Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = on-farm hatching

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2583 KiB  
Article
A Survey Analysis Comparing Perceptions of Plastic Use in Nurseries and Greenhouses in the United States
by Alexa J. Lamm, James S. Owen, James Altland and Sarah A. White
Land 2025, 14(7), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071383 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 377
Abstract
Plastic is extensively used in nursery and greenhouse operations. Concerns are growing about the potential release of plastic byproducts, such as microplastics and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), into water resources. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare perceptions of plastic [...] Read more.
Plastic is extensively used in nursery and greenhouse operations. Concerns are growing about the potential release of plastic byproducts, such as microplastics and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), into water resources. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare perceptions of plastic use and water quality impacts between scientists researching water contaminants and nursery/greenhouse growers, (2) identify barriers to growers reducing plastic use, and (3) explore preferred communication channels for scientists to inform growers about emerging research. An online survey was administered to collect data from scientists in a USDA-funded multi-state Hatch project (N = 20) and nursery/greenhouse growers (N = 66) across the United States. The findings indicated both groups were unsure of the impacts of plastic use. While most respondents perceived surface water pollution as a critical issue, neither scientists nor growers strongly agreed on-farm plastic use poses a significant threat. Both groups recognized the importance of regular water testing, but few believed mandatory changes to plastic use should be enacted without further evidence. Growers cited limited equipment, financial constraints, and uncertain availability of viable plastic alternatives as key barriers. Despite these barriers, growers were willing to learn more, primarily through online resources, short courses, and workshops. The findings underscore the need for targeted research that quantifies plastic byproducts in nursery/greenhouse water and identifies cost-effective alternatives. Timely dissemination of scientific findings using trusted sources will be critical to bridge knowledge gaps and support adoption of best practices to safeguard water quality in surface and groundwater. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrating Climate, Land, and Water Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1328 KiB  
Article
Antimicrobial Use in On-Farm Hatching Systems vs. Traditional Hatching Systems: A Case Study
by Julia G. Jerab, Ilias Chantziaras, Tommy Van Limbergen, Johan Van Erum, Filip Boel, Erik Hoeven and Jeroen Dewulf
Animals 2023, 13(20), 3270; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203270 - 19 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2642
Abstract
On-farm hatching is a relatively new method in the broiler industry, in which fertilized broiler eggs are transported to the farms at the stage of 17–19 days of incubation. Once hatched, the broiler chicks have direct access to feed and water. Previous studies [...] Read more.
On-farm hatching is a relatively new method in the broiler industry, in which fertilized broiler eggs are transported to the farms at the stage of 17–19 days of incubation. Once hatched, the broiler chicks have direct access to feed and water. Previous studies have shown on-farm hatching to increase animal welfare and intestinal development. However, no studies have yet aimed to quantify and compare the antimicrobial use in on-farm hatched flocks with that of traditionally hatched flocks. In this study, information on antimicrobial use (AMU) was collected from 211 Belgian conventional broiler farms, including data from 2244 traditionally hatched flocks and 227 on-farm (NestBorn) hatched flocks. On-farm hatched flocks had significantly (p < 0.001) more antimicrobial-free flocks (n = 109, 48.01%) compared to traditional flocks (n = 271, 12.08%) and a 44% lower (p < 0.01) treatment incidence (TI) at flock level (TI 8.40 vs. TI 15.13). Overall, the farms using traditional hatching had 5.6 times (95% CI 3.6–8.7) higher odds to use antimicrobials than the farms using on-farm hatching. Treated on-farm hatched flocks received three times less lincomycin-spectinomycin (linco-spectin) and less (routine) treatments at the start of the production round. However, both traditional and on-farm flocks experienced outbreaks later in the production round. These results show that on-farm hatching can contribute to the reduction in antimicrobial use in conventional broiler production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 553 KiB  
Article
Effects of Early Nutrition of Hatched Chicks on Welfare and Growth Performance: A Pilot Study
by Jan Berend Lingens, Amr Abd El-Wahab, Marwa Fawzy Elmetwaly Ahmed, Dana Carina Schubert, Christian Sürie and Christian Visscher
Animals 2021, 11(10), 2888; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102888 - 3 Oct 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3792
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the possibility of rearing newly hatched chicks with immediate access to feed and water in the same hatching unit one week prior to transferring them to the conventional broiler house with special regards to foot pad health and [...] Read more.
This study aimed to investigate the possibility of rearing newly hatched chicks with immediate access to feed and water in the same hatching unit one week prior to transferring them to the conventional broiler house with special regards to foot pad health and growth performance. Two trials were performed with a total of 6900/6850 (trials 1/2) broiler chickens (ROSS 308). A total of 3318/3391 chicks (trials 1/2) were transported from the hatchery (duration of about 3 h) and reared in a conventional broiler house (control group: delayed nutrition on-hatchery hatched). The control group did not receive any form of nutrition until they were taken to conventional broiler housing. Additionally, a total of 3582/3459 (trials 1/2) embryonated eggs (d 18) were obtained from the same parent flock of the same commercial hatchery and taken to the farm facility. After on-farm hatch, the chicks had immediate access to water and feed (experimental group: early nutrition on-farm hatched). After d 6/7 of life, the on-farm hatched chicks (trials 1/2) were transferred to the broiler house on the same facility. The delayed nutrition on-hatchery hatched groups displayed a significantly lower dry matter content in the litter compared to the early nutrition on-farm hatched groups (two-factorial analysis) at d 6/7 and d 14 of life. However, thereafter, no significant differences were noted. Based upon two-factorial analysis, the early nutrition on-farm hatched groups revealed lower foot pad lesions from d 14 of life onwards and showed a higher body weight (BW) throughout the rearing period compared to the delayed nutrition on-hatchery hatched groups (p < 0.05). Overall, early nutrition on-farm hatched chickens is of critical importance together with using new litter at d 7 to maintain healthy foot pads as well as to enhance nutrient utilization and optimize the growth performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transport and Early Feeding in Poultry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop