Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robust particle filter (RPF)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 5360 KB  
Article
Comprehensive Evaluations of NLOS and Linearization Errors on UWB Positioning
by Yan Li, Zhouzheng Gao, Qiaozhuang Xu and Cheng Yang
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 6187; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106187 - 18 May 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2971
Abstract
Currently, ultra-wide band (UWB) is adopted as a useful high-accuracy positioning technique in satellite-blocked areas. However, UWB’s positioning performance would be limited significantly because of non-line of sight (NLOS) errors. Additionally, the truncation errors in these linearization-based adjustments such as least squares (LS) [...] Read more.
Currently, ultra-wide band (UWB) is adopted as a useful high-accuracy positioning technique in satellite-blocked areas. However, UWB’s positioning performance would be limited significantly because of non-line of sight (NLOS) errors. Additionally, the truncation errors in these linearization-based adjustments such as least squares (LS) and extended Kalman filter (EKF) would also visibly degrade UWB positioning accuracy. To overcome the impacts of NLOS errors and truncation errors, this paper introduced a robust-theory-based particle filter (RPF) into UWB positioning. In such a method, the IGG-III model and PF were adopted to limit the impacts of NLOS errors and truncation errors, respectively, by introducing a weight inflation factor and particle group. For comparison, the Bancroft, LS, EKF, unscented Kalman filter (UKF), cubature Kalman filter (CKF), PF, and RPF were also presented. Here, the influences of truncation errors were analyzed by comparing the results based on LS and EKF with those calculated by UKF, CKF, and PF. The impacts of NLOS errors were evaluated by making a comparison between the results of PF and RPF. Results based on a set of simulated UWB data and a group of experiment UWB data demonstrated that the RPF can significantly avoid the positioning errors caused by both truncation errors and NLOS errors. In general, position improvements percentages of 57.2%, 52.7%, 39.6%, 38.2%, 26.6%, and 20.4% can be obtained by RPF compared to those calculated by Bancroft, LS, EKF, UKF, CKF, and PF, respectively. As a comparison, the truncation error would lead to about 8.1%, 10.1%, and 33.2% accuracy decrease in the north, east, and vertical directions on average. Such accuracy-decrease rates caused by NLOS were 6.1%, 5.2%, and 25%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Generation Indoor Positioning Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop