Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = dishonest recommendation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 943 KiB  
Article
Recommendation-Based Trust Evaluation Model for the Internet of Underwater Things
by Abeer Almutairi, Xavier Carpent and Steven Furnell
Future Internet 2024, 16(9), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16090346 - 23 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 6017
Abstract
The Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) represents an emerging and innovative field with the potential to revolutionize underwater exploration and monitoring. Despite its promise, IoUT faces significant challenges related to reliability and security, which hinder its development and deployment. A particularly critical issue [...] Read more.
The Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) represents an emerging and innovative field with the potential to revolutionize underwater exploration and monitoring. Despite its promise, IoUT faces significant challenges related to reliability and security, which hinder its development and deployment. A particularly critical issue is the establishment of trustworthy communication networks, necessitating the adaptation and enhancement of existing models from terrestrial and marine systems to address the specific requirements of IoUT. This work explores the problem of dishonest recommendations within trust modelling systems, a critical issue that undermines the integrity of trust modelling in IoUT networks. The unique environmental and operational constraints of IoUT exacerbate the severity of this issue, making current detection methods insufficient. To address this issue, a recommendation evaluation method that leverages both filtering and weighting strategies is proposed to enhance the detection of dishonest recommendations. The model introduces a filtering technique that combines outlier detection with deviation analysis to make initial decisions based on both majority outcomes and personal experiences. Additionally, a belief function is developed to weight received recommendations based on multiple criteria, including freshness, similarity, trustworthiness, and the decay of trust over time. This multifaceted weighting strategy ensures that recommendations are evaluated from different perspectives to capture deceptive acts that exploit the complex nature of IoUT to the advantage of dishonest recommenders. To validate the proposed model, extensive comparative analyses with existing trust evaluation methods are conducted. Through a series of simulations, the efficacy of the model in capturing dishonest recommendation attacks and improving the accuracy rate of detecting more sophisticated attack scenarios is demonstrated. These results highlight the potential of the model to significantly enhance the trustworthiness of IoUT establishments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 836 KiB  
Article
Trust-Aware Fog-Based IoT Environments: Artificial Reasoning Approach
by Mustafa Ghaleb and Farag Azzedin
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3665; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063665 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2250
Abstract
Establishing service-driven IoT systems that are reliable, efficient, and stable requires building trusted IoT environments to reduce catastrophic and unforeseen damages. Hence, building trusted IoT environments is of great importance. However, we cannot assume that every node in wide-area network is aware of [...] Read more.
Establishing service-driven IoT systems that are reliable, efficient, and stable requires building trusted IoT environments to reduce catastrophic and unforeseen damages. Hence, building trusted IoT environments is of great importance. However, we cannot assume that every node in wide-area network is aware of every other node, nor can we assume that all nodes are trustworthy and honest. As a result, prior to any collaboration, we need to develop a trust model that can evolve and establish trust relationships between nodes. Our proposed trust model uses subjective logic as a default artificial reasoning over uncertain propositions to collect recommendations from other nodes in the IoT environment. It also manages and maintains existing trust relationships established during direct communications. Furthermore, it resists dishonest nodes that provide inaccurate ratings for malicious reasons. Unlike existing trust models, our trust model is scalable as it leverages a Fog-based hierarchy architecture which allows IoT nodes to report/request the trust values of other nodes. We conducted extensive performance studies, and confirm the efficiency of our proposed trust model. The results show that at an early stage of the simulation time (i.e., within the first 2% of the number of transactions), our trust model accurately captures and anticipates the behavior of nodes. Results further demonstrate that our proposed trust model isolates untrustworthy behavior within the same FCD and prevents untrustworthy nodes from degrading trustworthy nodes’ reputations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Cybersecurity and Computer Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 14354 KiB  
Article
Blockchain-Based Trust and Reputation Management in SIoT
by Sana Alam, Shehnila Zardari and Jawwad Ahmed Shamsi
Electronics 2022, 11(23), 3871; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11233871 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 5272
Abstract
In the Social Internet of Things (SIoT), trust refers to the decision-making process used by the trustor (Service Requesters (SRs) or Service Consumers (SCs)) to decide whether or not to entrust the trustee (Service Providers (SPs)) with specific services. Trust is the key [...] Read more.
In the Social Internet of Things (SIoT), trust refers to the decision-making process used by the trustor (Service Requesters (SRs) or Service Consumers (SCs)) to decide whether or not to entrust the trustee (Service Providers (SPs)) with specific services. Trust is the key factor in SIoT domain. The designing of a two-way, two-stage parameterized feedback-based, service-driven, attacks-resistant trust and reputation system for SIoT accompanied by a penalty mechanism for dishonest SPs and SRs is our main contribution that mitigates the trust-related issues occurring during service provisioning and service acquisition amongst various entities (SPs or SRs) and enhances trust amongst them. Our proposed methodology examines a SP’s local trust, global trust, and reputation by taking into account “Social Trust” and “Quality of Service (QoS)” factors”. Two—Stage Parameterized feedback” is incorporated in our proposed strategy to better manage “intention” and “ability” of SRs and provides early identification of suspicious SRs. This feature compels SRs to act honestly and rate the corresponding SPs in a more accurate way. Our recommended paradigm sorts SPs into three SP status lists (White List, Grey List, and Black List) based on reputation values where each list has a threshold with respect to the maximum service fee that can be charged. SPs in White List charge the most per service. SPs in other lists have a lower selection probability. Every feedback updates the SP’s trust and reputation value. Sorting SPs increases resistance against On Off Attack, Discriminatory Attack, Opportunistic Service Attack, and Selective Behavior Attacks. SPs must operate honestly and offer the complete scope of stated services since their reputation value relies on all their global trust values (Tglobal) for various services. Service requests may be accepted or denied by SPs. “Temporarily banned” SRs can only request unblocked services. SRs lose all privileges once on a “permanently banned” list. If local and global trust values differ by more than the threshold, the SR is banned. Our method also provides resistance against Bad Mouthing Attack, Ballot Stuffing Attack. Good Mouthing Attack/Self—Propagating Attack. Experiments indicate our trust and reputation management system recognizes and bans fraudulent SRs. “Dishonest SPs” are “blacklisted,” which affects their reputation, trust, and service charges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Security and Privacy in Blockchain/IoT)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop