Search Results (3)

The Permian Lucaogou Formation (PLF) shale oil reservoirs in the Junggar Basin exhibit significant lithological heterogeneity, which limits the understanding of the relationship between macroscopic and microscopic reservoir characteristics, as well as insights into reservoir quality. To address this gap, thirty core samples, exhibiting typical sedimentary features, were selected from a 46 m section of the PLF for sedimentological analysis, thin section examination, high-performance microarea scanning, and scanning electron microscopy. Seven main lithofacies were identified, including massive bedding slitstone/fine-grained sandstone (LS1), cross to parallel bedding siltstone (LS2), climbing ripple laminated argillaceous siltstone (LS3), paired graded bedding argillaceous siltstone (LS4), irregular laminated argillaceous siltstone (LS5), irregular laminated silty mudstone (LM2), and horizontal laminated mudstone (LM2). The paired graded bedding sequences with internal erosion surfaces, massive bedding, and terrestrial plant fragments suggest a lacustrine hyperpycnal flow origin. The channel subfacies of hyperpycnal flow deposits, primarily consisting of LS1 and LS2, reflect strong hydrodynamic conditions, with a single-layer thickness ranging from 1.3 to 3.8 m (averaging 2.2 m) and porosity between 7.8 and 14.2% (averaging 12.5%), representing the primary sweet spot. The lobe subfacies, composed mainly of LS3, LS4, and LS5, reflect relatively strong hydrodynamic conditions, with a single-layer thickness ranging from 0.5 to 1.4 m (averaging 0.8 m) and porosity between 4.2 and 13.8% (averaging 9.6%), representing the secondary sweet spot. In conclusion, strong hydrodynamic conditions and depositional microfacies are key factors in the formation and distribution of sweet spots. The findings of this study are valuable for identifying sweet spots in the PLF and provide useful guidance for the exploration of lacustrine shale oil reservoirs in the context of hyperpycnal flow deposition globally. Full article

Since the discovery of the vast Jimusaer shale oilfield in the southeastern Junggar Basin in 2012, there has been considerable interest in neighboring areas around Bogeda Mountain that have shale oil potential. The primary productive interval in the basin, the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation (P₂l), is well-developed in the areas of Qitai, Mulei, Shiqiantan, Chaiwopu, and Miquan. In this study, we conducted an assessment of the hydrocarbon generation potential of the P₂l in these five areas and compared it with that of the P₂l in the Jimusaer oilfield, which were determined by GC-MS, total organic carbon (TOC) and vitrinite reflectance (Ro) measurements, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, and organic petrology to investigate the type, origin, thermal maturity, hydrocarbon potential, and oil/gas proneness of organic matter in the P₂l. Additionally, we applied open-system pyrolysis of hydrocarbon generation kinetics to explore differences in hydrocarbon generation and expulsion across various P₂l mudstone/shale in the southeastern Junggar Basin. The findings of this study revealed that the P₂l shale in Qitai and Miquan areas contains more abundant and lower thermally mature organic matter (early mature–mature stage), characterized by primarily Type II₁–I kerogen, similar to that found in the P₂l shale of the Jimusaer oilfield. Conversely, the P₂l shale in Mulei, Shiqiantan, and Chaiwopu contains less abundant and more thermally mature organic matter (mainly mature–highly mature stage), dominated by Type II₂–III kerogen. Consequently, shale in these areas is considerably less desirable for oil exploration compared to the Jimusaer shale. The semi-deep to deep lake facies in Miquan and Qitai exhibit the most promising exploration potential. This study can serve as a guide for shale oil exploration in the southeastern Junggar Basin. Full article

In order to improve the recovery efficiency of the Jimusaer tight reservoir in Xinjiang, the nanometer oil displacement agent system suitable for the Jimusaer reservoir was used. In view of the low permeability, high formation temperature, and high salinity characteristics of the prepared water in the Jimusaer tight conglomerate reservoir in Xinjiang, the performance of the nanometer oil displacement agent affecting oil recovery was studied; the study considered interfacial tension, temperature resistance, wetting performance, static oil washing efficiency, and long-term stability. Nanometer oil displacement agent No. 4 had the lowest interfacial tension and could reach the order of 10⁻¹ mN∙m⁻¹; it had excellent temperature resistance and the best static oil washing efficiency and stability. Nano-oil displacement agent No. 2 had the best emulsification performance and wettability and also had good stability. By studying the performance and final oil displacement effect of the nano-oil displacement agent, it was found that the key factor affecting the oil displacement effect of this reservoir was the interfacial activity of the nano-oil displacement agent. When the interfacial tension was lower, it produced strong dialysis for oil displacement. The emulsification effect has a negative effect on low-permeability reservoirs, mainly because the fluid produces strong emulsification in low-permeability reservoirs; thus, it can easily block the formation and cause high pressure. An excessive or small contact angle is not conducive to oil displacement. An excessive contact angle means strong hydrophilicity, which can cause a strong Jamin effect in oil-friendly formations. If the contact angle is too small, it has strong lipophilicity and can lead to poor solubility in water. Nano-oil displacement agent No. 4 had the best oil displacement effect, with an oil recovery increase of 7.35%, followed by nanometer oil displacement agent No. 1, with an oil recovery increase of 5.70%. Based on all the performance results, nanometer oil displacement agent No. 4 was more suitable as the oil displacement agent and can be used to enhance oil recovery in the Jimusaer reservoir. This study has laid a foundation for the chemical flooding development of shale oil in the Xinjiang oilfield. Full article