Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 573 KiB  
Article
A Physical Measure for Characterizing Crossover from Integrable to Chaotic Quantum Systems
by Chenguang Y. Lyu and Wen-Ge Wang
Entropy 2023, 25(2), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020366 - 17 Feb 2023
Viewed by 2075
Abstract
In this paper, a quantity that describes a response of a system’s eigenstates to a very small perturbation of physical relevance is studied as a measure for characterizing crossover from integrable to chaotic quantum systems. It is computed from the distribution of very [...] Read more.
In this paper, a quantity that describes a response of a system’s eigenstates to a very small perturbation of physical relevance is studied as a measure for characterizing crossover from integrable to chaotic quantum systems. It is computed from the distribution of very small, rescaled components of perturbed eigenfunctions on the unperturbed basis. Physically, it gives a relative measure to prohibition of level transitions induced by the perturbation. Making use of this measure, numerical simulations in the so-called Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model show in a clear way that the whole integrability-chaos transition region is divided into three subregions: a nearly integrable regime, a nearly chaotic regime, and a crossover regime. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2457 KiB  
Article
Non-Markovianity of a Central Spin Interacting with a Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick Bath via a Conditional Past–Future Correlation
by Liping Han, Jian Zou, Hai Li and Bin Shao
Entropy 2020, 22(8), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22080895 - 15 Aug 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2834
Abstract
Based on conditional past–future (CPF) correlations, we study the non-Markovianity of a central spin coupled to an isotropic Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick (LMG) bath. Although the dynamics of a system is always non-Markovian, it is found that some measurement time intervals considering a specific process, with [...] Read more.
Based on conditional past–future (CPF) correlations, we study the non-Markovianity of a central spin coupled to an isotropic Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick (LMG) bath. Although the dynamics of a system is always non-Markovian, it is found that some measurement time intervals considering a specific process, with respect to a particular set of CPF measurement operators, can be zero, which means that in this case the non-Markovianity of the system could not be detected. Furthermore, the initial system–bath correlations only slightly influence the non-Markovianity of the system in our model. Significantly, it is also found that the dynamics of the system for LMG baths, initially in the ground states corresponding to the symmetric phase and symmetry broken phase, exhibit different properties, and the maximal value of the CPF at the critical point is the smallest, independent of the measurement operator, which means that the criticality can manifest itself by the CPF. Moreover, the effect of bath temperature on the quantum criticality of the CPF depends on the measurement operator. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop