Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sacral erector spinae plane block

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 1133 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ring Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Circumcision Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
by Muhammed Halit Satıcı, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Betül Kozanhan, Yasin Tire, Bülent Hanedan, İlhami Aksoy, İbrahim Akkoyun, Mehmet Emin Boleken and Nuray Altay
Healthcare 2025, 13(6), 653; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060653 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 760
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery in male pediatric patients. The postoperative period is characterized by significant pain due to the sensitivity of the foreskin and low pain threshold in children. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery in male pediatric patients. The postoperative period is characterized by significant pain due to the sensitivity of the foreskin and low pain threshold in children. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB) and ring block on postoperative face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) pain scores after circumcision in children. We also assessed the amount of rescue analgesia used, the time to the first administration of rescue analgesia, potential problems, and parental satisfaction. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial conducted at two tertiary healthcare centers in Turkey. The patients were divided into two groups: Group S (patients who received the S-ESPB) and Group R (patients who received the ring block). The primary outcome measure was the FLACC score at 1 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included FLACC scores at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after surgery, the total dose of rescue analgesia, time to first rescue analgesia, complications, and parental satisfaction. Results: Group S exhibited significantly lower FLACC scores than Group R at all time (0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h) points (respectively, p = 0.013, p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.006, and p = 0.002). Group S required significantly less rescue analgesia and exhibited a significantly longer duration of analgesic efficacy compared to Group R (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: The S-ESPB is a safe and effective form of analgesia for managing pain following pediatric circumcision surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1210 KiB  
Article
Comparison between the Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spina Plane Block and Pudendal Block on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective Randomized Study
by Bilge Olgun Keleş, Elvan Tekir Yılmaz and Ali Altınbaş
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3617; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123617 - 20 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1757
Abstract
Objective: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) due to indwelling urinary catheterization in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is difficult to tolerate and needs to be treated. This randomized prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of sacral erector spinae plane block [...] Read more.
Objective: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) due to indwelling urinary catheterization in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is difficult to tolerate and needs to be treated. This randomized prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of sacral erector spinae plane block (SESPB) and pudendal nerve block (PNB) in reducing the incidence and score of CRBD. Methods: This study was conducted between November and December 2023. ASA I-III, fifty-four TURP patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 received SESPB (n = 27) and Group 2 received PNB (n = 27) under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. The incidence of CRBD, CRBD score, numerical rating scale (NRS) score, use of rescue analgesics, block performance time, first call for analgesics, patient satisfaction, and side effects were recorded for 24 h. Results: The incidence of CRBD was lowest at 33.3% and highest at 48.1% in Group 1 and lowest at 25.9% and highest at 48.1% in Group 2, with no significant difference between the groups at all measurement times. CRBD scores and NRS scores were low and similar between the two groups. Block performance times were 9 ± 1.7 min in SESPB and 20 ± 2.5 min in PNB, and there was a significant difference between the mean times (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was adequate and similar in both groups. Conclusions: SESPB demonstrated a similar decreasing effect to PNB on the incidence and scores of CRBD in the first 24 h following TURP operations. The duration of SESPB administration was shorter than PNB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop