Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = jersey finger

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 2358 KiB  
Article
Characteristics and Therapy of Jersey Finger Type V Injuries at a Middle-European Level 1 Trauma Center—A Retrospective Data Analysis
by Paul Lennart Hoppe, Stephan Frenzel, Irena Krusche-Mandl, Gerhild Thalhammer, Stefan Hajdu and Gabriel Halát
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216540 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1557
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Reports on type V FDP tendon avulsions and their treatment are rare. Furthermore, they are not always classified in a consistent manner in the literature. The purpose of our retrospective data analysis was to evaluate and present jersey finger type V [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Reports on type V FDP tendon avulsions and their treatment are rare. Furthermore, they are not always classified in a consistent manner in the literature. The purpose of our retrospective data analysis was to evaluate and present jersey finger type V injury characteristics, primary radiological findings, treatment options and subsequent patient outcomes, as well as potential complications. Methods: We reviewed all patients treated for a fracture of the distal phalanx at an academic Level 1 trauma center over a period of 19 years. By reviewing the patients’ charts and their initial X-rays, we identified 44 patients with injuries matching the criteria for classification as jersey finger type Va and type Vb. All clinical records and radiologic images were reviewed to gather data on the mechanism of trauma, injury characteristics, type of treatment and subsequent outcomes in both subtypes. Results: Direct blows represented the most common mechanism of trauma, accounting for 23 cases. Among 44 jersey finger type V injuries, 31 showed minor displacement and were treated conservatively with a good outcome. Six patients undergoing surgery showed a poor outcome, except for one. Conclusions: Jersey finger type V differs considerably from the remaining types of jersey finger injuries regarding the predominant trauma mechanism. Therefore, its inclusion in this classification should be reevaluated. Established surgical techniques for refixation did not show a satisfying outcome, thus the implementation of alternative surgical techniques seems advisable when better therapeutic results are sought. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Updates in Hand Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop