Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Gangetic catfish (Mystus cavasius)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 771 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Different Terrestrial Oils as an Alternative to Dietary Fish Oil on Feed Physical Properties, Growth, Feed Utilization, and Fatty Acid Profile of Gangetic Catfish (Mystus cavasius)
by Sadia Taslim Helen, Tanwi Dey, Anwesha Bharoteshwari, Kazi Rakib Uddin, Muhammad Anamul Kabir, Md. Rakibul Hasan and Md. Sakhawat Hossain
Animals 2026, 16(2), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16020330 - 21 Jan 2026
Abstract
The global demand for fish oil (FO) is increasing while its supply is decreasing, which has limited its use in aquafeeds. Research on alternative terrestrial oils (TOs) for commonly cultured fish species in Bangladesh is limited. This research involved a 70-day feeding experiment [...] Read more.
The global demand for fish oil (FO) is increasing while its supply is decreasing, which has limited its use in aquafeeds. Research on alternative terrestrial oils (TOs) for commonly cultured fish species in Bangladesh is limited. This research involved a 70-day feeding experiment to assess the effectiveness of replacing FO with TOs in the diet of Gangetic catfish (Mystus cavasius). Five diets were formulated: a control diet (D1) with fish meal and FO, and four diets replacing FO with soybean oil (D2), black soldier fly larvae oil (D3), palm oil (D4), or a mixed oil combination (D5) of 50% black soldier fly larvae oil, 25% soybean oil, and 25% palm oil. A total of 675 fish (0.5 g each) were distributed in 15 100 L aquariums (45 fish/aquarium) and fed to satiation twice daily. Fish fed with Diet D5 showed significantly higher growth, followed by those fed with D3, D4, and D1, while D2 resulted in significantly lower growth. Fish on the D5 diet consumed the most feed, followed by those on the D3 and D2 diets, with similar feed intake levels for those on the D1 and D4 diets. FCR, FCE, and PER were not significantly affected by dietary oil sources. Whole-body lipid content (p < 0.05) was significantly lower in the D3 group and higher in the D2 group, while other groups showed intermediate values. The fatty acid composition in the fish reflected their diets: significantly higher n-3 LC-PUFA (EPA + DHA) content was observed in the D1 group, followed by the D4 and D3 groups, and fish fed with D2 and D5 showed significantly lower values. Alpha-linolenic acid C18:3n-3) was significantly higher in the D2 group, followed by the D3, D1, and D4 groups, with the D5 group having a significantly lower value. Total MUFA was significantly higher in D4, followed by D1, D5, and D3; the D2-fed group showed a significantly lower value. Lauric acid (C12:0) was significantly higher in D3, followed by D5; other groups showed significantly lower values. Feed physical properties were significantly influenced by oil type, with water stability, pellet durability, and palatability being significantly highest in the D2 and D5 diets, followed by D3 and D4, with D1 being the lowest. Fish on the D1 and D5 diets had a significantly higher condition factor (CF) compared to fish on the D2 diet. Considering the growth and overall performance in the current study, we concluded that under the current dietary composition, TOs can effectively replace FO in the diets of Gangetic catfish, with mixed oils, black soldier fly larvae oil, and palm oil being the most promising alternatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop