Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = HiveAlive®

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1818 KiB  
Article
Pesticide Pollution Provokes Histopathological Alterations in Apis mellifera (Linnaeus, 1758) Drone Gonads
by Stela Stoyanova, Elenka Georgieva, Plamen Petrov, Vesela Yancheva, László Antal, Dóra Somogyi, Krisztián Nyeste and Evgeniya N. Ivanova
Environments 2025, 12(6), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12060173 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Honey bees are one of the most significant pollinators and contribute to the pollination of various crops. The honey bee, Apis mellifera (Linnaeus, 1758), has unique characteristics that could be successfully used to improve biomonitoring approaches in assessing environmental interactions. Three apiaries with [...] Read more.
Honey bees are one of the most significant pollinators and contribute to the pollination of various crops. The honey bee, Apis mellifera (Linnaeus, 1758), has unique characteristics that could be successfully used to improve biomonitoring approaches in assessing environmental interactions. Three apiaries with different rates of honey bee colony losses were included in the study—Dimovtsi, Plovdiv, and Krasnovo, Bulgaria. Male individuals (immature and mature) were collected from five colonies for each of the three apiaries and studied for histopathological changes in the gonads. The results concerning the rate of honey bee colony losses in the studied apiaries from 2022 and 2023 showed honey bee losses in the tested colonies due to queen problems, which were reported for Plovdiv, as well as the death of honey bees or a reduction in their number to a few hundred bees in the colony. The chemical analysis showed the presence of different organic substances, such as Coumaphos, DEET (N, N-diethyl-M-toluamide), Fluvalinate, and Piperonyl-butoxide, in the alive and dead honey bee samples and those of food stocks (wax, pollen, and honey) within the hives. Among the sample types, those of the dead honey bees contained the greatest variety of pesticide residues, particularly in Plovdiv and Dimovtsi, reinforcing the link between pesticide exposure and honey bee mortality. The histopathological alterations were mainly associated with the thinning of the covering epithelium of the seminiferous tubules and the detachment of the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubules. The more severe histopathological lesion, necrosis, was observed in a higher degree of expression in the drones from Plovdiv, indicating a higher pollution level in this region. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 934 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Efficacy of Common Treatments Used for Vairimorpha (Nosema) spp. Control
by Cody Prouty, Cameron Jack, Ramesh Sagili and James D. Ellis
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1303; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031303 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2994
Abstract
Vairimorpha (formerly Nosema) apis and V. ceranae are microsporidian pathogens that are of concern for managed honey bee colonies. Multiple treatments have been proposed to be effective in reducing the prevalence and intensity of Vairimorpha spp. infections. Here, we test the efficacy [...] Read more.
Vairimorpha (formerly Nosema) apis and V. ceranae are microsporidian pathogens that are of concern for managed honey bee colonies. Multiple treatments have been proposed to be effective in reducing the prevalence and intensity of Vairimorpha spp. infections. Here, we test the efficacy of these products in one lab-based experiment and three field experiments. In the lab experiment, we found no reductions in Vairimorpha spp. prevalence (proportion of individuals infected with Vairimorpha spp.) or intensity (number of Vairimorpha spp. spores per individual), but we did find a decrease in honey bee survival after treatment with Fumagilin-B, Honey-B-Healthy®, and Nozevit Plus. The first field experiment showed increased Vairimorpha spp. intensity in colonies treated with Fumagilin-B and HiveAlive® compared to a negative control (sucrose syrup alone). The second field experiment showed a weak reduction in Vairimorpha spp. intensity after 3 weeks post treatment with Fumagilin-B compared to Nozevit. However, Vairimorpha spp. intensity returned to levels comparable to those of other treatment groups after 5 weeks post treatment and remained similar to those of other groups for the duration of the experiment. The final field trial showed no positive or negative effects of treatment with Fumagilin-B or Nosevit on Vairimorpha spp. prevalence or intensity. These findings raise questions regarding the efficacy of the products currently being used by beekeepers to control Vairimorpha spp. We argue that the observed reduction of Vairimorpha spp. is more likely relevant to the phenology of spore prevalence and intensity in honey bee colonies than to chemical treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 679 KiB  
Article
Honeybees Exposure to Natural Feed Additives: How Is the Gut Microbiota Affected?
by Daniele Alberoni, Loredana Baffoni, Chiara Braglia, Francesca Gaggìa and Diana Di Gioia
Microorganisms 2021, 9(5), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051009 - 7 May 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4579
Abstract
The role of a balanced gut microbiota to maintain health and prevent diseases is largely established in humans and livestock. Conversely, in honeybees, studies on gut microbiota perturbations by external factors have started only recently. Natural methods alternative to chemical products to preserve [...] Read more.
The role of a balanced gut microbiota to maintain health and prevent diseases is largely established in humans and livestock. Conversely, in honeybees, studies on gut microbiota perturbations by external factors have started only recently. Natural methods alternative to chemical products to preserve honeybee health have been proposed, but their effect on the gut microbiota has not been examined in detail. This study aims to investigate the effect of the administration of a bacterial mixture of bifidobacteria and Lactobacillaceae and a commercial product HiveAliveTM on honeybee gut microbiota. The study was developed in 18 hives of about 2500 bees, with six replicates for each experimental condition for a total of three experimental groups. The absolute abundance of main microbial taxa was studied using qPCR and NGS. The results showed that the majority of the administered strains were detected in the gut. On the whole, great perturbations upon the administration of the bacterial mixture and the plant-based commercial product were not observed in the gut microbiota. Significant variations with respect to the untreated control were only observed for Snodgrassella sp. for the bacterial mixture, Bartonella sp. in HiveAliveTM and Bombilactobacillus sp. for both. Therefore, the studied approaches are respectful of the honeybee microbiota composition, conceivably without compromising the bee nutritional, social and ecological functions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal Health and Food Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop