Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Murray Basin ilmenite

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 19306 KB  
Article
Exploratory Study of Separation of Sulphidised Chrome Spinels from Reduced Ilmenite
by Sazzad Ahmad, Muhammad A. Rhamdhani, Mark I. Pownceby and Warren J. Bruckard
Minerals 2022, 12(10), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12101252 - 30 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1920
Abstract
The removal of chromium-containing impurities, such as chrome spinel (ZCr2O4 where Z = Fe, Mg, Mn) from ilmenite (FeTiO3) concentrates through selective sulphidation, has been investigated by the authors. Laboratory experimental studies using sulphur added to ilmenite concentrates [...] Read more.
The removal of chromium-containing impurities, such as chrome spinel (ZCr2O4 where Z = Fe, Mg, Mn) from ilmenite (FeTiO3) concentrates through selective sulphidation, has been investigated by the authors. Laboratory experimental studies using sulphur added to ilmenite concentrates under Becher-type reduction conditions showed it is possible to selectively sulphidise chrome spinels from different ilmenite deposits. In this paper, processes to remove the sulphidised chrome spinels from the bulk ilmenite concentrates were investigated using flotation and magnetic separation techniques. Clustering or fusing of the reduced ilmenite (RI) and sulphidised chrome spinel grains was found to have a detrimental effect on flotation performance and made it difficult to have clear separation. A light wet grind was effective for breaking the clustering, but it caused the sulphide rim to spall off from chrome spinel surfaces, which reduces flotation efficiency. The preliminary results obtained after a magnetic separation (0.7 A) of a demetallised sulphidised RI sample show that the sulphidised chrome spinels preferentially report to the magnetic fraction. Additional magnetic separation of the non-magnetic fraction at a lower current (0.3 A) improved the recovery of sulphidised chrome spinels. The demetallisation process followed by a magnetic separation provided insights into a potential route for the removal of chrome spinels from reduced ilmenite concentrates. These two steps simulate the aeration stage of the Becher process. Further studies are required to optimise the process parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop