Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = staggered floor frame structure

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
33 pages, 6091 KB  
Article
Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation of Local Staggered RC Frames with Steel Tube-Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Multi-Angle Earthquakes
by Shuyun Zhang, Long Guo, Lihua Ge, En Wang and Junfu Tong
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(16), 9092; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15169092 - 18 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 792
Abstract
Staggered floor frame structures with good spatial adaptability are widely used in large-space civil buildings such as conference halls and terminal buildings. However, the short columns formed by staggered floor slabs significantly affect load transfer, which is unfavorable to the seismic performance of [...] Read more.
Staggered floor frame structures with good spatial adaptability are widely used in large-space civil buildings such as conference halls and terminal buildings. However, the short columns formed by staggered floor slabs significantly affect load transfer, which is unfavorable to the seismic performance of the structure. To address this issue, based on a practical project, this paper establishes a finite element analysis model, sets up steel-tube-reinforced concrete (ST-RC) columns at staggered floors to improve the insufficient ductility of short columns, and adopts the dynamic time–history analysis method combined with performance-based evaluation methods to study the effects of different seismic input angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) on the seismic performance of local staggered floor frame structures at both the overall and member levels. The research results show that at the overall level, the fourth floor of the staggered floor frame structure is the weak floor, and the most unfavorable seismic input angle is 60°; additionally, at the member level, the damage of each member meets the performance objectives. Frame beams are more severely damaged under 0° and 90° seismic input, frame columns are more severely damaged under 30° and 60° seismic input, and the damage degree of ST-RC columns is similar in the four directions. As energy-dissipating members, frame beams have a significantly higher proportion of nonlinear strain energy than frame columns and ST-RC columns, which can effectively consume a large amount of seismic energy and enable the structure to retain more safety reserves. Therefore, for irregular buildings such as staggered floor frame structures that are prone to damage due to insufficient ductility of short columns, setting ST-RC columns at staggered floors can effectively reduce structural damage. The adoption of evaluation methods at both the overall structural and member levels enables a comprehensive understanding of the damage status of staggered floor structures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4695 KB  
Article
Influence of Staggered Truss on Progressive Collapse-Resistant Behavior of Steel Frame Structures
by Changren Ke, Yihui Fan and Junling Jiang
Buildings 2024, 14(4), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040931 - 28 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1645
Abstract
In order to study the effect of the support mode of a staggered truss system on the continuous collapse resistance performance of a steel structure, four finite element models were established based on the bracing arrangement of a five-story steel frame structure. The [...] Read more.
In order to study the effect of the support mode of a staggered truss system on the continuous collapse resistance performance of a steel structure, four finite element models were established based on the bracing arrangement of a five-story steel frame structure. The situations of different columns on the first floor removed were classified into eight scenarios, and five models of each scenario were analyzed with nonlinear dynamic analyses. Finally, a computational metric based on energy robustness was proposed to evaluate the robustness of the structure. The results of nonlinear dynamic analyses indicated that the staggered truss system significantly improved the resistance to progressive collapse of steel frame structures and effectively increased the redundancy of steel frame structures. All four bracing methods effectively reduced the vertical displacement at the point of failure, with the peak displacement at the point of failure reduced by a maximum of 84 percent and a minimum of 41 percent compared to a pure frame structure. Moreover, the staggered truss system can reduce some axial force peaks in the adjacent columns adjacent to the failed columns. The structural robustness coefficients of Model A, Scheme 1, Scheme 2, Scheme 3, and Scheme 4 are 1.144, 1.339, 1.306, 1.584, and 1.176, respectively, according to the proposed robustness calculation method, which shows that the braced steel frame structure has improved robustness over the original structure. The staggered truss system improves the robustness of the steel frame structure so that the steel frame structure has better resistance to progressive collapse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Steel Structures: Testing, Modelling and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop