Search Results (6)

Objective: This study aimed to analyze pharmacokinetic and clinical parameters (bleeding rates and joint health) before and after switching from standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) to extended half-life (EHL) PEGylated turoctocog alfa pegol in patients with severe/moderate hemophilia A (HA) on prophylaxis, one year prior to and following the switch in a real-world setting. Methods: A single-center, comparative, observational, sequential, retrospective, multidisciplinary study was designed. The population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WAPPS-Hemo^® platform. The annualized bleeding rate (including total and joint bleeds), joint health (Hemophilia Joint Health Score), FVIII consumption, administration frequency, and treatment costs were analyzed. Results: Eight patients with severe (n = 7) or moderate (n = 1) HA on prophylaxis were included after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol. With this regimen, the median FVIII half-life was 16.8 (15.2–19.1) hours, the area under the curve (AUC) was 18,182 (12,879–21,214) IU·h/dL, and the incremental recovery was 2.2 IU/dL per (1.6–2.4) IU/kg. The patients required a median of 2.0 infusions per week (2.0–2.0), corresponding to a weekly consumption of 57.8 (54.2–61.1) IU/kg. Clinically, the prophylactic regimen was associated with fewer infusions per week, stable joint health, and a reduction in overall treatment costs. Conclusions: Prophylaxis with turoctocog alfa pegol provided the expected pharmacokinetic profile of an EHL-FVIII concentrate, enabled a lower infusion frequency, and was linked to a decreased treatment burden and cost while maintaining joint health. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Hemophilia A presents a considerable challenge in cardiac surgery due to the elevated risk of perioperative bleeding, particularly during procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard management typically involves standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, which require frequent dosing. Extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products offer theoretical advantages, including prolonged action and reduced infusion frequency, but their use in cardiac surgery remains largely undocumented. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 73-year-old male with mild Hemophilia A who underwent successful aortic valve replacement using a 25 mm Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease biological prosthesis. The patient was managed perioperatively with an anti-hemorrhagic protocol based on EHL recombinant FVIII. The surgery and postoperative course were uneventful, with no bleeding complications or need for transfusion. Conclusions: This case illustrates the potential role of EHL FVIII in safely managing hemophilic patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. Given the lack of existing reports in the literature, further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EHL FVIII in this setting and to potentially optimize perioperative care protocols for this patient population. Full article

Background/Objectives: A compartmental pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis of new extended half-life FVIII concentrates has never been performed in a large cohort of hemophilia patients. An improved PK analysis of individual outcomes may help to tailor hemophilia replacement treatment. Methods: PK outcomes after the infusion of a standard single dose of Efmoroctocog alfa were collected from 173 patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A in 11 Italian hemophilia centers. Factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) was measured by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) in all patients, and chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) in a subgroup (n = 52). Fifty patients underwent a comparative PK assessment with standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA), one compartment model (OCM), and TCM were used to analyze the decay curves of all patients, and one-way paired ANOVA to compare the PK outcomes. Results: All 173 PKs conformed to the NCA and OCM, but only 106 (61%) conformed to the TCM based on the biphasic features of their decay curves. According to the TCM, the Beta HL and MRT of rFVIIIFc were 20.42 ± 7.73 and 25.64 ± 7.61 h, respectively. ANOVA analysis of the outcomes from the three PK models showed significant differences in clearance, half-life (HL), and mean residence time (MRT) (p < 0.001 for all parameters). As anticipated, the HL and MRT of rFVIIIFc were longer than those of SHL rFVIII. Comparing OSA with CSA outcomes, Cmax resulted higher when measured by CSA (p = 0.05) and, according to TCM, Beta HL resulted longer when measured by OSA (p = 0.03). FVIII:C trough levels obtained with SHL concentrates were significantly lower than those obtained with rFVIIIFc at each post-infusion time point. Conclusions: In a large group of hemophilia A (HA) patients, three different PK models confirmed the improved pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of rFVIIIFc, compared with standard half-life rFVIII concentrates. The TCM only fits two-thirds of the PKs, highlighting their biphasic decay and a long Beta half-life. In these patients, the TCM would be preferable to properly evaluate individual PK features. Full article

