Background: The aim of the present study was to establish a cut-off value of the Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP) between participants with different subtypes of Dry Eye Disease (DED) including Deficient Dry Eye (ADDE), Evaporative Dry Eye (EDE), and Mixed Dry Eye (MDE).
Methods: 240 participants diagnosed with DED according to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society in the Dry Eye Workshop II guidelines were included in the study. Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) using the Tearscope illumination and Meibomian Gland Loss Area (MGLA) using the Keratograph 5M were assessed to categorize the participants into an ADDE group, EDE group, or MDE group. Then, the LLP was assessed using the Tearscope following the Guillon (LLP-G) and Colour (LLP-C) schemes.
Results: Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) showed that both LLP-G and LLP-C have no diagnostic potential in distinguishing between ADDE and EDE participants (both
p ≥ 0.724). However, to differentiate the ADDE participants from the MDE, ROC procedures showed a good diagnostic potential with cut-off values of Closed Meshwork-Wave (AUC ± SD = 0.609 ± 0.049,
p = 0.038, sensitivity: 23.9%; specificity: 76.1%) and Grey-White (AUC ± SD = 0.611 ± 0.050,
p = 0.034, sensitivity: 40.7%; specificity: 73.9%) for LLP-G and LLP-C, respectively. Also, a significant potential to distinguish between the EDE from MDE participants was found, with cut-off values of Closed Meshwork (AUC ± SD = 0.604 ± 0.049,
p = 0.043, sensitivity: 40.8%; specificity: 76.1%) and Grey-White (AUC ± SD = 0.604 ± 0.051,
p = 0.038, sensitivity: 44.7%; specificity: 73.9%) for LLP-G and LLP-C, respectively.
Conclusions: Using the Tearscope, both LLP-G and LLP-C has diagnostic potential to distinguish MDE participants from the other subtypes of DED.
Full article
