Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = postictal suppression

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 307 KiB  
Review
Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: A Narrative Review of Mechanism, Risks, and Prevention
by Rena Y. Jiang, Robin T. Varughese and Sanjeev V. Kothare
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3329; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103329 - 10 May 2025
Viewed by 1293
Abstract
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is sudden, unexpected, witnessed or unwitnessed, nontraumatic, non-drowning death that occurs in a person with epilepsy. SUDEP is the leading cause of epilepsy-related death in adults with epilepsy, with an incidence of about 1.2 per 1000 person-years [...] Read more.
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is sudden, unexpected, witnessed or unwitnessed, nontraumatic, non-drowning death that occurs in a person with epilepsy. SUDEP is the leading cause of epilepsy-related death in adults with epilepsy, with an incidence of about 1.2 per 1000 person-years in the general epilepsy population. Recent studies have shown similar prevalence in the pediatric population too. Although the precise mechanism remains unclear, well-documented cases of SUDEP suggest that a generalized tonic clonic seizure-induced, centrally mediated change in cardiorespiratory function leads to terminal apnea and cardiac arrest. Risk factors include generalized tonic clonic seizure frequency, duration of epilepsy, nocturnal seizure, and certain genetic syndromes. Orexin, adenosine, and serotonin neurotransmission have been explored as novel drug targets to mitigate SUDEP risk. Neurostimulation and resective epilepsy surgery have been reported to have beneficial effects on long-term SUDEP risk as well. Future studies may aim to clarify the role of sleep and other comorbidities in SUDEP pathophysiology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sleep Disorders: Current Research and Future Directions)
18 pages, 3155 KiB  
Article
Adenosine A1 Receptors Participate in Excitability Changes after Cortical Epileptic Afterdischarges in Immature Rats
by Pavel Mareš, Libor Uttl, Martina Laczó, Zina BenSalem, Kateřina Vondráková, Petr Fábera, Grygoriy Tsenov and Hana Kubová
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(12), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121733 - 15 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1434
Abstract
Background: Postictal refractoriness, i.e., the inability to elicit a new epileptic seizure immediately after the first one, is present in mature animals. Immature rats did not exhibit this refractoriness, and it is replaced by postictal potentiation. In addition to the immediate postictal [...] Read more.
Background: Postictal refractoriness, i.e., the inability to elicit a new epileptic seizure immediately after the first one, is present in mature animals. Immature rats did not exhibit this refractoriness, and it is replaced by postictal potentiation. In addition to the immediate postictal potentiation, there is a delayed potentiation present at both ages. These phenomena were studied using cortical epileptic afterdischarges as a model. Objective: We aimed to analyze participation of adenosine A1 receptors in postictal potentiation and depression. Methods: Adenosine A1 receptors were studied by means of Western blotting in the cerebral cortex with a focus on the age groups studied electrophysiologically. Stimulation and recording electrodes were implanted epidurally in 12- and 25-day-old rats. The first stimulation always induced conditioning epileptic afterdischarge (AD), and 1 min after its end, the stimulation was repeated to elicit the second, testing AD. Then, the drugs were administered and paired stimulations were repeated 10 min later. A selective agonist CCPA (0.5 and 1 mg/kg i.p.) and a selective antagonist DPCPX (0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg i.p.) were used to examine the possible participation of adenosine A1 receptors. Results: Control younger animals exhibited potentiation of the testing AD and a moderate increase in both conditioning and testing ADs after an injection of saline. The A1 receptor agonist CCPA shortened both post-drug ADs, and neither potentiation was present. The administration of an antagonist DPCPX resulted in marked prolongation of the conditioning AD (delayed potentiation), and the second testing AD was shorter than the post-drug conditioning AD, i.e., there was no longer immediate potentiation of ADs. To eliminate effects of the solvent dimethylsulfoxide, we added experiments with DPCPX suspended with the help of Tween 80. The results were similar, only the prolongation of ADs was not as large, and the testing ADs were significantly depressed. The older control group exhibited a nearly complete suppression of the first testing AD. There was no significant change in the conditioning and testing ADs after CCPA (delayed potentiation was blocked). Both groups of DPCPX-treated rats (with DMSO or Tween) exhibited significant augmentation of delayed potentiation but no significant difference in the immediate depression. Adenosine A1 receptors were present in the cerebral cortex of both age groups, and their quantity was higher in 12- than in 25-day-old animals. Conclusions: An agonist of the A1 receptor CCPA suppressed both types of postictal potentiation in 12-day-old rats, whereas the A1 antagonist DPCPX suppressed immediate potentiation but markedly augmented the delayed one. Immediate postictal refractoriness in 25-day-old rats was only moderately (non-significantly) affected; meanwhile, the delayed potentiation was strongly augmented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 599 KiB  
Article
A Retrospective Study of Postictal Suppression during Electroconvulsive Therapy
by Virginie Moulier, Julien Guehl, Emilie Evêque-Mourroux, Pierre Quesada and Maud Rothärmel
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1440; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051440 - 5 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2489
Abstract
Background: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but its response remains partial. Identifying useful indicators to guide decision making for treatment and improve clinical response remains a major issue. The objective of the present retrospective study was [...] Read more.
