Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = chest drainage unit

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3015 KiB  
Review
Chest Tubes and Pleural Drainage: History and Current Status in Pleural Disease Management
by Claudio Sorino, David Feller-Kopman, Federico Mei, Michele Mondoni, Sergio Agati, Giampietro Marchetti and Najib M. Rahman
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6331; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216331 - 23 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 20739
Abstract
Thoracostomy and chest tube placement are key procedures in treating pleural diseases involving the accumulation of fluids (e.g., malignant effusions, serous fluid, pus, or blood) or air (pneumothorax) in the pleural cavity. Initially described by Hippocrates and refined through the centuries, chest drainage [...] Read more.
Thoracostomy and chest tube placement are key procedures in treating pleural diseases involving the accumulation of fluids (e.g., malignant effusions, serous fluid, pus, or blood) or air (pneumothorax) in the pleural cavity. Initially described by Hippocrates and refined through the centuries, chest drainage achieved a historical milestone in the 19th century with the creation of closed drainage systems to prevent the entry of air into the pleural space and reduce infection risk. The introduction of plastic materials and the Heimlich valve further revolutionized chest tube design and function. Technological advancements led to the availability of various chest tube designs (straight, angled, and pig-tail) and drainage systems, including PVC and silicone tubes with radiopaque stripes for better radiological visualization. Modern chest drainage units can incorporate smart digital systems that monitor and graphically report pleural pressure and evacuated fluid/air, improving patient outcomes. Suction application via wall systems or portable digital devices enhances drainage efficacy, although careful regulation is needed to avoid complications such as re-expansion pulmonary edema or prolonged air leak. To prevent recurrent effusion, particularly due to malignancy, pleurodesis agents can be applied through the chest tube. In cases of non-expandable lung, maintaining a long-term chest drain may be the most appropriate approach and procedures such as the placement of an indwelling pleural catheter can significantly improve quality of life. Continued innovations and rigorous training ensure that chest tube insertion remains a cornerstone of effective pleural disease management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the historical evolution and modern advancements in pleural drainage. By addressing both current technologies and procedural outcomes, it serves as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals aiming to optimize pleural disease management and patient care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 11056 KiB  
Case Report
Early Presentation of Boerhaave Syndrome in the Emergency Department: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Irina-Anca Eremia, Cătălin-Alexandru Anghel, Florina-Alexandra Cofaru and Silvia Nica
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1592; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151592 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1511
Abstract
We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who arrived at the emergency department with chest pain following an episode of vomiting. The diagnosis was Boerhaave syndrome and acute mediastinitis. Due to the prompt presentation and the location of the rupture in the [...] Read more.
We present the case of a 46-year-old patient who arrived at the emergency department with chest pain following an episode of vomiting. The diagnosis was Boerhaave syndrome and acute mediastinitis. Due to the prompt presentation and the location of the rupture in the lower esophagus, emergency surgical intervention was performed, including esophageal suturing, mediastinal drainage, and jejunostomy for feeding. Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for advanced monitoring and support. The patient’s condition improved favorably in the intensive care unit, allowing for extubation. Progress continued positively, and the patient was discharged 12 days postoperatively with a functional jejunostomy. At regular follow-ups, the patient’s recovery remained favorable, and the jejunostomy was removed 30 days after the surgery. This case highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis and early surgical intervention in Boerhaave syndrome, demonstrating the successful management of a severe condition through a multidisciplinary effort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging and Chest Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2156 KiB  
Article
Anaesthesia Management for Giant Intraabdominal Tumours: A Case Series Study
by Olga Grăjdieru, Cristina Petrișor, Constantin Bodolea, Ciprian Tomuleasa and Cătălin Constantinescu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1321; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051321 - 26 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3678
Abstract
Background: Due to a lack of randomised controlled trials and guidelines, and only case reports being available in the literature, there is no consensus on how to approach anaesthetic management in patients with giant intraabdominal tumours. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Background: Due to a lack of randomised controlled trials and guidelines, and only case reports being available in the literature, there is no consensus on how to approach anaesthetic management in patients with giant intraabdominal tumours. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the literature and explore the current status of evidence, by undertaking an observational research design with a descriptive account of characteristics observed in a case series referring to patients with giant intraabdominal tumours who underwent anaesthesia. Results: Twenty patients diagnosed with giant intraabdominal tumours were included in the study, most of them women, with the overall pathology being ovarian-related and sarcomas. Most of the patients were unable to lie supine and assumed a lateral decubitus position. Pulmonary function tests, chest X-rays, and thoracoabdominal CT were the most often performed preoperative evaluation methods, with the overall findings that there was no atelectasis or pleural effusion present, but there was bilateral diaphragm elevation. The removal of the intraabdominal tumour was performed under general anaesthesia in all cases. Awake fiberoptic intubation or awake videolaryngoscopy was performed in five cases, while the rest were performed with general anaesthesia with rapid sequence induction. Only one patient was ventilated with pressure support ventilation while maintaining spontaneous ventilation, while the rest were ventilated with controlled ventilation. Hypoxemia was the most reported respiratory complication during surgery. In more than 50% of cases, there was hypotension present during surgery, especially after the induction of anaesthesia and after tumour removal, which required vasopressor support. Most cases involved blood loss with subsequent transfusion requirements. The removal of the tumor requires prolonged surgical and anaesthesia times. Fluid drainage from cystic tumour ranged from 15.7 L to 107 L, with a fluid extraction rate of 0.5–2.5 L/min, and there was no re-expansion pulmonary oedema reported. Following surgery, all the patients required intensive care unit admission. One patient died during hospitalization. Conclusions: This study contributes to the creation of a certain standard of care when dealing with patients presenting with giant intraabdominal tumour. More research is needed to define the proper way to administer anaesthesia and create practice guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 2015 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors Associated with Post-Operative Complications in Multidisciplinary Treatment of Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis
by Maria Teresa Congedo, Dania Nachira, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Marco Chiappetta, Giuseppe Calabrese, Giuseppe Bello, Claudio Parrilla, Laura Franza, Marcello Covino, Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella, Venanzio Porziella, Maria Letizia Vita, Filippo Lococo, Stefano Margaritora and Elisa Meacci
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(21), 6364; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216364 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3142
Abstract
Background: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a severe, life-threatening complication of oropharyngeal infections with cervical necrotizing fasciitis. In this study, we aimed to identify any possible factors that correlate with favorable outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our series of 18 patients who underwent [...] Read more.
Background: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a severe, life-threatening complication of oropharyngeal infections with cervical necrotizing fasciitis. In this study, we aimed to identify any possible factors that correlate with favorable outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our series of 18 patients who underwent surgical treatment for DNM from a cervical abscess. Gender, age, symptoms, etiopathogenesis, comorbidities, time to surgery from diagnosis, degree of diffusion, identified microorganisms, surgical procedure, days in the intensive care unit, need for tracheostomy, complications, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. Results: The main type of surgery was thoracotomy + cervicotomy in eight cases (50.0%), followed by cervicotomy +VATS in four (22.2%). Seven patients (38.9%) had two or more surgeries; a bilateral operation was necessary for four patients. Evaluating the risk factors associated with post-operative complications, age ≥ 60 years (p:0.031), cervicotomy alone as surgical approach (p = 0.040), and the bilateral approach (p = 0.048) resulted in significance in terms of the univariate analysis; age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.04) and cervical approach (p = 0.05) maintained their significance in terms of the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The low mortality of our series emphasizes the importance of an extensive and immediate surgical drainage of both the neck and the mediastinum. Mediastinal drainage from cervicotomy seems to be a risk factor for post-operative complications. Minimally invasive surgery on the chest cavity, such as with Uniportal-VATS, could be a good approach above all in elderly patients and all those cases where bilateral access is required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2439 KiB  
Article
Chest Drainage Therapy: What Comes out of Pandora’s Box Can Affect Patient Outcomes
by Alberto Antonicelli, Fabrizio Monaco, Angelo Carretta, Bryan M. Burt, Joshua R. Sonett and Giulia Veronesi
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(18), 5311; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185311 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4332
Abstract
Background: Over the last 100 years, the original three-bottle chest drainage system has been variously engineered into compact disposables and electronic units. Clinicians are now surrounded by a plethora of different types of systems, but little is known about the way that they [...] Read more.
Background: Over the last 100 years, the original three-bottle chest drainage system has been variously engineered into compact disposables and electronic units. Clinicians are now surrounded by a plethora of different types of systems, but little is known about the way that they work and perform. Thus, we sought to test the performance of the most commonly used chest drainage units under conditions that are relevant to clinical practice. Methods: A pleural space environment simulator was built. Thirty-two units were tested under four clinical scenarios: air leak interpretation during quiet breathing and after obstructed inspiration (−5 to −150 cmH2O), a buildup of negative pressure (−100 cmH2O), a bronchopleural fistula (10 L/min) and the need for effective external suction in the presence of air leakage. Twenty-five units were “traditional” thoracic drainages, five were “digital” low-flow/low-vacuum pumps and two were hybrids (a combination of the two). According to the design of the seal and of the suction control, the units were classified as wet-wet, wet-dry and dry-dry. Results: All wet units showed reverse air flow, with the potential to mimic an air leak when there was none. Ten wet units showed no automatic negative pressure relief features, while five dry-dry did but were slow to react. Ten wet and five dry-dry units showed no capability to handle a 10 L/min leak, as they were restrictive to flow (peak pressure up to 55 cmH2O). Only seven dry-suction units were able to maintain the set suction at high airflow rates (>20 L/min). Conclusions: Different chest drainage unit designs lead to different performances, some of which may negatively impact patient outcomes. This sounds the call to tailor our clinical practice for the individual patient. A paradigm shift to better understand all components of pleural physiology post-surgical intervention on this relatively neglected topic is needed to improve our daily practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lung Cancer: Symptoms, Treatment, and Early Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1223 KiB  
Article
Multidisciplinary Approach in the Treatment of Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis: Twenty-Year Single-Center Experience
by Angela De Palma, Mirko Girolamo Cantatore, Francesco Di Gennaro, Francesca Signore, Teodora Panza, Debora Brascia, Giulia De Iaco, Doroty Sampietro, Rosatea Quercia, Marcella Genualdo, Ondina Pizzuto, Giuseppe Garofalo, Fabio Signorile, Davide Fiore Bavaro, Gaetano Brindicci, Nicolò De Gennaro, Annalisa Saracino, Nicola Antonio Adolfo Quaranta, Gianfranco Favia and Giuseppe Marulli
Antibiotics 2022, 11(5), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050664 - 16 May 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2994
Abstract
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is an acute, rare, severe condition with high mortality, but the optimal management protocol is still controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the results of multidisciplinary management in patients treated for DNM at our center over the last twenty years. Fifteen [...] Read more.
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is an acute, rare, severe condition with high mortality, but the optimal management protocol is still controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the results of multidisciplinary management in patients treated for DNM at our center over the last twenty years. Fifteen male patients, mean age 49.07 ± 14.92 years, were treated: 9 with cervico-pharyngeal etiopathogenesis, 3 peri-tonsillar/tonsillar, 2 odontogenic, 1 post-surgical; 6 with DNM type I, 6 with type IIA, and 3 with type IIB (Endo’s classification). Mean time between diagnosis and treatment was 2.24 ± 1.61 days. In all cases, mediastinum drainage via thoracotomy was performed after neck drainage via cervicotomy, associated with tooth treatment in two; one required re-operation; tracheostomy was necessary in 9, temporary intensive care unit stay in 4; 6 developed complications, without post-operative mortality. Main isolated germs were Staphylococci and Candida; 7 had polymicrobial infection. The most used antibiotics were meropenem, metronidazole, teicoplanin, third-generation cephalosporins and clyndamicin; anti-fungal drugs were fluconazole, caspofungin and anidulafungin. On multivariate analysis, presence of cardiovascular disease was statistically significantly associated with longer chest tube duration and hospital stay. DNM requires early diagnosis and treatment to reduce mortality and morbidity. The most effective treatment should provide a multidisciplinary approach, combining cervicotomy and thoracotomy to drain all infectious collections with administration and monitoring of the proper antimicrobial therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics and Infectious Respiratory Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop