Search Results (3)

Background: Medically unexplained oral symptoms/syndromes (MUOS), such as Burning Mouth Syndrome and Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, present significant management challenges due to the lack of standardized treatments and high-level evidence. While pharmacotherapy is often employed, real-world data on treatment adherence—a pragmatic proxy for effectiveness and tolerability—remain sparse, especially in Japan. This study aimed to describe the real-world prescribing patterns of antidepressants and dopamine receptor partial agonists (DPAs) for MUOS and retrospectively investigate their association with treatment continuation. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from patients initiating pharmacotherapy for MUOS at a specialized clinic in Japan (April 2021–March 2023). We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate treatment continuation for amitriptyline monotherapy and antidepressant–aripiprazole adjunctive therapy. The primary outcome was the time to discontinuation. Dosage effects were modeled using B-splines to capture nonlinearity. Results: Among 702 MUOS patients who started pharmacotherapy, 493 received amitriptyline as the first prescription, and 108 received aripiprazole as an adjunctive therapy. For amitriptyline monotherapy, a nonlinear relationship was observed between dosage and discontinuation risk, with a relatively lower hazard around 25 mg/day across age groups. In the antidepressant–aripiprazole adjunctive group, the overall hazard ratio for discontinuation was higher (HR = 4.75, p < 0.0005) compared to non-adjunctive therapy, likely due to indication bias reflecting more treatment-resistant cases. However, within the aripiprazole adjunctive group, a U-shaped relationship was identified between maximum aripiprazole dosage and discontinuation risk, with the lowest hazard (HR ≈ 0.30) observed at approximately 1.7–1.8 mg/day. Mild side effects such as drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, tremor, insomnia, and weight gain were noted, but no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: This real-world data analysis suggests specific dosage ranges (amitriptyline ≈ 25 mg/day; aripiprazole augmentation ≈ 1.7–1.8 mg/day) are associated with longer treatment continuation in MUOS patients. Treatment continuation reflects a crucial balance between symptom relief and tolerability, essential for managing these chronic conditions. It is critical to emphasize that these findings are descriptive and observational, derived from a specialized setting, and do not constitute prescriptive recommendations. They highlight the importance of individualized dosing. Definitive evidence-based strategies require validation through prospective randomized controlled trials. Full article

Despite great progress in pharmaceutical research, the medical treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation is far from ideal. The aim of the present article was to review literature data, focusing on poorly studied or commercially unavailable/unapproved drugs potentially useful for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults. An extensive online literature search was conducted using the keywords “chronic constipation”, “colon”, “constipation”, “drugs”, “laxatives”, and “treatment”, in various combinations between January 1960 and December 2022. The literature search showed the presence of some drugs whose efficacy has only recently been demonstrated by modern investigations, and which are likely to be incorporated into future guidelines, of others that are proven effective and potentially effective on constipated patients but limited by small or relatively old studies, or by side effects which could be used in experienced hands, and of others that might be useful but lack a solid scientific background. Looking into the future for patients with chronic constipation might add some more tools to the therapeutic portfolio, especially for certain subgroups of these patients. Full article

Understanding pathophysiological causes of constipation is worthwhile in directing therapy and improving symptoms. This review aims to identify and fill gaps in the understanding of the pathophysiology of constipation, understand its prevalence, review diagnostic tools available to primary care physicians (PCPs), and highlight patients’ expectations for the management of this common spectrum of disorders. Literature searches conducted via PubMed included terms related to constipation, diagnosis, and patient perceptions. Case studies were developed to highlight the differences between patients who may be appropriately managed in the primary care setting and those requiring specialty consultation. Myriad pathophysiological factors may contribute to constipation, including stool consistency, altered intestinal motility, gut microbiome, anorectal abnormalities, as well as behavioral and psychological factors. Common diagnoses of “primary constipation” include slow-transit constipation, defecation disorders, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and chronic idiopathic constipation. A detailed medical history should be conducted to exclude alarm features and PCPs should be familiar with pathophysiological factors that cause constipation, available diagnostic tools, alarm signs, and the various classification criteria for constipation subtypes in order to diagnose and treat patients accordingly. PCPs should understand when a referral to a gastroenterologist, anorectal specialist, pelvic floor physical therapist, and/or mental health specialist is appropriate. Full article