Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = interparticle molecular migration

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 10522 KB  
Article
Particle Size-Dependent Mechanical Behaviors of Disordered Copper Nanoparticle Assemblies: A Molecular Dynamics Study
by Jianjun Bian and Liang Yang
Crystals 2025, 15(12), 1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15121007 - 23 Nov 2025
Viewed by 355
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of nanoparticle assemblies depends strongly on particle size, yet the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. In present study, we employ a scheme combining discrete element method (DEM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine size-dependent strength and deformation in disordered [...] Read more.
The mechanical behavior of nanoparticle assemblies depends strongly on particle size, yet the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. In present study, we employ a scheme combining discrete element method (DEM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine size-dependent strength and deformation in disordered copper nanoparticle assemblies. Granular packings generated by DEM were transformed into atomic models and subjected to uniaxial compression in MD simulations. Assemblies composed of nanoparticles with radius smaller than ~2.5 nm fully densify during relaxation, forming nanopolycrystalline solids, whereas larger particles preserve porous architectures. This structural divergence governs subsequent deformation. Small-particle assemblies deform through grain boundary migration and grain growth, exhibiting an inverse Hall–Petch-type strength dependence. In contrast, large-particle assemblies deform primarily via interparticle contact evolution and densification, with strength conforming to a Gibson–Ashby-type prediction. A scaling law captures the strength variation across size range in this regime. These results establish the competition between surface energy-driven densification and contact-dominated deformation as the controlling factor in the mechanical response of nanoparticle assemblies, providing guidance for designing nanoparticle-based materials with tailored mechanical performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3008 KB  
Article
Coordination Chemistry inside Polymeric Nanoreactors: Metal Migration and Cross-Exchange in Amphiphilic Core-Shell Polymer Latexes
by Si Chen, Eric Manoury, Florence Gayet and Rinaldo Poli
Polymers 2016, 8(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8020026 - 22 Jan 2016
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 9548
Abstract
A well-defined amphiphilic core-shell polymer functionalized with bis(p-methoxy-phenylphosphino)phenylphosphine (BMOPPP) in the nanogel (NG) core has been obtained by a convergent RAFT polymerization in emulsion. This BMOPPP@NG and the previously-reported TPP@NG (TPP = triphenylphosphine) and core cross-linked micelles (L@CCM; L = TPP, [...] Read more.
A well-defined amphiphilic core-shell polymer functionalized with bis(p-methoxy-phenylphosphino)phenylphosphine (BMOPPP) in the nanogel (NG) core has been obtained by a convergent RAFT polymerization in emulsion. This BMOPPP@NG and the previously-reported TPP@NG (TPP = triphenylphosphine) and core cross-linked micelles (L@CCM; L = TPP, BMOPPP) having a slightly different architecture were loaded with [Rh(acac)(CO)2] or [RhCl(COD)]2 to yield [Rh(acac)(CO)(L@Pol)] or [RhCl(COD)(L@Pol)] (Pol = CCM, NG). The interparticle metal migration from [Rh(acac)(CO)(TPP@NG)] to TPP@NG is fast at natural pH and much slower at high pH, the rate not depending significantly on the polymer architecture (CCM vs. NG). The cross-exchange using [Rh(acac)(CO)(BMOPPP@Pol)] and [RhCl(COD)(TPP@Pol)] (Pol = CCM or NG) as reagents at natural pH is also rapid (ca. 1 h), although slower than the equivalent homogeneous reaction on the molecular species (<5 min). On the other hand, the subsequent rearrangement of [Rh(acac)(CO)(TPP@Pol)] and [RhCl(COD)(TPP@Pol)] within the TPP@Pol core and of [Rh(acac)(CO)(BMOPPP@Pol)] and [RhCl(COD)(BMOPPP@Pol)] within the BMOPPP@Pol core, leading respectively to [RhCl(CO)(TPP@Pol)2] and [RhCl(CO)(BMOPPP@Pol)2], is much more rapid (<30 min) than on the corresponding homogeneous process with the molecular species (>24 h). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Controlled/Living Radical Polymerization)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop