Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = total surface bearing (TSB)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2779 KiB  
Article
Finite Element Analysis of Custom Designed and Additive Manufactured Total Surface Bearing Prosthesis for Trans-Tibial Amputees
by Kamran Shah and Mustafa Ur Rehman
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 1284; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031284 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1522
Abstract
Our limb prostheses aim to restore Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for amputees, with the socket being a critical component of trans-tibial prostheses influencing both comfort and functionality. Despite technological advancements, challenges such as fit, weight, and durability remain. This study investigates an [...] Read more.
Our limb prostheses aim to restore Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for amputees, with the socket being a critical component of trans-tibial prostheses influencing both comfort and functionality. Despite technological advancements, challenges such as fit, weight, and durability remain. This study investigates an additive manufacturing method for Total Surface Bearing (TSB) sockets, leveraging CT scans to create a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and finite element (FE) model. Biomechanical behavior under static loading conditions were analyzed using FE analysis and resistive-based pressure sensors. The study found consistent pressure distribution across the residual limb, with deviations of 8.53 kPa and 4.46 kPa between FE analysis and experimental measurements. Mean pressures of 44.6 kPa and 22.11 kPa were observed under Full Body Weight (FBW) and Half Body Weight (HBW) conditions, respectively. The FE analysis demonstrated a uniform stress distribution in the prosthetic socket, with a maximum stress of 0.15 MPa and a deformation of 0.008 mm, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing socket design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Additive Manufacturing Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1533 KiB  
Communication
Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets
by Kazuhiko Sasaki, Gary Guerra, Win Lei Phyu, Sirarat Chaisumritchoke, Prawina Sutdet and Sirintip Kaewtip
Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5224; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145224 - 13 Jul 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3579
Abstract
(1) Background: A sustainable casting system that combines the use of a polystyrene bag, a prosthetic liner and a vacuum system was developed to reduce fabrication time while maintaining comfort for the trans-tibial prosthesis user. (2) Methods: Eight prosthetists (28.7 ± 8.25 years [...] Read more.
(1) Background: A sustainable casting system that combines the use of a polystyrene bag, a prosthetic liner and a vacuum system was developed to reduce fabrication time while maintaining comfort for the trans-tibial prosthesis user. (2) Methods: Eight prosthetists (28.7 ± 8.25 years old) fit ten trans-tibial prosthesis wearers (46 ± 12.4 years old) with two types of total surface bearing (TSB) prostheses; a polystyrene bead (PS) prosthesis and a plaster of paris (POP) prosthesis. Duration of casting and combined mean peak pressure was measured at six locations on the residual limb using Force Sensing Resistors (FSR). A pressure uniformity score (%) was determined. Socket Comfort Scale (SCS) was also measured. (3) Results: Duration of casting for the POP method was 64.8 ± 9.53 min and 7.8 ± 2 min for the PS method, (p = 0.006). Pressure uniformity in the POP prosthesis was 79.3 ± 6.54 and 81.7 ± 5.83 in the PS prosthesis (p = 0.027). SCS in both prosthesis types were equivalent. (4) Conclusion: A rapid fit PS prosthesis was developed, with significantly shorter duration than the traditional POP method. Socket pressure uniformity was confirmed and improved in the PS method. Socket comfort was equal between the two prothesis types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Sensors for Human Movement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop