In 1391 Spanish Jews were forcibly converted to Catholic Christianity, and Portuguese Jews suffered the same fate in 1497. Jewish law rendered involuntary converts as
anusim and voluntary converts as
meshumadim. Christians without Jewish ancestry called them by various names, New Christians,
[...] Read more.
In 1391 Spanish Jews were forcibly converted to Catholic Christianity, and Portuguese Jews suffered the same fate in 1497. Jewish law rendered involuntary converts as
anusim and voluntary converts as
meshumadim. Christians without Jewish ancestry called them by various names, New Christians,
alboraique,
xuetas, and
marranos, to name a few. In the fifteenth century, Catholic clerical authorities debated whether the New Christians were indeed Christians, albeit coerced. Canonic law rendered the sacrament of baptism as irrevocable. As such, any belief or practice not in accordance with Catholic doctrine was tantamount to heresy. Consequently, the Inquisition sought to rid the Church of the “Judaizing heresy.” On the one hand, the Sinaitic covenant (
berith) considered
anusim as Jews, even though there were Christians. This paper analyzes Jewish law and canonic law on respective religious identities. It includes an examination of rabbinic texts and rabbinic
responsa, and an examination of the sacrament of Christian baptism. Both religious traditions fought for the souls of the
anusim, characterizing what Victor Turner calls liminality and
communitas.
Full article
