Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = TAILORx

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1199 KiB  
Article
Application of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score in a Swiss Single-Center Breast Cancer Population: A Comparative Analysis of Treatment Administration before and after TAILORx
by Elena Diana Chiru, Anton Oseledchyk, Andreas Schoetzau, Christian Kurzeder, Raphael Mosimann, Marcus Vetter and Cvetka Grašič Kuhar
Diagnostics 2024, 14(1), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010097 - 31 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
In patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) negative breast cancer (BC), the TAILORx study showed the benefit of adding chemotherapy (CHT) to endocrine therapy (ET) in a subgroup of patients under 50 years with an intermediate Oncotype DX [...] Read more.
In patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) negative breast cancer (BC), the TAILORx study showed the benefit of adding chemotherapy (CHT) to endocrine therapy (ET) in a subgroup of patients under 50 years with an intermediate Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS 11–25). The aim of the present study was to determine if the TAILORx findings, including the changes in the RS categories, impacted CHT use in the intermediate RS (11–25) group in daily practice, as well as to identify the main factors for CHT decisions. We conducted a retrospective study on 326 BC patients (59% node-negative), of which 165 had a BC diagnosis before TAILORx (Cohort A) and 161 after TAILORx publication (Cohort B). Changes in the RS categories led to shifts in patient population distribution, thereby leading to a 40% drop in the low RS (from 60% to 20%), which represented a doubling in the intermediate RS (from 30% to 60%) and an increase of 5% in the high RS (from 8–10% to 15%). The overall CHT recommendation and application did not differ significantly between cohort B when compared with A (19% vs. 22%, resp., p = 0.763). In the intermediate RS (11–25), CHT use decreased by 5%, while in the high-risk RS category (>25), there was an increase of 13%. The tumor board recommended CHT for 90% of the patients according to the new RS guidelines in cohort A and for 85% in cohort B. The decision for CHT recommendation was based on age (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.08–0.97, p = 0.001), nodal stage (OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.03–11.22, p < 0.001), and RS categories (RS 11–25 vs. RS 0–10: OR 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.17), p < 0.001; RS > 26 vs. RS 11–25: OR 618.18 95% CI 91.64–4169.91, p < 0.001), but did not depend on the cohort. In conclusion, while the tumor board recommendation for CHT decreased in the intermediate RS category, there was an increase being reported in the high RS category, thus leading to overall minor changes in CHT application. As expected, among the younger women with intermediate RS and unfavorable histopathological factors, CHT use increased. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4906 KiB  
Article
The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX® Testing
by Bradley M. Turner, Brian S. Finkelman, David G. Hicks, Numbere Numbereye, Ioana Moisini, Ajay Dhakal, Kristin Skinner, Mary Ann G. Sanders, Xi Wang, Michelle Shayne, Linda Schiffhauer, Hani Katerji and Huina Zhang
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030903 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3590
Abstract
Introduction: Multigene genomic profiling has become the standard of care in the clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of ER+, HER2 breast cancer (BC) patients, with Oncotype DX® (ODX) emerging as the genomic profile test with the most support from the [...] Read more.
Introduction: Multigene genomic profiling has become the standard of care in the clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of ER+, HER2 breast cancer (BC) patients, with Oncotype DX® (ODX) emerging as the genomic profile test with the most support from the international community. The current state of the health care economy demands that cost-efficiency and access to testing must be considered when evaluating the clinical utility of multigene profile tests such as ODX. Several studies have suggested that certain lower risk patients can be identified more cost-efficiently than simply reflexing all ER+, HER2 BC patients to ODX testing. The Magee equationsTM use standard histopathologic data in a set of multivariable models to estimate the ODX recurrence score. Our group published the first outcome data in 2019 on the Magee equationsTM, using a modification of the Magee equationsTM combined with an algorithmic approach—the Rochester Modified Magee algorithm (RoMMa). There has since been limited published outcome data on the Magee equationsTM. We present additional outcome data, with considerations of the TAILORx risk-stratification recommendations. Methods: 355 patients with an ODX recurrence score, and at least five years of follow-up or a BC recurrence were included in the study. All patients received either Tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. None of the patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence in similar risk categories (very low risk, low risk, and high risk) between the average Modified Magee score and ODX recurrence score with the chi-square test of independence (p > 0.05) or log-rank test (p > 0.05). Using the RoMMa, we estimate that at least 17% of individuals can safely avoid ODX testing. Conclusion: Our study further reinforces that BC patients can be confidently stratified into lower and higher-risk recurrence groups using the Magee equationsTM. The RoMMa can be helpful in the initial clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of BC patients, providing increased opportunities for cost savings in the health care system, and for clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification in less-developed geographies where multigene testing might not be available. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer: Risk Factors, Prevention and Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Identifying Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX® 21-Gene Recurrence Score: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Patients in Quebec City, Canada
by Simon Gagnet, Caroline Diorio, Louise Provencher, Cynthia Mbuya-Bienge, Julie Lapointe, Claudya Morin, Julie Lemieux and Hermann Nabi
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(9), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090858 - 28 Aug 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2943
Abstract
Gene expression profiling tests such as the Oncotype DX (ODX) 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is increasingly used in clinical practice to predict the risk of recurrence and support treatment planning for early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, this test has some disadvantages such [...] Read more.
Gene expression profiling tests such as the Oncotype DX (ODX) 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is increasingly used in clinical practice to predict the risk of recurrence and support treatment planning for early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, this test has some disadvantages such as a high cost and a long turnaround time to get results, which may lead to disparities in access. We aim to identify clinicopathological factors associated with ODX RS in women with early-stage BC. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women identified in the medical database of the Deschênes-Fabia Breast Disease Center of Quebec City University, Canada. Our sample consists of 425 women diagnosed with early-stage BC who have obtained an ODX RS between January 2011 and April 2015. The ODX RS has been categorized into three levels as originally defined: low (0–17), intermediate (18–30), and high (>30). The mean RS was 17.8 (SD = 9.2). Univariate analyses and multinomial logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with intermediate and high RS compared with low RS. A total of 237 (55.8%) patients had low RS, 148 (34.8%) had intermediate RS, and 40 (9.4%) had high RS. Women with progesterone receptor (PR)-negative (ORs ranging from 3.51 to 10.34) and histologic grade II (ORs ranging from 3.16 to 23.04) tumors were consistently more likely to have intermediate or high RS than low RS. Similar patterns of associations were observed when the RS was categorised using redefined thresholds from (i.e., from the TAILORx study or dichotomized). This study provides evidence suggesting that histologic grade and PR status are predictive factors for intermediate or high RS in women with early-stage BC. If these results are confirmed in future studies, considering these clinicopathological factors could spare women the need to get such a test before the beginning of a possible adjuvant therapy. This option could be considered in settings where the cost of testing is an issue. Full article
Back to TopTop