Can Online Consumer Reviews Identify Key Evidence Regarding Common Consumer Choices for High-Tech Pet Products?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. The Experiments
3.1. Research Framework
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Topic Modeling
- Document–Topic Matrix: Each document is represented as a distribution over several topics, indicating the relative importance (RI) of each topic within the document.
- Topic–Word Matrix: Each topic is represented as a distribution over its words, indicating the likelihood of each word occurring in the topic.
3.4. Association Rules Algorithm
4. Experiment Results
4.1. Results of Topic Modeling
4.2. Results of Applying Key Association Rules
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Galindo-Martín, M.A.; Castano-Martínez, M.A.; Méndez-Picazo, M.T. Digital transformation, digital dividends and entrepreneurship: A quantitative analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Giudice, M.; Scuotto, V.; Papa, A.; Tarba, S.; Bresciani, S.; Warkentin, M. A self-tuning model for smart manufacturing SMEs: Effects on digital innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2020, 38, 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bresciani, S.; Huarng, K.H.; Malhotra, A.; Ferraris, A. Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, D.; Paul, J. Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective. Technovation 2022, 120, 102481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erevelles, S.; Fukawa, N.; Swayne, L. Big data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraris, A.; Del Giudice, M.; Grandhi, B.; Cillo, V. Refining the relation between cause-related marketing and consumers purchase intentions. Int. Mark. Rev. 2019, 37, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guha, S.; Kumar, S. Emergence of big data research in operations management, information systems, and healthcare: Past contributions and future roadmap. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2018, 27, 1724–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, J.W.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Z.P.; Zhang, J. Wisdom of crowds: Conducting importance-performance analysis (IPA) through online reviews. Tour. Manag. 2019, 70, 460–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Lee, J.S.; Nicolau, J.L. Understanding the dynamics of the quality of airline service attributes: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. Tour. Manag. 2020, 81, 104163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Büschken, J.; Allenby, G.M. Sentence-based text analysis for customer reviews. Mark. Sci. 2016, 35, 953–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J. The construction of sentiment lexicon based on context-dependent part-of-speech chunks for semantic disambiguation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 63359–63367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, D.R.; Mainland, J.D.; Arayata, C.J. Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products. Physiol. Behav. 2019, 209, 112579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.; Gu, S.; Xu, X. GSLDA: LDA-based group spamming detection in product reviews. Appl. Intell. 2018, 48, 3094–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, T.; Yannou, B.; Leroy, Y. Mining customer product reviews for product development: A summarization process. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019, 132, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Yadava, M.; Roy, P.P. Fusion of EEG response and sentiment analysis of products review to predict customer satisfaction. Inf. Fusion 2019, 52, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Zhou, S.; Gao, H. A recommendation approach based on product attribute reviews: Improved collaborative filtering considering the sentiment polarity. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2019, 25, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Zhang, D.; Yan, Z. An LDA and synonym lexicon based approach to product feature extraction from online consumer product reviews. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 14, 304. [Google Scholar]
- Alshamrani, S.; Abuhamad, M.; Abusnaina, A. Investigating online toxicity in users interactions with the mainstream media channels on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Mining Actionable Insights from Social Networks, Online, 20 October 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H. Analysis of online Comments on Agricultural products based on LDA theme Model and intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS. Data Acquis. Process. 2020, 35, 965–977. [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, R. Pet Industry Trends, Growth & Statistics in 2022 and Beyond: Unleashing Your Ecommerce Pet Marketing Strategies. Common Thread Collect. 2022. Available online: https://commonthreadco.com/blogs/coachs-corner/pet-industry-trends-growth-ecommerce-marketing (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Chen, C.D.; Ku, E.C.S. Diversified Online Review Websites as Accelerators for Online Impulsive Buying: The Moderating Effect of Price Dispersion. J. Internet Commer. 2021, 20, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Choeh, J.Y. Using the Social Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth for Predicting Product Sales: The Moderating Effect of Review or Reviewer Helpfulness and Product Type. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N.; Dospinescu, O. Word-of-Mouth Engagement in Online Social Networks: Influence of Network Centrality and Density. Electronics 2023, 12, 2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zelenka, J.; Azubuike, T.; Pásková, M. Trust Model for Online Reviews of Tourism Services and Evaluation of Destinations. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zibarzani, M.; Abumalloh, R.A.; Nilashi, M.; Samad, S.; Alghamdi, O.A.; Nayer, F.K.; Ismail, M.Y.; Mohd, S.; Mohammed Akib, N.A. Customer satisfaction with Restaurants Service Quality during COVID-19 outbreak: A two-stage methodology. Technol. Soc. 2022, 70, 101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xei, C.; Tian, X.; Feng, X.; Zhang, X.; Ruan, J. Preference Characteristics on Consumers’ Online Consumption of Fresh Agricultural Products under the Outbreak of COVID-19: An Analysis of Online Review Data Based on LDA Model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 207, 4486–4495. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, M.; Wang, H. Research on customer opinion summarization using topic mining and deep neural network. Math. Comput. Simul. 2021, 185, 88–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.J.; Ban, H.J.; Jun, J.K.; Kim, H.S. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of Online Review for Airlines. Information 2021, 12, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucini, F.R.; Tonetto, L.M.; Fogliatto, F.S.; Anzanello, M.J. Text mining approach to explore dimensions of airline customer satisfaction using online customer reviews. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 83, 101760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, G.A.; Li, Y.; He, S. Using neutral sentiment reviews to improve customer requirement identification and product design strategies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 254, 108641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, M.G.; Gupta, S.D.; Paul, J. Perceived usefulness of online customer reviews: A review mining approach using machine learning & exploratory data analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 150, 147–164. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, S.; Chang, H. A rough set-based association rule approach for a recommendation system for online consumers. Inf. Process. Manag. 2016, 52, 1142–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.G.; Kang, J. Analyzing the discriminative attributes of products using text mining focused on cosmetic reviews. Inf. Process. Manag. 2018, 54, 938–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiang, W. To mine association rules of customer values via a data mining procedure with improved model: An empirical case study. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 1716–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogan, O. A Recommendation System in E-Commerce with Profit-Support Fuzzy Association Rule Mining (P-FARM). J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 831–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldız, E.; Şen, C.G.; Işık, E.E. A Hyper-Personalized Product Recommendation System Focused on Customer Segmentation: An Application in the Fashion Retail Industry. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 571–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.C.; Shannayne, L.R. Analysing Digital Banking Reviews Using Text Mining. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, The Hague, The Netherlands, 7–10 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, H. Mining the determinants of review helpfulness: A novel approach using intelligent feature engineering and explainable AI. Data Technol. Appl. 2023, 57, 108–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Lee, E.; Yoo, D.H. Do SEC Filings Indicate any Trends? Evidence from the Sentiment Distribution of Forms 10-K and 10-Q with FinBERT. Data Technol. Appl. 2023, 57, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, M.B.; Andrew, Y.N.; Michael, I.J. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, R.; Imielinski, T.; Swami, A. Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Manag. Data 1993, 22, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Reference | Purpose | Technique |
---|---|---|
Lee and Choeh (2020) [22] | This study compared the prediction power of business intelligence methods for different subsamples of products created based on high or low reviews and reviewer helpfulness levels. | - |
Anastasiei et al., (2023) [23] | This article notes the influence of network centrality and network density on the propensity to engage in positive and negative eWOM, using social media use as a moderating variable. | - |
Zelenka et al., (2021) [24] | This paper proposed a trust model for online reviews of travel services and destination reviews. | - |