Background: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but its response remains partial. Identifying useful indicators to guide decision making for treatment and improve clinical response remains a major issue. The objective of the present retrospective study was to determine if clinical response—early (after 5 ECT sessions) or longer-term (after 12 ECT sessions)—was associated with postictal suppression during the first ECT course and/or with postictal suppression frequency during the whole ECT course. Methods: in a retrospective study, the data of 42 patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression and receiving at least 5 ECT sessions were collected. Two sessions per week of bitemporal brief-pulse ECT sessions were administered to patients. Each of the electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were assessed to determine the presence of postictal suppression. Results: the postictal suppression from the first ECT session predicted a better long-term clinical response (after 12 ECT sessions), but not early clinical response (after only 5 ECT sessions). The postictal suppression frequency was associated with neither the short- nor the long-term clinical response. In addition, postictal suppression and short-term cognitive performances were not associated. Conclusions: this EEG indicator is clinically useful if it appears in the first ECT sessions, but it is no longer relevant in the following sessions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
Factors Predicting Ictal Quality in Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Sessions
by Aida de Arriba-Arnau, Antonia Dalmau Llitjos, Virginia Soria, Stelania Savino, Neus Salvat-Pujol, Jordi Curto, José Manuel Menchón and Mikel Urretavizcaya
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(6), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060781 - 12 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3435
Abstract
In electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), ictal characteristics predict treatment response and can be modified by changes in seizure threshold and in the ECT technique. We aimed to study the impact of ECT procedure-related variables that interact during each session and might influence the seizure [...] Read more.
In electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), ictal characteristics predict treatment response and can be modified by changes in seizure threshold and in the ECT technique. We aimed to study the impact of ECT procedure-related variables that interact during each session and might influence the seizure results. Two hundred and fifty sessions of bilateral ECT in forty-seven subjects were included. Seizure results were evaluated by two different scales of combined ictal EEG parameters (seizure quality index (SQI) and seizure adequacy markers sum (SAMS) scores) and postictal suppression rating. Repeated measurement regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of each session’s three outcome variables. Univariate models identified age, physical status, hyperventilation, basal oxygen saturation, days between sessions, benzodiazepines, lithium, and tricyclic antidepressants as predictors of seizure quality. Days elapsed between sessions, higher oxygen saturation and protocolized hyperventilation application were significant predictors of better seizure quality in both scales used in multivariate models. Additionally, lower ASA classification influenced SQI scores as well as benzodiazepine use and lithium daily doses were predictors of SAMS scores. Higher muscle relaxant doses and lower applied stimulus intensities significantly influenced the postictal suppression rating. The study found several modifiable procedural factors that impacted the obtained seizure characteristics; they could be adjusted to optimize ECT session results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Bench to Bedside: Electroconvulsive Therapy on Depression)
10 pages, 224 KiB  
Review
Update on the Genetic Basis of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy
by Monica Coll, Antonio Oliva, Simone Grassi, Ramon Brugada and Oscar Campuzano
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(8), 1979; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081979 - 23 Apr 2019
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 4409
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, also known as SUDEP, is the main cause of death in patients with epilepsy. SUDEP has an incidence of 1.2 per 1000 person-years in adults and [...] Read more.
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, also known as SUDEP, is the main cause of death in patients with epilepsy. SUDEP has an incidence of 1.2 per 1000 person-years in adults and 0.2 per 1000 person-years in children. SUDEP accounts for 8–17% of deaths in patients with epilepsy. It is commonly associated with a history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and its risk may be increased by other factors such as postictal electroencephalographic suppression, prone sleeping position, altered heart rate variability, conduction abnormalities, gender, or antiepileptic medications. Recently, electrocardiograms, electroencephalograms, and imaging markers have helped clinicians stratify SUDEP risk and identify patients in need of close monitoring. However, the pathophysiology of SUDEP is likely multifactorial and still unknown. Improving the knowledge of SUDEP incidence, risk factors, and biomarkers can help design and implement effective prevention strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epilepsy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Targeted Therapies)
Back to TopTop