Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = preemptive albumin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 521 KiB  
Article
Improved Sixty-Day Mortality in Candidemia with Antifungal Treatment Within 72 Hours of Fever Onset: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Rural Japan
by Koji Hayashi, Chizuru Hashimoto, Kohei Ueda, Yuka Nakaya, Asuka Suzuki, Maho Hayashi, Mamiko Sato and Yasutaka Kobayashi
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17020036 - 21 Apr 2025
Viewed by 560
Abstract
Introduction: Prognostic factor investigations for candidemia have been conducted in large-scale facilities, leading to significant evidence, including early administration of echinocandin antifungal agents and removal of central venous catheters (CVCs). In departments that provide aggressive chemotherapy or transplantation, candidiasis markers are regularly evaluated, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Prognostic factor investigations for candidemia have been conducted in large-scale facilities, leading to significant evidence, including early administration of echinocandin antifungal agents and removal of central venous catheters (CVCs). In departments that provide aggressive chemotherapy or transplantation, candidiasis markers are regularly evaluated, and preemptive treatments may be initiated. However, in resource-limited facilities, candidemia detection largely relies on vital signs like fever and blood cultures. This study assessed whether evidence from large-scale facilities applies to such settings. Additionally, while prior studies indicate that early antifungal treatment is based on positive blood cultures, no established criteria exist for early administration based on fever as an indicator. Methods: This study analyzed cases of candidemia from blood cultures at Fukui General Hospital (2014–2024). Patients aged 18 or older with at least one positive blood culture for Candida species and clinical signs of infection were included, while contamination cases were excluded. The patients were categorized into survival and death groups based on 60-day survival from fever onset. The variables collected included age, gender, duration from admission to fever onset, time from fever onset to blood culture collection and antifungal treatment initiation, antifungal treatment within 72 h, serum albumin levels, history of cancer, diabetes, empiric echinocandin treatment, CVC insertion, duration of CVC insertion until fever onset, use of total parenteral nutrition, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Fever was defined as a body temperature of 38.0 °C or higher, guiding blood culture collection. Results: Of 30 candidemia cases, 29 were analyzed. Survival was significantly associated with younger age (average 73.3 ± 13.3 vs. 83.1 ± 9.1 years, p = 0.038) and antifungal treatment within 72 h of fever onset (9 vs. 3, p = 0.025). CVC use was of marginal significance (8 vs. 13, p = 0.108). There was a significant difference in the duration (in days) of CVC insertion until fever onset (median [IQR]: 15.5 [11.75–19.5] vs. 30.0 [19.0–39.0], p = 0.027). Logistic regression identified early antifungal treatment (OR = 0.065, p = 0.035) and CVC use (OR = 21.8, p = 0.024) as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Early antifungal treatment within 72 h of fever onset and CVC use were independent predictors of mortality in candidemia. The importance of early antifungal treatment was reaffirmed even in smaller facilities. The impact of CVC insertion on 60-day survival cannot be readily generalized due to the limited sample size. Further research is needed to clarify the impact of fever-based antifungal initiation and CVC use on 60-day survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 868 KiB  
Article
Preemptive Administration of Albumin during Pancreatectomy Does Not Reduce Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
by Heejoon Jeong, Jie Ae Kim, Mikyung Yang, Hyun Joo Ahn, JinSeok Heo, In Woong Han, Sang Hyun Shin, Nam Young Lee and Woo Jin Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(3), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030620 - 26 Jan 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4049
Abstract
Despite the empirical use of human albumin during pancreatectomy to replace intraoperative volume loss while preventing fluid overload and edema, its impact on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. In addition, most previous studies have focused on the effects of therapeutic albumin usage. Here, we [...] Read more.
Despite the empirical use of human albumin during pancreatectomy to replace intraoperative volume loss while preventing fluid overload and edema, its impact on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. In addition, most previous studies have focused on the effects of therapeutic albumin usage. Here, we investigated whether preemptive administration of human albumin to prevent edema during pancreatectomy could reduce the incidence of moderate postoperative complications. Adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy were assigned to either the albumin group (n = 100) or the control group (n = 100). Regardless of the preoperative albumin level, 200 mL of 20% albumin was administered to the albumin group after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate postoperative complications as defined by a Clavien–Dindo classification grade ≥ 2 at discharge. Intraoperative net-fluid balance, a known risk factor of postoperative complication after pancreatectomy, was lower in the albumin group than in the control group (p = 0.030), but the incidence of moderate postoperative complications was not different between the albumin and control groups (47/100 vs. 38/100, respectively; risk ratio: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.71; p = 0.198). Therefore, preemptive administration of human albumin to prevent fluid overload and edema during pancreatectomy is not recommended because of its lack of apparent benefit in improving postoperative outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop