Search Results (4)

Objectives: To assess the usefulness of first amniotic sac Interleukin-6 (IL-6) to rule out intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI), as well as maternal blood c-reactive protein (CRP), to select patients with a twin pregnancy who may benefit from an emergency cerclage. Materials and Methods: Retrospective, descriptive study among all patients with a twin pregnancy and mid-trimester bulging membranes admitted to a tertiary Hospital from January 2012 to September 2023. According to the Hospital’s Protocol, all patients received a vaginal and abdominal ultrasound, a maternal blood test, and an amniocentesis of the first sac to rule out IAI, defined by IL-6 ≥ 2.6 ng/dL. Results: A total of 28 patients with a twin pregnancy and mid-trimester bulging membranes were included. Among them, 18 patients (64.28%) had IL-6 levels ≥ 2.6 ng/dL. Cerclage was placed in 10 patients with IL-6 < 2.6 ng/dL. Perinatal mortality in pregnancies with IL-6 ≥ 2.6 ng/dL was 77.22%. The gestational age at delivery of patients with IL-6 < 2.6 ng/dL was 34 ± 3 weeks, compared to 23 ± 4 weeks when IL-6 was ≥2.6 ng/dL (p < 0.001). The latency to delivery with IL-6 < 2.6 ng/dL was 88.1 ±31.56 days, compared to 13.11 ± 20.43 days when IL-6 was ≥2.6 ng/dL (p < 0.001). Significant differences were found in maternal blood CRP levels in both study groups (no IAI 4.32 ± 3.67 vs. IAI 13.32 ± 15.07, p < 0.05). The area under the curve with an ROC curve was 0.799 (IC 95% 0.596–0.929), with a cut-off of 3.9 mg/L (S 94.4%, % E 62.5%). The gestational age at delivery with CRP < 3.9 mg/L was 33 ± 5 weeks, while in cases with CRP ≥ 3.9 mg/L, it was 24 ± 5 weeks (p < 0.001). The latency days to delivery were 86.5 ± 44.88 and 21.95 ± 30.97 days (p < 0.01), respectively. A positive correlation between the IL-6 values of both amniotic sacs was obtained, along with the Spearman coefficient correlation rank (rho = 0.835, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared to those with IAI, patients with a twin pregnancy and mid-trimester bulging membranes without IAI who underwent emergency cerclage had a significantly higher interval from diagnosis to delivery, as well as a significantly lower incidence of preterm birth < 34 weeks and perinatal death. Further studies are needed to assess whether the IL-6 of the first amniotic sac and maternal blood CRP might constitute a useful parameter to select patients who may benefit from an emergency cerclage. Full article

The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between the concentrations of bisphenols residues in the amniotic fluid (AF) samples collected during amniocentesis and fetal chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women. A total of 33 pregnant Polish women aged between 24 and 44 years, and screened to detect high risk for chromosomal defects in the first trimester, were included in this study. Samples were collected from these patients during routine diagnostic and treatment procedures at mid-gestation. The concentrations of various bisphenols residues in the samples were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS). Residues of eight analytes (BPS, BPF, BPA, BPAF, BADGE, BADGE•2H₂O, BADGE•H₂O•HCl and BADGE•2HCl) were detected in amniotic fluid samples in the range 0.69 ng/mL to 3.38 ng/mL. Fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities showed a slightly higher frequency of occurrence of selected bisphenols residues in the AF samples collected between 15–26 weeks of pregnancies. Finally, the proposed method was applied in the simultaneous determination of several endocrine-disrupting chemicals from bisphenol group in 33 human AF samples. BADGE•H2O•HCl has been identified in the AF samples taken from women older than average in the examined group. The number of detected compounds has been significant for the following analytes: BPS, BPAF, BADGE•H₂O•HCl and BADGE. The proposed method may be an attractive alternative for application in large-scale human biomonitoring studies. Full article

Background: The prevention of preterm delivery (PTD) represents one of the major topics in modern obstetrics. The aim was to design a prospective study and investigate if mid-trimester serum and amniotic fluid levels of MCP-1 could predict the occurence of spontaneous PTD. Methods: The study involved 198 women who underwent genetic amniocentesis and blood sampling in the middle of their trimester. After applying the criteria for inclusion in the study, there were 16 respondents in the study group, and 38 respondents in the control group. Level of MCP-1 in amniotic fluid and serum was measured with commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and statistical analysis was conducted. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in serum or amniotic fluid MCP1 levels between PTD and the control groups. Conclusion: The results suggest that MCP-1 is probably not the most relevant marker for predicting PTD. This study provides new normative data for MCP-1 levels in amniotic fluid and maternal sera and is a valuable tool for future diagnostic and comparative studies. Full article

Early amniocentesis (EA)—before 15 gestational weeks—is not recommended because of a high rate of miscarriages. Most studies performed amniocentesis at very early stages of pregnancy (11–13 weeks of gestational age). However, amniocentesis performed at 14 gestational weeks could be an important alternative to mid-trimester amniocentesis (MA) because it shortens the time period between the screening (non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT)) and the diagnostic test (amniocentesis). This study aimed to compare the procedure-related risk of miscarriage between MA (15 + 0 to 17 + 6 weeks of gestational age) and EA (14 + 0–6 weeks of gestational age). This is a multicentric, retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2007 to 21 November 2018, comparing the MA to the EA cohort. Procedure-related fetal loss is defined as spontaneous abortion occurring within 4 weeks of the procedure. Multiple gestations, amniocenteses performed after 17 or before 14 weeks, indications other than prenatal genetic diagnoses and procedures performed by less experienced gynaecologists were excluded. Complete outcome data were available for 1107 out of 1515 women (73.1%): 809 (69.9%) in the MA and 298 (83.2%) in the EA cohort. No significant difference was found (EA 0.82% vs. MA 0.36%; p = 0.646). The difference was 0.46% (odds ratio = 0.673; 95% confidence interval = 0.123–3.699). This study found no significant difference in the procedure-related risk of miscarriage when EA was compared to MA. EA might be considered a safe alternative, though further research is necessary. Full article