(1) Background: Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder characterized by hemarthrosis. Prophylaxis is the gold standard for bleeding prevention. Extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII replacement products have shown to be associated with low bleeding rates. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of EHL prophylaxis in improving perceived quality of life, adherence to treatment, and kinesiophobia in patients with hemophilia. (2) Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Forty-six patients from different regions, who had started EHL FVIII concentrate prophylactic treatment, were evaluated at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The study variables were as follows: perceived quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), adherence to treatment (Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale—Prophylaxis), and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia). (3) Results: There were statistically significant differences in the domains Role-Physical (p < 0.001), Bodily Pain (p < 0.001), Role-Emotional (p < 0.001), Vitality (p = 0.04), and Social Functioning (p = 0.01) and the total scores, Physical Health (p < 0.001) and Mental Health (p < 0.001) on perceived quality of life. There were significant differences in the domains Skipping (p < 0.01), Communicating (p < 0.001), and the total score (p = 0.01) in terms of adherence. There were also significant differences in kinesiophobia (p = 0.02) after the study period. (4) Conclusions: EHL prophylaxis can improve the perceived quality of life of people with hemophilia. This prophylactic regimen, which requires fewer infusions, may improve adherence to treatment in adult patients with hemophilia over a 12-month period. The administration of extended half-life factor VIII concentrates can reduce kinesiophobia in adult patients with hemophilic arthropathy. Full article

The Medical Directors of nine Italian Hemophilia Centers reviewed and discussed the key issues concerning the replacement therapy of hemophilia patients during a one-day consensus conference held in Rome one year ago. Particular attention was paid to the replacement therapy needed for surgery using continuous infusion (CI) versus bolus injection (BI) of standard and extended half-life Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in severe hemophilia A patients. Among the side effects, the risk of development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and thromboembolic complications was addressed. The specific needs of mild hemophilia A patients were described, as well as the usage of bypassing agents to treat patients with high-responding inhibitors. Young hemophilia A patients may take significant advantages from primary prophylaxis three times or twice weekly, even with standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII concentrates. Patients affected by severe hemophilia B probably have a less severe clinical phenotype than severe hemophilia A patients, and in about 30% of cases may undergo weekly prophylaxis with an rFIX SHL concentrate. The prevalence of missense mutations in 55% of severe hemophilia B patients allows the synthesis of a partially changed FIX molecule that can play some hemostatic role at the level of endothelial cells or the subendothelial matrix. The flow back of infused rFIX from the extravascular to the plasma compartment allows a very long half-life of about 30 h in some hemophilia B patients. Once weekly, prophylaxis can assure a superior quality of life in a large severe or moderate hemophilia B population. According to the Italian registry of surgery, hemophilia B patients undergo joint replacement by arthroplasty less frequently than hemophilia A patients. Finally, the relationships between FVIII/IX genotypes and the pharmacokinetics of clotting factor concentrates have been investigated. Full article

Background. Regular treatment to prevent bleeding and consequent joint deterioration (prophylaxis) is the standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A, traditionally based on intravenous infusions of the deficient clotting FVIII concentrates (CFCs). In recent years, extended half-life (EHL) CFCs and the non-replacement agent emicizumab, subcutaneously administered, have reduced the treatment burden. Methods. To compare and integrate the opinions on the different therapies available, eight hemophilia specialists were involved in drafting items of interest and relative statements through the Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) method (“mini-Delphi”), in this way reaching consensus. Results. Eighteen items were identified, then harmonized to 10, and a statement was generated for each. These statements highlight the importance of personalized prophylaxis regimens. CFCs, particularly EHL products, seem more suitable for this, despite the challenging intravenous (i.v.) administration. Limited real-world experience, particularly in some clinical settings, and the lack of evidence on long-term safety and efficacy of non-replacement agents, require careful individual risk/benefit assessment and multidisciplinary data collection. Conclusions. The increased treatment options extend the opportunities of personalized prophylaxis, the mainstay of modern management of hemophilia. Close, long-term clinical and laboratory follow-up of patients using newer therapeutic approaches by specialized hemophilia treatment centers is needed. Full article