Zibarzani et al., [25] | This effort explores consumer satisfaction and service preferences in restaurants during the COVID-19 crisis, using clustering, supervised learning, and topic modeling techniques. | LDA |
Xie et al., (2022) [26] | This study utilizes the LDA model to indicate the factors that influence consumers’ preferences when purchasing fresh agricultural products online. | LDA |
Hong and Wang (2021) [27] | This article proposes a novel framework that combines grammar rules, the LDA model, and the deep neural network to synthesize customer opinions from product reviews. | LDA |
Kwon et al., (2021) [28] | This research conducted topic modeling and sentiment analysis on Skytrax (airlinequality.com, accessed on 2 August 2023) posts, where there is a lot of interest and engagement from people who have used or are willing to use that knowledge for airlines. | Topic modeling |
Lucini et al., (2020) [29] | This study presents a novel framework for measuring customer satisfaction in the airline industry using text-mining methods. | Text mining |
Zhang et al., (2022) [30] | This paper proposes a customer requirements identification framework using topic modeling, specifically the LDA model. | LDA |
Majumder et al., (2022) [31] | This paper argues that peripheral sources, such as review content, the star rating, and the length of the review, can significantly impact product search. | Text mining |
Liao and Chang (2016) [32] | This study develops a recommendation system to analyze Internet customers’ preferences by using a data mining approach and preliminary set-based association rules. | Association rules |
Kim and Kang (2019) [33] | This article analyzes online car reviews of three different competitive automobile brands using text mining and association rules methods. | Text mining, |
Chiang (2011) [34] | This paper proposes a new procedure and an improved model to better leverage the association rules of customer values in the online shopping industry in Taiwan. | Association rules |
Dogan (2023) [35] | This study introduces a novel method called P-FARM, which helps companies make better decisions by providing them with more profitable products with fewer rules. | Association rules |
Yıldız et al., (2023) [36] | This study presents a customer segmentation model and an association rule mining algorithm to generate highly personalized product recommendations for individual customers. | Association rules |
Cheng and Shannayne (2020) [37] | This study performs topic modeling, using LDA to uncover customer interests and explore customer concerns regarding digital banking features, using association rules and rating scores. | LDA, Association rules |
This study | We compare and analyze OCRs of high-tech pet products to identify consumer concerns and derive meaningful associated terms for these topics of interest. | LDA, Association rules |
No. | Product | Rating * (Reviews **) | Image | Main Features |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Furbo dog camera | 32,708 (9715) |
| |
2 | Petlibro automatic pet feeder | 15,260 (4068) |
| |
3 | Sure pet care microchip pet feeder | 9772 (4978) |
| |
4 | Wopet automatic pet feeder | 5687 (1595) |
| |
5 | Wickedbone automatic pet toy | 1742 (464) |
|
No. | Product | Before Removing Data | After Removing Data |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Furbo dog camera | 9715 reviews | 6998 reviews |
2 | Petlibro automatic pet feeder | 4068 reviews | 3449 reviews |
3 | Sure pet care microchip pet feeder | 4978 reviews | 1771 reviews |
4 | Wopet automatic pet feeder | 1595 reviews | 1593 reviews |
5 | Wickedbone automatic pet toy | 464 reviews | 457 reviews |
No. | RI | Keywords | Topic |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.62289 | love, great, furbo, dog, product, dogs, treats, check, easy, fun, home, loves, camera, awesome, day | satisfaction |
2 | 0.2462 | furbo, work, customer, product, service, connect, working, app, WIFI, time, support, worked, issues, back, device | service |
3 | 0.16537 | dog, furbo, barking, home, alerts, day, dogs, anxiety, check, house, alert, time, mind, person, camera | barking alerts |
4 | 0.3104 | treats, treat, camera, dog, good, time, quality, great, app, works, it’s, video, furbo, sound, work | treatment quality |
5 | 0.10501 | camera, features, subscription, pay, nanny, free, dog, it’s, product, money, worth, furbo, buy, price, premium | worth |
No. | RI | Keywords | Topic |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.12097 | food, lid, feeder, cat, bowl, top, cats, open, design, plastic, tray, stainless, steel, easily, good | design |
2 | 0.26576 | cat, food, cats, feeder, eat, eating, bowl, open, training, back, it’s, microchip, problem, works, fat | training |
3 | 0.27944 | food, portion, time, it’s, set, size, feeder, easy, works, great, portions, good, small, feeding, batteries | working mode |
4 | 0.15129 | feeder, product, working, customer, work, months, service, stopped, worked, company, app, WIFI, great, year, unit | service |
5 | 0.63703 | cat, great, feeder, easy, food, product, love, works, sets, cats, time, day, feed, feeding, recommends | satisfaction |
