Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = symbiosis/symbiogenesis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 271 KB  
Article
A New Way of “Thinking” Consciousness: Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, and Neo-Materialism
by Aloisia Moser
Religions 2025, 16(5), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050611 - 12 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1927 | Correction
Abstract
This paper re-examines consciousness through Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, and contemporary neo-materialism, arguing that traditional views overstate its importance and that retreating to the subconscious is inadequate. Using a moth infestation metaphor, it highlights the interconnectedness of sentient and non-sentient beings and advocates for recognizing [...] Read more.
This paper re-examines consciousness through Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, and contemporary neo-materialism, arguing that traditional views overstate its importance and that retreating to the subconscious is inadequate. Using a moth infestation metaphor, it highlights the interconnectedness of sentient and non-sentient beings and advocates for recognizing our shared existence. Nietzsche’s perspectivism shows that human will arises from interdependent life forces, while Wittgenstein’s “form of life” illustrates that meaning comes from shared practices. In one reading of the form of life, religion can be seen as different forms of life. This paper concludes that theology must rethink its focus on human consciousness post the “anthropological turn”, avoiding dualistic body–soul separations. By embracing a holistic view of interconnectedness, we can enrich our understanding of human existence and foster compassionate engagement with diverse life forms, promoting a more integrated and empathetic approach to living. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Consciousness between Science and Religion)
15 pages, 322 KB  
Article
Synergy between Rhizobial Co-Microsymbionts Leads to an Increase in the Efficiency of Plant–Microbe Interactions
by Vera Safronova, Anna Sazanova, Andrey Belimov, Polina Guro, Irina Kuznetsova, Denis Karlov, Elizaveta Chirak, Oleg Yuzikhin, Alla Verkhozina, Alexey Afonin and Igor Tikhonovich
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1206; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051206 - 4 May 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2693
Abstract
Combined inoculation of legumes with rhizobia and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria or endophytes is a known technique for increasing the efficiency of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis and plant productivity. The aim of this work was to expand knowledge about the synergistic effects between commercial rhizobia of [...] Read more.
Combined inoculation of legumes with rhizobia and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria or endophytes is a known technique for increasing the efficiency of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis and plant productivity. The aim of this work was to expand knowledge about the synergistic effects between commercial rhizobia of pasture legumes and root nodule bacteria of relict legume species. Pot experiments were performed on common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) co-inoculated with the participation of the corresponding commercial rhizobial strains (R. leguminosarum bv. viciae RCAM0626 and R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii RCAM1365) and seven strains isolated from nodules of relict legumes inhabiting the Baikal Lake region and the Altai Republic: Oxytropis popoviana, Astragalus chorinensis, O. tragacanthoides and Vicia costata. The inoculation of plants with combinations of strains (commercial strain plus the isolate from relict legume) had a different effect on symbiosis depending on the plant species: the increase in the number of nodules was mainly observed on vetch, whereas increased acetylene reduction activity was evident on clover. It was shown that the relict isolates differ significantly in the set of genes related to different genetic systems that affect plant–microbe interactions. At the same time, they had additional genes that are involved in the formation of symbiosis and determine its effectiveness, but are absent in the used commercial strains: symbiotic genes fix, nif, nod, noe and nol, as well as genes associated with the hormonal status of the plant and the processes of symbiogenesis (acdRS, genes for gibberellins and auxins biosynthesis, genes of T3SS, T4SS and T6SS secretion systems). It can be expected that the accumulation of knowledge about microbial synergy on the example of the joint use of commercial and relict rhizobia will allow in the future the development of methods for the targeted selection of co-microsymbionts to increase the efficiency of agricultural legume–rhizobia systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microbial and Plant Biotechnology)
31 pages, 463 KB  
Review
Testing the “(Neo-)Darwinian” Principles against Reticulate Evolution: How Variation, Adaptation, Heredity and Fitness, Constraints and Affordances, Speciation, and Extinction Surpass Organisms and Species
by Nathalie Gontier
Information 2020, 11(7), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11070352 - 5 Jul 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5114
Abstract
Variation, adaptation, heredity and fitness, constraints and affordances, speciation, and extinction form the building blocks of the (Neo-)Darwinian research program, and several of these have been called “Darwinian principles”. Here, we suggest that caution should be taken in calling these principles Darwinian because [...] Read more.
Variation, adaptation, heredity and fitness, constraints and affordances, speciation, and extinction form the building blocks of the (Neo-)Darwinian research program, and several of these have been called “Darwinian principles”. Here, we suggest that caution should be taken in calling these principles Darwinian because of the important role played by reticulate evolutionary mechanisms and processes in also bringing about these phenomena. Reticulate mechanisms and processes include symbiosis, symbiogenesis, lateral gene transfer, infective heredity mediated by genetic and organismal mobility, and hybridization. Because the “Darwinian principles” are brought about by both vertical and reticulate evolutionary mechanisms and processes, they should be understood as foundational for a more pluralistic theory of evolution, one that surpasses the classic scope of the Modern and the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis. Reticulate evolution moreover demonstrates that what conventional (Neo-)Darwinian theories treat as intra-species features of evolution frequently involve reticulate interactions between organisms from very different taxonomic categories. Variation, adaptation, heredity and fitness, constraints and affordances, speciation, and extinction therefore cannot be understood as “traits” or “properties” of genes, organisms, species, or ecosystems because the phenomena are irreducible to specific units and levels of an evolutionary hierarchy. Instead, these general principles of evolution need to be understood as common goods that come about through interactions between different units and levels of evolutionary hierarchies, and they are exherent rather than inherent properties of individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Review)
8 pages, 100 KB  
Commentary
Changes in Population Dynamics in Mutualistic versus Pathogenic Viruses
by Marilyn J. Roossinck
Viruses 2011, 3(1), 12-19; https://doi.org/10.3390/v3010012 - 17 Jan 2011
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 7235
Abstract
Although generally regarded as pathogens, viruses can also be mutualists. A number of examples of extreme mutualism (i.e., symbiogenesis) have been well studied. Other examples of mutualism are less common, but this is likely because viruses have rarely been thought of [...] Read more.
Although generally regarded as pathogens, viruses can also be mutualists. A number of examples of extreme mutualism (i.e., symbiogenesis) have been well studied. Other examples of mutualism are less common, but this is likely because viruses have rarely been thought of as having any beneficial effects on their hosts. The effect of mutualism on the population dynamics of viruses is a topic that has not been addressed experimentally. However, the potential for understanding mutualism and how a virus might become a mutualist may be elucidated by understanding these dynamics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Virus Dynamics and Evolution)
Back to TopTop