Search Results (2)

Background/Objectives: Persons identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, omnisexual, queer, questioning, fluid, asexual, or other non-heterosexual orientations (LGB+ persons) have been identified as a risk group for sexual victimization (SV), which can have long-lasting negative effects on well-being and physical, mental, sexual, and reproductive health. Othering-Based Stress (OBS)—reflecting societal processes of othering and resulting from stigma, prejudice, and discrimination—may contribute to increased vulnerability to SV and its consequences in LGB+ persons and affect help-seeking behavior following victimization. This study examines the impact of SV on LGB+ persons and their help-seeking behavior after victimization. Methods: Using a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, first survey data from a nationally representative sample of the Belgian population on SV, its consequences, and subsequent help-seeking behavior were collected from 4632 individuals. Of these, 2965 participants (2601 heterosexual and 364 LGB+ individuals) experienced SV and represented the final sample for the quantitative analyses. In a second phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 LGB+ victims to explore their experiences more thoroughly. Results: LGB+ individuals reported more negative consequences following SV than heterosexual persons, particularly regarding identity-related processes such as questioning gender expression and decreases in self-esteem. They also reported additional barriers to disclosing SV and seeking help from professional services or the police, including fears of stigma, invalidation, and concerns about professionals’ LGB+ competence. No significant differences were found between LGB+ persons who explicitly identified as belonging to a sexual minority group and those who did not, neither in the perceived consequences of SV nor in help-seeking barriers. Conclusions: LGB+ victims of sexual violence experienced more severe identity-related consequences and faced greater barriers to professional support than heterosexual victims. These results highlight the urgent need for trauma-informed, LGB+-inclusive services and structural policy measures to improve access to appropriate care. Full article

Background: Some (minority) groups (MGs) are more vulnerable to sexual violence (SV) exposure than others. Othering-based stress (OBS) may mediate the relationship between minority identification and SV. This study aims to assess the prevalence of SV in different MGs to explore the relationship between minority identification and SV, to investigate whether belonging to multiple MGs moderates this relationship, and to explore OBS SV moderation for different MGs. Method: Through an online survey administered to a nationally representative sample in Belgium, data was collected from 4632 persons, of whom 21.01% self-identified as belonging to a MG (SI-Minority). SV prevalence was measured using behaviorally specific questions based on the WHO definition of SV. SI-Minority participants received an additional scale on OBS. Results: SI-Minority participants reported more SV victimization compared to the non-minorities. However, this increased risk was not moderated by minority identification but linked to the socio-demographic SV risk markers common to minority individuals. Multiple-minority participants were found more at risk of SV compared to single-minority respondents. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, pan-/omnisexual, asexual, and other non-heterosexual (LGB+) participants were found more at risk than heterosexual participants. OBS was found to be significantly correlated to SV in sexual and gender minorities and in cultural minorities. Conclusions: This study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between minority identification, OBS, and SV. Studying both specific and common SV vulnerabilities and outcomes within specific societal subgroups and the general population may inform policy makers when allocating resources to those interventions with the largest societal impact. Full article