Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = countercurrent flow plate heat exchanger

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 5372 KiB  
Article
Model Predictive Control (MPC) of a Countercurrent Flow Plate Heat Exchanger in a Virtual Environment
by Jairo Siza, Jacqueline Llanos, Paola Velasco, Alexander Paul Moya and Henry Sumba
Sensors 2024, 24(14), 4511; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144511 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2165
Abstract
This research proposes advanced model-based control strategies for a countercurrent flow plate heat exchanger in a virtual environment. A virtual environment with visual and auditory effects is designed, which requires a mathematical model describing the real dynamics of the process; this allows parallel [...] Read more.
This research proposes advanced model-based control strategies for a countercurrent flow plate heat exchanger in a virtual environment. A virtual environment with visual and auditory effects is designed, which requires a mathematical model describing the real dynamics of the process; this allows parallel fluid movement in different directions with hot and cold temperatures at the outlet, incorporating control monitoring interfaces as communication links between the virtual heat exchanger and control applications. A multivariable and non-linear process like the plate and countercurrent flow heat exchanger requires analysis in the controller design; therefore, this work proposes and compares two control strategies to identify the best-performing one. The first controller is based on the inverse model of the plant, with linear algebra techniques and numerical methods; the second controller is a model predictive control (MPC), which presents optimal control actions that minimize the steady-state errors and aggressive variations in the actuators, respecting the temperature constraints and the operating limits, incorporating a predictive model of the plant. The controllers are tested for different setpoint changes and disturbances, determining that they are not overshot and that the MPC controller has the shortest settling time and lowest steady-state error. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3824 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Thermal and Economic Investigation of Similar Shell & Tube and Plate Heat Exchangers with Low Concentration Ag-H2O Nanofluid
by Seyed Hadi Pourhoseini, Mojtaba Baghban and Maryam Ghodrat
Energies 2023, 16(4), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041854 - 13 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1899
Abstract
Plate Heat Exchanger (PHE) and Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (STHE) with identical heat transfer areas and material characteristics are proposed and a comparative thermal and economic comparative analysis is carried out on both exchangers. Ag-water nanofluid is used at low concentrations (0, [...] Read more.
Plate Heat Exchanger (PHE) and Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (STHE) with identical heat transfer areas and material characteristics are proposed and a comparative thermal and economic comparative analysis is carried out on both exchangers. Ag-water nanofluid is used at low concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg/L), flow rates (2, 5, and 8 L/min), and inlet temperatures (36, 46, and 56 °C) as hot flow and the heat transfer coefficient (U), electrical power consumption of the pump, and costs per unit of average U value are considered as the calculated parameters for each heat exchanger in co-current and counter-current flows. The results revealed that PHE generates a higher U value compared to the STHE under different Ag-water nanofluid concentrations. This is due to the existence of grooves on the plates of PHE which generates turbulent flow. The impact of nanofluid concentration on U is negligible for lower concentrations in both PHE and STHE. It is also found that the nanofluid flow rate has the highest impact on the U value, just like conventional fluid. Besides, even though counter-current flow increases the U values for both PHE and STHE, the flow pattern has a higher impact on the U value of PHE than that of STHE. For both PHE and STHE, increasing the nanofluid flow rate enhances the amount of U. However, the effect of flow rate on the U value of PHE is greater than that of the STHE. It is also shown that throughout the entire experimental temperature domain, PHE has had higher performance than STHE, and as the fluid temperature increased from 36 to 56 °C, there was a slight increase in the overall heat transfer of both PHE and STHE. Furthermore, for the same flow rate, both PHE and STHE had almost the same pump power consumption, and increasing the nanofluid flow rate from 2 L/min to 8 L/min promoted the electrical power consumption of the pump. Finally, we found that the costs per unit of heat transfer coefficient for PHE are significantly lower than STHE. The presented results also indicated that using a vortex generator at the inlet of STHE tubes, to form turbulent flow, increases the U values of STHE for both co-current and counter-current flows but these U values are lower than the corresponding U values of PHE. Small plates gap in PHE structure cause higher fluid flow velocities and create a chain-like structure of nanoparticles (NPs) between PHE’s plates (especially at higher nanofluids concentrations). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2254 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Parameters of the Two-Sections Hot Side Heat Exchanger of the Module with Thermoelectric Generators
by Mirosław Neska, Mirosław Mrozek, Marta Żurek-Mortka and Andrzej Majcher
Energies 2021, 14(16), 5169; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165169 - 21 Aug 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2214
Abstract
One of the methods of converting thermal energy into electricity is the use of thermoelectric generators (TEG). The method can be used in low-temperature waste heat conversion systems from industrial installations, but its serious limitation is the low efficiency of thermolectric generators and [...] Read more.
One of the methods of converting thermal energy into electricity is the use of thermoelectric generators (TEG). The method can be used in low-temperature waste heat conversion systems from industrial installations, but its serious limitation is the low efficiency of thermolectric generators and the relatively low power of the electric waveforms obtained. Increasing the obtained power values is done by multiplying the number of TEGs used, grouped into modules (MTEG). In such systems, the design of the module is extremely important, as it should ensure the best possible heat transfer between both sides of the TEG (hot and cold), and thus obtaining maximum electrical power. The article presents an analysis of a two-section flat plate heat hot side exchanger MTEG. The key parameters like effectiveness of exchange and MTEG efficiency and their impact on the efficiency of heat use and generated electric power were indicated. The tests showed an improvement in these main system parameters for the mixed cycle (co-current and countercurrent—inward direction) of the hot side heat exchanger, compared to the countercurrent flow in both sections of this exchanger. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Heat Transfer Enhancement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop