Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = odontoid fracture

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1270 KiB  
Review
Odontoid Fractures: A Review of the Current State of the Art
by Aria Nouri, Michele Da Broi, Adrien May, Insa Janssen, Granit Molliqaj, Benjamin Davies, Naveen Pandita, Karl Schaller, Enrico Tessitore and Mark Kotter
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6270; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206270 - 21 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3553
Abstract
Odontoid fractures (OFs) represent up to 15% of all cervical fractures encountered and present most commonly amongst elderly patients, typically in the setting of low energy trauma such as falls. The Anderson and D’Alonzo classification and Roy-Camille subtype description are the most clinically [...] Read more.
Odontoid fractures (OFs) represent up to 15% of all cervical fractures encountered and present most commonly amongst elderly patients, typically in the setting of low energy trauma such as falls. The Anderson and D’Alonzo classification and Roy-Camille subtype description are the most clinically noteworthy descriptions of OFs used. Even though most patients will not present with neurological injury, mechanical instability can occur with type II and type III (Anderson and D’Alonzo) fractures, particularly if the transverse ligament of the atlas is ruptured; however, this is very rare. Conservative treatment is usually employed for type I and type III injuries, and to a varying degree for non-displaced type II injuries. Surgical treatment is typically reserved for type II fractures, patients with neurological injury, and in the setting of other associated fractures or ligamentous injury. Anterior screw fixation is a viable option in the setting of a favorable fracture line orientation in type II fractures, whereas posterior C1–C2 screw fixation is an option for any type II or type III fracture presentation. There is evidence that surgery for type II fractures has higher rates of union and lower mortality than nonoperative treatments. While surgical options have increased over the decades and the management of OF has been optimized by considering fracture subtypes and patient factors, there remains a significant morbidity and mortality associated with OFs. The aging population and changing demographics suggest that there will be an ongoing rise in the incidence of OFs. Therefore, the appropriate management of these cases will be essential for ensuring optimization of health care resources and the quality of life of affected patients Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1092 KiB  
Article
Odontoid Fracture with Accompanying Severe Atlantoaxial Instability in Elderly Patients—Analysis of Treatment, Adverse Events, and Outcome
by Michael Kreinest, Philipp Raisch, Lukas Hörnig, Sven Y. Vetter, Paul A. Grützner and Matthias K. Jung
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1326; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051326 - 26 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1372
Abstract
(1) Background: In elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures, accompanying severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is discussed as a marker possibly warranting more aggressive surgical therapy. This study aimed to characterize adverse events as well as the radiological and functional outcomes of surgical [...] Read more.
(1) Background: In elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures, accompanying severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is discussed as a marker possibly warranting more aggressive surgical therapy. This study aimed to characterize adverse events as well as the radiological and functional outcomes of surgical vs. conservative therapy in patients with odontoid fracture and AAI. (2) Methods: Patients aged 65 years and older with type II odontoid fracture and AAI treated were included. AAI was assumed if the mean subluxation across both atlantoaxial facet joints in the sagittal plane was greater than 50%. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment, adverse events, radiological, and functional outcomes were analyzed. (3) Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in conservatively treated patients compared to patients with ventral or dorsal surgery. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (28.2%), affecting 10 surgically treated patients (35.7%), and 1 conservatively treated patient (9.1%). Moreover, 25 patients were followed-up (64.1%). One secondary dislocation occurred in the conservative group (11.1%) and three in the surgical group (18.8%). (4) Conclusions: Despite the potential for instability in this injury, conservative treatment does not seem to lead to unfavorable short-term results, less adverse events, and a shorter hospital stay and should thus be considered and discussed with patients as a treatment option, even in the presence of severe AAI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 248 KiB  
Comment
Comment on Bunmaprasert et al. Reducible Nonunited Type II Odontoid Fracture with Atlantoaxial Instability: Outcomes of Two Different Fixation Techniques. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7990
by Ayhan Kanat
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5018; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095018 - 20 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1676
Abstract
I read with great interest the paper of Bunmaprasert et al. [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurotrauma and Health)
6 pages, 1091 KiB  
Article
Intraoperative Positioning in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients with Cervical Spine Injury—Is It Safe? Radiological Simulation in a Healthy Volunteer
by Thomas Pepper, Harry Spiers, Alex Weller and Clare Schilling
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2022, 15(4), 312-317; https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211053091 - 3 Jan 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 81
Abstract
Study Design: Observational. Objective: To investigate the effects on the cervical spine of positioning patients for maxillofacial procedures by simulating intraoperative positions for common maxillofacial procedures. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of head position in common intraoperative configurations—neutral [...] Read more.
Study Design: Observational. Objective: To investigate the effects on the cervical spine of positioning patients for maxillofacial procedures by simulating intraoperative positions for common maxillofacial procedures. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of head position in common intraoperative configurations—neutral (anterior mandible position), extended (tracheostomy position) and laterally rotated (mandibular condyle position) on the C-spine of a healthy volunteer. Results: In the tracheostomy position, maximal movement occurred in the sagittal plane between the cervico-occipital junction and C4–C5, as well as at the cervico-thoracic junction. Minimal movement occurred at C2 (on C3), C5 (on C6) and C6 (on C7). In the mandibular condyle position, C-spine movements occurred in both rotational and sagittal planes. Maximal movement occurred above the level of C4, concentrated at atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial (C1–2) joints. Conclusions: Neck extension is likely to be relatively safe in injuries that are stable in flexion and extension, such as odontoid peg fracture and fractures between C5 and C7. Head rotation is likely to be relatively safe in fractures below C4, as well as vertebral body fractures, and laminar fractures without disc disruption. Early dialogue with the neurosurgical team remains a central tenet of safe management of patients with combined maxillofacial and C-spine injuries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1685 KiB  
Article
Morbidity and Mortality in Patients over 90 Years of Age Following Posterior Stabilization for Acute Traumatic Odontoid Type II Fractures: A Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-Up of Three Years
by Mohammed Issa, Karl L. Kiening, Andreas W. Unterberg, Moritz Scherer, Alexander Younsi, Stepan Fedorko, Rod J. Oskouian, Jens R. Chapman and Basem Ishak
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3780; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173780 - 24 Aug 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4535
Abstract
Odontoid type II fractures represent the most common cervical spine injuries in the elderly. The decision for surgical treatment in very elderly patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess morbidity and mortality in patients over 90 years of [...] Read more.
Odontoid type II fractures represent the most common cervical spine injuries in the elderly. The decision for surgical treatment in very elderly patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess morbidity and mortality in patients over 90 years of age undergoing CT-guided posterior stabilization for unstable odontoid type II fractures. A total of 15 patients with an acute traumatic odontoid type II fracture who received surgical treatment for unstable odontoid type II fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Complications, morbidity, and mortality as well as length of ICU and hospital stay were determined. Clinical follow-up evaluation was based on outpatient presentation and information from family members and general practitioners. Finally, we conducted a comparison of complications rates between patients over 90 years of age and patients between 65 and 89 years old with a type II odontoid fracture after CT-guided posterior stabilization in our institution. The mean age was 91.4 years. Patients were predominately female (87%). In-hospital deaths did not occur. The average length of the hospital stay was 13.4 days and 1.9 days for the ICU. Blood transfusion was necessary in two patients (13%). Two patients (13%) developed urinary tract infection, one patient (7%) a delirium, and another epistaxis (7%). One patient (7%) developed pneumonic sepsis and fully recovered within several weeks. The mean follow-up was 36 months (range 9–72 months). Implant-related complications developed in one patient (7%). Five patients died during the follow-up period, with an average time to death of 26.6 months. Postoperative bracing was not needed in any of the patients. Posterior stabilization of unstable odontoid fractures type II using CT-guided navigation in patients over 90 years of age is a safe and effective procedure with low complications and mortality rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1961 KiB  
Article
Reducible Nonunited Type II Odontoid Fracture with Atlantoaxial Instability: Outcomes of Two Different Fixation Techniques
by Torphong Bunmaprasert, Vorapop Trirattanapikul, Nantawit Sugandhavesa, Areerak Phanphaisarn, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang and Phichayut Phinyo
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 7990; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157990 - 28 Jul 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6898
Abstract
Displaced nonunited type II odontoid fracture can result in atlantoaxial instability, causing delayed cervical myelopathy. Both Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod segmental fixation technique are effective techniques to provide stability. This study aimed to demonstrate the results of [...] Read more.
Displaced nonunited type II odontoid fracture can result in atlantoaxial instability, causing delayed cervical myelopathy. Both Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod segmental fixation technique are effective techniques to provide stability. This study aimed to demonstrate the results of two surgical fixation techniques for the treatment of reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture with atlantoaxial instability. Medical records of patients with reducible nonunited type II odontoid fracture hospitalized for spinal fusion between April 2007 and April 2018 were reviewed. For each patient, specific surgical fixation, either Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring or Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique, was performed according to our management protocol. We reported the fusion rate, fusion period, and complications for each technique. Of 21 patients, 10 patients were treated with Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique augmented with supplemental wiring, and 11 were treated with Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. The bony fusion rate was 100% in both groups. The mean time to fusion was 69.7 (95%CI 53.1, 86.3) days in Magerl’s C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation technique and 75.2 (95%CI 51.8, 98.6) days in Harms-Goel C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique. No severe complications were observed in either group. Displaced reducible, nonunited type II odontoid fracture with cervical myelopathy should be treated by surgery. Both fixation techniques promote bony fusion and provide substantial construct stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurotrauma and Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2686 KiB  
Article
Cranio-Vertebral Junction Triangular Area: Quantification of Brain Stem Compression by Magnetic Resonance Images
by Chih-Chang Chang, Ching-Lan Wu, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Jau-Ching Wu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Peng-Yuan Chang, Li-Yu Fay, Wen-Cheng Huang and Henrich Cheng
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010064 - 6 Jan 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3730
Abstract
(1) Background: Most of the currently used radiological criteria for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) were developed prior to the popularity of magnetic resonance images (MRIs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel triangular area (TA) calculated on MRIs for pathologies at [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Most of the currently used radiological criteria for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) were developed prior to the popularity of magnetic resonance images (MRIs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel triangular area (TA) calculated on MRIs for pathologies at the CVJ. (2) Methods: A total of 702 consecutive patients were enrolled, grouped into three: (a) Those with pathologies at the CVJ (n = 129); (b) those with underlying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but no CVJ abnormalities (n = 279); and (3) normal (control; n = 294). TA was defined on T2-weighted MRIs by three points: The lowest point of the clivus, the posterior-inferior point of C2, and the most dorsal indentation point at the ventral brain stem. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to correlate the prognostic value of the TA with myelopathy. Pre- and post-operative TA values were compared for validation. (c) Results: The CVJ-pathology group had the largest mean TA (1.58 ± 0.47 cm2), compared to the RA and control groups (0.96 ± 0.31 and 1.05 ± 0.26, respectively). The ROC analysis calculated the cutoff-point for myelopathy as 1.36 cm2 with the area under the curve at 0.93. Of the 81 surgical patients, the TA was reduced (1.21 ± 0.37 cm2) at two-years post-operation compared to that at pre-operation (1.67 ± 0.51 cm2). Moreover, intra-operative complete reduction of the abnormalities could further decrease the TA to 1.03 ± 0.39 cm2. (4) Conclusions: The TA, a valid measurement to quantify compression at the CVJ and evaluate the efficacy of surgery, averaged 1.05 cm2 in normal patients, and 1.36 cm2 could be a cutoff-point for myelopathy and of clinical significance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Degenerative Spinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop