Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = suburethral stiffness

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 737 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Suburethral Tissue Elasticity Using Strain Elastography in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
by Lóránt Csákány, Zoltan Kozinszky, Flórián Kovács, Seron Kíra Krajczár, Szabolcs Várbíró, Attila Keresztúri, Gábor Németh, Andrea Surányi and Norbert Pásztor
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5617; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165617 - 8 Aug 2025
Viewed by 315
Abstract
Objectives: Strain elastography (SE) is a non-invasive ultrasound-based technique for evaluating tissue elasticity. This study investigated whether SE can reproducibly detect differences in suburethral tissue stiffness between women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and continent controls. Methods: In this prospective cohort [...] Read more.
Objectives: Strain elastography (SE) is a non-invasive ultrasound-based technique for evaluating tissue elasticity. This study investigated whether SE can reproducibly detect differences in suburethral tissue stiffness between women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and continent controls. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 40 women (20 with SUI, 20 continent controls) underwent introital two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound in the midsagittal plane at rest. SE was performed at three predefined suburethral regions of interest (ROIs): the internal urethral orifice (IUO), midurethra (MU), and external urethral orifice (EUO), with the adipose layer (AL) serving as reference tissue. Group comparisons and reproducibility analyses were conducted. Results: SE enabled reliable in vivo assessment of suburethral elasticity. Women with SUI demonstrated significantly higher tissue elasticity at all three urethral levels compared to controls. The MU level showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.813; sensitivity = 0.65; specificity = 0.85). Measurement reproducibility was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95 across all ROIs. Conclusions: SE is a feasible, reproducible imaging modality for assessing suburethral biomechanics in women with SUI. It effectively distinguishes affected individuals from continent controls, particularly at the midurethral level. Standardized protocols and diagnostic thresholds are needed to facilitate clinical integration of SE in the evaluation and management of SUI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultrasound Diagnosis of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop