Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = estuarine small inlet

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 4682 KB  
Article
UAS Remote Sensing for Coastal Wetland Vegetation Biomass Estimation: A Destructive vs. Non-Destructive Sampling Experiment
by Grayson R. Morgan, Lane Stevenson, Cuizhen Wang and Ram Avtar
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(14), 2335; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142335 - 8 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1220
Abstract
Coastal wetlands are critical ecosystems that require effective monitoring to support conservation and restoration efforts. This study evaluates the use of small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) and multispectral imagery to estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) in tidal marshes, comparing models calibrated with destructive versus [...] Read more.
Coastal wetlands are critical ecosystems that require effective monitoring to support conservation and restoration efforts. This study evaluates the use of small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) and multispectral imagery to estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) in tidal marshes, comparing models calibrated with destructive versus non-destructive in situ sampling methods. Imagery was collected over South Carolina’s North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, and vegetation indices (VIs) were derived from sUAS imagery to model biomass. Stepwise linear regression was used to develop and validate models based on both sampling approaches. Destructive sampling models, particularly those using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Difference Vegetation Index (DVI), achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) values (as low as 70.91 g/m2), indicating higher predictive accuracy. Non-destructive models, while less accurate (minimum RMSE of 214.86 g/m2), demonstrated higher R2 values (0.44 and 0.61), suggesting the potential for broader application with further refinement. These findings highlight the trade-offs between ecological impact and model performance, and support the viability of non-destructive methods for biomass estimation in sensitive wetland environments. Future work should explore machine learning approaches and improved temporal alignment of data collection to enhance model robustness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3497 KB  
Article
Comparison of Flows through a Tidal Inlet in Late Spring and after the Passage of an Atmospheric Cold Front in Winter Using Acoustic Doppler Profilers and Vessel-Based Observations
by Mingming Li and Chunyan Li
Sensors 2022, 22(9), 3478; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093478 - 3 May 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2471
Abstract
This paper discusses the application of acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP) for the quantification of transport of water and the underlining physical mechanism. The transport of water through estuaries and tidal inlets is affected by tide, river flow, and wind. It is often [...] Read more.
This paper discusses the application of acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP) for the quantification of transport of water and the underlining physical mechanism. The transport of water through estuaries and tidal inlets is affected by tide, river flow, and wind. It is often assumed that wind effects in such systems are negligible unless under severe weather conditions. This study compares the ADCP-measured flows across a tidal inlet under weak wind conditions in late spring and those after the passage of an atmospheric cold front in winter. The Barataria Pass is a major inlet connecting Barataria Bay and northern Gulf of Mexico. The water exchange between the bay and coastal ocean is influenced by wind, especially in winter, because tide in the region is small (microtidal). The winter weather and late spring–summer weather are different. This difference results in different estuarine circulations. To examine this, two surveys were carried out with ship-mounted ADCPs—one in winter (19 December 2014) shortly after the passage of a cold front from the northwest, and the other in late spring (4 May 2015) with weak southeasterly winds. Distinctly different features of mean transport through the inlet were observed between the two surveys. The results from the first survey in winter showed that the total water transport was from the bay to the coastal ocean under northerly winds with intense outflows in shallow water, which is a typical signature of wind effects. The net flow was outward when the water level dropped. Data from the second survey in spring showed that the mid-channel water flew out of the bay (against the wind), whilst inflow appeared at both ends across the inlet, which was also a response to the weak wind stress and outward pressure gradient force set by the estuarine flow. The inflow at the eastern end (exceeding 0.1 m/s) is consistent with the idea that the coastal current resulted from the Mississippi River outflow enters the bay from the eastern end. The influence of tidal oscillations on water exchange appeared to be higher in the late spring data. The hydrographic observations in spring showed typical tidal straining features of an inverse estuary during the ebb–flood cycle, while salinity in the eastern shallow water generally varied with time, indicating the inflow of fresher water into the bay, confirming previous observations from summer 2008. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 19754 KB  
Article
Environmental Factors Affecting the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Copepods in a Small Mesotidal Inlet and Estuary
by Min-Ho Seo, Hyeon-Jung Kim, Seok-Ju Lee, So-Yeon Kim, Yang-Ho Yoon, Kyeong-Ho Han, Sang-Duck Choi, Myeong-Taek Kwak, Man-Ki Jeong and Ho-Young Soh
Diversity 2021, 13(8), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13080389 - 18 Aug 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3571
Abstract
To understand the environmental factors affecting the spatiotemporal distribution of copepods, sampling was conducted seasonally in a small mesotidal inlet and estuary located in Doam Bay of southwestern Korea. The study area was divided seasonally into two or three station groups (estuarine, mixed, [...] Read more.
To understand the environmental factors affecting the spatiotemporal distribution of copepods, sampling was conducted seasonally in a small mesotidal inlet and estuary located in Doam Bay of southwestern Korea. The study area was divided seasonally into two or three station groups (estuarine, mixed, and coastal) by a cluster analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling based on copepod abundance. Acartia forticrusa, A. hudsonica, A. ohtsukai, Paracalanus parvus s. l., Pseudodiaptomus marinus, Tortanus derjugini, T. dextrilobatus, T. forcipatus, Oithona spp., and harpacticoids were important species for grouping the stations. The spatiotemporal distribution of the first two species was restricted to the estuarine area in summer and significantly correlated with temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-a concentration. The distribution of other brackish species, such as T. derjugini and T. dextrilobatus, significantly correlated with temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-a concentration. In contrast, A. hudsonica significantly correlated with dinoflagellate density and turbidity in winter, in addition to the abovementioned environmental factors. Acartia hudsonica also maintained a large population in the estuarine area in fall and winter, and its distribution extended across the entire bay in spring. Other coastal species occurred in all areas and did not significantly correlate with environmental factors. Therefore, brackish species in the study area may have developed seasonally different behaviors to sustain their populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop