Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = UH2/U ratio

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 6047 KB  
Article
Reduced Element for Adaptive Finite Element Analysis of First-Order IVP with Built-in Error Estimator in Maximum Norm
by Quan Yuan and Si Yuan
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(16), 7264; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167264 - 19 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1139
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel yet simple approach to the adaptive finite element (FE) analysis of the first-order Initial Value Problems (IVPs) in the maximum norm by introducing the reduced element technique. In the present approach, the FE solution uh of the [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a novel yet simple approach to the adaptive finite element (FE) analysis of the first-order Initial Value Problems (IVPs) in the maximum norm by introducing the reduced element technique. In the present approach, the FE solution uh of the conventional Galerkin element of degree m + 1 is decomposed into two parts: a reduced solution uRh from the reduced element of degree m obtained by ignoring the highest degree term of uh, and a built-in point-wise error estimator εRh directly given by the ignored term. Since the end node solutions of the reduced element are inherited from the full order element, it gains O(h2m+2) accuracy and achieves a nodal/element accuracy ratio as high as two, which greatly enhances its adaptive capability regarding solving IVPs on long time domains. The related error analysis is addressed and a complete adaptivity algorithm is given. Typical numerical examples of both linear and nonlinear IVPs of both single and systems of equations are presented to show the validity and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Finite Element Method and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 789 KB  
Article
Association of 5-FU Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to DPD Phenotype Assessment May Reduce 5-FU Under-Exposure
by Marine Dolat, Pauline Macaire, Françoise Goirand, Julie Vincent, Audrey Hennequin, Rémi Palmier, Leïla Bengrine-Lefevre, François Ghiringhelli, Bernard Royer and Antonin Schmitt
Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(11), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110416 - 23 Nov 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4987
Abstract
In order to limit 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, some health agencies recommend evaluating dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency before any 5-FU treatment introduction. In our study, we investigated relationships between 5-FU clearance and markers of DPD activity such as uracilemia (U), dihydrouracilemia (UH2)/U [...] Read more.
In order to limit 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, some health agencies recommend evaluating dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency before any 5-FU treatment introduction. In our study, we investigated relationships between 5-FU clearance and markers of DPD activity such as uracilemia (U), dihydrouracilemia (UH2)/U ratio, or genotype of the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). All patients with gastrointestinal cancers who received 5-FU-based regimens form March 2018 to June 2020 were included in our study. They routinely benefited of a pre-therapeutic DPYD genotyping and phenotyping. During 5-FU infusion, blood samples were collected to measure 5-FU steady-state concentration in order to adapt 5-FU doses at the following cycles. A total of 169 patients were included. Median age was 68 (40–88) years and main primary tumor sites were colorectal (40.8%) and pancreas (31.4%), metastatic in 76.3%. 5-FU was given as part of FOLFIRINOX (44.4%), simplified FOLFOX-6 (26.6%), or docetaxel/FOLFOX-4 (10.6%). Regarding DPD activity, median U and UH2/U were, respectively, 10.8 ng/mL and 10.1, and almost 15% harbored a heterozygous mutation. On the range of measured U and UH2/U, no correlation was observed with 5-FU clearance. Moreover, in patients with U < 16 ng/mL, 5-FU exposure was higher than in other patients, and most of them benefited of dose increase following 5-FU therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). If recent guidelines recommend decreasing 5-FU dose in patients harboring U ≥ 16 ng/mL, our study highlights that those patients are at risk of under-exposure and that 5-FU TDM should be conducted in order to avoid loss of efficacy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1560 KB  
Review
A Genotyping/Phenotyping Approach with Careful Clinical Monitoring to Manage the Fluoropyrimidines-Based Therapy: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature
by Valeria Conti, Emanuela De Bellis, Valentina Manzo, Francesco Sabbatino, Francesco Iannello, Fabrizio Dal Piaz, Viviana Izzo, Bruno Charlier, Berenice Stefanelli, Martina Torsiello, Teresa Iannaccone, Albino Coglianese, Francesca Colucci, Stefano Pepe and Amelia Filippelli
J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10(3), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10030113 - 3 Sep 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5008
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are mainly metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene. FP pharmacogenetics, including four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD-PGx), is recommended to tailor the FP-based chemotherapy. These polymorphisms increase the risk of severe toxicity; thus, the DPYD-PGx should [...] Read more.
Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are mainly metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene. FP pharmacogenetics, including four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD-PGx), is recommended to tailor the FP-based chemotherapy. These polymorphisms increase the risk of severe toxicity; thus, the DPYD-PGx should be performed prior to starting FP. Other factors influence FP safety, therefore phenotyping methods, such as the measurement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) clearance and DPD activity, could complement the DPYD-PGx. We describe a case series of patients in whom we performed DPYD-PGx (by real-time PCR), 5-FU clearance and a dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (as the phenotyping analysis) and a continuous clinical monitoring. Patients who had already experienced severe toxicity were then identified as carriers of DPYD variants. The plasmatic dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) ranged between 1.77 and 7.38. 5-FU clearance (by ultra-HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry) was measured in 3/11 patients. In one of them, it reduced after the 5-FU dosage was halved; in the other case, it remained high despite a drastic dosage reduction. Moreover, we performed a systematic review on genotyping/phenotyping combinations used as predictive factors of FP safety. Measuring the plasmatic 5-FU clearance and/or dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) ratio could improve the predictive potential of DPYD-PGx. The upfront DPYD-PGx combined with clinical monitoring and feasible phenotyping method is essential to optimising FP-based chemotherapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics of Oncology Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop