education | 0.09 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.84 | ||||
10. Techno-invasion | 0.24 | 0.06 | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.21 | −0.06 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.85 | |||
11. Techno-overload | 0.29 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.86 | ||
12. Techno-uncertainty | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.92 | |
13. Turnover-intention | 0.57 | −0.03 | −0.08 | −0.27 | 0.03 | −0.01 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Burnout | |||||||||||||
2. Co-worker support | 0.04 | ||||||||||||
3. IT dept. support | 0.05 | 0.58 | |||||||||||
4. Job satisfaction | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | ||||||||||
5. Sales performance | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.52 | |||||||||
6. Supervisor support | 0.03 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 0.31 | ||||||||
7. Techno-insecurity | 0.37 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.11 | |||||||
8. Techno-complexity | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.48 | ||||||
9. Techno-education | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.16 | 0.08 | |||||
10. Techno-invasion | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.13 | ||||
11. Techno-overload | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.65 | |||
12. Techno-uncertainty | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.49 | ||
13. Turnover-intention | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.20 |
Higher-Order Constructs | Lower-Order Constructs | Loadings | α | rho_a | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Techno-demands | Techno-insecurity | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.50 |
Techno-complexity | 0.70 | |||||
Techno-invasion | 0.71 | |||||
Techno-overload | 0.79 | |||||
Techno-uncertainty | 0.55 | |||||
Techno-resources | Co-worker support | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.61 |
IT dept. support | 0.80 | |||||
Supervisor support | 0.80 | |||||
Techno-education | 0.75 |
Proposed Hypotheses | Estimate | t-Values | p-Values | CI (2.5%) | CI (97.5%) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1:Techno-demands → Job burnout | 0.38 | 7.40 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.48 | Supported |
H2: Techno-resources → Job satisfaction | 0.43 | 7.86 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.54 | Supported |
H3: Job burnout → Turnover intention | 0.54 | 11.43 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.62 | Supported |
H4: Job burnout → Sales performance | 0.08 | 1.19 | 0.23 | −0.05 | 0.20 | Not supported |
H5: Job satisfaction → Sales performance | 0.50 | 9.25 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.60 | Supported |
H6: Job satisfaction → Turnover intention | −0.12 | 2.25 | 0.02 | −0.21 | −0.02 | Supported |
Endogenous Latent Constructs | R2 | Q2 | f2 |
---|---|---|---|
Job burnout | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
Job satisfaction | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
Turnover intention | 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.39 |
Sales performance | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.30 |
Relationships | Total Effect | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | T | p | β | T | p | β | T | p | 5.0% | 95.0% | |
Techno-demands → Job Burnout → Turnover intention | 0.34 | 5.57 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 2.65 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 4.85 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.24 |
Techno-demands → Job Burnout → Sales performance | 0.02 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 3.56 | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.47 | 0.64 | −0.06 | 0.03 |
Techno-resources→ Job satisfaction → Sales performance | 0.28 | 4.40 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 1.52 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 5.27 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.24 |
Techno-resources → Job satisfaction→ Turnover intention | −0.05 | 1.02 | 0.299 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.86 | −0.06 | 4.85 | 0.00 | −0.12 | −0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shin, K.; Ji, S.; Jan, I.U.; Kim, Y. The Roles of Sales Technologies for Salespeople: Techno Demands and Resources Model Perspective. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 362-380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010019
Shin K, Ji S, Jan IU, Kim Y. The Roles of Sales Technologies for Salespeople: Techno Demands and Resources Model Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2024; 19(1):362-380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010019
Chicago/Turabian StyleShin, Kangsun, Seonggoo Ji, Ihsan Ullah Jan, and Younghoon Kim. 2024. "The Roles of Sales Technologies for Salespeople: Techno Demands and Resources Model Perspective" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 1: 362-380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010019
APA StyleShin, K., Ji, S., Jan, I. U., & Kim, Y. (2024). The Roles of Sales Technologies for Salespeople: Techno Demands and Resources Model Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010019