Search Results (5)

Direct neuronal reprogramming is a promising approach to replace neurons lost due to disease via the conversion of endogenous glia reacting to brain injury into neurons. However, it is essential to demonstrate that the newly generated neurons originate from glial cells and/or show that they are not pre-existing endogenous neurons. Here, we use controls for both requirements while comparing two viral vector systems (Mo-MLVs and AAVs) for the expression of the same neurogenic factor, the phosphorylation-resistant form of Neurogenin2. Our results show that Mo-MLVs targeting proliferating glial cells after traumatic brain injury reliably convert astrocytes into neurons, as assessed by genetic fate mapping of astrocytes. Conversely, expressing the same neurogenic factor in a flexed AAV system results in artefactual labelling of endogenous neurons fatemapped by birthdating in development that are negative for the genetic fate mapping marker induced in astrocytes. These results are further corroborated by chronic live in vivo imaging. Taken together, the phosphorylation-resistant form of Neurogenin2 is more efficient in reprogramming reactive glia into neurons than its wildtype counterpart in vivo using retroviral vectors (Mo-MLVs) targeting proliferating glia. Conversely, AAV-mediated expression generates artefacts and is not sufficient to achieve fate conversion. Full article

In vivo cell reprogramming of glial cells offers a promising way to generate new neurons in the adult mammalian nervous system. This approach might compensate for neuronal loss occurring in neurological disorders, but clinically viable tools are needed to advance this strategy from bench to bedside. Recently published work has described the successful neuronal conversion of glial cells through the repression of a single gene, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (Ptbp1), which encodes a key RNA-binding protein. Newly converted neurons not only express correct markers but they also functionally integrate into endogenous brain circuits and modify disease symptoms in in vivo models of neurodegenerative diseases. However, doubts about the nature of “converted” neurons, in particular in vivo, have been raised, based on concerns about tracking reporter genes in converted cells. More robust lineage tracing is needed to draw definitive conclusions about the reliability of this strategy. In vivo reprogramming and the possibility of implementing it with approaches that could be translated into the clinic with antisense oligonucleotides targeting a single gene like Ptbp1 are hot topics. They warrant further investigation with stringent methods and criteria of evaluation for the ultimate treatment of neurological diseases. Full article

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) elicits an acute inflammatory response which comprises numerous cell populations. It is driven by the immediate response of macrophages and microglia, which triggers activation of genes responsible for the dysregulated microenvironment within the lesion site and in the spinal cord parenchyma immediately adjacent to the lesion. Recently published data indicate that microglia induces astrocyte activation and determines the fate of astrocytes. Conversely, astrocytes have the potency to trigger microglial activation and control their cellular functions. Here we review current information about the release of diverse signaling molecules (pro-inflammatory vs. anti-inflammatory) in individual cell phenotypes (microglia, astrocytes, blood inflammatory cells) in acute and subacute SCI stages, and how they contribute to delayed neuronal death in the surrounding spinal cord tissue which is spared and functional but reactive. In addition, temporal correlation in progressive degeneration of neurons and astrocytes and their functional interactions after SCI are discussed. Finally, the review highlights the time-dependent transformation of reactive microglia and astrocytes into their neuroprotective phenotypes (M2a, M2c and A2) which are crucial for spontaneous post-SCI locomotor recovery. We also provide suggestions on how to modulate the inflammation and discuss key therapeutic approaches leading to better functional outcome after SCI. Full article

Retinal diseases often cause the loss of photoreceptor cells and, consequently, impairment of vision. To date, several cell populations are known as potential endogenous retinal regeneration cell sources (RRCSs): the eye ciliary zone, the retinal pigment epithelium, the iris, and Müller glia. Factors that can activate the regenerative responses of RRCSs are currently under investigation. The present review considers accumulated data on the relationship between the progenitor properties of RRCSs and the features determining their differentiation. Specialized RRCSs (all except the ciliary zone in low vertebrates), despite their differences, appear to be partially “prepared” to exhibit their plasticity and be reprogrammed into retinal neurons due to the specific gene expression and epigenetic landscape. The “developmental” characteristics of RRCS gene expression are predefined by the pathway by which these cell populations form during eye morphogenesis; the epigenetic features responsible for chromatin organization in RRCSs are under intracellular regulation. Such genetic and epigenetic readiness is manifested in vivo in lower vertebrates and in vitro in higher ones under conditions permissive for cell phenotype transformation. Current studies on gene expression in RRCSs and changes in their epigenetic landscape help find experimental approaches to replacing dead cells through recruiting cells from endogenous resources in vertebrates and humans. Full article

At present there are no clinical therapies that can repair traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury or degenerative brain disease. While redundancy and rewiring of surviving circuits can recover some lost function, the brain and spinal column lack sufficient endogenous stem cells to replace lost neurons or their supporting glia. In contrast, pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that exogenous transplants can have remarkable efficacy for brain repair in animal models. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can provide paracrine factors that repair damage caused by ischemic injury, and oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) grafts give dramatic functional recovery from spinal cord injury. These studies have progressed to clinical trials, including human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived OPCs for spinal cord repair. However, ESC-derived allografts are less than optimal, and we need to identify a more appropriate donor graft population. The cell reprogramming field has developed the ability to trans-differentiate somatic cells into distinct cell types, a technology that has the potential to generate autologous neurons and glia which address the histocompatibility concerns of allografts and the tumorigenicity concerns of ESC-derived grafts. Further clarifying how cell reprogramming works may lead to more efficient direct reprogram approaches, and possibly in vivo reprogramming, in order to promote brain and spinal cord repair. Full article