Search Results (2)

Background: The decision of the Joint Federal Committee on the treatment of hip fractures stipulates that proximal femur fractures must be treated within the first 24 h. This leads to organizational and personnel difficulties in day-to-day care. Therefore, we investigated the question at what times of day we operate to maintain this timeline and whether there is a difference in the outcome for the patients according to treatment hours. Methods: Data from the DGU’s “AltersTraumaRegister” from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. For the analysis, the patients were divided into seven cohorts depending on the time of surgery. Pre-operative, operative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: A total of 29,470 patients were included in our study. The results showed that 74% of patients were treated within 24 h. 72% of patients operated on between 0–7 h had pertrochanteric fractures, while 56% of all arthroplasties were performed during normal working hours. In supra-regional trauma centers, significantly fewer operations were performed during normal working hours, while significantly more surgeries were carried out in the late evening and at night (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality and morbidity between the individual groups. Conclusions: Although we manage to treat most patients within 24 h, only 46% of patients are operated on within normal working hours. In terms of the outcome parameters, this does not appear to be a disadvantage for the patients. Nevertheless, night work and fatigue affect concentration and post-operative results in many areas, as we know. Consequently, patient care during normal working hours within 24 h creates the best possible initial situation for the patient, as significantly more personnel resources are available during normal working hours. The aim should be to create the logistical and personnel requirements for this. Full article

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) remains a common morbidity after gastrointestinal surgery. POGD is associated with delayed hospital recovery, increased length of stay, poor patient satisfaction and experience, and increased economic hardship. The I-FEED scoring system was created by a group of experts to address the lack of a consistent objective definition of POGD. However, the I-FEED tool needs clinical validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. The scope of this phase 1 Quality Improvement initiative involves the feasibility of implementing percussion into the nursing workflow without additional burden. Methods: All gastrointestinal/colorectal surgical unit registered nurses underwent comprehensive training in abdominal percussion. This involved understanding the technique, its application in postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction assessment, and its integration into the existing nursing documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). After six months of education and practice, a six-question survey was sent to all inpatient GI surgical unit nurses about incorporating the percussion assessment into their routine workflow and documentation. Results: Responses were received from 91% of day-shift nurses and 76% of night-shift registered nurses. Overall, 95% of the nurses were confident in completing the abdominal percussion during their daily assessment. Conclusion: Nurses’ effective use of the I-FEED tool may help improve patient outcomes after surgery. The tool could also be an effective instrument for the early identification of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) in surgical patients. Full article