Search Results (2)

Background: This study aims to evaluate the quality of treated wastewater flowing in the Zarqa River to determine its suitability for agricultural use. The assessment is based on physicochemical and biological parameters in accordance with Jordanian standards (JS 893:2021), the CCME water quality index, and the weighted arithmetic water quality index (WAWQI). Additionally, a microbial assessment was conducted to identify the presence of pathogens in the treated wastewater. Methods: A total of 168 water samples were collected from seven different sites along the Zarqa River over a 24-month period. This study focused on microbial assessment and selected parameters from the JS 893:2021, including total dissolved solids (TDSs), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and E. coli levels. Furthermore, data were gathered on additional physicochemical parameters such as pH, mineral content (including Na, Ca, K, Mg, and Cl), salts (HCO₃, SO₄, NO₃, and PO₄), and heavy metals (Fe, Cu, Pb, Mn, and Co). The CCME water quality index and weighted arithmetic WQI scores were calculated to determine the water quality from all seven study sites. Results: In terms of Jordanian standards, Site 1 had the lowest TDS and DO values along with E. coli concentration. Further, in terms of minerals and salts, the maximum concentrations found for the sites are given herewith: Site 2 (K⁺ and NO₃), Site 3 (Cl⁻, Na⁺), Site 5 (Ca, HCO₃), and Site 7 (Mg²⁺, PO₄, and SO₄). In terms of pH, all the study sites had pH values within the acceptable range, i.e., between 6 and 9, for irrigation purposes. The concentrations of certain heavy metals, specifically lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co), were observed to be negligible. In contrast, Site 6 exhibited the highest concentration of iron (Fe) (0.0178 mg/L), while Site 5 recorded the maximum concentration of copper (Cu) (0.0210 mg/L) among the study locations. Site 1 demonstrated the most favorable water quality among the seven sites evaluated, whereas Site 6 exhibited the poorest water quality. Overall, the water quality from the majority of the sites was deemed suitable for drainage and for irrigating crops classified under the B category. However, based on the weighted arithmetic water quality index (WQI) values, none of the sites achieved a classification of good or excellent water quality, although the water quality at these sites may still be utilized for irrigation purposes. The current study is the first to report the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Zarqa River water samples. Conclusions: The current study outcomes are promising and provide knowledgeable insights in terms of water quality parameters, while public health aspects should be considered when planning the WWTPs in parallel to reclaiming the wastewater for irrigation purposes. Full article

Water scarcity remains the major looming challenge that is facing Jordan. Wastewater reclamation is considered as an alternative source of fresh water in semi-arid areas with water shortage or increased consumption. In the present study, the current status of wastewater reclamation and reuse in Jordan was analyzed considering 30 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The assessment was based on the WWWTPs’ treatment processes in Jordan, the flowrates scale, and the effluents’ average total dissolved solid (TDS) contents. Accordingly, 60% of the WWTPs in Jordan used activated sludge as a treatment technology; 30 WWTPs were small scale (<1 × 10⁴ m³/day); and a total of 17.932 million m³ treated wastewater had low TDS (<1000 ppm) that generally can be used in industries with relatively minimal cost of treatment. Moreover, the analysis classified the 26 million m³ groundwater abstraction by major industries in Jordanian governorates. The results showed that the reclaimed wastewater can fully offset the industrial demand of fresh water in Amman, Zarqa, and Aqaba governorates. Hence, the environmental assessment showed positive impacts of reclaimed wastewater reuse scenario in terms of water depletion (saving of 72.55 million m³ groundwater per year) and climate change (17.683 million kg CO_2Eq reduction). The energy recovery assessment in the small- and medium-scale WWTPs (<10 × 10⁴ m³/day) revealed that generation of electricity by anaerobic sludge digestion equates potentially to an offset of 0.11–0.53 kWh/m³. Finally, several barriers and prospects were put forth to help the stakeholders when considering entering into an agreement to supply and/or reuse reclaimed water. Full article