No. | RI | Keywords | Topic |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.09097 | carpet, hardwood, varram, fast, floors, collie, border, gobone, leaving, years, rug, devices, rate, things, wheels | usage |
2 | 1.34427 | dog, toy, dogs, bone, play, fun, great, loves, mode, good, interactive, it’s, time, thing, puppy | satisfaction |
3 | 0.13793 | port, plastic, charging, ends, reviews, tiny, didn’t, instructions, directions, tires, modes, point, cover, figured, plug | instruction |
4 | 0.47437 | it’s, product, money, waste, work, don’t, minutes, I’m, didn’t, doesn’t, dog, day, buy, bought, company | dissatisfaction |
5 | 0.30542 | app, phone, bone, work, connect, toy, give, device, Bluetooth, connection, price, charge, charged, item, requires | connectivity |
(a) Support Value = 0.05 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | easy | set | 5.69 |
2 | set | easy | 5.69 |
3 | tossing | treat | 2.41 |
4 | treat | tossing | 2.41 |
5 | give | treat | 2.09 |
6 | treat | give | 2.09 |
7 | day | dog&treat | 1.74 |
… | … | … | … |
374 | product | dog | 1.03 |
375 | love | dog&work | 1.02 |
376 | dog&work | love | 1.02 |
(b) Support value = 0.1 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | gog&furbo | treat | 1.57 |
2 | treat | dog&furbo | 1.57 |
3 | furbo | love&treat | 1.48 |
4 | love&treat | furbo | 1.48 |
5 | great | product | 1.48 |
6 | product | great | 1.48 |
7 | furbo&love | treat | 1.47 |
… | … | … | … |
48 | work | dog | 1.04 |
49 | furbo | great | 1.03 |
50 | great | furbo | 1.03 |
(c) Support value = 0.2 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | dog | treat | 1.34 |
2 | treat | dog | 1.34 |
3 | love | treat | 1.16 |
4 | treat | love | 1.16 |
5 | dog | love | 1.14 |
6 | love | dog | 1.14 |
(a) Support Values = 0.05 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | food&portion | cat&size | 3.33 |
2 | cat&size | food&portion | 3.33 |
3 | feeder&portion | size&time | 3.27 |
4 | size&time | feeder&portion | 3.27 |
5 | feeder&portion | cat&size | 3.23 |
6 | cat&size | feeder&portion | 3.23 |
7 | easier&portion | feeder&size | 3.09 |
… | … | … | … |
3634 | easier&set | cat&food | 1 |
3635 | day | easier | 1 |
3636 | easier | day | 1 |
(b) Support value = 0.1 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | feeder&portion | size | 2.84 |
2 | size | feeder&portion | 2.84 |
3 | portion | size | 2.77 |
4 | size | portion | 2.77 |
5 | portion | feeder&size | 2.77 |
6 | feeder&size | portion | 2.77 |
7 | eat | cat&food | 1.9 |
… | … | … | … |
474 | cat | work | 1.01 |
475 | cat&feeder | product | 1 |
476 | product | cat&feeder | 1 |
(c) Support value = 0.2 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | food | time | 1.29 |
2 | time | food | 1.29 |
3 | feeder&food | cat | 1.28 |
4 | cat | feeder&food | 1.28 |
5 | cat&feeder | food | 1.27 |
6 | food | cat&feeder | 1.27 |
7 | feeder | time | 1.26 |
… | … | … | … |
32 | cat | easier | 1.02 |
33 | work | cat | 1.01 |
34 | cat | work | 1.01 |
(a) Support Value = 0.05 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | loaded | media | 18.82 |
2 | media | loaded | 18.82 |
3 | interactive | mode | 4.68 |
4 | mode | interactive | 4.68 |
5 | dog&interactive | mode | 4.34 |
6 | mode | dog&interactive | 4.34 |
7 | interactive | dog&mode | 4.03 |
… | … | … | … |
1014 | dog | bought | 1.01 |
1015 | play | product | 1.01 |
1016 | product | play | 1.01 |
(b) Support value = 0.1 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | fun | dog&play | 2.08 |
2 | dog&play | fun | 2.08 |
3 | dog&fun | play | 1.93 |
4 | play | dog&fun | 1.93 |
5 | love | play&toys | 1.93 |
6 | play&toys | love | 1.93 |
7 | love&toys | play | 1.9 |
… | … | … | … |
90 | dog | charging | 1.01 |
91 | app | dog | 1.01 |
92 | dog | app | 1.01 |
(c) Support value = 0.2 | |||
No. | Source | Target | Value |
1 | toys | play | 1.43 |
2 | play | toys | 1.43 |
3 | play | dog | 1.25 |
4 | dog | play | 1.25 |
5 | dog | toys | 1.14 |
6 | toys | dog | 1.14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nguyen, H.N.; Yoo, D. Can Online Consumer Reviews Identify Key Evidence Regarding Common Consumer Choices for High-Tech Pet Products? J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 1878-1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18040095
Nguyen HN, Yoo D. Can Online Consumer Reviews Identify Key Evidence Regarding Common Consumer Choices for High-Tech Pet Products? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2023; 18(4):1878-1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18040095
Chicago/Turabian StyleNguyen, Huyen Ngoc, and Donghee Yoo. 2023. "Can Online Consumer Reviews Identify Key Evidence Regarding Common Consumer Choices for High-Tech Pet Products?" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 18, no. 4: 1878-1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18040095
APA StyleNguyen, H. N., & Yoo, D. (2023). Can Online Consumer Reviews Identify Key Evidence Regarding Common Consumer Choices for High-Tech Pet Products? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 1878-1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18040095