Search Results (1)

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging therapy in the treatment of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). There is a gap in the research on the safety and efficacy of bsAbs in adults with LBCL, with current research focusing on the wider non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma population. To address this research gap, we conducted a systematic review aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of bsAbs in adults with LBCL. A systematized search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 10 April 2024. Interventional clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. Observational studies, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. According to the Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies, the included studies were largely of a high quality for safety outcome reporting, but of mixed quality for efficacy outcome reporting. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the results were discussed as a narrative synthesis. Nineteen early phase studies were evaluated in the final analysis, with a pooled sample size of 1332 patients. Nine bsAbs were investigated across the studies as monotherapy (nine studies) or in combination regimes (10 studies). The rates of cytokine release syndrome were variable, with any grade events ranging from 0 to 72.2%. Infection rates were consistently high across the reporting studies (38–60%). Cytopenias were found to be common, in particular, anemia (4.4–62%), thrombocytopenia (3.3–69%), and neutropenia (4.4–70%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade ≥3 adverse events were not commonly reported. Promising efficacy outcomes were reported, with median overall response rates of 95–100% in the front-line and 36–91% in terms of relapsed/refractory disease. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that bsAbs are generally well-tolerated and effective in adults with LBCL. BsAbs appear to have superior tolerability, but inferior efficacy to CAR T-cell therapies in adults with LBCL. Future research on safety and efficacy should focus on evaluating adverse event timing and management, the impact on the patient’s quality of life, the burden on the healthcare system, and overall survival outcomes. Full article