Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = osteopathic cranial manipulation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 944 KB  
Systematic Review
Physiological Mechanisms Underlying the Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM) and Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) in Osteopathy: A Systematic Review
by François Mériaux, Laurent Stubbe and Alice Guyon
Healthcare 2024, 12(24), 2503; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12242503 - 11 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 7531
Abstract
Background: Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) or Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM), movement felt on the scalp or the rest of the body, respectively, is a fundamental concept used by osteopaths in their practice for their diagnosis and treatment. However, the physiological basis of this [...] Read more.
Background: Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI) or Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM), movement felt on the scalp or the rest of the body, respectively, is a fundamental concept used by osteopaths in their practice for their diagnosis and treatment. However, the physiological basis of this phenomenon remains unclear. Sutherland, the founder of cranial osteopathy, proposed in 1939 that PRM was due to the movement of the cranial bones pulled by the meninges, themselves pushed by the fluctuation of cerebrospinal fluid and the motility of the central nervous system. Since then, Sutherland’s theory has become dogma, despite scientific progress refuting it, and few osteopaths have attempted to find better explanations. Objective: This systematic review of Medline, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library indexed electronic databases explores current knowledge of the physiological mechanisms underlying the Primary Respiratory Movement (PRM) or Cranial Rhythmic Impulse (CRI). Methods: We entered the following identified keywords: “osteopathy in the cranial field”; “cranial rhythmic impulse”; and “primary respiratory mechanism”. We identified 193 studies, evaluated 115, and identified 28 articles that fulfilled our criteria. We classified the studies in terms of methodological rigor, types of studies and tools used. No study had three good-level items, and only five studies had two good-level items corresponding to the type of study and tools used. The protocol of the review has been registered on PROSPERO-CRD42023488497. Results: Out of the 28 articles, 20 referenced at least one of Sutherland’s hypotheses, often quoting the model to critique or challenge it, while 25 of them refer to other hypotheses and/or mechanisms underlying PRM/CRI: 11 concern vasomotion in blood vessels (7) and lymphatic vessels (6), 20 THM waves, 14 heart rate variability, 9 ventilation rate, 2 the extra-cellular matrix and 1 oxidative metabolism. Conclusions: Although Sutherland’s theory remains prevalent in general beliefs, in scientific literature, THM waves driven by autonomous system activity have gained prominence, emerging as the leading hypothesis. The results from this systematic review confirm the need for a paradigm shift for the CRI/PRM in osteopathy, and for more rigorous evaluation and communication on a model in step with evolving scientific data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 418 KB  
Perspective
Neurophysiology, Neuro-Immune Interactions, and Mechanobiology in Osteopathy in the Cranial Field: An Evidence-Informed Perspective for a Scientific Rationale
by Nicola Barsotti, Alessandro Casini, Marco Chiera, Christian Lunghi and Mauro Fornari
Healthcare 2023, 11(23), 3058; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233058 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 13032
Abstract
(1) Background: Osteopathy in the cranial field (OCF) is a distinctive approach within osteopathy, focusing on the cranial region’s manual manipulation. Nevertheless, OCF fosters doubt in the scientific community because it refers to out-of-date models. This perspective paper critically analyzes the current knowledge [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Osteopathy in the cranial field (OCF) is a distinctive approach within osteopathy, focusing on the cranial region’s manual manipulation. Nevertheless, OCF fosters doubt in the scientific community because it refers to out-of-date models. This perspective paper critically analyzes the current knowledge in the fields of neurophysiology and mechanobiology to propose an evidence-informed rationale for OCF. (2) Methods: The reporting framework used in the current perspective article obeyed the guidelines for writing a commentary. (3) Results: The article’s main findings focus on the tactile stimulation of exocranial receptors and their implications in the management of craniofacial algic-dysfunctional syndromes implementing OCF. (4) Conclusions: By establishing an evidence-based rationale for OCF, this research aims to guide future directions in OCF and contribute to a more patient-centered and effective approach to health and wellbeing. Full article
14 pages, 1290 KB  
Review
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Decreases Hospital Stay and Healthcare Cost in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
by Hannah Roland, Amanda Brown, Amy Rousselot, Natalie Freeman, J. Michael Wieting, Stephen Bergman and Debasis Mondal
Medicines 2022, 9(10), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines9100049 - 21 Sep 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 11613
Abstract
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is used in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Evidence suggests that OMT can reduce both patients’ recovery time and the financial cost of their acute medical treatment and rehabilitation. Multiple studies from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are presented [...] Read more.
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is used in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Evidence suggests that OMT can reduce both patients’ recovery time and the financial cost of their acute medical treatment and rehabilitation. Multiple studies from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are presented in this article that demonstrate infants treated with OMT recover faster, are discharged earlier, and have lower healthcare costs than their non-OMT-treated counterparts. Data clearly show that adjunctive OMT facilitates feeding coordination in newborns, such as latching, suckling, swallowing, and breathing, and increases long-term weight gain and maintenance, which reduces hospital length of stay (LOS). Osteopathic techniques, such as soft tissue manipulation, balanced ligamentous tension, myofascial release, and osteopathic cranial manipulation (OCM), can reduce regurgitation, vomiting, milky bilious, or bloody discharge and decrease the need for constipation treatment. OMT can also be effective in reducing the complications of pneumonia in premature babies. Studies show the use of OCM and lymphatic pump technique (LPT) reduces the occurrence of both aspiration and environmentally acquired pneumonia, resulting in significantly lower morbidity and mortality in infants. Based on published findings, it is determined that OMT is clinically effective, cost efficient, a less invasive alternative to surgery, and a less toxic choice to pharmacologic drugs. Therefore, routine incorporation of OMT in the NICU can be of great benefit in infants with multiple disorders. Future OMT research should aim to initiate clinical trial designs that include randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts of infants admitted to the NICU. Furthermore, a streamlined and concerted effort to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms associated with the beneficial effects of OMT will aid in understanding the significant value of incorporating OMT into optimal patient care. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 880 KB  
Article
Objectivation of an Educational Model in Cranial Osteopathy Based on Experience
by Jesús Requena-García, Evelyn García-Nieto and David Varillas-Delgado
Medicina 2021, 57(3), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030246 - 5 Mar 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3362
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The techniques directed to the cranial field in osteopathy are the most questioned due to the lack of scientific evidence. In osteopathic practice, manual palpation is essential and, therefore, measuring reliability is fundamental. The objective of this study is [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The techniques directed to the cranial field in osteopathy are the most questioned due to the lack of scientific evidence. In osteopathic practice, manual palpation is essential and, therefore, measuring reliability is fundamental. The objective of this study is to assess the precision and objectification of an educational model in cranial osteopathy based on experience. Materials and Methods: A reliability study was conducted in a cadaver skull where a strain gauge was placed on the sphenobasilar synchondrosis (SBS) of the base of the skull. Three cranial osteopathic techniques (lateral compression, anteroposterior compression, and compression maneuver of the mastoids) were performed 25 times by osteopaths with different degrees of experience (5–10 years, 1–5 years, <1 year). Measurements were computed for each of the three techniques of each group in comparison with the osteopath with >15 years of experience. Data were analyzed to check for inter- and intra-observer reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Reliability in osteopaths with 5–10 years’ experience (observer 1 and observer 2) performing all three techniques was higher (p < 0.001) than the osteopath with >15 years’ experience. Little or no reliability were observed in osteopaths with less experience. Conclusions: The experience of the osteopaths determines the reliability and effectiveness of the cranial techniques, a fundamental part in objectifying these techniques. This model can help implement objective training in cranial osteopathy formation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop