Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = paediatric incontinence

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 731 KiB  
Systematic Review
Response to Treatment with Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) in Children and Adolescents with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Andrea Panunzio, Rossella Orlando, Giovanni Mazzucato, Sonia Costantino, Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo, Clara Cerrato, Rita De Mitri, Vincenzo Pagliarulo, Alessandro Tafuri, Antonio Benito Porcaro, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Giuseppe Bertolo, Luca Giacomello and Maria Angela Cerruto
Toxins 2024, 16(10), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16100443 - 15 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2167
Abstract
Introduction: Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is a treatment option for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctions (NLUTD) and idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in adults. Recently, its use has gained popularity in paediatric urology. Transitional urology deals with adolescents affected by congenital urological issues, who [...] Read more.
Introduction: Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is a treatment option for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctions (NLUTD) and idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in adults. Recently, its use has gained popularity in paediatric urology. Transitional urology deals with adolescents affected by congenital urological issues, who mature into adulthood. The aim of this systematic review was to update the current knowledge on the use of BoNT-A in children and adolescents. Methods: A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed from articles published up to September 2024. Both prospective and retrospective single-cohort or comparative studies evaluating outcomes of interest were included. These consisted of the amelioration of urinary incontinence (UI), continence rates, improvement of urodynamic parameters (maximum detrusor pressure during voiding, maximum bladder capacity, and bladder compliance), and type and prevalence of adverse/side effects. Qualitative and quantitative data syntheses were provided. Moderators and meta-regression analyses were carried out as well. Results: Forty-one full-text manuscripts were selected of which 26 focused on children with NLUTD, 13 on idiopathic OAB, and two on both conditions. Overall, 1521 patients were included of whom 715 were male, 646 female, and 160 of unknown sex. Mean age varied between 5.6 and 15.6 years. No studies specifically focused on transitional urology, despite patients up to at least 17 years of age being included. Several differences existed in design, type, dose, way of administration, outcomes measured and follow-up time; however, all studies independently showed an improvement of UI and urodynamic parameters with no major side/adverse events. Pooled analysis showed a mean rate of improvement in UI scores/episodes of 75.87% within a period of 3–6 months following BoNT-A treatment. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated a significant correlation between dryness rate and both patients’ age (negative) and bladder compliance (positive). Conclusions: Several uncontrolled or comparative studies provided significative evidence of the clinical benefit and safety of BoNT-A administration in children in terms of UI relief and improvement of urodynamic parameters, with neurogenic aetiologies being the most investigated conditions. A reduced bladder compliance was identified as one of the potential predictors of poor response to BoNT-A. Moreover, the earlier the treatment was started the higher the success rate that was reached in terms of dryness/urinary continence achievement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1186 KiB  
Article
Reengineering eADVICE for Long Waitlists: A Tale of Two Systems and Conditions
by Deborah Richards, Patrina H. Y. Caldwell, Amal Abdulrahman, Amy von Huben, Karen Waters and Karen M. Scott
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2785; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142785 - 16 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1181
Abstract
Long outpatient waiting times pose a significant global challenge in healthcare, impacting children and families with implications for health outcomes. This paper presents the eHealth system called eADVICE (electronic Advice and Diagnosis Via the Internet following Computerised Evaluation) that is designed to address [...] Read more.
Long outpatient waiting times pose a significant global challenge in healthcare, impacting children and families with implications for health outcomes. This paper presents the eHealth system called eADVICE (electronic Advice and Diagnosis Via the Internet following Computerised Evaluation) that is designed to address waiting list challenges for paediatricians. Initially designed for children’s incontinence, the system’s success in terms of health goals and user experience led to its adaptation for paediatric sleep problems. This paper focuses on user experiences and the development of a working alliance with the virtual doctor, alongside health outcomes based on a randomised controlled trial (N = 239) for incontinence. When reengineering eADVICE to sleep disorders, the promising results regarding the reciprocal relationship between user experience and building a working alliance encouraged a focus on the further development of the embodied conversational agent (ECA) component. This involved tailoring the ECA discussion to patient cognition (i.e., beliefs and goals) to further improve engagement and outcomes. The proposed eADVICE framework facilitates adaptation across paediatric conditions, offering a scalable model to enhance access and self-efficacy during care delays. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Computer Interactions in E-health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop