Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = type 2 trigeminal neuralgia

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 2367 KB  
Case Report
Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment via Piezosurgical Enlargement of the Mental Foramen
by Radosław Jadach and Karolina Osypko
Life 2025, 15(3), 382; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030382 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 3400
Abstract
Background: This article and the novel surgical approach described here were inspired by the ideas and observations of the late professors T. Pawela and J. Wnukiewicz. The authors present the medical history and unique surgical treatment of four patients with trigeminal neuralgia, who, [...] Read more.
Background: This article and the novel surgical approach described here were inspired by the ideas and observations of the late professors T. Pawela and J. Wnukiewicz. The authors present the medical history and unique surgical treatment of four patients with trigeminal neuralgia, who, despite pharmacological treatment and numerous specialists being involved in the treatment process, continued suffering. Our belief is that the direct cause of the symptoms is a narrow mental foramen, which compresses the mental nerve. It can be easily verified by local anesthesia administration to verify the trigger point, and by analyzing CBCT scans with a special emphasis on the diameter of both mental foramina. Methods: Surgical decompression by narrow mental foramen enlargement was conducted with a piezosurgical device. In this procedure, a rectangle of cortical bone is gently and precisely cut around the mental foramen and then into smaller pieces. This technique enables its easy and safe removal. Then, the mental nerve is left loose, uncompressed. Results: All four patients reported immediate recovery, their pain attacks stopped, and their quality of life improved significantly. One patient reported temporal hypoesthesia that lasted 5 months post-op. About 2 years post-op, another patient reported rare recurrences of pain, although much less severe than before surgery. Conclusions: This type of treatment may be considered when trigeminal neuralgia cannot be classified as classic or as secondary and is unresponsive to pharmacological treatment. A piezosurgical device seems to be the safest option in terms of potential damage to the nerve. Further research should include a larger sample of patients and focus on analyzing the mental foramina diameter of patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pain and Therapy: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2672 KB  
Article
The Therapeutic Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Trigeminal Neuralgia: Are There Any Differences between Type 1 versus Type 2 Trigeminal Neuralgia?
by Yan Tereshko, Mariarosaria Valente, Enrico Belgrado, Chiara Dalla Torre, Simone Dal Bello, Giovanni Merlino, Gian Luigi Gigli and Christian Lettieri
Toxins 2023, 15(11), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15110654 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4756
Abstract
Background: Botulinum toxin type A is an effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. Moreover, its efficacy in type 2 trigeminal neuralgia and comparative studies between type 1 and type 2 trigeminal neuralgia (TN) still need to be improved. Methods: We treated 40 TN patients [...] Read more.
Background: Botulinum toxin type A is an effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. Moreover, its efficacy in type 2 trigeminal neuralgia and comparative studies between type 1 and type 2 trigeminal neuralgia (TN) still need to be improved. Methods: We treated 40 TN patients with onabotulinumtoxinA; 18 had type 1 TN, and 22 had type 2 TN. We compared the baseline pain score with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and paroxysm frequency (number per week) at the baseline with those obtained at 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. Nonetheless, we compared the baseline Penn Facial Pain Scale with the scores obtained at the 1-month follow-up. Results: BoNT/A effectively reduced pain intensity and frequency at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. Moreover, the type 1 TN and type 2 TN groups had baseline pain scores of 7.8 ± 1.65 and 8.4 ± 1.1, respectively. Pain significantly improved (p < 0.001) in both groups to 3.1 ± 2.3 (type 1 TN) and 3.5 ± 2.3 (type 2 TN) at the 1-month follow-up and to 3.2 ± 2.5 (type 1 TN) and 3.6 ± 2.5 (type 2 TN) at the 3-month follow-up. There was no difference between the two groups (p 0.345). The baseline paroxysm frequencies (number per week) were 86.7 ± 69.3 and 88.9 ± 62.2 for the type 1 and type 2 TN groups, respectively; they were significantly reduced in both groups at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups without significant differences between the two groups (p 0.902). The Pain Facial Pain Scale improved at the 1-month follow-up, and no significant differences were found between the two groups. There was a strong correlation between background pain and paroxysm pain intensity (r 0.8, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Botulinum toxin type A effectively reduced the pain, paroxysm frequency, and PFPS scores of type 1 and type 2 trigeminal neuralgia patients without statistically significant differences. Facial asymmetry was the only adverse event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Botulinum Toxins on Human Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop